我一直在寻找一个不涉及使用不同库的简单答案，我想出了我自己的答案，我想这里没有提到过。 我不知道它的效率如何，但它确实有效;

    function find_diff(arr1, arr2) {
      diff = [];
      joined = arr1.concat(arr2);
      for( i = 0; i <= joined.length; i++ ) {
        current = joined[i];
        if( joined.indexOf(current) == joined.lastIndexOf(current) ) {
          diff.push(current);
        }
      }
      return diff;
    }

对于我的代码，我也需要删除副本，但我想这并不总是可取的。

我想主要的缺点是它可能会比较许多已经被拒绝的选择。

这里是使用地图的更快的方法

const arr1 = ['a','b','c','d'];
const arr2 = ['a','b','c']
let table = {}
arr1.forEach(v=>{table[v]=false})
arr2.forEach(v=>{
    if(table[v]===false) table[v] = true
    else table[v] = false
})
const diff = Object.keys(table).filter(v=>table[v]==false)

var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
var diff = [];
for (var i in a2) {
   var found = false;
   for (var j in a1) {
      if (a2[i] === a1[j]) found = true;
   }
   if (found === false) diff.push(a2[i]);
}

那么简单。也可以用于对象，检查对象的一个属性。 就像,

if (a2[i].id === a1[j].id) found = true;

根据之前的答案…取决于你是想要一个高效的还是“漂亮的联机”解决方案。

一般有三种方法……

"manual iterative" (using indexOf) - naive with O(n2) complexity (slow) var array_diff_naive = function(a,b){ var i, la = a.length, lb = b.length, res = []; if (!la) return b; else if (!lb) return a; for (i = 0; i < la; i++) { if (b.indexOf(a[i]) === -1) res.push(a[i]); } for (i = 0; i < lb; i++) { if (a.indexOf(b[i]) === -1) res.push(b[i]); } return res; } "abstract iterative" (using filter and concat library methods) - syntactic sugar for manual iterative (looks nicer, still sucks) var array_diff_modern = function(a1,a2){ return a1.filter(function(v) { return !a2.includes(v); } ) .concat(a2.filter(function(v) { return !a1.includes(v);})); } "using hashtable" (using object keys) - much more efficient - only O(n), but has slightly limited range of input array values var array_diff_hash = function(a1,a2){ var a = [], diff = []; for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) { a[a1[i]] = true; } for (var i = 0; i < a2.length; i++) { if (a[a2[i]]) { delete a[a2[i]]; } else { a[a2[i]] = true; } } for (var k in a) { diff.push(k); } return diff; }

在jsperf上可以看到 https://jsperf.com/array-diff-algo

困难的方法(如果你想做一些比.indexOf更奇特的东西)

var difference = function (source, target) {
    return source.reduce(function (diff, current) { 
        if (target.indexOf(current) === -1) { 
            diff.push(current); 
        }

        return diff; 
    }, []);
}

简单的方法

var difference = function (source, target) {
    return source.filter(function (current) {
        return target.indexOf(current) === -1;
    });
}

所选的答案只对了一半。您必须比较数组的两种方式才能得到完整的答案。

const ids_exist = [
   '1234',
   '5678',
   'abcd',
]

const ids_new = [
  '1234',
  '5678',
  'efjk',
  '9999',
]

function __uniq_Filter (__array_1, __array_2) {
  const one_not_in_two = __array_1.filter(function (obj) {
    return __array_2.indexOf(obj) == -1
  })
  const two_not_in_one = __array_2.filter(function (obj) {
    return __array_1.indexOf(obj) == -1
  })
  return one_not_in_two.concat(two_not_in_one)
}

let uniq_filter = __uniq_Filter(ids_exist, ids_new)

console.log('uniq_filter', uniq_filter) // => [ 'abcd', 'efjk', '9999' ]