是否有一种方法可以在JavaScript中返回两个数组之间的差异?
例如:
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
// need ["c", "d"]
是否有一种方法可以在JavaScript中返回两个数组之间的差异?
例如:
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
// need ["c", "d"]
当前回答
转换为字符串对象类型:
[1, 1].toString() === [1, 1].toString(); // true
其他回答
ES2015的函数方法
计算两个数组之间的差值是Set操作之一。这个术语已经表明应该使用本机Set类型,以便提高查找速度。不管怎样,当你计算两个集合之间的差值时,有三种排列:
[+left difference] [-intersection] [-right difference]
[-left difference] [-intersection] [+right difference]
[+left difference] [-intersection] [+right difference]
下面是反映这些排列的功能性解决方案。
离开的区别:
// small, reusable auxiliary functions const apply = f => x => f(x); const flip = f => y => x => f(x) (y); const createSet = xs => new Set(xs); const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f)); // left difference const differencel = xs => ys => { const zs = createSet(ys); return filter(x => zs.has(x) ? false : true ) (xs); }; // mock data const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5]; const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9]; // run the computation console.log( differencel(xs) (ys) );
正确的区别:
差异是微不足道的。这与翻转的参数不同。为了方便,你可以写一个函数:const differencer = flip(difference)。这是所有!
对称的区别:
现在我们有了左边和右边,实现对称的差异也变得微不足道:
// small, reusable auxiliary functions const apply = f => x => f(x); const flip = f => y => x => f(x) (y); const concat = y => xs => xs.concat(y); const createSet = xs => new Set(xs); const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f)); // left difference const differencel = xs => ys => { const zs = createSet(ys); return filter(x => zs.has(x) ? false : true ) (xs); }; // symmetric difference const difference = ys => xs => concat(differencel(xs) (ys)) (flip(differencel) (xs) (ys)); // mock data const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5]; const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9]; // run the computation console.log( difference(xs) (ys) );
我想这个例子是一个很好的起点,可以让你了解函数式编程的含义:
使用可以以许多不同方式组合在一起的构建块进行编程。
const a1 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
const a2 = ['a', 'b'];
const diffArr = a1.filter(o => !a2.includes(o));
console.log(diffArr);
输出:
[ 'a', 'b' ]
根据之前的答案…取决于你是想要一个高效的还是“漂亮的联机”解决方案。
一般有三种方法……
"manual iterative" (using indexOf) - naive with O(n2) complexity (slow) var array_diff_naive = function(a,b){ var i, la = a.length, lb = b.length, res = []; if (!la) return b; else if (!lb) return a; for (i = 0; i < la; i++) { if (b.indexOf(a[i]) === -1) res.push(a[i]); } for (i = 0; i < lb; i++) { if (a.indexOf(b[i]) === -1) res.push(b[i]); } return res; } "abstract iterative" (using filter and concat library methods) - syntactic sugar for manual iterative (looks nicer, still sucks) var array_diff_modern = function(a1,a2){ return a1.filter(function(v) { return !a2.includes(v); } ) .concat(a2.filter(function(v) { return !a1.includes(v);})); } "using hashtable" (using object keys) - much more efficient - only O(n), but has slightly limited range of input array values var array_diff_hash = function(a1,a2){ var a = [], diff = []; for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) { a[a1[i]] = true; } for (var i = 0; i < a2.length; i++) { if (a[a2[i]]) { delete a[a2[i]]; } else { a[a2[i]] = true; } } for (var k in a) { diff.push(k); } return diff; }
在jsperf上可以看到 https://jsperf.com/array-diff-algo
使用ES7有一个更好的方法:
十字路口
let intersection = arr1.filter(x => arr2.includes(x));
对于[1,2,3][2,3],它将生成[2,3]。另一方面,for[1,2,3][2,3,5]将返回相同的结果。
区别
let difference = arr1.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x));
对于[1,2,3][2,3],它将生成[1]。另一方面,for[1,2,3][2,3,5]将返回相同的结果。
对于对称差分,你可以这样做:
let difference = arr1
.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x))
.concat(arr2.filter(x => !arr1.includes(x)));
通过这种方式,您将得到一个包含arr1中所有不在arr2中的元素的数组,反之亦然
正如@Joshaven Potter在他的回答中指出的,你可以把这个添加到Array中。原型,所以它可以这样使用:
Array.prototype.diff = function(arr2) { return this.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x)); }
[1, 2, 3].diff([2, 3])
这就是我如何得到两个数组的不同。纯净干净。
它将返回一个包含[add list]和[remove list]的对象。
function getDiff(past, now) {
let ret = { add: [], remove: [] };
for (var i = 0; i < now.length; i++) {
if (past.indexOf(now[i]) < 0)
ret['add'].push(now[i]);
}
for (var i = 0; i < past.length; i++) {
if (now.indexOf(past[i]) < 0)
ret['remove'].push(past[i]);
}
return ret;
}