根据之前的答案…取决于你是想要一个高效的还是“漂亮的联机”解决方案。

一般有三种方法……

"manual iterative" (using indexOf) - naive with O(n2) complexity (slow) var array_diff_naive = function(a,b){ var i, la = a.length, lb = b.length, res = []; if (!la) return b; else if (!lb) return a; for (i = 0; i < la; i++) { if (b.indexOf(a[i]) === -1) res.push(a[i]); } for (i = 0; i < lb; i++) { if (a.indexOf(b[i]) === -1) res.push(b[i]); } return res; } "abstract iterative" (using filter and concat library methods) - syntactic sugar for manual iterative (looks nicer, still sucks) var array_diff_modern = function(a1,a2){ return a1.filter(function(v) { return !a2.includes(v); } ) .concat(a2.filter(function(v) { return !a1.includes(v);})); } "using hashtable" (using object keys) - much more efficient - only O(n), but has slightly limited range of input array values var array_diff_hash = function(a1,a2){ var a = [], diff = []; for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) { a[a1[i]] = true; } for (var i = 0; i < a2.length; i++) { if (a[a2[i]]) { delete a[a2[i]]; } else { a[a2[i]] = true; } } for (var k in a) { diff.push(k); } return diff; }

在jsperf上可以看到 https://jsperf.com/array-diff-algo

这个答案是2009年写的，所以有点过时了，但是对于理解这个问题还是很有教育意义的。我今天最好的解决办法是

let difference = arr1.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x));

(此处致谢给其他作者)

我假设你比较的是一个普通数组。如果不是，你需要将for循环改为for ..在循环。

函数arr_diff (a1, a2) { Var a = []， diff = []; For (var I = 0;I < a1.length;我+ +){ A [a1[i]] = true; ｝ For (var I = 0;I < a2.length;我+ +){ If (a[a2[i]]) { 删除一个[a2[我]]; }其他{ A [a2[i]] = true; ｝ ｝ 对于(var k in a) { diff.push (k); ｝ 返回差异; ｝ console.log (arr_diff ([a, b], [a, b, c, d '))); console.log (arr_diff(“abcd”、"中的")); console.log (arr_diff(“必杀技”,“必杀技”));

只是修整字符串以确保....空格不会影响差异

function arr_diff(a1, a2) {
    var a=[], diff=[];
    for(var i=0;i<a1.length;i++)
        a[a1[i]]=true;
    for(var i=0;i<a2.length;i++)
        if(a[a2[i].trim()]) delete a[a2[i].trim()];
    else a[a2[i].trim()]=true;
    for(var k in a)
        diff.push(k);
    return diff;
}

只是想…为了一个挑战;-)这个工作…(对于字符串，数字等的基本数组)没有嵌套数组

function diffArrays(arr1, arr2, returnUnion){
  var ret = [];
  var test = {};
  var bigArray, smallArray, key;
  if(arr1.length >= arr2.length){
    bigArray = arr1;
    smallArray = arr2;
  } else {
    bigArray = arr2;
    smallArray = arr1;
  }
  for(var i=0;i<bigArray.length;i++){
    key = bigArray[i];
    test[key] = true;
  }
  if(!returnUnion){
    //diffing
    for(var i=0;i<smallArray.length;i++){
      key = smallArray[i];
      if(!test[key]){
        test[key] = null;
      }
    }
  } else {
    //union
    for(var i=0;i<smallArray.length;i++){
      key = smallArray[i];
      if(!test[key]){
        test[key] = true;
      }
    }
  }
  for(var i in test){
    ret.push(i);
  }
  return ret;
}

array1 = "test1", "test2","test3", "test4", "test7"
array2 = "test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6"
diffArray = diffArrays(array1, array2);
//returns ["test5","test6","test7"]

diffArray = diffArrays(array1, array2, true);
//returns ["test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6","test7"]

注意排序可能不会像上面提到的那样…但是如果需要的话，可以在数组上调用.sort()对其进行排序。

如果你想找出两个object数组之间的差异，你可以这样做:

let arrObj = [{id: 1}，{id: 2}，{id: 3}] let arrObj2 = [{id: 1}，{id: 3}] let result = arrObj。filter(x => arrObj2.)每个(x2 => x2。Id == x.id) console.log(结果)

使用indexOf()的解决方案对于小型数组是可以的，但是随着长度的增长，算法的性能将接近O(n^2)。这里有一个解决方案，将执行非常大的数组使用对象作为关联数组存储数组项作为键;它还自动消除重复项，但只适用于字符串值(或可以安全地存储为字符串的值):

function arrayDiff(a1, a2) {
  var o1={}, o2={}, diff=[], i, len, k;
  for (i=0, len=a1.length; i<len; i++) { o1[a1[i]] = true; }
  for (i=0, len=a2.length; i<len; i++) { o2[a2[i]] = true; }
  for (k in o1) { if (!(k in o2)) { diff.push(k); } }
  for (k in o2) { if (!(k in o1)) { diff.push(k); } }
  return diff;
}

var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
arrayDiff(a1, a2); // => ['c', 'd']
arrayDiff(a2, a1); // => ['c', 'd']