来自@齿轮的投票最多的答案是最好的答案，但我已经尝试实现trim()字符串方法，因此它将从字符串开始到结束修剪所有用户空白。检查代码下面的完整示例-

bool IsValidEmail(string email)
{
    try
    {
        email = email.Trim();
        var addr = new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(email);
        return addr.Address == email;
    }
    catch
    {
        return false;
    }
}

以前，我写了一个EmailAddressValidationAttribute，它应该正确地验证表单中几乎任何相对正常的电子邮件地址

local-part@domain

它是System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations。ValidationAttribute，所以使用非常简单。

而且，由于挖掘所有rfc和勘误表，并组装所需的所有位来正确枚举所有规则……太乏味了!-我在回答c#电子邮件地址验证源代码的问题时发布了验证器的源代码。

我的验证器无论怎么想象都不是完美的，只是对于初学者来说，它没有任何内置的对发出客户端javascript验证的支持，尽管将其添加进来并不太难。从我上面的回答来看:

Here's the validation attribute I wrote. It validates pretty much every "raw" email address, that is those of the form local-part@domain. It doesn't support any of the other, more...creative constructs that the RFCs allow (this list is not comprehensive by any means): comments (e.g., jsmith@whizbang.com (work)) quoted strings (escaped text, to allow characters not allowed in an atom) domain literals (e.g. foo@[123.45.67.012]) bang-paths (aka source routing) angle addresses (e.g. John Smith <jsmith@whizbang.com>) folding whitespace double-byte characters in either local-part or domain (7-bit ASCII only). etc. It should accept almost any email address that can be expressed thusly foo.bar@bazbat.com without requiring the use of quotes ("), angle brackets ('<>') or square brackets ([]). No attempt is made to validate that the rightmost dns label in the domain is a valid TLD (top-level domain). That is because the list of TLDs is far larger now than the "big 6" (.com, .edu, .gov, .mil, .net, .org) plus 2-letter ISO country codes. ICANN actually updates the TLD list daily, though I suspect that the list doesn't actually change daily. Further, [ICANN just approved a big expansion of the generic TLD namespace][2]). And some email addresses don't have what you'd recognize as a TLD (did you know that postmaster@. is theoretically valid and mailable? Mail to that address should get delivered to the postmaster of the DNS root zone.) Extending the regular expression to support domain literals shouldn't be too difficult.

Personally, I would say that you should just make sure there is an @ symbol in there, with possibly a . character. There's many regexes you could use of varying correctness, but I think most of these leave out valid email addresses, or let invalid ones through. If people want to put in a fake email address, they will put in a fake one. If you need to verify that the email address is legit, and that the person is in control of that email address, then you will need to send them an email with a special coded link so they can verify that it indeed is a real address.

我只是想指出，最近在. net文档中增加了关于电子邮件验证的内容，也使用了Regex操作。 关于它们实现的详细解释可以在那里找到。

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/base-types/how-to-verify-that-strings-are-in-valid-email-format

为了方便起见，下面是他们的测试结果:

//       Valid: david.jones@proseware.com
//       Valid: d.j@server1.proseware.com
//       Valid: jones@ms1.proseware.com
//       Invalid: j.@server1.proseware.com
//       Valid: j@proseware.com9
//       Valid: js#internal@proseware.com
//       Valid: j_9@[129.126.118.1]
//       Invalid: j..s@proseware.com
//       Invalid: js*@proseware.com
//       Invalid: js@proseware..com
//       Valid: js@proseware.com9
//       Valid: j.s@server1.proseware.com
//       Valid: "j\"s\""@proseware.com
//       Valid: js@contoso.中国

电子邮件地址验证并不像看起来那么简单。实际上，从理论上讲，仅使用正则表达式完全验证电子邮件地址是不可能的。

请查看我的博客文章，了解关于这个主题的讨论以及使用FParsec的f#实现。[/ shameless_plug]

识别电子邮件id是否有效的简单方法。

public static bool EmailIsValid(string email)
{
        return Regex.IsMatch(email, @"^([\w-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([\w-]+\.)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)$");
}