是否有一种方法可以在JavaScript中返回两个数组之间的差异?
例如:
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
// need ["c", "d"]
是否有一种方法可以在JavaScript中返回两个数组之间的差异?
例如:
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
// need ["c", "d"]
当前回答
求两个没有重复项的数组的差值:
function difference(arr1, arr2){
let setA = new Set(arr1);
let differenceSet = new Set(arr2.filter(ele => !setA.has(ele)));
return [...differenceSet ];
}
1.difference([2,2,3,4],[2,3,3,4])将返回[]
2.difference([1,2,3],[4,5,6])将返回[4,5,6]
3.difference([1,2,3,4],[1,2])返回[]
4.difference([1,2],[1,2,3,4])将返回[3,4]
注意:上述解决方案要求始终将较大的数组作为第二个参数发送。要找到绝对差值,首先需要找到两者的较大数组,然后对它们进行处理。
求两个不存在重复项的数组的绝对差值:
function absDifference(arr1, arr2){
const {larger, smaller} = arr1.length > arr2.length ?
{larger: arr1, smaller: arr2} : {larger: arr2, smaller: arr1}
let setA = new Set(smaller);
let absDifferenceSet = new Set(larger.filter(ele => !setA.has(ele)));
return [...absDifferenceSet ];
}
1. absdifference((2, 2, 3, 4),[2、3、3、4])将返回[]
2. absdifference([1, 2, 3],[4、5、6])将返回(4、5、6)
3. absdifference([1、2、3、4],[1,2])将返回(3、4)
4. absdifference([1, 2],[1、2、3、4])将返回(3、4)
请注意这两个解决方案中的示例3
其他回答
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
return a.concat(b).filter(val => !(b.includes(val)));
//(or) return a.concat(b).filter(val => !(a.includes(val) && b.includes(val)));
}
下面是另一个可以返回差异的解决方案,就像git diff一样:(它已经用typescript编写,如果你不使用typescript版本,只需删除类型)
/**
* util function to calculate the difference between two arrays (pay attention to 'from' and 'to'),
* it would return the mutations from 'from' to 'to'
* @param { T[] } from
* @param { T[] } to
* @returns { { [x in string]: boolean } } it would return the stringified version of array element, true means added,
* false means removed
*/
export function arrDiff<T>(from: T[], to: T[]): { [x in string]: boolean } {
var diff: { [x in string]: boolean } = {};
var newItems: T[] = []
diff = from.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [JSON.stringify(e)]: true }), {})
for (var i = 0; i < to.length; i++) {
if (diff[JSON.stringify(to[i])]) {
delete diff[JSON.stringify(to[i])]
} else {
newItems.push(to[i])
}
}
return {
...Object.keys(diff).reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [e]: false }), {}),
...newItems.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [JSON.stringify(e)]: true }), {})
}
}
下面是一个用法示例:
arrDiff(['a', 'b', 'c'], ['a', 'd', 'c', 'f']) //{"b": false, "d": true, "f": true}
另一种解决问题的方法
function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
return arr1.concat(arr2).filter(function (val) {
if (!(arr1.includes(val) && arr2.includes(val)))
return val;
});
}
diffArray([1, 2, 3, 7], [3, 2, 1, 4, 5]); // return [7, 4, 5]
同样,你可以使用箭头函数语法:
const diffArray = (arr1, arr2) => arr1.concat(arr2)
.filter(val => !(arr1.includes(val) && arr2.includes(val)));
diffArray([1, 2, 3, 7], [3, 2, 1, 4, 5]); // return [7, 4, 5]
一个衬垫
const unique = (a) => [...new Set(a)]; const uniqueBy = (x,f)=>Object.values(x.reduce((a,b)=>((a[f(b)]=b),a),{})); const intersection = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => b.includes(v)); const diff = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => !b.includes(v)); const symDiff = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(diff(b, a)); const union = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(b); const a = unique([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5]); console.log(a); const b = [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]; console.log(intersection(a, b), diff(a, b), symDiff(a, b), union(a, b)); console.log(uniqueBy( [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 2, name: "xyz" }, { id: 1, name: "abc" }, ], (v) => v.id )); const intersectionBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => b.some((u) => f(v, u))); console.log(intersectionBy( [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 2, name: "xyz" }, ], [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 3, name: "pqr" }, ], (v, u) => v.id === u.id )); const diffBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => !b.some((u) => f(v, u))); console.log(diffBy( [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 2, name: "xyz" }, ], [ { id: 1, name: "abc" }, { id: 3, name: "pqr" }, ], (v, u) => v.id === u.id ));
打印稿
操场上的链接
const unique = <T>(array: T[]) => [...new Set(array)];
const intersection = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
array1.filter((v) => array2.includes(v));
const diff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
array1.filter((v) => !array2.includes(v));
const symDiff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
diff(array1, array2).concat(diff(array2, array1));
const union = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
diff(array1, array2).concat(array2);
const intersectionBy = <T>(
array1: T[],
array2: T[],
predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));
const diffBy = <T>(
array1: T[],
array2: T[],
predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => !array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));
const uniqueBy = <T>(
array: T[],
predicate: (v: T, i: number, a: T[]) => string
) =>
Object.values(
array.reduce((acc, value, index) => {
acc[predicate(value, index, array)] = value;
return acc;
}, {} as { [key: string]: T })
);
对我来说,把它作为部分函数处理比较容易。很惊讶没有看到函数式编程的解决方案,这是我在ES6中的:
const arrayDiff = (a, b) => {
return diff(b)(a);
}
const contains = (needle) => (array) => {
for (let i=0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] == needle) return true;
}
return false;
}
const diff = (compare) => {
return (array) => array.filter((elem) => !contains(elem)(compare))
}