我有一个包含15个数字的列表,我需要编写一些代码来生成这些数字的所有32,768种组合。
我已经找到了一些代码(通过谷歌搜索),显然做了我正在寻找的,但我发现代码相当不透明,并谨慎使用它。而且我觉得肯定有更优雅的解决方案。
我唯一想到的就是循环十进制整数1-32768并将其转换为二进制,并使用二进制表示作为筛选器来挑选适当的数字。
有人知道更好的办法吗?使用map(),也许?
我有一个包含15个数字的列表,我需要编写一些代码来生成这些数字的所有32,768种组合。
我已经找到了一些代码(通过谷歌搜索),显然做了我正在寻找的,但我发现代码相当不透明,并谨慎使用它。而且我觉得肯定有更优雅的解决方案。
我唯一想到的就是循环十进制整数1-32768并将其转换为二进制,并使用二进制表示作为筛选器来挑选适当的数字。
有人知道更好的办法吗?使用map(),也许?
看看itertools.combination:
itertools.combinations (iterable, r) 返回元素的r长度子序列 输入迭代对象。 组合是按字典排序顺序发出的。那么,如果 Input iterable已排序,则 组合元组将在 排序顺序。
从2.6开始,电池包括在内!
这个答案漏掉了一个方面:OP要求所有的组合……不仅仅是长度为r的组合。
所以你要么要遍历所有长度为L的循环:
import itertools
stuff = [1, 2, 3]
for L in range(len(stuff) + 1):
for subset in itertools.combinations(stuff, L):
print(subset)
或者——如果你想变得时髦(或者让那些在你之后阅读你的代码的人动脑筋)——你可以生成“组合()”生成器链,并遍历它:
from itertools import chain, combinations
def all_subsets(ss):
return chain(*map(lambda x: combinations(ss, x), range(0, len(ss)+1)))
for subset in all_subsets(stuff):
print(subset)
下面是一个惰性一行代码,同样使用itertools:
from itertools import compress, product
def combinations(items):
return ( set(compress(items,mask)) for mask in product(*[[0,1]]*len(items)) )
# alternative: ...in product([0,1], repeat=len(items)) )
这个答案背后的主要思想是:有2^N种组合——与长度为N的二进制字符串的数量相同。对于每个二进制字符串,您选择与“1”对应的所有元素。
items=abc * mask=###
|
V
000 ->
001 -> c
010 -> b
011 -> bc
100 -> a
101 -> a c
110 -> ab
111 -> abc
需要考虑的事情:
This requires that you can call len(...) on items (workaround: if items is something like an iterable like a generator, turn it into a list first with items=list(_itemsArg)) This requires that the order of iteration on items is not random (workaround: don't be insane) This requires that the items are unique, or else {2,2,1} and {2,1,1} will both collapse to {2,1} (workaround: use collections.Counter as a drop-in replacement for set; it's basically a multiset... though you may need to later use tuple(sorted(Counter(...).elements())) if you need it to be hashable)
Demo
>>> list(combinations(range(4)))
[set(), {3}, {2}, {2, 3}, {1}, {1, 3}, {1, 2}, {1, 2, 3}, {0}, {0, 3}, {0, 2}, {0, 2, 3}, {0, 1}, {0, 1, 3}, {0, 1, 2}, {0, 1, 2, 3}]
>>> list(combinations('abcd'))
[set(), {'d'}, {'c'}, {'c', 'd'}, {'b'}, {'b', 'd'}, {'c', 'b'}, {'c', 'b', 'd'}, {'a'}, {'a', 'd'}, {'a', 'c'}, {'a', 'c', 'd'}, {'a', 'b'}, {'a', 'b', 'd'}, {'a', 'c', 'b'}, {'a', 'c', 'b', 'd'}]
使用列表推导式:
def selfCombine( list2Combine, length ):
listCombined = str( ['list2Combine[i' + str( i ) + ']' for i in range( length )] ).replace( "'", '' ) \
+ 'for i0 in range(len( list2Combine ) )'
if length > 1:
listCombined += str( [' for i' + str( i ) + ' in range( i' + str( i - 1 ) + ', len( list2Combine ) )' for i in range( 1, length )] )\
.replace( "', '", ' ' )\
.replace( "['", '' )\
.replace( "']", '' )
listCombined = '[' + listCombined + ']'
listCombined = eval( listCombined )
return listCombined
list2Combine = ['A', 'B', 'C']
listCombined = selfCombine( list2Combine, 2 )
输出将是:
['A', 'A']
['A', 'B']
['A', 'C']
['B', 'B']
['B', 'C']
['C', 'C']
我同意Dan H的观点,Ben确实要求所有的组合。itertools.combination()不会给出所有的组合。
另一个问题是,如果输入iterable很大,返回一个生成器而不是列表中的所有内容可能会更好:
iterable = range(10)
for s in xrange(len(iterable)+1):
for comb in itertools.combinations(iterable, s):
yield comb
下面是一个使用递归的例子:
>>> import copy
>>> def combinations(target,data):
... for i in range(len(data)):
... new_target = copy.copy(target)
... new_data = copy.copy(data)
... new_target.append(data[i])
... new_data = data[i+1:]
... print new_target
... combinations(new_target,
... new_data)
...
...
>>> target = []
>>> data = ['a','b','c','d']
>>>
>>> combinations(target,data)
['a']
['a', 'b']
['a', 'b', 'c']
['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
['a', 'b', 'd']
['a', 'c']
['a', 'c', 'd']
['a', 'd']
['b']
['b', 'c']
['b', 'c', 'd']
['b', 'd']
['c']
['c', 'd']
['d']
这一行代码给出了所有的组合(如果原始列表/set包含n个不同的元素,则在0到n个元素之间),并使用本机方法itertools.combination:
Python 2
from itertools import combinations
input = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
output = sum([map(list, combinations(input, i)) for i in range(len(input) + 1)], [])
Python 3
from itertools import combinations
input = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
output = sum([list(map(list, combinations(input, i))) for i in range(len(input) + 1)], [])
输出将是:
[[],
['a'],
['b'],
['c'],
['d'],
['a', 'b'],
['a', 'c'],
['a', 'd'],
['b', 'c'],
['b', 'd'],
['c', 'd'],
['a', 'b', 'c'],
['a', 'b', 'd'],
['a', 'c', 'd'],
['b', 'c', 'd'],
['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']]
在网上试试吧:
http://ideone.com/COghfX
你可以使用以下简单的代码在Python中生成列表的所有组合:
import itertools
a = [1,2,3,4]
for i in xrange(0,len(a)+1):
print list(itertools.combinations(a,i))
结果将是:
[()]
[(1,), (2,), (3,), (4,)]
[(1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (2, 3), (2, 4), (3, 4)]
[(1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)]
[(1, 2, 3, 4)]
这段代码采用了一个简单的嵌套列表算法…
# FUNCTION getCombos: To generate all combos of an input list, consider the following sets of nested lists...
#
# [ [ [] ] ]
# [ [ [] ], [ [A] ] ]
# [ [ [] ], [ [A],[B] ], [ [A,B] ] ]
# [ [ [] ], [ [A],[B],[C] ], [ [A,B],[A,C],[B,C] ], [ [A,B,C] ] ]
# [ [ [] ], [ [A],[B],[C],[D] ], [ [A,B],[A,C],[B,C],[A,D],[B,D],[C,D] ], [ [A,B,C],[A,B,D],[A,C,D],[B,C,D] ], [ [A,B,C,D] ] ]
#
# There is a set of lists for each number of items that will occur in a combo (including an empty set).
# For each additional item, begin at the back of the list by adding an empty list, then taking the set of
# lists in the previous column (e.g., in the last list, for sets of 3 items you take the existing set of
# 3-item lists and append to it additional lists created by appending the item (4) to the lists in the
# next smallest item count set. In this case, for the three sets of 2-items in the previous list. Repeat
# for each set of lists back to the initial list containing just the empty list.
#
def getCombos(listIn = ['A','B','C','D','E','F'] ):
listCombos = [ [ [] ] ] # list of lists of combos, seeded with a list containing only the empty list
listSimple = [] # list to contain the final returned list of items (e.g., characters)
for item in listIn:
listCombos.append([]) # append an emtpy list to the end for each new item added
for index in xrange(len(listCombos)-1, 0, -1): # set the index range to work through the list
for listPrev in listCombos[index-1]: # retrieve the lists from the previous column
listCur = listPrev[:] # create a new temporary list object to update
listCur.append(item) # add the item to the previous list to make it current
listCombos[index].append(listCur) # list length and append it to the current list
itemCombo = '' # Create a str to concatenate list items into a str
for item in listCur: # concatenate the members of the lists to create
itemCombo += item # create a string of items
listSimple.append(itemCombo) # add to the final output list
return [listSimple, listCombos]
# END getCombos()
下面是一个“标准递归答案”,类似于其他类似的答案https://stackoverflow.com/a/23743696/711085。(实际上,我们不必担心耗尽堆栈空间,因为我们没有办法处理所有N!排列)。
它依次访问每个元素,要么取它,要么离开它(从这个算法中我们可以直接看到2^N的基数)。
def combs(xs, i=0):
if i==len(xs):
yield ()
return
for c in combs(xs,i+1):
yield c
yield c+(xs[i],)
演示:
>>> list( combs(range(5)) )
[(), (0,), (1,), (1, 0), (2,), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 1, 0), (3,), (3, 0), (3, 1), (3, 1, 0), (3, 2), (3, 2, 0), (3, 2, 1), (3, 2, 1, 0), (4,), (4, 0), (4, 1), (4, 1, 0), (4, 2), (4, 2, 0), (4, 2, 1), (4, 2, 1, 0), (4, 3), (4, 3, 0), (4, 3, 1), (4, 3, 1, 0), (4, 3, 2), (4, 3, 2, 0), (4, 3, 2, 1), (4, 3, 2, 1, 0)]
>>> list(sorted( combs(range(5)), key=len))
[(),
(0,), (1,), (2,), (3,), (4,),
(1, 0), (2, 0), (2, 1), (3, 0), (3, 1), (3, 2), (4, 0), (4, 1), (4, 2), (4, 3),
(2, 1, 0), (3, 1, 0), (3, 2, 0), (3, 2, 1), (4, 1, 0), (4, 2, 0), (4, 2, 1), (4, 3, 0), (4, 3, 1), (4, 3, 2),
(3, 2, 1, 0), (4, 2, 1, 0), (4, 3, 1, 0), (4, 3, 2, 0), (4, 3, 2, 1),
(4, 3, 2, 1, 0)]
>>> len(set(combs(range(5))))
32
这里是另一个解决方案(一行程序),涉及到使用itertools.combination函数,但这里我们使用了双链表理解式(而不是for循环或sum):
def combs(x):
return [c for i in range(len(x)+1) for c in combinations(x,i)]
演示:
>>> combs([1,2,3,4])
[(),
(1,), (2,), (3,), (4,),
(1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (2, 3), (2, 4), (3, 4),
(1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4),
(1, 2, 3, 4)]
如文档中所述
def combinations(iterable, r):
# combinations('ABCD', 2) --> AB AC AD BC BD CD
# combinations(range(4), 3) --> 012 013 023 123
pool = tuple(iterable)
n = len(pool)
if r > n:
return
indices = list(range(r))
yield tuple(pool[i] for i in indices)
while True:
for i in reversed(range(r)):
if indices[i] != i + n - r:
break
else:
return
indices[i] += 1
for j in range(i+1, r):
indices[j] = indices[j-1] + 1
yield tuple(pool[i] for i in indices)
x = [2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6, 4, 7, 8, 3, 9]
for i in combinations(x, 2):
print i
In comments under the highly upvoted answer by @Dan H, mention is made of the powerset() recipe in the itertools documentation—including one by Dan himself. However, so far no one has posted it as an answer. Since it's probably one of the better if not the best approach to the problem—and given a little encouragement from another commenter, it's shown below. The function produces all unique combinations of the list elements of every length possible (including those containing zero and all the elements).
注意:如果略有不同,目标是只获得唯一元素的组合,将s = list(iterable)一行更改为s = list(set(iterable))以消除任何重复的元素。无论如何,iterable最终被转换为列表这一事实意味着它将与生成器一起工作(与其他几个答案不同)。
from itertools import chain, combinations
def powerset(iterable):
"powerset([1,2,3]) --> () (1,) (2,) (3,) (1,2) (1,3) (2,3) (1,2,3)"
s = list(iterable) # allows duplicate elements
return chain.from_iterable(combinations(s, r) for r in range(len(s)+1))
stuff = [1, 2, 3]
for i, combo in enumerate(powerset(stuff), 1):
print('combo #{}: {}'.format(i, combo))
输出:
combo #1: ()
combo #2: (1,)
combo #3: (2,)
combo #4: (3,)
combo #5: (1, 2)
combo #6: (1, 3)
combo #7: (2, 3)
combo #8: (1, 2, 3)
我想我应该为那些寻求答案的人添加这个函数,而不需要导入itertools或任何其他额外的库。
def powerSet(items):
"""
Power set generator: get all possible combinations of a list’s elements
Input:
items is a list
Output:
returns 2**n combination lists one at a time using a generator
Reference: edx.org 6.00.2x Lecture 2 - Decision Trees and dynamic programming
"""
N = len(items)
# enumerate the 2**N possible combinations
for i in range(2**N):
combo = []
for j in range(N):
# test bit jth of integer i
if (i >> j) % 2 == 1:
combo.append(items[j])
yield combo
简单Yield Generator用法:
for i in powerSet([1,2,3,4]):
print (i, ", ", end="")
以上用法示例的输出:
[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [3], [1, 3], [2, 3], [1, 2, 3], [4]. [1, 4], [2, 4], [1, 2, 4], [3, 4], [1, 3, 4], [2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 3, 4],
这是我的实现
def get_combinations(list_of_things):
"""gets every combination of things in a list returned as a list of lists
Should be read : add all combinations of a certain size to the end of a list for every possible size in the
the list_of_things.
"""
list_of_combinations = [list(combinations_of_a_certain_size)
for possible_size_of_combinations in range(1, len(list_of_things))
for combinations_of_a_certain_size in itertools.combinations(list_of_things,
possible_size_of_combinations)]
return list_of_combinations
我知道使用itertools来获得所有的组合要实际得多,但是如果你碰巧想要,假设你想要编写很多代码,你可以只使用列表理解来部分实现这一点
对于两对组合:
lambda l: [(a, b) for i, a in enumerate(l) for b in l[i+1:]]
而且,对于三对组合,它是这样简单的:
lambda l: [(a, b, c) for i, a in enumerate(l) for ii, b in enumerate(l[i+1:]) for c in l[i+ii+2:]]
结果和使用itertools.combination是一样的:
import itertools
combs_3 = lambda l: [
(a, b, c) for i, a in enumerate(l)
for ii, b in enumerate(l[i+1:])
for c in l[i+ii+2:]
]
data = ((1, 2), 5, "a", None)
print("A:", list(itertools.combinations(data, 3)))
print("B:", combs_3(data))
# A: [((1, 2), 5, 'a'), ((1, 2), 5, None), ((1, 2), 'a', None), (5, 'a', None)]
# B: [((1, 2), 5, 'a'), ((1, 2), 5, None), ((1, 2), 'a', None), (5, 'a', None)]
不使用itertools:
def combine(inp):
return combine_helper(inp, [], [])
def combine_helper(inp, temp, ans):
for i in range(len(inp)):
current = inp[i]
remaining = inp[i + 1:]
temp.append(current)
ans.append(tuple(temp))
combine_helper(remaining, temp, ans)
temp.pop()
return ans
print(combine(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']))
下面是itertools.combination的两个实现
返回一个列表的函数
def combinations(lst, depth, start=0, items=[]):
if depth <= 0:
return [items]
out = []
for i in range(start, len(lst)):
out += combinations(lst, depth - 1, i + 1, items + [lst[i]])
return out
一个返回一个生成器
def combinations(lst, depth, start=0, prepend=[]):
if depth <= 0:
yield prepend
else:
for i in range(start, len(lst)):
for c in combinations(lst, depth - 1, i + 1, prepend + [lst[i]]):
yield c
请注意,建议为它们提供一个helper函数,因为prepend参数是静态的,不会随着每次调用而改变
print([c for c in combinations([1, 2, 3, 4], 3)])
# [[1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 4], [1, 3, 4], [2, 3, 4]]
# get a hold of prepend
prepend = [c for c in combinations([], -1)][0]
prepend.append(None)
print([c for c in combinations([1, 2, 3, 4], 3)])
# [[None, 1, 2, 3], [None, 1, 2, 4], [None, 1, 3, 4], [None, 2, 3, 4]]
这是一个很肤浅的例子,但小心为妙
如果有人正在寻找一个反向列表,就像我一样:
stuff = [1, 2, 3, 4]
def reverse(bla, y):
for subset in itertools.combinations(bla, len(bla)-y):
print list(subset)
if y != len(bla):
y += 1
reverse(bla, y)
reverse(stuff, 1)
这个怎么样?使用字符串而不是列表,但同样的事情..string可以像Python中的列表一样处理:
def comb(s, res):
if not s: return
res.add(s)
for i in range(0, len(s)):
t = s[0:i] + s[i + 1:]
comb(t, res)
res = set()
comb('game', res)
print(res)
来自itertools的组合
import itertools
col_names = ["aa","bb", "cc", "dd"]
all_combinations = itertools.chain(*[itertools.combinations(col_names,i+1) for i,_ in enumerate(col_names)])
print(list(all_combinations))
在Python 3中没有itertools,你可以这样做:
def combinations(arr, carry):
for i in range(len(arr)):
yield carry + arr[i]
yield from combinations(arr[i + 1:], carry + arr[i])
其中最初的carry = ""。
这种方法可以很容易地移植到所有支持递归的编程语言中(没有itertools,没有yield,没有列表理解):
def combs(a):
if len(a) == 0:
return [[]]
cs = []
for c in combs(a[1:]):
cs += [c, c+[a[0]]]
return cs
>>> combs([1,2,3,4,5])
[[], [1], [2], [2, 1], [3], [3, 1], [3, 2], ..., [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]]
flag = 0
requiredCals =12
from itertools import chain, combinations
def powerset(iterable):
s = list(iterable) # allows duplicate elements
return chain.from_iterable(combinations(s, r) for r in range(len(s)+1))
stuff = [2,9,5,1,6]
for i, combo in enumerate(powerset(stuff), 1):
if(len(combo)>0):
#print(combo , sum(combo))
if(sum(combo)== requiredCals):
flag = 1
break
if(flag==1):
print('True')
else:
print('else')
from itertools import combinations
features = ['A', 'B', 'C']
tmp = []
for i in range(len(features)):
oc = combinations(features, i + 1)
for c in oc:
tmp.append(list(c))
输出
[
['A'],
['B'],
['C'],
['A', 'B'],
['A', 'C'],
['B', 'C'],
['A', 'B', 'C']
]
3个功能:
列出n个元素的所有组合 列出n个元素的所有组合,其中顺序不明确 所有的排列
import sys
def permutations(a):
return combinations(a, len(a))
def combinations(a, n):
if n == 1:
for x in a:
yield [x]
else:
for i in range(len(a)):
for x in combinations(a[:i] + a[i+1:], n-1):
yield [a[i]] + x
def combinationsNoOrder(a, n):
if n == 1:
for x in a:
yield [x]
else:
for i in range(len(a)):
for x in combinationsNoOrder(a[:i], n-1):
yield [a[i]] + x
if __name__ == "__main__":
for s in combinations(list(map(int, sys.argv[2:])), int(sys.argv[1])):
print(s)
还可以使用more_itertools包中的powerset函数。
from more_itertools import powerset
l = [1,2,3]
list(powerset(l))
# [(), (1,), (2,), (3,), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 3), (1, 2, 3)]
我们也可以验证,它满足OP的要求
from more_itertools import ilen
assert ilen(powerset(range(15))) == 32_768
我来晚了,但我想分享我找到的解决这个问题的方法: 具体来说,我想要做顺序组合,所以对于“STAR”,我想要“STAR”,“TA”,“AR”,但不是“SR”。
lst = [S, T, A, R]
lstCombos = []
for Length in range(0,len(lst)+1):
for i in lst:
lstCombos.append(lst[lst.index(i):lst.index(i)+Length])
可以通过在最后一行之前添加额外的if来过滤重复:
lst = [S, T, A, R]
lstCombos = []
for Length in range(0,len(lst)+1):
for i in lst:
if not lst[lst.index(i):lst.index(i)+Length]) in lstCombos:
lstCombos.append(lst[lst.index(i):lst.index(i)+Length])
如果由于某种原因,这将在输出中返回空白列表,这发生在我身上,我添加:
for subList in lstCombos:
if subList = '':
lstCombos.remove(subList)
如果你不想使用组合库,这里是解决方案:
nums = [1,2,3]
p = [[]]
fnl = [[],nums]
for i in range(len(nums)):
for j in range(i+1,len(nums)):
p[-1].append([i,j])
for i in range(len(nums)-3):
p.append([])
for m in p[-2]:
p[-1].append(m+[m[-1]+1])
for i in p:
for j in i:
n = []
for m in j:
if m < len(nums):
n.append(nums[m])
if n not in fnl:
fnl.append(n)
for i in nums:
if [i] not in fnl:
fnl.append([i])
print(fnl)
输出:
[[], [1, 2, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [1], [2], [3]]
我在这个话题上有点晚了,但我想我可以帮助别人。
你可以使用itertools中的product:
from itertools import product
n = [1, 2, 3]
result = product(n, repeat=3) # You can change the repeat more then n length
print(list(result))
输出:
[(1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 2), (1, 1, 3), (1, 2, 1), (1, 2, 2), (1, 2, 3), (1, 3, 1),
(1, 3, 2), (1, 3, 3), (2, 1, 1), (2, 1, 2), (2, 1, 3), (2, 2, 1), (2, 2, 2),
(2, 2, 3), (2, 3, 1), (2, 3, 2), (2, 3, 3), (3, 1, 1), (3, 1, 2), (3, 1, 3),
(3, 2, 1), (3, 2, 2), (3, 2, 3), (3, 3, 1), (3, 3, 2), (3, 3, 3)]
另一个例子,但是改变了repeat参数:
from itertools import product
n = [1, 2, 3]
result = product(n, repeat=4) # Changing repeat to 4
print(list(result))
输出:
(1, 1, 2, 3), (1, 1, 3, 1), (1, 1, 3, 2), (1, 1, 3, 3), (1, 2, 1, 1),
(1, 2, 1, 2), (1, 2, 1, 3), (1, 2, 2, 1), (1, 2, 2, 2), (1, 2, 2, 3),
(1, 2, 3, 1), (1, 2, 3, 2), (1, 2, 3, 3), (1, 3, 1, 1), (1, 3, 1, 2),
(1, 3, 1, 3), (1, 3, 2, 1), (1, 3, 2, 2), (1, 3, 2, 3), (1, 3, 3, 1),
(1, 3, 3, 2), (1, 3, 3, 3), (2, 1, 1, 1), (2, 1, 1, 2), (2, 1, 1, 3),
(2, 1, 2, 1), (2, 1, 2, 2), (2, 1, 2, 3), (2, 1, 3, 1), (2, 1, 3, 2),
(2, 1, 3, 3), (2, 2, 1, 1), (2, 2, 1, 2), (2, 2, 1, 3), (2, 2, 2, 1),
(2, 2, 2, 2), (2, 2, 2, 3), (2, 2, 3, 1), (2, 2, 3, 2), (2, 2, 3, 3),
(2, 3, 1, 1), (2, 3, 1, 2), (2, 3, 1, 3), (2, 3, 2, 1), (2, 3, 2, 2),
(2, 3, 2, 3), (2, 3, 3, 1), (2, 3, 3, 2), (2, 3, 3, 3), (3, 1, 1, 1),
(3, 1, 1, 2), (3, 1, 1, 3), (3, 1, 2, 1), (3, 1, 2, 2), (3, 1, 2, 3),
(3, 1, 3, 1), (3, 1, 3, 2), (3, 1, 3, 3), (3, 2, 1, 1), (3, 2, 1, 2),
(3, 2, 1, 3), (3, 2, 2, 1), (3, 2, 2, 2), (3, 2, 2, 3), (3, 2, 3, 1),
(3, 2, 3, 2), (3, 2, 3, 3), (3, 3, 1, 1), (3, 3, 1, 2), (3, 3, 1, 3),
(3, 3, 2, 1), (3, 3, 2, 2), (3, 3, 2, 3), (3, 3, 3, 1), (3, 3, 3, 2),
(3, 3, 3, 3)]```
正如James Brady提到的,你的itertools.combination是一个键。但这并不是一个完整的解决方案。
解决方案1
import itertools
def all(lst):
# ci is a bitmask which denotes particular combination,
# see explanation below
for ci in range(1, 2**len(lst)):
yield tuple(itertools.compress(
lst,
[ci & (1<<k) for k in range(0, len(lst))]
))
解决方案2
import itertools
def all_combs(lst):
for r in range(1, len(lst)+1):
for comb in itertools.combinations(lst, r):
yield comb
例子
>>> list(all_combs([1,2,3]))
[(1,), (2,), (3,), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 3), (1, 2, 3)]
>>> len(list(all_combs([1,2,3])))
7
>>> len(list(all_combs(range(0, 15))))
32767
>>> list(all([1,2,3]))
[(1,), (2,), (1, 2), (3,), (1, 3), (2, 3), (1, 2, 3)]
>>> len(list(all(range(15))))
32767
解释
假设数组A的长度为N,让长度为N的位掩码B表示一个特定的组合C。如果B[i]是1,那么A[i]属于组合C。
方案1说明
所以我们可以遍历所有的位掩码并用这个位掩码过滤源数组A,这可以通过itertools。compress来完成。
方案2说明
...或者,我们可以用组合来表示
现在我们需要考虑这样的情况,当B中只有一个1,然后只有两个1,等等。每种情况都属于特定的组合。 因此,一旦我们组合所有的组合集,我们将得到所有的子序列。
同样,很明显,在这种情况下,所有可能的组合的数量是2^N - 1。当所有B[i]都为零时,我们省略大小写,因为我们假设空集不是一个组合。否则,就不要减去1。
我喜欢这个问题,因为有很多方法来实现它。我决定为未来创造一个参考答案。
在生产中使用什么?
intertools的文档有一个独立的例子,为什么不在你的代码中使用它呢?一些人建议使用more_itertools。Powerset,但它具有完全相同的实现!如果我是你,我不会为一个小东西安装整个软件包。也许这是最好的方法:
import itertools
def powerset(iterable):
"powerset([1,2,3]) --> () (1,) (2,) (3,) (1,2) (1,3) (2,3) (1,2,3)"
s = list(iterable)
return itertools.chain.from_iterable(combinations(s, r) for r in range(len(s)+1))
其他可能的方法
方法0:使用组合
import itertools
def subsets(nums):
result = []
for i in range(len(nums) + 1):
result += itertools.combinations(nums, i)
return result
方法1:简单的递归
def subsets(nums):
result = []
def powerset(alist, index, curr):
if index == len(alist):
result.append(curr)
return
powerset(alist, index + 1, curr + [alist[index]])
powerset(alist, index + 1, curr)
powerset(nums, 0, [])
return result
方法2:回溯
def subsets(nums):
result = []
def backtrack(index, curr, k):
if len(curr) == k:
result.append(list(curr))
return
for i in range(index, len(nums)):
curr.append(nums[i])
backtrack(i + 1, curr, k)
curr.pop()
for k in range(len(nums) + 1):
backtrack(0, [], k)
return result
or
def subsets(nums):
result = []
def dfs(nums, index, path, result):
result.append(path)
for i in range(index, len(nums)):
dfs(nums, i + 1, path + [nums[i]], result)
dfs(nums, 0, [], result)
return result
方法3:位掩码
def subsets(nums):
res = []
n = len(nums)
for i in range(1 << n):
aset = []
for j in range(n):
value = (1 << j) & i # value = (i >> j) & 1
if value:
aset.append(nums[j])
res.append(aset)
return res
或者(不是位掩码,直觉上是2^n个子集)
def subsets(nums):
subsets = []
expected_subsets = 2 ** len(nums)
def generate_subset(subset, nums):
if len(subsets) >= expected_subsets:
return
if len(subsets) < expected_subsets:
subsets.append(subset)
for i in range(len(nums)):
generate_subset(subset + [nums[i]], nums[i + 1:])
generate_subset([], nums)
return subsets
方法4:级联
def subsets(nums):
result = [[]]
for i in range(len(nums)):
for j in range(len(result)):
subset = list(result[j])
subset.append(nums[i])
result.append(subset)
return result