以前，我写了一个EmailAddressValidationAttribute，它应该正确地验证表单中几乎任何相对正常的电子邮件地址

local-part@domain

它是System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations。ValidationAttribute，所以使用非常简单。

而且，由于挖掘所有rfc和勘误表，并组装所需的所有位来正确枚举所有规则……太乏味了!-我在回答c#电子邮件地址验证源代码的问题时发布了验证器的源代码。

我的验证器无论怎么想象都不是完美的，只是对于初学者来说，它没有任何内置的对发出客户端javascript验证的支持，尽管将其添加进来并不太难。从我上面的回答来看:

Here's the validation attribute I wrote. It validates pretty much every "raw" email address, that is those of the form local-part@domain. It doesn't support any of the other, more...creative constructs that the RFCs allow (this list is not comprehensive by any means): comments (e.g., jsmith@whizbang.com (work)) quoted strings (escaped text, to allow characters not allowed in an atom) domain literals (e.g. foo@[123.45.67.012]) bang-paths (aka source routing) angle addresses (e.g. John Smith <jsmith@whizbang.com>) folding whitespace double-byte characters in either local-part or domain (7-bit ASCII only). etc. It should accept almost any email address that can be expressed thusly foo.bar@bazbat.com without requiring the use of quotes ("), angle brackets ('<>') or square brackets ([]). No attempt is made to validate that the rightmost dns label in the domain is a valid TLD (top-level domain). That is because the list of TLDs is far larger now than the "big 6" (.com, .edu, .gov, .mil, .net, .org) plus 2-letter ISO country codes. ICANN actually updates the TLD list daily, though I suspect that the list doesn't actually change daily. Further, [ICANN just approved a big expansion of the generic TLD namespace][2]). And some email addresses don't have what you'd recognize as a TLD (did you know that postmaster@. is theoretically valid and mailable? Mail to that address should get delivered to the postmaster of the DNS root zone.) Extending the regular expression to support domain literals shouldn't be too difficult.

在“尝试块”发送一个验证电子邮件。 让用户打开电子邮件并单击一个链接，以验证电子邮件是真实的。

在此过程成功完成之前，该电子邮件被认为是无效的。

Personally, I would say that you should just make sure there is an @ symbol in there, with possibly a . character. There's many regexes you could use of varying correctness, but I think most of these leave out valid email addresses, or let invalid ones through. If people want to put in a fake email address, they will put in a fake one. If you need to verify that the email address is legit, and that the person is in control of that email address, then you will need to send them an email with a special coded link so they can verify that it indeed is a real address.

如果你真的，我是说真的想知道一个电子邮件地址是否有效……请邮件交换器来证明它，不需要正则表达式。如果需要，我可以提供代码。

一般步骤如下: 1. 电子邮件地址有域名部分吗?(@ > 0的索引) 2. 使用DNS查询询问域是否有邮件交换器 3.打开到邮件交换器的TCP连接 4. 使用SMTP协议，以电子邮件地址作为接收者打开到服务器的消息 5. 解析服务器的响应。 6. 如果你能走到这一步，就别发短信了，一切都好。

正如您可以想象的那样，这是非常昂贵的时间，并且依赖于smtp，但它确实有效。

我经常用这个来验证电子邮件，它就像一个魅力。这验证了电子邮件必须在@之前至少有一个字符，并且在“”之前至少有一个字符。

public static bool ValidateEmail(string value, bool required, int minLength, int maxLength)
        {
           value = value.Trim();
           if (required == false && value == "") return true;
           if (required && value == "") return false;
           if (value.Length < minLength || value.Length > maxLength) return false;

           //Email must have at least one character before an @, and at least one character before the .
           int index = value.IndexOf('@');
           if (index < 1 || value.LastIndexOf('.') < index + 2) return false;
           return true;
        }

public static bool IsEmail(string strEmail)
{
    Regex rgxEmail = new Regex(@"^([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}" +
                               @"\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\" +
                               @".)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)$");
    return rgxEmail.IsMatch(strEmail);
}