在这种情况下，您可以使用Set。它针对这种操作(并、交、差)进行了优化。

确保它适用于你的案例，一旦它不允许重复。

var a = new JS.Set([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
var b = new JS.Set([2,4,6,8]);

a.difference(b)
// -> Set{1,3,5,7,9}

只是想…为了一个挑战;-)这个工作…(对于字符串，数字等的基本数组)没有嵌套数组

function diffArrays(arr1, arr2, returnUnion){
  var ret = [];
  var test = {};
  var bigArray, smallArray, key;
  if(arr1.length >= arr2.length){
    bigArray = arr1;
    smallArray = arr2;
  } else {
    bigArray = arr2;
    smallArray = arr1;
  }
  for(var i=0;i<bigArray.length;i++){
    key = bigArray[i];
    test[key] = true;
  }
  if(!returnUnion){
    //diffing
    for(var i=0;i<smallArray.length;i++){
      key = smallArray[i];
      if(!test[key]){
        test[key] = null;
      }
    }
  } else {
    //union
    for(var i=0;i<smallArray.length;i++){
      key = smallArray[i];
      if(!test[key]){
        test[key] = true;
      }
    }
  }
  for(var i in test){
    ret.push(i);
  }
  return ret;
}

array1 = "test1", "test2","test3", "test4", "test7"
array2 = "test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6"
diffArray = diffArrays(array1, array2);
//returns ["test5","test6","test7"]

diffArray = diffArrays(array1, array2, true);
//returns ["test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6","test7"]

注意排序可能不会像上面提到的那样…但是如果需要的话，可以在数组上调用.sort()对其进行排序。

这个答案是2009年写的，所以有点过时了，但是对于理解这个问题还是很有教育意义的。我今天最好的解决办法是

let difference = arr1.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x));

(此处致谢给其他作者)

我假设你比较的是一个普通数组。如果不是，你需要将for循环改为for ..在循环。

函数arr_diff (a1, a2) { Var a = []， diff = []; For (var I = 0;I < a1.length;我+ +){ A [a1[i]] = true; ｝ For (var I = 0;I < a2.length;我+ +){ If (a[a2[i]]) { 删除一个[a2[我]]; }其他{ A [a2[i]] = true; ｝ ｝ 对于(var k in a) { diff.push (k); ｝ 返回差异; ｝ console.log (arr_diff ([a, b], [a, b, c, d '))); console.log (arr_diff(“abcd”、"中的")); console.log (arr_diff(“必杀技”,“必杀技”));

这个怎么样:

Array.prototype.contains = function(needle){
  for (var i=0; i<this.length; i++)
    if (this[i] == needle) return true;

  return false;
} 

Array.prototype.diff = function(compare) {
    return this.filter(function(elem) {return !compare.contains(elem);})
}

var a = new Array(1,4,7, 9);
var b = new Array(4, 8, 7);
alert(a.diff(b));

这样你就可以用array1。diff(array2)来得到它们的区别算法的时间复杂度很可怕- O(array1。长度(我相信)

我想要一个类似的函数，它接受一个旧数组和一个新数组，并给我一个添加项的数组和一个删除项的数组，我希望它是有效的(所以没有.contains!)。

你可以在这里尝试我提出的解决方案:http://jsbin.com/osewu3/12。

有人能看出算法的问题或改进吗?谢谢!

代码清单:

function diff(o, n) {
  // deal with empty lists
  if (o == undefined) o = [];
  if (n == undefined) n = [];

  // sort both arrays (or this won't work)
  o.sort(); n.sort();

  // don't compare if either list is empty
  if (o.length == 0 || n.length == 0) return {added: n, removed: o};

  // declare temporary variables
  var op = 0; var np = 0;
  var a = []; var r = [];

  // compare arrays and add to add or remove lists
  while (op < o.length && np < n.length) {
      if (o[op] < n[np]) {
          // push to diff?
          r.push(o[op]);
          op++;
      }
      else if (o[op] > n[np]) {
          // push to diff?
          a.push(n[np]);
          np++;
      }
      else {
          op++;np++;
      }
  }

  // add remaining items
  if( np < n.length )
    a = a.concat(n.slice(np, n.length));
  if( op < o.length )
    r = r.concat(o.slice(op, o.length));

  return {added: a, removed: r}; 
}

Array.prototype.diff =函数(a) { return this.filter(function(i) {return a.f index_of (i) < 0;}); }; ////////////// //示例// ////////////// Const dif1 =[1,2,3,4,5,6]。Diff ([3,4,5]); console.log (dif1);// => [1,2,6] const dif2 =[“test1”、“test2”,“test3”,“test4”,“test5”,“test6”].diff([“test1”、“test2”,“test3”、“test4”)); console.log (dif2);// => ["test5"， "test6"]

注意:. indexof()和.filter()在IE9之前是不可用的。

使用http://phrogz.net/JS/ArraySetMath.js你可以:

var array1 = ["test1", "test2","test3", "test4"];
var array2 = ["test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6"];

var array3 = array2.subtract( array1 );
// ["test5", "test6"]

var array4 = array1.exclusion( array2 );
// ["test5", "test6"]

我一直在寻找一个不涉及使用不同库的简单答案，我想出了我自己的答案，我想这里没有提到过。 我不知道它的效率如何，但它确实有效;

    function find_diff(arr1, arr2) {
      diff = [];
      joined = arr1.concat(arr2);
      for( i = 0; i <= joined.length; i++ ) {
        current = joined[i];
        if( joined.indexOf(current) == joined.lastIndexOf(current) ) {
          diff.push(current);
        }
      }
      return diff;
    }

对于我的代码，我也需要删除副本，但我想这并不总是可取的。

我想主要的缺点是它可能会比较许多已经被拒绝的选择。

对于想要从一个数组中减去另一个数组的人的回应…

如果不超过1000个元素试试这个…

设置一个新变量来复制Array01，并将其命名为Array03。

现在，使用冒泡排序算法比较Array01和Array02的元素，并在找到匹配时进行比较 对Array03执行以下操作…

 if (Array01[x]==Array02[y]) {Array03.splice(x,1);}

注意:我们正在修改Array03而不是Array01，这样就不会搞砸冒泡排序的嵌套循环!

最后，用一个简单的赋值操作将Array03的内容复制到Array01，就完成了。

Samuel:“对于我的代码，我也需要删除副本，但我想这并不总是可取的。 我想主要的缺点是它可能会比较许多已经被拒绝的选择。”

当比较TWO列表、数组等，且元素小于1000时，行业标准中的 3GL世界是使用冒泡排序，以避免欺骗。

代码看起来像这样……(未经测试，但应该有效)

var Array01=new Array('A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H','I','J','K','L','M','N','O','P');
var Array02=new Array('X','B','F','W','Z','X','J','P','P','O','E','N','Q');
var Array03=Array01;

for(x=1; x<Array02.length; x++) {
 for(y=0; y<Array01.length-1; y++) {
  if (Array01[y]==Array02[x]) {Array03.splice(y,1);}}}

Array01=Array03;

要测试输出…

for(y=0; y<Array01.length; y++) {document.write(Array01[y])}

要从另一个数组中减去一个数组，只需使用下面的代码片段:

var a1 = ['1','2','3','4','6'];
var a2 = ['3','4','5'];

var items = new Array();

items = jQuery.grep(a1,function (item) {
    return jQuery.inArray(item, a2) < 0;
});

它将返回['1，'2'，'6']，这些是第一个数组中不存在的项。

因此，根据您的问题示例，以下代码是准确的解决方案:

var array1 = ["test1", "test2","test3", "test4"];
var array2 = ["test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6"];

var _array = new Array();

_array = jQuery.grep(array2, function (item) {
     return jQuery.inArray(item, array1) < 0;
});

修正了一下最佳答案

function arr_diff(a1, a2)
{
  var a=[], diff=[];
  for(var i=0;i<a1.length;i++)
    a[a1[i]]=a1[i];
  for(var i=0;i<a2.length;i++)
    if(a[a2[i]]) delete a[a2[i]];
    else a[a2[i]]=a2[i];
  for(var k in a)
   diff.push(a[k]);
  return diff;
}

这将考虑当前的元素类型。B /c当我们创建一个[a1[i]]时，它将一个值从原始值转换为字符串，因此我们失去了实际值。

我在这里读到的答案有很多问题，使得它们在实际编程应用中价值有限。

First and foremost, you're going to want to have a way to control what it means for two items in the array to be "equal". The === comparison is not going to cut it if you're trying to figure out whether to update an array of objects based on an ID or something like that, which frankly is probably one of the most likely scenarios in which you will want a diff function. It also limits you to arrays of things that can be compared with the === operator, i.e. strings, ints, etc, and that's pretty much unacceptable for grown-ups.

其次，diff操作有三种状态结果:

在第一个数组中但不在第二个数组中的元素 两个数组共用的元素 在第二个数组中但不在第一个数组中的元素

我认为这意味着你需要不少于2个循环，但我愿意接受肮脏的技巧，如果有人知道如何将其减少到一个。

这里是我拼凑的一些东西，我想强调的是，我绝对不在乎它在旧版本的Microshaft浏览器中不起作用。如果您在IE这样的较差的编码环境中工作，那么您就可以自行修改它，使其在您无法满意的限制范围内工作。

Array.defaultValueComparison = function(a, b) {
    return (a === b);
};

Array.prototype.diff = function(arr, fnCompare) {

    // validate params

    if (!(arr instanceof Array))
        arr = [arr];

    fnCompare = fnCompare || Array.defaultValueComparison;

    var original = this, exists, storage, 
        result = { common: [], removed: [], inserted: [] };

    original.forEach(function(existingItem) {

        // Finds common elements and elements that 
        // do not exist in the original array

        exists = arr.some(function(newItem) {
            return fnCompare(existingItem, newItem);
        });

        storage = (exists) ? result.common : result.removed;
        storage.push(existingItem);

    });

    arr.forEach(function(newItem) {

        exists = original.some(function(existingItem) {
            return fnCompare(existingItem, newItem);
        });

        if (!exists)
            result.inserted.push(newItem);

    });

    return result;

};

使用indexOf()的解决方案对于小型数组是可以的，但是随着长度的增长，算法的性能将接近O(n^2)。这里有一个解决方案，将执行非常大的数组使用对象作为关联数组存储数组项作为键;它还自动消除重复项，但只适用于字符串值(或可以安全地存储为字符串的值):

function arrayDiff(a1, a2) {
  var o1={}, o2={}, diff=[], i, len, k;
  for (i=0, len=a1.length; i<len; i++) { o1[a1[i]] = true; }
  for (i=0, len=a2.length; i<len; i++) { o2[a2[i]] = true; }
  for (k in o1) { if (!(k in o2)) { diff.push(k); } }
  for (k in o2) { if (!(k in o1)) { diff.push(k); } }
  return diff;
}

var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
arrayDiff(a1, a2); // => ['c', 'd']
arrayDiff(a2, a1); // => ['c', 'd']

下划线中的差分方法(或它的替换，Lo-Dash)也可以做到这一点:

(R)eturns the values from array that are not present in the other arrays

_.difference([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [5, 2, 10]);
=> [1, 3, 4]

与任何下划线函数一样，你也可以以更面向对象的风格使用它:

_([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]).difference([5, 2, 10]);

以上Joshaven Potter的回答非常棒。但是它返回数组B中不在数组C中的元素，而不是反过来。例如，如果var a=[1,2,3,4,5,6]。diff([3、4、5、7]);然后它将输出:==>[1,2,6]，而不是[1,2,6,7]，这是两者之间的实际差异。你仍然可以使用上面的Potter代码，但也可以简单地向后做一次比较:

Array.prototype.diff = function(a) {
    return this.filter(function(i) {return !(a.indexOf(i) > -1);});
};

////////////////////  
// Examples  
////////////////////

var a=[1,2,3,4,5,6].diff( [3,4,5,7]);
var b=[3,4,5,7].diff([1,2,3,4,5,6]);
var c=a.concat(b);
console.log(c);

这应该输出:[1,2,6,7]

你可以使用underscore.js: http://underscorejs.org/#intersection

你需要数组的方法:

_.difference([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [5, 2, 10]);
=> [1, 3, 4]

_.intersection([1, 2, 3], [101, 2, 1, 10], [2, 1]);
=> [1, 2]

这是目前为止最简单的方法来得到你正在寻找的结果，使用jQuery:

var diff = $(old_array).not(new_array).get();

Diff现在包含了old_array中不在new_array中的内容

如果不使用hasOwnProperty，那么我们有不正确的元素。例如:

[1,2,3].diff([1,2]); //Return ["3", "remove", "diff"] This is the wrong version

我的版本:

Array.prototype.diff = function(array2)
  {
    var a = [],
        diff = [],
        array1 = this || [];

    for (var i = 0; i < array1.length; i++) {
      a[array1[i]] = true;
    }
    for (var i = 0; i < array2.length; i++) {
      if (a[array2[i]]) {
        delete a[array2[i]];
      } else {
        a[array2[i]] = true;
      }
    }

    for (var k in a) {
      if (!a.hasOwnProperty(k)){
        continue;
      }
      diff.push(k);
    }

    return diff;
  }

我就遇到了这个问题，就是求两个简单数组的差值

var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];

// need ["c", "d"]

我不明白为什么不使用基本的for循环:

for(var i=0; i < a1.length; i++) {
  for(var j=0; j < a2.length; j++) {
    if(a1[i] == a2[j]) {
      a2.splice(j, 1);
    }
  }
}

这将返回所需的["c"， "d"]

[编辑]提议正上方，看到晚了。

不管怎样，有什么好的理由来避免这个简单的解决方案吗?

贡献一个jQuery解决方案，我目前正在使用:

if (!Array.prototype.diff) {
    Array.prototype.diff = function (a) {
        return $.grep(this, function (i) { return $.inArray(i, a) === -1; });
    }; 
}

var result = [];
var arr1 = [1,2,3,4];
var arr2 = [2,3];
arr1.forEach(function(el, idx) {
    function unEqual(element, index, array) {
        var a = el;
        return (element!=a);
    }
    if (arr2.every(unEqual)) {
        result.push(el);
    };
});
alert(result);

这个问题很老了，但仍然是javascript数组减法的热门问题，所以我想添加我正在使用的解决方案。适用于以下情况:

var a1 = [1,2,2,3]
var a2 = [1,2]
//result = [2,3]

下面的方法将产生预期的结果:

function arrayDifference(minuend, subtrahend) {
  for (var i = 0; i < minuend.length; i++) {
    var j = subtrahend.indexOf(minuend[i])
    if (j != -1) {
      minuend.splice(i, 1);
      subtrahend.splice(j, 1);
    }
  }
  return minuend;
}

需要注意的是，该函数不包括减数中没有被减数的值:

var a1 = [1,2,3]
var a2 = [2,3,4]
//result = [1]

这是受到了思想者接受的答案的启发，但是思想者的答案似乎假设数组是集合。如果数组是["1"，"2"]和["1"，"1"，"2"，"2"]，它就不成立了

这些数组之间的差值是["1"，"2"]。下面的解决方案是O(n*n)，所以不理想，但如果您有大数组，它也比思想者的解决方案具有内存优势。

如果你首先处理的是集合，思想者的解决方案肯定更好。如果你有一个可以访问过滤器的Javascript新版本，你也应该使用它们。这只适用于那些不处理集的人，并且正在使用旧版本的JavaScript(无论出于什么原因)…

if (!Array.prototype.diff) { 
    Array.prototype.diff = function (array) {
        // if the other array is a falsy value, return a copy of this array
        if ((!array) || (!Array.prototype.isPrototypeOf(array))) { 
            return this.slice(0);
        }

        var diff = [];
        var original = this.slice(0);

        for(var i=0; i < array.length; ++i) {
            var index = original.indexOf(array[i]);
            if (index > -1) { 
                original.splice(index, 1);
            } else { 
                diff.push(array[i]);
            }
        }

        for (var i=0; i < original.length; ++i) {
            diff.push(original[i]);
        }
        return diff;
    }
}   

只是修整字符串以确保....空格不会影响差异

function arr_diff(a1, a2) {
    var a=[], diff=[];
    for(var i=0;i<a1.length;i++)
        a[a1[i]]=true;
    for(var i=0;i<a2.length;i++)
        if(a[a2[i].trim()]) delete a[a2[i].trim()];
    else a[a2[i].trim()]=true;
    for(var k in a)
        diff.push(k);
    return diff;
}

快速的解决方案。尽管似乎其他人已经发布了相同方法的不同变体。我不确定这是否适合大型数组，但它适用于不大于10或15的数组。

差b - a

for(var i = 0; i < b.length; i++){
  for(var j = 0; j < a.length; j ++){
    var loc = b.indexOf(a[j]);
    if(loc > -1){
      b.splice(loc, 1);
    }
  }
}

纯JavaScript解决方案(没有库) 与旧浏览器兼容(不使用过滤器) O (n ^ 2) 可选的fn回调参数，用于指定如何比较数组项

function diff(a, b, fn){ var max = Math.max(a.length, b.length); d = []; fn = typeof fn === 'function' ? fn : false for(var i=0; i < max; i++){ var ac = i < a.length ? a[i] : undefined bc = i < b.length ? b[i] : undefined; for(var k=0; k < max; k++){ ac = ac === undefined || (k < b.length && (fn ? fn(ac, b[k]) : ac == b[k])) ? undefined : ac; bc = bc === undefined || (k < a.length && (fn ? fn(bc, a[k]) : bc == a[k])) ? undefined : bc; if(ac == undefined && bc == undefined) break; } ac !== undefined && d.push(ac); bc !== undefined && d.push(bc); } return d; } alert( "Test 1: " + diff( [1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 4, 5, 6, 7] ).join(', ') + "\nTest 2: " + diff( [{id:'a',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'b',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'c',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'d',toString:function(){return this.id}}], [{id:'a',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'e',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'f',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'d',toString:function(){return this.id}}], function(a, b){ return a.id == b.id; } ).join(', ') );

我已经尝试了以上所有这些，但没有一个工作时，你需要匹配不接受副本。

例如:

var a1 = [1, 2, 1, 4], a2 = [1, 2, 4];

会返回一个空的diff数组，因为2会在第二个数组中被找到一次，即使我们需要它匹配两次。

所以我设法解决了一些问题:

Array.prototype.diff = function(a) {
    return this.filter(function(item) {
        match = a.indexOf(item);
        if (match)
            a.splice(match, 1);
        return match < 0;
    });
};

这是我用来获得两个数组之间的差异的函数-它适用于数值，字符串，混合num/字符串数组。在数组/多维数组中不是对象文字

function diff(arr1, arr2) {

    var x, 
        t;

    function uniq(a, b) {
        t = b;

        if( (b === 0 && x[b+1]!==a) || 
           (t > 0 && a !== x[b+1] && a !== x[b-1]) ) {
            return  a;
        }
    }


    x = arr1.concat(arr2).sort();

    return x.filter(uniq);
}

var a1 = ['a', 'b', 'e', 'c'],
    a2 = ['b', 'a', 'c', 'f' ];

diff(a1, a2);

随着ES6的到来，带有sets和splat操作符(当时只在Firefox中工作，请检查兼容性表)，你可以编写以下一行代码:

var a = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
var b = ['a', 'b'];
var b1 = new Set(b);
var difference = [...new Set(a.filter(x => !b1.has(x)))];

结果是["c"， "d"]。

CoffeeScript版本:

diff = (val for val in array1 when val not in array2)

纯JavaScript

对于“差异”有两种可能的解释。我让你选你想要的。假设你有:

var a1 = ['a', 'b'     ];
var a2 = [     'b', 'c'];

If you want to get ['a'], use this function: function difference(a1, a2) { var result = []; for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) { if (a2.indexOf(a1[i]) === -1) { result.push(a1[i]); } } return result; } If you want to get ['a', 'c'] (all elements contained in either a1 or a2, but not both -- the so-called symmetric difference), use this function: function symmetricDifference(a1, a2) { var result = []; for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) { if (a2.indexOf(a1[i]) === -1) { result.push(a1[i]); } } for (i = 0; i < a2.length; i++) { if (a1.indexOf(a2[i]) === -1) { result.push(a2[i]); } } return result; }

斜线/下划线

如果你正在使用lodash，你可以使用_。差异(a1, a2)(上述情况1)或_。Xor (a1, a2)(情形2)

如果你使用的是Underscore.js，你可以使用_。情况1的差分(a1, a2)函数。

ES6 Set，用于非常大的数组

上面的代码适用于所有浏览器。然而，对于超过10,000个项目的大型数组，它变得相当慢，因为它有O(n²)的复杂度。在许多现代浏览器中，我们可以利用ES6 Set对象来加快速度。Lodash在可用时自动使用Set。如果你不使用lodash，使用下面的实现，灵感来自Axel Rauschmayer的博客文章:

function difference(a1, a2) {
  var a2Set = new Set(a2);
  return a1.filter(function(x) { return !a2Set.has(x); });
}

function symmetricDifference(a1, a2) {
  return difference(a1, a2).concat(difference(a2, a1));
}

笔记

如果您关心-0、+0、NaN或稀疏数组，那么所有示例的行为都可能令人惊讶或不明显。(对于大多数用途来说，这并不重要。)

如果你的数组包含对象，如果你想比较一个属性，就会变得有点困难。

幸运的是，lodash使用_contains和_.pluck使这非常简单:

var list1 = [{id: 1},{id: 2}];
var list1 = [{id: 1},{id: 2}, {id: 3}];

//es6
var results = list2.filter(item => {
  return !_.contains(_.pluck(list1, 'id'), item.id);
});

//es5
var results = list2.filter(function(item){
  return !_.contains(_.pluck(list1, 'id'), item.id);
});

//results contains [{id: 3}]

function diff(a1, a2) {
  return a1.concat(a2).filter(function(val, index, arr){
    return arr.indexOf(val) === arr.lastIndexOf(val);
  });
}

合并这两个数组，唯一的值将只出现一次，因此indexOf()将与lastIndexOf()相同。

Array.prototype.difference = function(e) {
    return this.filter(function(i) {return e.indexOf(i) < 0;});
};

eg:- 

[1,2,3,4,5,6,7].difference( [3,4,5] );  
 => [1, 2, 6 , 7]

这是工作的:基本上合并两个数组，寻找重复的，并将没有重复的推入一个新数组，这是差异。

函数diff(arr1, arr2) { var newArr = []; Var arr = ar1 .concat(arr2); For (var I in arr){ Var f = arr[i]; Var t = 0; (j = 0;j < arr.length;j + +) { If (arr[j] === f){ t + +; ｝ ｝ 如果(t == 1){ newArr.push (f); ｝ ｝ 返回newArr; ｝

转换为字符串对象类型:

[1, 1].toString() === [1, 1].toString(); // true

使用ES7有一个更好的方法:

十字路口

 let intersection = arr1.filter(x => arr2.includes(x));

对于[1,2,3][2,3]，它将生成[2,3]。另一方面，for[1,2,3][2,3,5]将返回相同的结果。

区别

let difference = arr1.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x));

对于[1,2,3][2,3]，它将生成[1]。另一方面，for[1,2,3][2,3,5]将返回相同的结果。

对于对称差分，你可以这样做:

let difference = arr1
                 .filter(x => !arr2.includes(x))
                 .concat(arr2.filter(x => !arr1.includes(x)));

通过这种方式，您将得到一个包含arr1中所有不在arr2中的元素的数组，反之亦然

正如@Joshaven Potter在他的回答中指出的，你可以把这个添加到Array中。原型，所以它可以这样使用:

Array.prototype.diff = function(arr2) { return this.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x)); }
[1, 2, 3].diff([2, 3])

简单地比较所有值，并返回数组与不重复的值。

var main = [9, '$', 'x', 'r', 3, 'A', '#', 0, 1];

var arr0 = ['Z', 9, 'e', '$', 'r'];
var arr1 = ['x', 'r', 3, 'A', '#'];
var arr2 = ['m', '#', 'a', 0, 'r'];
var arr3 = ['$', 1, 'n', '!', 'A'];


Array.prototype.diff = function(arrays) {
    var items = [].concat.apply(this, arguments);
    var diff = [].slice.call(items), i, l, x, pos;

    // go through all items
    for (x = 0, i = 0, l = items.length; i < l; x = 0, i++) {
        // find all positions
        while ((pos = diff.indexOf(items[i])) > -1) {
            // remove item + increase found count
            diff.splice(pos, 1) && x++;
        }
        // if item was found just once, put it back
        if (x === 1) diff.push(items[i]);
    }
    // get all not duplicated items
    return diff;
};

main.diff(arr0, arr1, arr2, arr3).join(''); // returns "Zeman!"

[].diff(main, arr0, arr1, arr2, arr3).join(''); // returns "Zeman!"

以下是我使用的方法:

var newArr = a1.filter(function(elem) {
            return a2.indexOf(elem) === -1;
        }).concat( a2.filter(function(elem) {
            return a1.indexOf(elem) === -1;
        }));
console.log(newArr);

或者这个

var newArr = a1.concat(a2);
        function check(item) {
            if (a1.indexOf(item) === -1 || a2.indexOf(item) === -1) {
                return item;
            }
        }
        return newArr.filter(check);

function diff(arr1, arr2) {
  var filteredArr1 = arr1.filter(function(ele) {
    return arr2.indexOf(ele) == -1;
  });

  var filteredArr2 = arr2.filter(function(ele) {
    return arr1.indexOf(ele) == -1;
  });
  return filteredArr1.concat(filteredArr2);
}

diff([1, "calf", 3, "piglet"], [1, "calf", 3, 4]); // Log ["piglet",4]

function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
  var newArr = arr1.concat(arr2);
  return newArr.filter(function(i){
    return newArr.indexOf(i) == newArr.lastIndexOf(i);
  });
}

这对我很有用

var arrayDifference = function(arr1, arr2){
  if(arr1 && arr1.length){
    if(arr2 && arr2.length > 0){
      for (var i=0, itemIndex; i<arr2.length; i++){
        itemIndex = arr1.indexOf(arr2[i]);
        if(itemIndex !== -1){
          arr1.splice(itemIndex, 1);
        }
      }
    }
    return arr1;
  }
  return [];
};

arrayDifference([1,2,3,4,5], [1,5,6]);

困难的方法(如果你想做一些比.indexOf更奇特的东西)

var difference = function (source, target) {
    return source.reduce(function (diff, current) { 
        if (target.indexOf(current) === -1) { 
            diff.push(current); 
        }

        return diff; 
    }, []);
}

简单的方法

var difference = function (source, target) {
    return source.filter(function (current) {
        return target.indexOf(current) === -1;
    });
}

ES2015的函数方法

计算两个数组之间的差值是Set操作之一。这个术语已经表明应该使用本机Set类型，以便提高查找速度。不管怎样，当你计算两个集合之间的差值时，有三种排列:

[+left difference] [-intersection] [-right difference]
[-left difference] [-intersection] [+right difference]
[+left difference] [-intersection] [+right difference]

下面是反映这些排列的功能性解决方案。

离开的区别:

// small, reusable auxiliary functions const apply = f => x => f(x); const flip = f => y => x => f(x) (y); const createSet = xs => new Set(xs); const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f)); // left difference const differencel = xs => ys => { const zs = createSet(ys); return filter(x => zs.has(x) ? false : true ) (xs); }; // mock data const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5]; const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9]; // run the computation console.log( differencel(xs) (ys) );

正确的区别:

差异是微不足道的。这与翻转的参数不同。为了方便，你可以写一个函数:const differencer = flip(difference)。这是所有!

对称的区别:

现在我们有了左边和右边，实现对称的差异也变得微不足道:

// small, reusable auxiliary functions const apply = f => x => f(x); const flip = f => y => x => f(x) (y); const concat = y => xs => xs.concat(y); const createSet = xs => new Set(xs); const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f)); // left difference const differencel = xs => ys => { const zs = createSet(ys); return filter(x => zs.has(x) ? false : true ) (xs); }; // symmetric difference const difference = ys => xs => concat(differencel(xs) (ys)) (flip(differencel) (xs) (ys)); // mock data const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5]; const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9]; // run the computation console.log( difference(xs) (ys) );

我想这个例子是一个很好的起点，可以让你了解函数式编程的含义:

使用可以以许多不同方式组合在一起的构建块进行编程。

数据:

var new_storage = JSON.parse('[{"id_order":"0003"},{"id_order":"0004"},{"id_order":"0006"}]');

var old_storage = JSON.parse('[{"id_order":"0001"},{"id_order":"0002"},{"id_order":"0003"},{"id_order":"0004"},{"id_order":"0005"}]');

使用过滤器:

var diff = new_storage
.filter(x => {if(!(old_storage.filter(y => y.id_order==x.id_order)).length){return x}})
    .concat(old_storage
    .filter(x => {if(!(new_storage.filter(y => y.id_order==x.id_order)).length){return x}})
                       ) 

console.log(JSON.stringify(diff))

两个数组的结果不同

[{"id_order":"0006"},{"id_order":"0001"},{"id_order":"0002"},{"id_order":"0005"}]

另一种解决问题的方法

function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
    return arr1.concat(arr2).filter(function (val) {
        if (!(arr1.includes(val) && arr2.includes(val)))
            return val;
    });
}

diffArray([1, 2, 3, 7], [3, 2, 1, 4, 5]);    // return [7, 4, 5]

同样，你可以使用箭头函数语法:

const diffArray = (arr1, arr2) => arr1.concat(arr2)
    .filter(val => !(arr1.includes(val) && arr2.includes(val)));

diffArray([1, 2, 3, 7], [3, 2, 1, 4, 5]);    // return [7, 4, 5]

const difference = function (baseArray, arrayToCampare, callback = (a, b) => a!== b) {
  if (!(arrayToCampare instanceof Array)) {
    return baseArray;
  }
  return baseArray.filter(baseEl =>
    arrayToCampare.every(compareEl => callback(baseEl, compareEl)));
}

非常简单的解决方案与JavaScript的过滤器功能:

Var a1 = ['a'， 'b']; Var a2 = ['a'， 'b'， 'c'， 'd']; (arr1, arr2) { var newArr = []; var myArr = ar1 .concat(arr2); newArr = myArr.filter(函数(项){ return arr2.indexOf(item) < 0 || arr1.indexOf(item) < 0; })； 警报(newArr); ｝ diffArray (a1, a2);

function array_diff(a, b) {

    let array = [];
    for(let i = 0; i <a.length; i++) {
        let k = 0;
        for( let j = 0; j < b.length; j++) {
            if(a[i]!==b[j]) {
                k++;
            }
            if(k===b.length) {
                array = array.concat(a[i]);
            }
        }

        if(b.length ===0) {
            array = array.concat(a[i]);
        }
    }
    return array;
}

/ / es6方法

function diff(a, b) {
  var u = a.slice(); //dup the array
  b.map(e => {
    if (u.indexOf(e) > -1) delete u[u.indexOf(e)]
    else u.push(e)   //add non existing item to temp array
  })
  return u.filter((x) => {return (x != null)}) //flatten result
}

这就是我如何得到两个数组的不同。纯净干净。

它将返回一个包含[add list]和[remove list]的对象。

  function getDiff(past, now) {
        let ret = { add: [], remove: [] };
        for (var i = 0; i < now.length; i++) {
          if (past.indexOf(now[i]) < 0)
            ret['add'].push(now[i]);
        }
        for (var i = 0; i < past.length; i++) {
          if (now.indexOf(past[i]) < 0)
            ret['remove'].push(past[i]);
        }
        return ret;
      }

如果数组不是简单类型，则可以采用上面的答案之一:

Array.prototype.diff = function(a) {
        return this.filter(function(i) {return a.map(function(e) { return JSON.stringify(e); }).indexOf(JSON.stringify(i)) < 0;});
    };

这种方法适用于复杂对象的数组。

您可以使用一个公共对象并计算第一个数组中每个值的频率。对于第二个数组，减少公共对象中的值。然后遍历所有键并添加所有值大于1的键。

常量差值= (a1, a2) => { Var obj = {}; a1。forEach(obj[v] = (obj[v] || 0) + 1); a2。forEach(v => obj[v] = (obj[v] || 0) - 1); 返回对象 . keys (obj) .reduce((r,k) => { If (obj[k] > 0) r = r.concat (Array.from({长度:obj [k]}) .fill (k)); 返回r; }, []); }; const =结果不同([' a ', ' ', ' b ', ' c ', ' d '], [a, b]); console.log(结果);

所选的答案只对了一半。您必须比较数组的两种方式才能得到完整的答案。

const ids_exist = [
   '1234',
   '5678',
   'abcd',
]

const ids_new = [
  '1234',
  '5678',
  'efjk',
  '9999',
]

function __uniq_Filter (__array_1, __array_2) {
  const one_not_in_two = __array_1.filter(function (obj) {
    return __array_2.indexOf(obj) == -1
  })
  const two_not_in_one = __array_2.filter(function (obj) {
    return __array_1.indexOf(obj) == -1
  })
  return one_not_in_two.concat(two_not_in_one)
}

let uniq_filter = __uniq_Filter(ids_exist, ids_new)

console.log('uniq_filter', uniq_filter) // => [ 'abcd', 'efjk', '9999' ]

对称和线性复杂度。需要ES6。

function arrDiff(arr1, arr2) {
    var arrays = [arr1, arr2].sort((a, b) => a.length - b.length);
    var smallSet = new Set(arrays[0]);

    return arrays[1].filter(x => !smallSet.has(x));
}

**这将根据'type'参数为任意2个数组返回一个唯一值数组，或一个重复值数组，或一个非重复值数组(difference)。**

let json1 = ['one', 'two']
let json2 = ['one', 'two', 'three', 'four']

function uniq_n_shit (arr1, arr2, type) {

  let concat = arr1.concat(arr2)
  let set = [...new Set(concat)]

  if (!type || type === 'uniq' || type === 'unique') {

    return set

  } else if (type === 'duplicate') {

    concat = arr1.concat(arr2)
    return concat.filter(function (obj, index, self) {
      return index !== self.indexOf(obj)
    })

  } else if (type === 'not_duplicate') {

    let duplicates = concat.filter(function (obj, index, self) {
      return index !== self.indexOf(obj)
    })

    for (let r = 0; r < duplicates.length; r++) {
      let i = set.indexOf(duplicates[r]);
      if(i !== -1) {
        set.splice(i, 1);
      }
    }

    return set

  }
}

console.log(uniq_n_shit(json1, json2, null)) // => [ 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four' ]
console.log(uniq_n_shit(json1, json2, 'uniq')) // => [ 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four' ]
console.log(uniq_n_shit(json1, json2, 'duplicate')) // => [ 'one', 'two' ]
console.log(uniq_n_shit(json1, json2, 'not_duplicate')) // => [ 'three', 'four' ]

为了获得对称差异，您需要以两种方式比较数组(或在多个数组的情况下以所有方式比较)

ES7 (ECMAScript 2016)

// diff between just two arrays:
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
    return [
        ...a.filter(x => !b.includes(x)),
        ...b.filter(x => !a.includes(x))
    ];
}

// diff between multiple arrays:
function arrayDiff(...arrays) {
    return [].concat(...arrays.map( (arr, i) => {
        const others = arrays.slice(0);
        others.splice(i, 1);
        const unique = [...new Set([].concat(...others))];
        return arr.filter(x => !unique.includes(x));
    }));
}

ES6(2015年ECMAScript)

// diff between just two arrays:
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
    return [
        ...a.filter(x => b.indexOf(x) === -1),
        ...b.filter(x => a.indexOf(x) === -1)
    ];
}

// diff between multiple arrays:
function arrayDiff(...arrays) {
    return [].concat(...arrays.map( (arr, i) => {
        const others = arrays.slice(0);
        others.splice(i, 1);
        const unique = [...new Set([].concat(...others))];
        return arr.filter(x => unique.indexOf(x) === -1);
    }));
}

ES5 (ECMAScript 5.1)

// diff between just two arrays:
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
    var arrays = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
    var diff = [];

    arrays.forEach(function(arr, i) {
        var other = i === 1 ? a : b;
        arr.forEach(function(x) {
            if (other.indexOf(x) === -1) {
                diff.push(x);
            }
        });
    })

    return diff;
}

// diff between multiple arrays:
function arrayDiff() {
    var arrays = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
    var diff = [];

    arrays.forEach(function(arr, i) {
        var others = arrays.slice(0);
        others.splice(i, 1);
        var otherValues = Array.prototype.concat.apply([], others);
        var unique = otherValues.filter(function (x, j) { 
            return otherValues.indexOf(x) === j; 
        });
        diff = diff.concat(arr.filter(x => unique.indexOf(x) === -1));
    });
    return diff;
}

例子:

// diff between two arrays:
const a = ['a', 'd', 'e'];
const b = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
arrayDiff(a, b); // (3) ["e", "b", "c"]

// diff between multiple arrays
const a = ['b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'g'];
const b = ['a', 'b'];
const c = ['a', 'e', 'f'];
arrayDiff(a, b, c); // (4) ["c", "d", "g", "f"]

对象数组之间的差异

function arrayDiffByKey(key, ...arrays) {
    return [].concat(...arrays.map( (arr, i) => {
        const others = arrays.slice(0);
        others.splice(i, 1);
        const unique = [...new Set([].concat(...others))];
        return arr.filter( x =>
            !unique.some(y => x[key] === y[key])
        );
    }));
}

例子:

const a = [{k:1}, {k:2}, {k:3}];
const b = [{k:1}, {k:4}, {k:5}, {k:6}];
const c = [{k:3}, {k:5}, {k:7}];
arrayDiffByKey('k', a, b, c); // (4) [{k:2}, {k:4}, {k:6}, {k:7}]

对我来说，把它作为部分函数处理比较容易。很惊讶没有看到函数式编程的解决方案，这是我在ES6中的:

const arrayDiff = (a, b) => {
  return diff(b)(a);
}

const contains = (needle) => (array) => {
  for (let i=0; i < array.length; i++) {
    if (array[i] == needle) return true;
  }

  return false;
}

const diff = (compare) => {
    return (array) => array.filter((elem) => !contains(elem)(compare))
}

var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
var diff = [];
for (var i in a2) {
   var found = false;
   for (var j in a1) {
      if (a2[i] === a1[j]) found = true;
   }
   if (found === false) diff.push(a2[i]);
}

那么简单。也可以用于对象，检查对象的一个属性。 就像,

if (a2[i].id === a1[j].id) found = true;

还有另一个答案，但似乎没有人提到jsperf，他们比较了几种算法和技术支持:https://jsperf.com/array-difference-javascript似乎使用过滤器得到了最好的结果。谢谢

类似于Ian Grainger的解决方案(但在打字稿中):

function findDiffs(arrayOne: string[], arrayTwo: string[]) {

    let onlyInArrayOne = []
    let onlyInArrayTwo = []
    let share = []
    let [arrayOneCopy, arrayTwoCopy] = [[...arrayOne], [...arrayTwo]]

    arrayOneCopy.sort(); arrayTwoCopy.sort()

    while (arrayOneCopy.length !== 0 && arrayTwoCopy.length !== 0) {
        if (arrayOneCopy[0] == arrayTwoCopy[0]) {
            share.push(arrayOneCopy[0])
            arrayOneCopy.splice(0, 1)
            arrayTwoCopy.splice(0, 1)
        }
        if (arrayOneCopy[0] < arrayTwoCopy[0]) {
            onlyInArrayOne.push(arrayOneCopy[0])
            arrayOneCopy.splice(0, 1)
        }
        if (arrayOneCopy[0] > arrayTwoCopy[0]) {
            onlyInArrayTwo.push(arrayTwoCopy[0])
            arrayTwoCopy.splice(0, 1)
        }
    }
    onlyInArrayTwo = onlyInArrayTwo.concat(arrayTwoCopy)
    onlyInArrayOne = onlyInArrayOne.concat(arrayOneCopy)

    return {
        onlyInArrayOne,
        onlyInArrayTwo,
        share,
        diff: onlyInArrayOne.concat(onlyInArrayTwo)
    }
}

// arrayOne: [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'm', 'y' ] 
// arrayTwo: [ 'c', 'b', 'f', 'h' ]
//
// Results: 
// { 
//    onlyInArrayOne: [ 'a', 'm', 'y' ],
//    onlyInArrayTwo: [ 'f', 'h' ],
//    share: [ 'b', 'c' ],
//    diff: [ 'a', 'm', 'y', 'f', 'h' ] 
// }

如果你不关心原始数组，编辑它们没有问题，那么这是一个更快的算法:

let iterator = arrayA.values()
let result = []
for (entryA of iterator) {
    if (!arrayB.includes(entryA)) {
        result.push(entryA)
    } else {
        arrayB.splice(arrayB.indexOf(entryA), 1) 
    }
}

result.push(...arrayB)
return result

基于思考者的答案，但允许重复。

映射在映射值出现时增加它们，如果它们在另一个数组中，则减少它们。

任何剩余的部分都将包括在差额中。

function diff(curr, prev) { let a = curr.split('').sort(), b = prev.split('').sort(), c = arrDiff(a, b); console.log(JSON.stringify(a), '-', JSON.stringify(b), '=', JSON.stringify(c)); return c; } function arrDiff(larger, smaller) { var entries = {}; for (var i = 0; i < larger.length; i++) { entries[larger[i]] = (entries[larger[i]] || 0) + 1; } for (var i = 0; i < smaller.length; i++) { if (entries[smaller[i]]) { entries[smaller[i]] -= 1; } else { entries[smaller[i]] = (entries[smaller[i]] || 0) + 1; } } return Object.keys(entries).sort().reduce((diff, key) => { if (entries[key] > 0) { for (var i = 0; i < entries[key]; i++) { diff.push(key); } } return diff; }, []); } // Smaller is a subset of Larger console.log('Result:', JSON.stringify(diff('ENLIGHTEN', 'LENGTHEN'))); // [ I ] console.log('Result:', JSON.stringify(diff('STRENGTH', 'TENTHS'))); // [ G, R ] // Both have a unique value console.log('Result:', JSON.stringify(diff('BUBBLE', 'RUBBLE'))); // [ B, R ] .as-console-wrapper { top: 0; max-height: 100% !important; }

ES6中一个更简洁的方法是以下解决方案。

var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];

区别

a2.filter(d => !a1.includes(d)) // gives ["c", "d"]

十字路口

a2.filter(d => a1.includes(d)) // gives ["a", "b"]

析取联合(对称差分)

[ ...a2.filter(d => !a1.includes(d)),
  ...a1.filter(d => !a2.includes(d)) ]

我同意@luis-sieira的解决方案

我创建了位自解释函数，便于初学者一步一步理解:

function difference(oneArr, twoArr){
  var newArr = [];
  newArr = oneArr.filter((item)=>{
      return !twoArr.includes(item)
  });
  console.log(newArr)
    let arr = twoArr.filter((item)=>{
        return !oneArr.includes(item)
     });
    newArr =  newArr.concat(arr);
  console.log(newArr)
}
difference([1, 2, 3, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5])

使用额外的内存来做到这一点。这样你可以用更少的时间复杂度来求解，O(n)而不是O(n *n)

function getDiff(arr1,arr2){
let k = {};
let diff = []
arr1.map(i=>{
    if (!k.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
        k[i] = 1
    }
}
)
arr2.map(j=>{
    if (!k.hasOwnProperty(j)) {
        k[j] = 1;
    } else {
        k[j] = 2;
    }
}
)
for (var i in k) {
    if (k[i] === 1)
        diff.push(+i)
}
return diff
}
getDiff([4, 3, 52, 3, 5, 67, 9, 3],[4, 5, 6, 75, 3, 334, 5, 5, 6])

根据之前的答案…取决于你是想要一个高效的还是“漂亮的联机”解决方案。

一般有三种方法……

"manual iterative" (using indexOf) - naive with O(n2) complexity (slow) var array_diff_naive = function(a,b){ var i, la = a.length, lb = b.length, res = []; if (!la) return b; else if (!lb) return a; for (i = 0; i < la; i++) { if (b.indexOf(a[i]) === -1) res.push(a[i]); } for (i = 0; i < lb; i++) { if (a.indexOf(b[i]) === -1) res.push(b[i]); } return res; } "abstract iterative" (using filter and concat library methods) - syntactic sugar for manual iterative (looks nicer, still sucks) var array_diff_modern = function(a1,a2){ return a1.filter(function(v) { return !a2.includes(v); } ) .concat(a2.filter(function(v) { return !a1.includes(v);})); } "using hashtable" (using object keys) - much more efficient - only O(n), but has slightly limited range of input array values var array_diff_hash = function(a1,a2){ var a = [], diff = []; for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) { a[a1[i]] = true; } for (var i = 0; i < a2.length; i++) { if (a[a2[i]]) { delete a[a2[i]]; } else { a[a2[i]] = true; } } for (var k in a) { diff.push(k); } return diff; }

在jsperf上可以看到 https://jsperf.com/array-diff-algo

下面是一个稍微修改的版本，它使用Object来存储哈希，可以处理数组中的数字和字符串。

function arrDiff(a, b) {
  const hash = {};
  a.forEach(n => { hash[n] = n; });
  b.forEach(n => {
    if (hash[n]) {
      delete hash[n];
    } else {
      hash[n] = n;
    }
  });
  return Object.values(hash);
}

var compare = array1.length > array2.length ? array1 : array2;
var compareWith = array1.length > array2.length ? array2 : array1;
var uniqueValues = compareWith.filter(function(value){
                    if(compare.indexOf(vakye) == -1)
                       return true;
                   });

这将检查数组中哪个更大，然后进行比较。

function diffArray(newArr, oldArr) {
    var newSet = new Set(newArr)
    var diff = []
    oldArr.forEach((a) => {
        if(!newSet.delete(a))diff.push(a)
    })
    return diff.concat(Array.from(newSet)) 
}

    function arrayDiff(a, b) {
      return a.concat(b).filter(val => !(b.includes(val)));
      //(or) return a.concat(b).filter(val => !(a.includes(val) && b.includes(val)));
    }

求两个没有重复项的数组的差值:

function difference(arr1, arr2){

  let setA = new Set(arr1);
  let differenceSet = new Set(arr2.filter(ele => !setA.has(ele)));
  return [...differenceSet ];

}

1.difference([2,2,3,4]，[2,3,3,4])将返回[]

2.difference([1,2,3]，[4,5,6])将返回[4,5,6]

3.difference([1,2,3,4]，[1,2])返回[]

4.difference([1,2]，[1,2,3,4])将返回[3,4]

注意:上述解决方案要求始终将较大的数组作为第二个参数发送。要找到绝对差值，首先需要找到两者的较大数组，然后对它们进行处理。

求两个不存在重复项的数组的绝对差值:

function absDifference(arr1, arr2){

  const {larger, smaller} = arr1.length > arr2.length ? 
  {larger: arr1, smaller: arr2} : {larger: arr2, smaller: arr1}
  
  let setA = new Set(smaller);
  let absDifferenceSet = new Set(larger.filter(ele => !setA.has(ele)));
  return [...absDifferenceSet ];

}

1. absdifference((2, 2, 3, 4),[2、3、3、4])将返回[]

2. absdifference([1, 2, 3],[4、5、6])将返回(4、5、6)

3. absdifference([1、2、3、4],[1,2])将返回(3、4)

4. absdifference([1, 2],[1、2、3、4])将返回(3、4)

请注意这两个解决方案中的示例3

下面是另一个可以返回差异的解决方案，就像git diff一样:(它已经用typescript编写，如果你不使用typescript版本，只需删除类型)

/**
 * util function to calculate the difference between two arrays (pay attention to 'from' and 'to'),
 * it would return the mutations from 'from' to 'to' 
 * @param { T[] } from
 * @param { T[] } to
 * @returns { { [x in string]: boolean } } it would return the stringified version of array element, true means added,
 * false means removed
 */
export function arrDiff<T>(from: T[], to: T[]): { [x in string]: boolean } {

  var diff: { [x in string]: boolean } = {};
  var newItems: T[] = []
  diff = from.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [JSON.stringify(e)]: true }), {})

  for (var i = 0; i < to.length; i++) {
    if (diff[JSON.stringify(to[i])]) {
      delete diff[JSON.stringify(to[i])]
    } else {
      newItems.push(to[i])
    }
  }

  return {
    ...Object.keys(diff).reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [e]: false }), {}),
    ...newItems.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [JSON.stringify(e)]: true }), {})
  }
}

下面是一个用法示例:

arrDiff(['a', 'b', 'c'], ['a', 'd', 'c', 'f']) //{"b": false, "d": true, "f": true}

试一试。

var first = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ];
    var second = [ 4, 5, 6 ];
     
    var difference = first.filter(x => second.indexOf(x) === -1);
    console.log(difference);


Output: [ 1, 2, 3]

Var first = [1,2,3,4,5]; Var second = [4,5,6]; Var差=第一。filter(x => second.indexOf(x) === -1); console.log(差异);

如果你想找出两个object数组之间的差异，你可以这样做:

let arrObj = [{id: 1}，{id: 2}，{id: 3}] let arrObj2 = [{id: 1}，{id: 3}] let result = arrObj。filter(x => arrObj2.)每个(x2 => x2。Id == x.id) console.log(结果)

adaen对post(比较两个包含整数的数组JavaScript)的响应是关闭的:

有几个选项:

您可以将第二个数组的所有条目添加到hashmap中。然后遍历第一个数组中的条目，并记录hashmap中不存在的条目。

const arrOne = [2,3,10,7,9,15,7,15,21,1];
const arrTwo = [3,15,1,2,21];

const hash = {};

arrTwo.forEach(a => hash[a]++);
arrOne.filter(a => typeof hash[a] === 'undefined').forEach(a => console.log(a));

另一个选择是对两个数组进行排序。然后迭代第二个数组。在其中，迭代第一个数组。当您遇到第一个数组中的条目小于第二个数组中的下一个条目但不等于它时，您将它们注销。

const arrOne = [2,3,10,7,9,15,7,15,21,1].sort((a,b)=>a-b);
const arrTwo = [3,15,1,2,21].sort((a,b)=>a-b);

var i1 = 0;
for(var i2 = 0; i2 < arrTwo.length; i2++) {
  while(arrOne[i1] < arrTwo[i2+1]) {
    if(arrOne[i1] != arrTwo[i2]) {
      console.log(arrOne[i1]);
    }
    i1++;
  }
}

一个衬垫

const unique = (a) => [...new Set(a)]; const uniqueBy = (x,f)=>Object.values(x.reduce((a,b)=>((a[f(b)]=b),a),{})); const intersection = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => b.includes(v)); const diff = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => !b.includes(v)); const symDiff = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(diff(b, a)); const union = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(b); const a = unique([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5]); console.log(a); const b = [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]; console.log(intersection(a, b), diff(a, b), symDiff(a, b), union(a, b)); console.log(uniqueBy( [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 2, name: "xyz" }, { id: 1, name: "abc" }, ], (v) => v.id )); const intersectionBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => b.some((u) => f(v, u))); console.log(intersectionBy( [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 2, name: "xyz" }, ], [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 3, name: "pqr" }, ], (v, u) => v.id === u.id )); const diffBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => !b.some((u) => f(v, u))); console.log(diffBy( [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 2, name: "xyz" }, ], [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 3, name: "pqr" }, ], (v, u) => v.id === u.id ));

打印稿

操场上的链接

const unique = <T>(array: T[]) => [...new Set(array)];


const intersection = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
  array1.filter((v) => array2.includes(v));


const diff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
  array1.filter((v) => !array2.includes(v));


const symDiff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
  diff(array1, array2).concat(diff(array2, array1));


const union = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
  diff(array1, array2).concat(array2);


const intersectionBy = <T>(
  array1: T[],
  array2: T[],
  predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));


const diffBy = <T>(
  array1: T[],
  array2: T[],
  predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => !array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));


const uniqueBy = <T>(
  array: T[],
  predicate: (v: T, i: number, a: T[]) => string
) =>
  Object.values(
    array.reduce((acc, value, index) => {
      acc[predicate(value, index, array)] = value;
      return acc;
    }, {} as { [key: string]: T })
  );

如果你有两个对象列表

const people = [{name: 'cesar', age: 23}]
const morePeople = [{name: 'cesar', age: 23}, {name: 'kevin', age: 26}, {name: 'pedro', age: 25}]

let result2 = morePeople.filter(person => people.every(person2 => !person2.name.includes(person.name)))

function array_diff(array1, array2) {
   let returnArray = [];
   $.each(array1, function(index, value) {
     let findStatus = false;
     if (Array.isArray(array2)) {
       $.each(array2, function(index2, value2) {
         if (value == value2) findStatus = true;
       });
     } else {
       if (value == array2) {
         findStatus = true;
       }
     }

     if (findStatus == false) {
       returnArray.push(value);
     }
   });
   return returnArray;
}

function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
  const newArr = [];

// arr1 match to arr2
arr1.map((item)=>{
if(arr2.indexOf(item)<0){
  console.log(item)
  newArr.push(item)
}  
})

// arr2 match to arr1
arr2.map((item)=>{
if(arr1.indexOf(item)<0){
  newArr.push(item)
}
})

  return newArr; 
}

差异([1,2,3,5]，[1,2,3,4,5])

输出::[4]

const dbData = [{name:'ally'}, 
{name:'James'}]
const localData = [{name:'James'}] 

const diff = dbData.filter(a =>!localData.some(b => { return a.name === b.name}))

const a1 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
const a2 = ['a', 'b'];

const diffArr = a1.filter(o => !a2.includes(o));

console.log(diffArr);

输出:

[ 'a', 'b' ]

这里是使用地图的更快的方法

const arr1 = ['a','b','c','d'];
const arr2 = ['a','b','c']
let table = {}
arr1.forEach(v=>{table[v]=false})
arr2.forEach(v=>{
    if(table[v]===false) table[v] = true
    else table[v] = false
})
const diff = Object.keys(table).filter(v=>table[v]==false)