验证字符串是否是有效的电子邮件地址的最优雅的代码是什么?
Personally, I would say that you should just make sure there is an @ symbol in there, with possibly a . character. There's many regexes you could use of varying correctness, but I think most of these leave out valid email addresses, or let invalid ones through. If people want to put in a fake email address, they will put in a fake one. If you need to verify that the email address is legit, and that the person is in control of that email address, then you will need to send them an email with a special coded link so they can verify that it indeed is a real address.
电子邮件地址验证并不像看起来那么简单。实际上，从理论上讲，仅使用正则表达式完全验证电子邮件地址是不可能的。
请查看我的博客文章，了解关于这个主题的讨论以及使用FParsec的f#实现。[/ shameless_plug]
老实说，在产品代码中，我所做的最好的事情就是检查@符号。
我从来没有在一个地方完全验证电子邮件。你知道我怎么判断它是否有效吗?如果发送出去了。如果没有，那就糟了，如果有，生活就好了。这就是我需要知道的。
我发现这个正则表达式在检查@标记以外的东西和接受奇怪的边缘情况之间是一个很好的权衡:
^[^@\s]+@[^@\s]+(\.[^@\s]+)+$
它至少会让你在@标记周围放一些东西，并且至少放一个正常的域。
如果你真的，我是说真的想知道一个电子邮件地址是否有效……请邮件交换器来证明它，不需要正则表达式。如果需要，我可以提供代码。
一般步骤如下: 1. 电子邮件地址有域名部分吗?(@ > 0的索引) 2. 使用DNS查询询问域是否有邮件交换器 3.打开到邮件交换器的TCP连接 4. 使用SMTP协议，以电子邮件地址作为接收者打开到服务器的消息 5. 解析服务器的响应。 6. 如果你能走到这一步，就别发短信了，一切都好。
正如您可以想象的那样，这是非常昂贵的时间，并且依赖于smtp，但它确实有效。
一般来说，使用正则表达式来验证电子邮件地址并不是一件容易的事情;在撰写本文时，电子邮件地址的语法必须遵循相对较多的标准，在正则表达式中实现所有这些标准实际上是不可行的!
我强烈建议你试试我们的EmailVerify。NET是一个成熟的。NET库，它可以根据当前所有的IETF标准(RFC 1123, RFC 2821, RFC 2822, RFC 3696, RFC 4291, RFC 5321和RFC 5322)验证电子邮件地址，测试相关的DNS记录，检查目标邮箱是否可以接受消息，甚至可以判断给定的地址是否是一次性的。
免责声明:我是这个组件的主要开发人员。
我从第1条中得到Phil的答案，并创建了这个类。 这样调用它:bool isValid = Validator.EmailIsValid(emailString);
下面是这个类:
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
public static class Validator
{
static Regex ValidEmailRegex = CreateValidEmailRegex();
/// <summary>
/// Taken from http://haacked.com/archive/2007/08/21/i-knew-how-to-validate-an-email-address-until-i.aspx
/// </summary>
/// <returns></returns>
private static Regex CreateValidEmailRegex()
{
string validEmailPattern = @"^(?!\.)(""([^""\r\\]|\\[""\r\\])*""|"
+ @"([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?<!\.)\.)*)(?<!\.)"
+ @"@[a-z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$";
return new Regex(validEmailPattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
}
internal static bool EmailIsValid(string emailAddress)
{
bool isValid = ValidEmailRegex.IsMatch(emailAddress);
return isValid;
}
}
这是一个老问题，但我在SO上找到的所有答案，包括最近的答案，都与这个问题类似。然而，在。net 4.5 / MVC 4中，你可以通过从System.ComponentModel中添加[EmailAddress]注释来向表单添加电子邮件地址验证。DataAnnotations，所以我想知道为什么我不能只使用。net的内置功能。
这似乎是可行的，而且在我看来是相当优雅的:
using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;
class ValidateSomeEmails
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var email = new EmailAddressAttribute();
email.IsValid("someone@somewhere.com"); //true
email.IsValid("someone@somewhere.co.uk"); //true
email.IsValid("someone+tag@somewhere.net"); //true
email.IsValid("futureTLD@somewhere.fooo"); //true
email.IsValid("fdsa"); //false
email.IsValid("fdsa@"); //false
email.IsValid("fdsa@fdsa"); //false
email.IsValid("fdsa@fdsa."); //false
//one-liner
if (new EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid("someone@somewhere.com"))
return true;
}
}
我认为最好的方法如下:
public static bool EmailIsValid(string email)
{
string expression = "\\w+([-+.']\\w+)*@\\w+([-.]\\w+)*\\.\\w+([-.]\\w+)*";
if (Regex.IsMatch(email, expression))
{
if (Regex.Replace(email, expression, string.Empty).Length == 0)
{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
你可以在一个通用类中使用这个静态函数。
public static bool IsEmail(string strEmail)
{
Regex rgxEmail = new Regex(@"^([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}" +
@"\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\" +
@".)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)$");
return rgxEmail.IsMatch(strEmail);
}
.net 4.5增加了System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.EmailAddressAttribute
你可以浏览EmailAddressAttribute的源代码，这是它内部使用的正则表达式:
const string pattern = @"^((([a-z]|\d|[!#\$%&'\*\+\-\/=\?\^_`{\|}~]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])+(\.([a-z]|\d|[!#\$%&'\*\+\-\/=\?\^_`{\|}~]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])+)*)|((\x22)((((\x20|\x09)*(\x0d\x0a))?(\x20|\x09)+)?(([\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x7f]|\x21|[\x23-\x5b]|[\x5d-\x7e]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])|(\\([\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0d-\x7f]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF]))))*(((\x20|\x09)*(\x0d\x0a))?(\x20|\x09)+)?(\x22)))@((([a-z]|\d|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])|(([a-z]|\d|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])([a-z]|\d|-|\.|_|~|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])*([a-z]|\d|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])))\.)+(([a-z]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])|(([a-z]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])([a-z]|\d|-|\.|_|~|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])*([a-z]|[\u00A0-\uD7FF\uF900-\uFDCF\uFDF0-\uFFEF])))\.?$";
这是我的答案——Phil的解决方案不适用于“someone@q.com”这样的单字母域名。信不信由你，这是used =)(例如，转到centurylink)。
菲尔的答案也只适用于PCRE标准…所以c#将会接受它，但javascript将会爆炸。这对于javascript来说太复杂了。所以你不能使用Phil的mvc验证属性的解决方案。
这是正则表达式。它将很好地与MVC验证属性一起工作。 @之前的所有内容都被简化了，这样至少javascript可以工作。我可以在这里放松验证，只要交换服务器不给我5.1.3。 @后面的都是Phil针对单字母域修改的解决方案。
public const string EmailPattern =
@"^\s*[\w\-\+_']+(\.[\w\-\+_']+)*\@[A-Za-z0-9]([\w\.-]*[A-Za-z0-9])?\.[A-Za-z][A-Za-z\.]*[A-Za-z]$";
对于那些建议使用system.net.mailmessage()的人来说，这个东西太灵活了。当然，c#将接受电子邮件，但交换服务器将爆炸5.1.3运行时错误一旦你试图发送电子邮件。
以前，我写了一个EmailAddressValidationAttribute，它应该正确地验证表单中几乎任何相对正常的电子邮件地址
local-part@domain
它是System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations。ValidationAttribute，所以使用非常简单。
而且，由于挖掘所有rfc和勘误表，并组装所需的所有位来正确枚举所有规则……太乏味了!-我在回答c#电子邮件地址验证源代码的问题时发布了验证器的源代码。
我的验证器无论怎么想象都不是完美的，只是对于初学者来说，它没有任何内置的对发出客户端javascript验证的支持，尽管将其添加进来并不太难。从我上面的回答来看:
Here's the validation attribute I wrote. It validates pretty much every "raw" email address, that is those of the form local-part@domain. It doesn't support any of the other, more...creative constructs that the RFCs allow (this list is not comprehensive by any means): comments (e.g., jsmith@whizbang.com (work)) quoted strings (escaped text, to allow characters not allowed in an atom) domain literals (e.g. foo@[123.45.67.012]) bang-paths (aka source routing) angle addresses (e.g. John Smith <jsmith@whizbang.com>) folding whitespace double-byte characters in either local-part or domain (7-bit ASCII only). etc. It should accept almost any email address that can be expressed thusly foo.bar@bazbat.com without requiring the use of quotes ("), angle brackets ('<>') or square brackets ([]). No attempt is made to validate that the rightmost dns label in the domain is a valid TLD (top-level domain). That is because the list of TLDs is far larger now than the "big 6" (.com, .edu, .gov, .mil, .net, .org) plus 2-letter ISO country codes. ICANN actually updates the TLD list daily, though I suspect that the list doesn't actually change daily. Further, [ICANN just approved a big expansion of the generic TLD namespace][2]). And some email addresses don't have what you'd recognize as a TLD (did you know that postmaster@. is theoretically valid and mailable? Mail to that address should get delivered to the postmaster of the DNS root zone.) Extending the regular expression to support domain literals shouldn't be too difficult.
private static bool IsValidEmail(string emailAddress)
{
const string validEmailPattern = @"^(?!\.)(""([^""\r\\]|\\[""\r\\])*""|"
+ @"([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?<!\.)\.)*)(?<!\.)"
+ @"@[a-z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$";
return new Regex(validEmailPattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase).IsMatch(emailAddress);
}
通过system . text . regulareexpressions检查电子邮件字符串的格式是否正确:
public static bool IsValidEmailId(string InputEmail)
{
Regex regex = new Regex(@"^([\w\.\-]+)@([\w\-]+)((\.(\w){2,3})+)$");
Match match = regex.Match(InputEmail);
if (match.Success)
return true;
else
return false;
}
protected void Email_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
String UserEmail = Email.Text;
if (IsValidEmailId(UserEmail))
{
Label4.Text = "This email is correct formate";
}
else
{
Label4.Text = "This email isn't correct formate";
}
}
/使用内部Regex在.Net4.5 >>>中创建“new EmailAddressAttribute();”组件，使用System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations; //验证邮箱地址......测试和工作。
public bool IsEmail(string email)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(email))
{ return false; }
try
{
Regex _regex = new Regex("^((([a-z]|\\d|[!#\\$%&'\\*\\+\\-\\/=\\?\\^_`{\\|}~]|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])" +
"+(\\.([a-z]|\\d|[!#\\$%&'\\*\\+\\-\\/=\\?\\^_`{\\|}~]|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])+)*)|((\\x22)" +
"((((\\x20|\\x09)*(\\x0d\\x0a))?(\\x20|\\x09)+)?(([\\x01-\\x08\\x0b\\x0c\\x0e-\\x1f\\x7f]|\\x21|[\\x23-\\x5b]|[\\x5d-\\x7e]|" +
"[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])|(\\\\([\\x01-\\x09\\x0b\\x0c\\x0d-\\x7f]|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\u" +
"FDF0-\\uFFEF]))))*(((\\x20|\\x09)*(\\x0d\\x0a))?(\\x20|\\x09)+)?(\\x22)))@((([a-z]|\\d|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])|" +
"(([a-z]|\\d|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])([a-z]|\\d|-|\\.|_|~|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])*([a-z]|\\d|" +
"[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])))\\.)+(([a-z]|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])|(([a-z]|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900" +
"-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])([a-z]|\\d|-|\\.|_|~|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFFEF])*([a-z]|[\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uF900-\\uFDCF\\uFDF0-\\uFF" +
"EF])))\\.?$", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.ExplicitCapture | RegexOptions.Compiled);
return _regex.IsMatch(email);
}
catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
{
return false;
}
}
你也可以用这个:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/01escwtf (v = vs.110) . aspx
/// <summary>
/// Validates the email if it follows the valid email format
/// </summary>
/// <param name="emailAddress"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static bool EmailIsValid(string emailAddress)
{
//if string is not null and empty then check for email follow the format
return string.IsNullOrEmpty(emailAddress)?false : new Regex(@"^(?!\.)(""([^""\r\\]|\\[""\r\\])*""|([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?<!\.)\.)*)(?<!\.)@[a-z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase).IsMatch(emailAddress);
}
public bool IsValidEmail(string email)
{
try
{
var addr = new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(email);
return addr.Address == email;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
我用的是单线法，它对我有用
using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;
public bool IsValidEmail(string source)
{
return new EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid(source);
}
根据注释，如果源(电子邮件地址)为空，这将“失败”。
public static bool IsValidEmailAddress(this string address) => address != null && new EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid(address);
我将Poyson 1的答案简化如下:
public static bool IsValidEmailAddress(string candidateEmailAddr)
{
string regexExpresion = "\\w+([-+.']\\w+)*@\\w+([-.]\\w+)*\\.\\w+([-.]\\w+)*";
return (Regex.IsMatch(candidateEmailAddr, regexExpresion)) &&
(Regex.Replace(candidateEmailAddr, regexExpresion, string.Empty).Length == 0);
}
我根据维基百科的规则和样本地址创建了一个电子邮件地址验证程序。对于那些不介意多看一点代码的人，这里。说实话，我不知道电子邮件地址规范中有这么多疯狂的规则。我没有完全验证主机名或ipaddress，但它仍然通过了维基百科上的所有测试用例。
using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
namespace EmailValidateUnitTests
{
[TestClass]
public class EmailValidationUnitTests
{
[TestMethod]
public void TestEmailValidate()
{
// Positive Assertions
Assert.IsTrue("prettyandsimple@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("very.common@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("other.email-with-dash@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("\"much.more unusual\"@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("\"very.unusual.@.unusual.com\"@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //"very.unusual.@.unusual.com"@example.com
Assert.IsTrue("\"very.(),:;<>[]\\\".VERY.\\\"very@\\\\ \\\"very\\\".unusual\"@strange.example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //"very.(),:;<>[]\".VERY.\"very@\\ \"very\".unusual"@strange.example.com
Assert.IsTrue("admin@mailserver1".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("#!$%&'*+-/=?^_`{}|~@example.org".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("\"()<>[]:,;@\\\\\\\"!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{}| ~.a\"@example.org".IsValidEmailAddress()); //"()<>[]:,;@\\\"!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{}| ~.a"@example.org
Assert.IsTrue("\" \"@example.org".IsValidEmailAddress()); //" "@example.org (space between the quotes)
Assert.IsTrue("example@localhost".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("example@s.solutions".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("user@com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("user@localserver".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("user@[IPv6:2001:db8::1]".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("user@[192.168.2.1]".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("(comment and stuff)joe@gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("joe(comment and stuff)@gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("joe@(comment and stuff)gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("joe@gmail.com(comment and stuff)".IsValidEmailAddress());
// Failure Assertions
Assert.IsFalse("joe(fail me)smith@gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("joesmith@gma(fail me)il.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("joe@gmail.com(comment and stuff".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("Abc.example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("A@b@c@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("a\"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[j\\k]l@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[j\k]l@example.com
Assert.IsFalse("just\"not\"right@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //just"not"right@example.com
Assert.IsFalse("this is\"not\\allowed@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //this is"not\allowed@example.com
Assert.IsFalse("this\\ still\\\"not\\\\allowed@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());//this\ still\"not\\allowed@example.com
Assert.IsFalse("john..doe@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("john.doe@example..com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse(" joe@gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("joe@gmail.com ".IsValidEmailAddress());
}
}
public static class ExtensionMethods
{
private const string ValidLocalPartChars = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{|}~";
private const string ValidQuotedLocalPartChars = "(),:;<>@[]. ";
private const string ValidDomainPartChars = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789-:";
private enum EmailParseMode
{
BeginLocal, Local, QuotedLocalEscape, QuotedLocal, QuotedLocalEnd, LocalSplit, LocalComment,
At,
Domain, DomainSplit, DomainComment, BracketedDomain, BracketedDomainEnd
};
public static bool IsValidEmailAddress(this string s)
{
bool valid = true;
bool hasLocal = false, hasDomain = false;
int commentStart = -1, commentEnd = -1;
var mode = EmailParseMode.BeginLocal;
for (int i = 0; i < s.Length; i++)
{
char c = s[i];
if (mode == EmailParseMode.BeginLocal || mode == EmailParseMode.LocalSplit)
{
if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.LocalComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else if (c == '"') { mode = EmailParseMode.QuotedLocal; }
else if (ValidLocalPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { mode = EmailParseMode.Local; hasLocal = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.LocalComment)
{
if (c == ')')
{
mode = EmailParseMode.Local; commentEnd = i;
// comments can only be at beginning and end of parts...
if (commentStart != 0 && ((commentEnd + 1) < s.Length) && s[commentEnd + 1] != '@') { valid = false; break; }
}
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.Local)
{
if (c == '.') mode = EmailParseMode.LocalSplit;
else if (c == '@') mode = EmailParseMode.At;
else if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.LocalComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else if (ValidLocalPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { hasLocal = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.QuotedLocal)
{
if (c == '"') { mode = EmailParseMode.QuotedLocalEnd; }
else if (c == '\\') { mode = EmailParseMode.QuotedLocalEscape; }
else if (ValidLocalPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0 || ValidQuotedLocalPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { hasLocal = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.QuotedLocalEscape)
{
if (c == '"' || c == '\\') { mode = EmailParseMode.QuotedLocal; hasLocal = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.QuotedLocalEnd)
{
if (c == '.') { mode = EmailParseMode.LocalSplit; }
else if (c == '@') mode = EmailParseMode.At;
else if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.LocalComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.At)
{
if (c == '[') { mode = EmailParseMode.BracketedDomain; }
else if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.DomainComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else if (ValidDomainPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { mode = EmailParseMode.Domain; hasDomain = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.DomainComment)
{
if (c == ')')
{
mode = EmailParseMode.Domain;
commentEnd = i;
// comments can only be at beginning and end of parts...
if ((commentEnd + 1) != s.Length && (commentStart > 0) && s[commentStart - 1] != '@') { valid = false; break; }
}
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.DomainSplit)
{
if (ValidDomainPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { mode = EmailParseMode.Domain; hasDomain = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.Domain)
{
if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.DomainComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else if (c == '.') { mode = EmailParseMode.DomainSplit; }
else if (ValidDomainPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { hasDomain = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.BracketedDomain)
{
if (c == ']') { mode = EmailParseMode.BracketedDomainEnd; }
else if (c == '.' || ValidDomainPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { hasDomain = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.BracketedDomain)
{
if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.DomainComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
}
bool unfinishedComment = (commentEnd == -1 && commentStart >= 0);
return hasLocal && hasDomain && valid && !unfinishedComment;
}
}
}
这可能是对文本框进行电子邮件验证的最佳方式。
string pattern = null;
pattern = "^([0-9a-zA-Z]([-\\.\\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z])*@([0-9a-zA-Z][-\\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]\\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,9})$";
if (Regex.IsMatch("txtemail.Text", pattern))
{
MessageBox.Show ("Valid Email address ");
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("Invalid Email Email");
}
只要在任何你想要的函数中包含。
最优雅的方法是使用. net的内置方法。
这些方法:
都是经过考验的。我在自己的专业项目中使用了这些方法。 内部使用正则表达式，这是可靠和快速的。 由微软为c#编写。没有必要做重复的工作。 返回bool类型的结果。True表示邮件有效。
适用于。net 4.5及以上版本的用户
将此引用添加到项目中:
System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations
现在你可以使用下面的代码:
(new EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid("youremailhere@test.test"));
使用实例
下面是一些需要声明的方法:
protected List<string> GetRecipients() // Gets recipients from TextBox named `TxtRecipients`
{
List<string> MethodResult = null;
try
{
List<string> Recipients = TxtRecipients.Text.Replace(",",";").Replace(" ", "").Split(';').ToList();
List<string> RecipientsCleaned = new List<string>();
foreach (string Recipient in RecipientsCleaned)
{
if (!String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(Recipient))
{
RecipientsNoBlanks.Add(Recipient);
}
}
MethodResult = RecipientsNoBlanks;
}
catch//(Exception ex)
{
//ex.HandleException();
}
return MethodResult;
}
public static bool IsValidEmailAddresses(List<string> recipients)
{
List<string> InvalidAddresses = GetInvalidEmailAddresses(recipients);
return InvalidAddresses != null && InvalidAddresses.Count == 0;
}
public static List<string> GetInvalidEmailAddresses(List<string> recipients)
{
List<string> MethodResult = null;
try
{
List<string> InvalidEmailAddresses = new List<string>();
foreach (string Recipient in recipients)
{
if (!(new EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid(Recipient)) && !InvalidEmailAddresses.Contains(Recipient))
{
InvalidEmailAddresses.Add(Recipient);
}
}
MethodResult = InvalidEmailAddresses;
}
catch//(Exception ex)
{
//ex.HandleException();
}
return MethodResult;
}
.．.以及演示它们的代码:
List<string> Recipients = GetRecipients();
bool IsValidEmailAddresses = IsValidEmailAddresses(Recipients);
if (IsValidEmailAddresses)
{
//Emails are valid. Your code here
}
else
{
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.Append("The following addresses are invalid:");
List<string> InvalidEmails = GetInvalidEmailAddresses(Recipients);
foreach (string InvalidEmail in InvalidEmails)
{
sb.Append("\n" + InvalidEmail);
}
MessageBox.Show(sb.ToString());
}
另外，这个例子:
扩展超出规范，因为一个字符串用于包含0，一个或多个由分号分隔的电子邮件地址; 清楚地演示了如何使用EmailAddressAttribute对象的IsValid方法。
对于.Net 4.5以下版本的用户，可以选择
对于.Net 4.5不可用的情况，我使用以下解决方案:
具体来说，我使用:
public static bool IsValidEmailAddress(string emailAddress)
{
bool MethodResult = false;
try
{
MailAddress m = new MailAddress(emailAddress);
MethodResult = m.Address == emailAddress;
}
catch //(Exception ex)
{
//ex.HandleException();
}
return MethodResult;
}
public static List<string> GetInvalidEmailAddresses(List<string> recipients)
{
List<string> MethodResult = null;
try
{
List<string> InvalidEmailAddresses = new List<string>();
foreach (string Recipient in recipients)
{
if (!IsValidEmail(Recipient) && !InvalidEmailAddresses.Contains(Recipient))
{
InvalidEmailAddresses.Add(Recipient);
}
}
MethodResult = InvalidEmailAddresses;
}
catch //(Exception ex)
{
//ex.HandleException();
}
return MethodResult;
}
这是你问题的答案，供你核对。
using System;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
public class RegexUtilities
{
public bool IsValidEmail(string strIn)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(strIn))
{
return false;
}
// Use IdnMapping class to convert Unicode domain names.
try
{
strIn = Regex.Replace(strIn, @"(@)(.+)$", this.DomainMapper, RegexOptions.None, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(200));
}
catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
{
return false;
}
if (invalid)
{
return false;
}
// Return true if strIn is in valid e-mail format.
try
{
return Regex.IsMatch(strIn, @"^(?("")("".+?(?<!\\)""@)|(([0-9a-z]((\.(?!\.))| [-!#\$%&'\*\+/=\?\^`\{\}\|~\w])*)(?<=[0-9a-z])@))(?(\[)(\[(\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\])|(([0-9a-z][-\w]*[0-9a-z]*\.)+[a-z0-9][\-a-z0-9]{0,22}[a-z0-9]))$", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(250));
}
catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
{
return false;
}
}
private string DomainMapper(Match match)
{
// IdnMapping class with default property values.
IdnMapping idn = new IdnMapping();
string domainName = match.Groups[2].Value;
try
{
domainName = idn.GetAscii(domainName);
}
catch (ArgumentException)
{
invalid = true;
}
return match.Groups[1].Value + domainName;
}
}
我写了一个函数来检查电子邮件是否有效。在大多数情况下，这似乎对我很有效。
结果:
dasddas-@.com => FALSE
-asd@das.com => FALSE
as3d@dac.coas- => FALSE
dsq!a?@das.com => FALSE
_dasd@sd.com => FALSE
dad@sds => FALSE
asd-@asd.com => FALSE
dasd_-@jdas.com => FALSE
asd@dasd@asd.cm => FALSE
da23@das..com => FALSE
_dasd_das_@9.com => FALSE
d23d@da9.co9 => TRUE
dasd.dadas@dasd.com => TRUE
dda_das@das-dasd.com => TRUE
dasd-dasd@das.com.das => TRUE
代码:
private bool IsValidEmail(string email)
{
bool valid = false;
try
{
var addr = new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(email);
valid = true;
}
catch
{
valid = false;
goto End_Func;
}
valid = false;
int pos_at = email.IndexOf('@');
char checker = Convert.ToChar(email.Substring(pos_at + 1, 1));
var chars = "qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm0123456789";
foreach (char chr in chars)
{
if (checker == chr)
{
valid = true;
break;
}
}
if (valid == false)
{
goto End_Func;
}
int pos_dot = email.IndexOf('.', pos_at + 1);
if(pos_dot == -1)
{
valid = false;
goto End_Func;
}
valid = false;
try
{
checker = Convert.ToChar(email.Substring(pos_dot + 1, 1));
foreach (char chr in chars)
{
if (checker == chr)
{
valid = true;
break;
}
}
}
catch
{
valid = false;
goto End_Func;
}
Regex valid_checker = new Regex(@"^[a-zA-Z0-9_@.-]*$");
valid = valid_checker.IsMatch(email);
if (valid == false)
{
goto End_Func;
}
List<int> pos_list = new List<int> { };
int pos = 0;
while (email.IndexOf('_', pos) != -1)
{
pos_list.Add(email.IndexOf('_', pos));
pos = email.IndexOf('_', pos) + 1;
}
pos = 0;
while (email.IndexOf('.', pos) != -1)
{
pos_list.Add(email.IndexOf('.', pos));
pos = email.IndexOf('.', pos) + 1;
}
pos = 0;
while (email.IndexOf('-', pos) != -1)
{
pos_list.Add(email.IndexOf('-', pos));
pos = email.IndexOf('-', pos) + 1;
}
int sp_cnt = pos_list.Count();
pos_list.Sort();
for (int i = 0; i < sp_cnt - 1; i++)
{
if (pos_list[i] + 1 == pos_list[i + 1])
{
valid = false;
break;
}
if (pos_list[i]+1 == pos_at || pos_list[i]+1 == pos_dot)
{
valid = false;
break;
}
}
if(valid == false)
{
goto End_Func;
}
if (pos_list[sp_cnt - 1] == email.Length - 1 || pos_list[0] == 0)
{
valid = false;
}
End_Func:;
return valid;
}
识别电子邮件id是否有效的简单方法。
public static bool EmailIsValid(string email)
{
return Regex.IsMatch(email, @"^([\w-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([\w-]+\.)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)$");
}
在c#的regex中有文化问题，而不是js。所以我们需要在US模式下使用regex进行邮件检查。如果你不使用ECMAScript模式，你的语言特殊字符是在A-Z与正则表达式中隐含的。
Regex.IsMatch(email, @"^([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([a-zA-Z0-9_\-]+\.)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)$", RegexOptions.ECMAScript)
我最终使用了这个正则表达式，因为它成功地验证了逗号、注释、Unicode字符和IP(v4)域地址。
有效地址为:
“@example。org (评论)test@example。org тест@example。org ტესტი@example。org test@[192.168 . 1章1段]
public const string REGEX_EMAIL = @"^(((\([\w!#$%&'*+\/=?^_`{|}~-]*\))?[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@\""]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@\""]+)*)|(\"".+\""))(\([\w!#$%&'*+\/=?^_`{|}~-]*\))?@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$";
一个简单的没有使用Regex(我不喜欢它的可读性差):
bool IsValidEmail(string email)
{
string emailTrimed = email.Trim();
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(emailTrimed))
{
bool hasWhitespace = emailTrimed.Contains(" ");
int indexOfAtSign = emailTrimed.LastIndexOf('@');
if (indexOfAtSign > 0 && !hasWhitespace)
{
string afterAtSign = emailTrimed.Substring(indexOfAtSign + 1);
int indexOfDotAfterAtSign = afterAtSign.LastIndexOf('.');
if (indexOfDotAfterAtSign > 0 && afterAtSign.Substring(indexOfDotAfterAtSign).Length > 1)
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
例子:
IsValidEmail（“@b.com”） // false IsValidEmail（“a@.com”） // false IsValidEmail（“a@bcom”） // false IsValidEmail（“a.b@com”） // false IsValidEmail（“a@b.”） // false IsValidEmail（“a b@c.com”） // false IsValidEmail（“a@b c.com”） // false IsValidEmail（“a@b.com”） // true IsValidEmail（“a@b.c.com”） // true IsValidEmail（“a+b@c.com”） // true IsValidEmail（“a@123.45.67.89”） // true
它意味着简单，因此它不处理罕见的情况，如电子邮件的括号域包含空格(通常是允许的)，电子邮件的IPv6地址等。
For the simple email like goerge@xxx.com, below code is sufficient.
public static bool ValidateEmail(string email)
{
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex emailRegex = new System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex(@"^([\w\.\-]+)@([\w\-]+)((\.(\w){2,3})+)$");
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Match emailMatch = emailRegex.Match(email);
return emailMatch.Success;
}
短而准确的代码
string Email = txtEmail.Text;
if (Email.IsValidEmail())
{
//use code here
}
public static bool IsValidEmail(this string email)
{
string pattern = @"^(?!\.)(""([^""\r\\]|\\[""\r\\])*""|" + @"([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?<!\.)\.)*)(?<!\.)" + @"@[a-z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$";
var regex = new Regex(pattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
return regex.IsMatch(email);
}
如果你正在使用FluentValidation，你可以写一些像这样简单的东西:
public cass User
{
public string Email { get; set; }
}
public class UserValidator : AbstractValidator<User>
{
public UserValidator()
{
RuleFor(x => x.Email).EmailAddress().WithMessage("The text entered is not a valid email address.");
}
}
// Validates an user.
var validationResult = new UserValidator().Validate(new User { Email = "açflkdj" });
// This will return false, since the user email is not valid.
bool userIsValid = validationResult.IsValid;
基于@Cogwheel的回答，我想分享一个修改后的解决方案，适用于SSIS和“脚本组件”:
Place the "Script Component" into your Data Flow connect and then open it. In the section "Input Columns" set the field that contains the E-Mail Adresses to "ReadWrite" (in the example 'fieldName'). Switch back to the section "Script" and click on "Edit Script". Then you need to wait after the code opens. Place this code in the right method: public override void Input0_ProcessInputRow(Input0Buffer Row) { string email = Row.fieldName; try { System.Net.Mail.MailAddress addr = new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(email); Row.fieldName= addr.Address.ToString(); } catch { Row.fieldName = "WRONGADDRESS"; } }
然后，您可以使用条件分割过滤掉所有无效记录或任何您想做的事情。
对@齿轮回答做了一点修改
public static bool IsValidEmail(this string email)
{
// skip the exception & return early if possible
if (email.IndexOf("@") <= 0) return false;
try
{
var address = new MailAddress(email);
return address.Address == email;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
There are a lot of strong answers here. However, I recommend that we take a step back. @Cogwheel answers the question https://stackoverflow.com/a/1374644/388267. Nevertheless, it could be costly in a bulk validation scenario, if many of the email address being validated are invalid. I suggest that we employ a bit of logic before we enter into his try-catch block. I know that the following code could be written using RegEx but that could be costly for new developers to understand. This is my twopence worth:
public static bool IsEmail(this string input)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(input)) return false;
// MUST CONTAIN ONE AND ONLY ONE @
var atCount = input.Count(c => c == '@');
if (atCount != 1) return false;
// MUST CONTAIN PERIOD
if (!input.Contains(".")) return false;
// @ MUST OCCUR BEFORE LAST PERIOD
var indexOfAt = input.IndexOf("@", StringComparison.Ordinal);
var lastIndexOfPeriod = input.LastIndexOf(".", StringComparison.Ordinal);
var atBeforeLastPeriod = lastIndexOfPeriod > indexOfAt;
if (!atBeforeLastPeriod) return false;
// CODE FROM COGWHEEL'S ANSWER: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1374644/388267
try
{
var addr = new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(input);
return addr.Address == input;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
来自@齿轮的投票最多的答案是最好的答案，但我已经尝试实现trim()字符串方法，因此它将从字符串开始到结束修剪所有用户空白。检查代码下面的完整示例-
bool IsValidEmail(string email)
{
try
{
email = email.Trim();
var addr = new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(email);
return addr.Address == email;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
另一个正则表达式匹配答案:
/// <summary>
/// Validates the email input
/// </summary>
internal static bool ValidateEmail(string _emailAddress)
{
string _regexPattern = @"^(([\w-]+\.)+[\w-]+|([a-zA-Z]{1}|[\w-]{2,}))@"
+ @"((([0-1]?[0-9]{1,2}|25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9])\.([0-1]?[0-9]{1,2}|25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9])\."
+ @"([0-1]?[0-9]{1,2}|25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9])\.([0-1]?[0-9]{1,2}|25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9])){1}|"
+ @"([a-zA-Z]+[\w-]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,4})$";
return (string.IsNullOrEmpty(_emailAddress) == false && System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.IsMatch(_emailAddress, _regexPattern))
? true
: false;
}
如果您将多个解决方案组合在一起来编写完美的代码呢?
我得到了排名最高的2个解决方案和评论，并结合起来得到更准确的答案。 它的短，快和可爱。
public static bool isValidEmail(string email)
{
try
{
var addr = new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(email);
if (addr.Address == email)
{
string expression = "\\w+([-+.']\\w+)*@\\w+([-.]\\w+)*\\.\\w+([-.]\\w+)*";
if (Regex.IsMatch(email, expression))
{
if (Regex.Replace(email, expression, string.Empty).Length == 0)
return true;
}
return false;
}
return false;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
正如在许多回答中提到的，电子邮件地址的领域是复杂的。在这种情况下，我强烈反对使用正则表达式。那些匹配(大多数)用例的异常复杂，难以读取，因此也难以维护。此外，它们仍然难以支持所有病例，而且速度缓慢。
微软的EmailAddress类在这方面有所帮助，但我认为也不是完美的。在几年前的一个开源项目中，我尝试使用定制的EmailParser。
在[EmailAddress]https://github.com/Qowaiv/Qowaiv/blob/master/src/Qowaiv/EmailAddress.cs中使用。
通过使用这种方法，不仅可以验证电子邮件地址，还可以清除显示名称的多种格式，去掉mailto:-前缀，并根据ip地址规范化域字面量，并将所有内容小写(注意，本地部分是大小写敏感的)。
你的解决方案应该支持的场景(上面提到的就是):
[TestCase(null)]
[TestCase("")]
[TestCase("..@test.com")]
[TestCase(".a@test.com")]
[TestCase("ab@sd@dd")]
[TestCase(".@s.dd")]
[TestCase("ab@988.120.150.10")]
[TestCase("ab@120.256.256.120")]
[TestCase("ab@120.25.1111.120")]
[TestCase("ab@[188.120.150.10")]
[TestCase("ab@188.120.150.10]")]
[TestCase("ab@[188.120.150.10].com")]
[TestCase("a@b.-de.cc")]
[TestCase("a@bde-.cc")]
[TestCase("a@bde.c-c")]
[TestCase("a@bde.cc.")]
[TestCase("ab@b+de.cc")]
[TestCase("a..b@bde.cc")]
[TestCase("_@bde.cc,")]
[TestCase("plainaddress")]
[TestCase("plain.address")]
[TestCase("@%^%#$@#$@#.com")]
[TestCase("@domain.com")]
[TestCase("Joe Smith <email@domain.com>")]
[TestCase("email.domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@domain@domain.com")]
[TestCase(".email@domain.com")]
[TestCase("email.@domain.com")]
[TestCase("email..email@domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@-domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@domain-.com")]
[TestCase("email@domain.com-")]
[TestCase("email@.domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@domain.com.")]
[TestCase("email@domain..com")]
[TestCase("email@111.222.333")]
[TestCase("email@111.222.333.256")]
[TestCase("email@[123.123.123.123")]
[TestCase("email@[123.123.123].123")]
[TestCase("email@123.123.123.123]")]
[TestCase("email@123.123.[123.123]")]
[TestCase("email@{leftbracket.com")]
[TestCase("email@rightbracket}.com")]
[TestCase("email@p|pe.com")]
[TestCase("isis@100%.nl")]
[TestCase("email@dollar$.com")]
[TestCase("email@r&d.com")]
[TestCase("email@#hash.com")]
[TestCase("email@wave~tilde.com")]
[TestCase("email@exclamation!mark.com")]
[TestCase("email@question?mark.com")]
[TestCase("email@obelix*asterisk.com")]
[TestCase("email@grave`accent.com")]
[TestCase("email@colon:colon.com")]
[TestCase("email@caret^xor.com")]
[TestCase("email@=qowaiv.com")]
[TestCase("email@plus+.com")]
[TestCase("email@domain.com>")]
[TestCase("email( (nested) )@plus.com")]
[TestCase("email)mirror(@plus.com")]
[TestCase("email@plus.com (not closed comment")]
[TestCase("email(with @ in comment)plus.com")]
[TestCase(@"""Joe Smith email@domain.com")]
[TestCase(@"""Joe Smith' email@domain.com")]
[TestCase(@"""Joe Smith""email@domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@mailto:domain.com")]
[TestCase("mailto:mailto:email@domain.com")]
[TestCase("Display Name <email@plus.com> (after name with display)")]
[TestCase("ReDoSaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa")]
public void IsInvalid(string email)
{
Assert.IsFalse(EmailAddress.IsValid(email), email);
}
[TestCase("w@com")]
[TestCase("w.b.f@test.com")]
[TestCase("w.b.f@test.museum")]
[TestCase("a.a@test.com")]
[TestCase("ab@288.120.150.10.com")]
[TestCase("ab@188.120.150.10")]
[TestCase("ab@1.0.0.10")]
[TestCase("ab@120.25.254.120")]
[TestCase("ab@01.120.150.1")]
[TestCase("ab@88.120.150.021")]
[TestCase("ab@88.120.150.01")]
[TestCase("ab@[120.254.254.120]")]
[TestCase("local@2001:0db8:85a3:0000:0000:8a2e:0370:7334")]
[TestCase("local@[2001:0db8:85a3:0000:0000:8a2e:0370:7334]")]
[TestCase("2@bde.cc")]
[TestCase("-@bde.cc")]
[TestCase("a2@bde.cc")]
[TestCase("a-b@bde.cc")]
[TestCase("ab@b-de.cc")]
[TestCase("a+b@bde.cc")]
[TestCase("f.f.f@bde.cc")]
[TestCase("ab_c@bde.cc")]
[TestCase("_-_@bde.cc")]
[TestCase("k.haak@12move.nl")]
[TestCase("K.HAAK@12MOVE.NL")]
[TestCase("email@domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@domain")]
[TestCase("あいうえお@domain.com")]
[TestCase("local@あいうえお.com")]
[TestCase("firstname.lastname@domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@subdomain.domain.com")]
[TestCase("firstname+lastname@domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@123.123.123.123")]
[TestCase("email@[123.123.123.123]")]
[TestCase("1234567890@domain.com")]
[TestCase("a@domain.com")]
[TestCase("a.b.c.d@domain.com")]
[TestCase("aap.123.noot.mies@domain.com")]
[TestCase("1@domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@domain-one.com")]
[TestCase("_______@domain.com")]
[TestCase("email@domain.topleveldomain")]
[TestCase("email@domain.co.jp")]
[TestCase("firstname-lastname@domain.com")]
[TestCase("firstname-lastname@d.com")]
[TestCase("FIRSTNAME-LASTNAME@d--n.com")]
[TestCase("first-name-last-name@d-a-n.com")]
[TestCase("{local{name{{with{@leftbracket.com")]
[TestCase("}local}name}}with{@rightbracket.com")]
[TestCase("|local||name|with|@pipe.com")]
[TestCase("%local%%name%with%@percentage.com")]
[TestCase("$local$$name$with$@dollar.com")]
[TestCase("&local&&name&with&$@amp.com")]
[TestCase("#local##name#with#@hash.com")]
[TestCase("~local~~name~with~@tilde.com")]
[TestCase("!local!!name!with!@exclamation.com")]
[TestCase("?local??name?with?@question.com")]
[TestCase("*local**name*with*@asterisk.com")]
[TestCase("`local``name`with`@grave-accent.com")]
[TestCase("^local^^name^with^@xor.com")]
[TestCase("=local==name=with=@equality.com")]
[TestCase("+local++name+with+@equality.com")]
[TestCase("Joe Smith <email@domain.com>")]
[TestCase("email@domain.com (joe Smith)")]
[TestCase(@"""Joe Smith"" email@domain.com")]
[TestCase(@"""Joe\\tSmith"" email@domain.com")]
[TestCase(@"""Joe\""Smith"" email@domain.com")]
[TestCase(@"Test |<gaaf <email@domain.com>")]
[TestCase("MailTo:casesensitve@domain.com")]
[TestCase("mailto:email@domain.com")]
[TestCase("Joe Smith <mailto:email@domain.com>")]
[TestCase("Joe Smith <mailto:email(with comment)@domain.com>")]
[TestCase(@"""With extra < within quotes"" Display Name<email@domain.com>")]
[TestCase("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa")]
public void IsValid(string email)
{
Assert.IsTrue(EmailAddress.IsValid(email), email);
}
我经常用这个来验证电子邮件，它就像一个魅力。这验证了电子邮件必须在@之前至少有一个字符，并且在“”之前至少有一个字符。
public static bool ValidateEmail(string value, bool required, int minLength, int maxLength)
{
value = value.Trim();
if (required == false && value == "") return true;
if (required && value == "") return false;
if (value.Length < minLength || value.Length > maxLength) return false;
//Email must have at least one character before an @, and at least one character before the .
int index = value.IndexOf('@');
if (index < 1 || value.LastIndexOf('.') < index + 2) return false;
return true;
}
我只是想指出，最近在. net文档中增加了关于电子邮件验证的内容，也使用了Regex操作。 关于它们实现的详细解释可以在那里找到。
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/base-types/how-to-verify-that-strings-are-in-valid-email-format
为了方便起见，下面是他们的测试结果:
// Valid: david.jones@proseware.com
// Valid: d.j@server1.proseware.com
// Valid: jones@ms1.proseware.com
// Invalid: j.@server1.proseware.com
// Valid: j@proseware.com9
// Valid: js#internal@proseware.com
// Valid: j_9@[129.126.118.1]
// Invalid: j..s@proseware.com
// Invalid: js*@proseware.com
// Invalid: js@proseware..com
// Valid: js@proseware.com9
// Valid: j.s@server1.proseware.com
// Valid: "j\"s\""@proseware.com
// Valid: js@contoso.中国
我总结了以上所有的答案，截至2021年，我在这门课上为自己写的答案:
public static class StringExt {
private const string emailPattern = @"^(?!\.)(""([^""\r\\]|\\[""\r\\])*""|"
+ @"([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?<!\.)\.)*)(?<!\.)"
+ @"@[a-z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$";
public static bool IsValidMailAddress(this string pThis)
=> pThis is not null
&& Regex.IsMatch(pThis, emailPattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
}
我是来偷电子邮件的验证码的。然后我发现答案中的代码不必要地扩展了。我相信我用最短的方式写出了最好的解决方案:
public static bool IsEmail(string email)
{
try
{
return new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(email).Address == email && !email.Trim().EndsWith(".");
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
推荐文章
- 在c#中从URI字符串获取文件名
- 检查SqlDataReader对象中的列名
- 如何将类标记为已弃用?
- c# 8支持。net框架吗?
- Linq-to-Entities Join vs GroupJoin
- 为什么字符串类型的默认值是null而不是空字符串?
- 在list中获取不同值的列表
- 组合框:向项目添加文本和值(无绑定源)
- 如何为ASP.net/C#应用程序配置文件值中的值添加&号
- 从System.Drawing.Bitmap中加载WPF BitmapImage
- 如何找出一个文件存在于c# / .NET?
- 为什么更快地检查字典是否包含键，而不是捕捉异常，以防它不?
- [DataContract]的命名空间
- string. isnullorempty (string) vs. string. isnullowhitespace (string)
- 完全外部连接
