我一直在寻找一个不涉及使用不同库的简单答案，我想出了我自己的答案，我想这里没有提到过。 我不知道它的效率如何，但它确实有效;

    function find_diff(arr1, arr2) {
      diff = [];
      joined = arr1.concat(arr2);
      for( i = 0; i <= joined.length; i++ ) {
        current = joined[i];
        if( joined.indexOf(current) == joined.lastIndexOf(current) ) {
          diff.push(current);
        }
      }
      return diff;
    }

对于我的代码，我也需要删除副本，但我想这并不总是可取的。

我想主要的缺点是它可能会比较许多已经被拒绝的选择。

var compare = array1.length > array2.length ? array1 : array2;
var compareWith = array1.length > array2.length ? array2 : array1;
var uniqueValues = compareWith.filter(function(value){
                    if(compare.indexOf(vakye) == -1)
                       return true;
                   });

这将检查数组中哪个更大，然后进行比较。

一个衬垫

const unique = (a) => [...new Set(a)]; const uniqueBy = (x,f)=>Object.values(x.reduce((a,b)=>((a[f(b)]=b),a),{})); const intersection = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => b.includes(v)); const diff = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => !b.includes(v)); const symDiff = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(diff(b, a)); const union = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(b); const a = unique([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5]); console.log(a); const b = [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]; console.log(intersection(a, b), diff(a, b), symDiff(a, b), union(a, b)); console.log(uniqueBy( [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 2, name: "xyz" }, { id: 1, name: "abc" }, ], (v) => v.id )); const intersectionBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => b.some((u) => f(v, u))); console.log(intersectionBy( [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 2, name: "xyz" }, ], [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 3, name: "pqr" }, ], (v, u) => v.id === u.id )); const diffBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => !b.some((u) => f(v, u))); console.log(diffBy( [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 2, name: "xyz" }, ], [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 3, name: "pqr" }, ], (v, u) => v.id === u.id ));

打印稿

操场上的链接

const unique = <T>(array: T[]) => [...new Set(array)];


const intersection = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
  array1.filter((v) => array2.includes(v));


const diff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
  array1.filter((v) => !array2.includes(v));


const symDiff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
  diff(array1, array2).concat(diff(array2, array1));


const union = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
  diff(array1, array2).concat(array2);


const intersectionBy = <T>(
  array1: T[],
  array2: T[],
  predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));


const diffBy = <T>(
  array1: T[],
  array2: T[],
  predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => !array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));


const uniqueBy = <T>(
  array: T[],
  predicate: (v: T, i: number, a: T[]) => string
) =>
  Object.values(
    array.reduce((acc, value, index) => {
      acc[predicate(value, index, array)] = value;
      return acc;
    }, {} as { [key: string]: T })
  );

const difference = function (baseArray, arrayToCampare, callback = (a, b) => a!== b) {
  if (!(arrayToCampare instanceof Array)) {
    return baseArray;
  }
  return baseArray.filter(baseEl =>
    arrayToCampare.every(compareEl => callback(baseEl, compareEl)));
}

使用indexOf()的解决方案对于小型数组是可以的，但是随着长度的增长，算法的性能将接近O(n^2)。这里有一个解决方案，将执行非常大的数组使用对象作为关联数组存储数组项作为键;它还自动消除重复项，但只适用于字符串值(或可以安全地存储为字符串的值):

function arrayDiff(a1, a2) {
  var o1={}, o2={}, diff=[], i, len, k;
  for (i=0, len=a1.length; i<len; i++) { o1[a1[i]] = true; }
  for (i=0, len=a2.length; i<len; i++) { o2[a2[i]] = true; }
  for (k in o1) { if (!(k in o2)) { diff.push(k); } }
  for (k in o2) { if (!(k in o1)) { diff.push(k); } }
  return diff;
}

var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
arrayDiff(a1, a2); // => ['c', 'd']
arrayDiff(a2, a1); // => ['c', 'd']

试一试。

var first = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ];
    var second = [ 4, 5, 6 ];
     
    var difference = first.filter(x => second.indexOf(x) === -1);
    console.log(difference);


Output: [ 1, 2, 3]

Var first = [1,2,3,4,5]; Var second = [4,5,6]; Var差=第一。filter(x => second.indexOf(x) === -1); console.log(差异);