第一步(pre-OP-edit):使用集合:

mylist = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
goodvals = [1,3,7,8,9]

myset = set(mylist)
goodset = set(goodvals)

print list(myset.intersection(goodset))  # [1, 3, 7]
print list(myset.difference(goodset))    # [2, 4, 5, 6]

这对可读性(IMHO)和性能都有好处。

第二步(post-OP-edit):

创建一个好的扩展列表:

IMAGE_TYPES = set(['.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png'])

这将提高性能。否则，你现在的情况在我看来还不错。

就我个人而言，我喜欢你引用的版本，假设你已经有了一个好的列表。如果没有，就像这样:

good = filter(lambda x: is_good(x), mylist)
bad = filter(lambda x: not is_good(x), mylist)

当然，这真的非常类似于使用列表理解，就像你最初做的，但用一个函数而不是一个查找:

good = [x for x in mylist if is_good(x)]
bad  = [x for x in mylist if not is_good(x)]

总的来说，我发现列表推导式的美学非常令人满意。当然，如果您实际上不需要保留顺序，也不需要重复，那么在集合上使用交集和差分方法也会很好。

为了提高性能，请尝试itertools。

itertools模块标准化了一组快速、内存高效的核心工具，这些工具单独使用或组合使用都很有用。它们一起构成了一个“迭代器代数”，使得用纯Python简洁有效地构造专门的工具成为可能。

出现看到itertools。过滤器或imap。

itertools。iterable ifilter(谓词) 创建一个迭代器，从iterable中过滤元素，只返回谓词为True的元素

所有提出的解决方案的问题是，它将扫描和应用过滤功能两次。我会做一个简单的小函数，像这样:

def split_into_two_lists(lst, f):
    a = []
    b = []
    for elem in lst:
        if f(elem):
            a.append(elem)
        else:
            b.append(elem)
    return a, b

这样你就不会重复处理任何东西，也不会重复代码。

下面是惰性迭代器方法:

from itertools import tee

def split_on_condition(seq, condition):
    l1, l2 = tee((condition(item), item) for item in seq)
    return (i for p, i in l1 if p), (i for p, i in l2 if not p)

它对每个项计算一次条件，并返回两个生成器，第一个生成条件为真时序列中的值，另一个生成条件为假时序列中的值。

因为它是惰性的，你可以在任何迭代器上使用它，甚至是无限迭代器:

from itertools import count, islice

def is_prime(n):
    return n > 1 and all(n % i for i in xrange(2, n))

primes, not_primes = split_on_condition(count(), is_prime)
print("First 10 primes", list(islice(primes, 10)))
print("First 10 non-primes", list(islice(not_primes, 10)))

通常情况下，非惰性列表返回方法会更好:

def split_on_condition(seq, condition):
    a, b = [], []
    for item in seq:
        (a if condition(item) else b).append(item)
    return a, b

编辑:对于您更具体的用例，将项目按某些键分割到不同的列表中，这里有一个通用函数:

DROP_VALUE = lambda _:_
def split_by_key(seq, resultmapping, keyfunc, default=DROP_VALUE):
    """Split a sequence into lists based on a key function.

        seq - input sequence
        resultmapping - a dictionary that maps from target lists to keys that go to that list
        keyfunc - function to calculate the key of an input value
        default - the target where items that don't have a corresponding key go, by default they are dropped
    """
    result_lists = dict((key, []) for key in resultmapping)
    appenders = dict((key, result_lists[target].append) for target, keys in resultmapping.items() for key in keys)

    if default is not DROP_VALUE:
        result_lists.setdefault(default, [])
        default_action = result_lists[default].append
    else:
        default_action = DROP_VALUE

    for item in seq:
        appenders.get(keyfunc(item), default_action)(item)

    return result_lists

用法:

def file_extension(f):
    return f[2].lower()

split_files = split_by_key(files, {'images': IMAGE_TYPES}, keyfunc=file_extension, default='anims')
print split_files['images']
print split_files['anims']

如果你坚持聪明，你可以采用温登的解决方案，再加上一点虚假的聪明:

def splay(l, f, d=None):
  d = d or {}
  for x in l: d.setdefault(f(x), []).append(x)
  return d

Good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals] Bad = [x for x in mylist if x not in goodvals] 我怎样才能做得更优雅呢?

代码已经非常优雅了。

使用集合可能会有轻微的性能改进，但差异是微不足道的。基于集合的方法也会丢弃重复项，并且不会保留元素的顺序。我发现列表理解也更容易阅读。

事实上，我们甚至可以更简单地使用for循环:

good, bad = [], []

for x in mylist:
    if x in goodvals:
        good.append(f)
    else:
        bad.append(f)

这种方法可以更容易地添加额外的逻辑。例如，代码很容易被修改为丢弃None值:

good, bad = [], []

for x in mylist:
    if x is None:
        continue
    if x in goodvals:
        good.append(f)
    else:
        bad.append(f)

itertools。Groupby几乎可以满足您的要求，除了它要求对条目进行排序以确保您获得一个连续的范围之外，因此您需要首先根据键进行排序(否则您将为每种类型获得多个交错的组)。如。

def is_good(f):
    return f[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES

files = [ ('file1.jpg', 33L, '.jpg'), ('file2.avi', 999L, '.avi'), ('file3.gif', 123L, '.gif')]

for key, group in itertools.groupby(sorted(files, key=is_good), key=is_good):
    print key, list(group)

给:

False [('file2.avi', 999L, '.avi')]
True [('file1.jpg', 33L, '.jpg'), ('file3.gif', 123L, '.gif')]

与其他解决方案类似，可以将键func定义为任意数量的组。

如果你想用FP风格:

good, bad = [ sum(x, []) for x in zip(*(([y], []) if y in goodvals else ([], [y])
                                        for y in mylist)) ]

不是最易读的解决方案，但至少只遍历mylist一次。

我基本上喜欢安德斯的方法，因为它非常普遍。下面的版本将分类器放在前面(以匹配过滤器语法)，并使用defaultdict(假定已导入)。

def categorize(func, seq):
    """Return mapping from categories to lists
    of categorized items.
    """
    d = defaultdict(list)
    for item in seq:
        d[func(item)].append(item)
    return d

有时候你并不需要清单上的另一半。 例如:

import sys
from itertools import ifilter

trustedPeople = sys.argv[1].split(',')
newName = sys.argv[2]

myFriends = ifilter(lambda x: x.startswith('Shi'), trustedPeople)

print '%s is %smy friend.' % (newName, newName not in myFriends 'not ' or '')

我的看法。我提出一个惰性单次配分函数， 它保持输出子序列的相对顺序。

1. 需求

我认为这些要求是:

维护元素的相对顺序(因此，没有集合和 字典) 对于每个元素只计算condition一次(因此不使用 (i)筛选或分组) 允许任意一个序列的惰性消耗(如果我们能够负担得起的话) 预先计算它们，那么naïve实现很可能是 可接受)

2. 把图书馆

我的配分函数(下面介绍)和其他类似的函数 把它变成了一个小图书馆:

python-split

它通常可以通过PyPI安装:

pip install --user split

要根据条件拆分列表，使用partition函数:

>>> from split import partition
>>> files = [ ('file1.jpg', 33L, '.jpg'), ('file2.avi', 999L, '.avi') ]
>>> image_types = ('.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png')
>>> images, other = partition(lambda f: f[-1] in image_types, files)
>>> list(images)
[('file1.jpg', 33L, '.jpg')]
>>> list(other)
[('file2.avi', 999L, '.avi')]

3.配分函数说明

在内部，我们需要同时构建两个子序列，因此需要消耗 只有一个输出序列强制计算另一个输出序列 了。我们需要在用户请求之间保持状态(存储已处理) 但还没有请求的元素)。为了保持状态，我使用了两个双端 队列(双端队列):

from collections import deque

SplitSeq类负责内部管理:

class SplitSeq:
    def __init__(self, condition, sequence):
        self.cond = condition
        self.goods = deque([])
        self.bads = deque([])
        self.seq = iter(sequence)

魔术发生在它的. getnext()方法中。就像。next() 的迭代器，但允许指定我们想要的元素类型 这一次。在幕后，它并没有丢弃被拒绝的元素， 而是把它们放在两个队列中的一个:

    def getNext(self, getGood=True):
        if getGood:
            these, those, cond = self.goods, self.bads, self.cond
        else:
            these, those, cond = self.bads, self.goods, lambda x: not self.cond(x)
        if these:
            return these.popleft()
        else:
            while 1: # exit on StopIteration
                n = self.seq.next()
                if cond(n):
                    return n
                else:
                    those.append(n)

最终用户应该使用配分函数。它需要 条件函数和序列(就像映射或过滤器)，以及 返回两个生成器。的子序列 元素，则第二个元素将构建 互补的子序列。迭代器和生成器允许延迟 偶长序列或无限序列的分裂。

def partition(condition, sequence):
    cond = condition if condition else bool  # evaluate as bool if condition == None
    ss = SplitSeq(cond, sequence)
    def goods():
        while 1:
            yield ss.getNext(getGood=True)
    def bads():
        while 1:
            yield ss.getNext(getGood=False)
    return goods(), bads()

为了方便起见，我选择test函数作为第一个参数 将来的部分应用(类似于如何映射和过滤 将test函数作为第一个参数)。

如果你不想用两行代码来完成一个语义只需要一次的操作，你可以把上面的一些方法(甚至是你自己的方法)包装在一个函数中:

def part_with_predicate(l, pred):
    return [i for i in l if pred(i)], [i for i in l if not pred(i)]

这不是一种惰性计算方法，它确实对列表进行了两次迭代，但是它允许您在一行代码中对列表进行分区。

手动迭代，使用条件选择每个元素将被追加到的列表:

good, bad = [], []
for x in mylist:
    (bad, good)[x in goodvals].append(x)

受到@gnibbler伟大(但简洁!)回答的启发，我们可以应用该方法映射到多个分区:

from collections import defaultdict

def splitter(l, mapper):
    """Split an iterable into multiple partitions generated by a callable mapper."""

    results = defaultdict(list)

    for x in l:
        results[mapper(x)] += [x]

    return results

然后可以使用splitter，如下所示:

>>> l = [1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 4, 3, 2, 3]
>>> split = splitter(l, lambda x: x % 2 == 0)  # partition l into odds and evens
>>> split.items()
>>> [(False, [1, 3, 3, 5, 3, 3]), (True, [2, 4, 2, 4, 6, 4, 2])]

这适用于有更复杂映射的两个以上分区(也适用于迭代器):

>>> import math
>>> l = xrange(1, 23)
>>> split = splitter(l, lambda x: int(math.log10(x) * 5))
>>> split.items()
[(0, [1]),
 (1, [2]),
 (2, [3]),
 (3, [4, 5, 6]),
 (4, [7, 8, 9]),
 (5, [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]),
 (6, [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22])]

或者用字典来映射:

>>> map = {'A': 1, 'X': 2, 'B': 3, 'Y': 1, 'C': 2, 'Z': 3}
>>> l = ['A', 'B', 'C', 'C', 'X', 'Y', 'Z', 'A', 'Z']
>>> split = splitter(l, map.get)
>>> split.items()
(1, ['A', 'Y', 'A']), (2, ['C', 'C', 'X']), (3, ['B', 'Z', 'Z'])]

def partition(pred, seq):
  return reduce( lambda (yes, no), x: (yes+[x], no) if pred(x) else (yes, no+[x]), seq, ([], []) )

这里已经有很多解了，但另一种方法是

anims = []
images = [f for f in files if (lambda t: True if f[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES else anims.append(t) and False)(f)]

只在列表上迭代一次，看起来更python化，因此对我来说是可读的。

>>> files = [ ('file1.jpg', 33L, '.jpg'), ('file2.avi', 999L, '.avi'), ('file1.bmp', 33L, '.bmp')]
>>> IMAGE_TYPES = ('.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png')
>>> anims = []
>>> images = [f for f in files if (lambda t: True if f[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES else anims.append(t) and False)(f)]
>>> print '\n'.join([str(anims), str(images)])
[('file2.avi', 999L, '.avi')]
[('file1.jpg', 33L, '.jpg'), ('file1.bmp', 33L, '.bmp')]
>>>

我将采用2步方法，将谓词的求值与列表的过滤分离:

def partition(pred, iterable):
    xs = list(zip(map(pred, iterable), iterable))
    return [x[1] for x in xs if x[0]], [x[1] for x in xs if not x[0]]

就性能而言(除了在iterable的每个成员上只对pred求值一次之外)，这样做的好处在于它将大量逻辑从解释器中移出，转移到高度优化的迭代和映射代码中。这可以加快长迭代对象的迭代速度，就像回答中描述的那样。

在表达性方面，它利用了像理解和映射这样的表达性习语。

def partition(pred, iterable):
    'Use a predicate to partition entries into false entries and true entries'
    # partition(is_odd, range(10)) --> 0 2 4 6 8   and  1 3 5 7 9
    t1, t2 = tee(iterable)
    return filterfalse(pred, t1), filter(pred, t2)

检查这个

解决方案

from itertools import tee

def unpack_args(fn):
    return lambda t: fn(*t)

def separate(fn, lx):
    return map(
        unpack_args(
            lambda i, ly: filter(
                lambda el: bool(i) == fn(el),
                ly)),
        enumerate(tee(lx, 2)))

test

[even, odd] = separate(
    lambda x: bool(x % 2),
    [1, 2, 3, 4, 5])
print(list(even) == [2, 4])
print(list(odd) == [1, 3, 5])

我认为基于N个条件来划分一个可迭代对象是很方便的

from collections import OrderedDict
def partition(iterable,*conditions):
    '''Returns a list with the elements that satisfy each of condition.
       Conditions are assumed to be exclusive'''
    d= OrderedDict((i,list())for i in range(len(conditions)))        
    for e in iterable:
        for i,condition in enumerate(conditions):
            if condition(e):
                d[i].append(e)
                break                    
    return d.values()

例如:

ints,floats,other = partition([2, 3.14, 1, 1.69, [], None],
                              lambda x: isinstance(x, int), 
                              lambda x: isinstance(x, float),
                              lambda x: True)

print " ints: {}\n floats:{}\n other:{}".format(ints,floats,other)

 ints: [2, 1]
 floats:[3.14, 1.69]
 other:[[], None]

如果元素可以满足多个条件，则删除断点。

有时候，列表理解并不是最好的选择!

我根据人们对这个话题的回答做了一个小测试，在一个随机生成的列表上测试。以下是列表的生成(可能有更好的方法，但这不是重点):

good_list = ('.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png')

import random
import string
my_origin_list = []
for i in xrange(10000):
    fname = ''.join(random.choice(string.lowercase) for i in range(random.randrange(10)))
    if random.getrandbits(1):
        fext = random.choice(good_list)
    else:
        fext = "." + ''.join(random.choice(string.lowercase) for i in range(3))

    my_origin_list.append((fname + fext, random.randrange(1000), fext))

好了

# Parand
def f1():
    return [e for e in my_origin_list if e[2] in good_list], [e for e in my_origin_list if not e[2] in good_list]

# dbr
def f2():
    a, b = list(), list()
    for e in my_origin_list:
        if e[2] in good_list:
            a.append(e)
        else:
            b.append(e)
    return a, b

# John La Rooy
def f3():
    a, b = list(), list()
    for e in my_origin_list:
        (b, a)[e[2] in good_list].append(e)
    return a, b

# Ants Aasma
def f4():
    l1, l2 = tee((e[2] in good_list, e) for e in my_origin_list)
    return [i for p, i in l1 if p], [i for p, i in l2 if not p]

# My personal way to do
def f5():
    a, b = zip(*[(e, None) if e[2] in good_list else (None, e) for e in my_origin_list])
    return list(filter(None, a)), list(filter(None, b))

# BJ Homer
def f6():
    return filter(lambda e: e[2] in good_list, my_origin_list), filter(lambda e: not e[2] in good_list, my_origin_list)

使用cmpthese函数，最好的结果是dbr答案:

f1     204/s  --    -5%   -14%   -15%   -20%   -26%
f6     215/s     6%  --    -9%   -11%   -16%   -22%
f3     237/s    16%    10%  --    -2%    -7%   -14%
f4     240/s    18%    12%     2%  --    -6%   -13%
f5     255/s    25%    18%     8%     6%  --    -8%
f2     277/s    36%    29%    17%    15%     9%  --

这是这个问题的另一个解决方案。我需要一个尽可能快的解决方案。这意味着只对列表进行一次迭代，并且最好是O(1)用于向结果列表之一添加数据。这与sastanin提供的解决方案非常相似，只是更短:

from collections import deque

def split(iterable, function):
    dq_true = deque()
    dq_false = deque()

    # deque - the fastest way to consume an iterator and append items
    deque((
      (dq_true if function(item) else dq_false).append(item) for item in iterable
    ), maxlen=0)

    return dq_true, dq_false

此时，可以按照如下方式使用该函数:

lower, higher = split([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], lambda x: x < 5)

selected, other = split([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], lambda x: x in {0,4,9})

如果你对结果的deque对象不满意，你可以很容易地将其转换为list、set或任何你喜欢的对象(例如list(lower))。转换要快得多，直接构建列表。

该方法保持项目的顺序，以及任何副本。

如果你不介意使用一个外部库，有两个我知道本机实现这个操作:

>>> files = [ ('file1.jpg', 33, '.jpg'), ('file2.avi', 999, '.avi')]
>>> IMAGE_TYPES = ('.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png')

iteration_utilities.partition: >>> from iteration_utilities import partition >>> notimages, images = partition(files, lambda x: x[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES) >>> notimages [('file2.avi', 999, '.avi')] >>> images [('file1.jpg', 33, '.jpg')] more_itertools.partition >>> from more_itertools import partition >>> notimages, images = partition(lambda x: x[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES, files) >>> list(notimages) # returns a generator so you need to explicitly convert to list. [('file2.avi', 999, '.avi')] >>> list(images) [('file1.jpg', 33, '.jpg')]

不确定这是否是一个好方法，但也可以这样做

IMAGE_TYPES = ('.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png')
files = [ ('file1.jpg', 33L, '.jpg'), ('file2.avi', 999L, '.avi')]
images, anims = reduce(lambda (i, a), f: (i + [f], a) if f[2] in IMAGE_TYPES else (i, a + [f]), files, ([], []))

例如，按偶数和奇数拆分列表

arr = range(20)
even, odd = reduce(lambda res, next: res[next % 2].append(next) or res, arr, ([], []))

或者概括地说:

def split(predicate, iterable):
    return reduce(lambda res, e: res[predicate(e)].append(e) or res, iterable, ([], []))

优点:

最短路径 Predicate对每个元素只应用一次

缺点

需要函数式编程范例的知识

如果列表由组和间歇分隔符组成，您可以使用:

def split(items, p):
    groups = [[]]
    for i in items:
        if p(i):
            groups.append([])
        groups[-1].append(i)
    return groups

用法:

split(range(1,11), lambda x: x % 3 == 0)
# gives [[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [6, 7, 8], [9, 10]]

优雅快捷

受到DanSalmo评论的启发，这里有一个简洁、优雅的解决方案，同时也是最快的解决方案之一。

good_set = set(goodvals)
good, bad = [], []
for item in my_list:
    good.append(item) if item in good_set else bad.append(item)

提示:将goodvals转换为一组可以很容易地提高速度。

最快

为了获得最大速度，我们取最快的答案，并通过将good_list转换为一个集合来对其进行涡轮增压。仅这一项就为我们提供了40%以上的速度提升，我们最终得到了比最慢的解决方案快5.5倍以上的解决方案，即使它仍然可读。

good_list_set = set(good_list)  # 40%+ faster than a tuple.

good, bad = [], []
for item in my_origin_list:
    if item in good_list_set:
        good.append(item)
    else:
        bad.append(item)

稍微短一点

这是之前答案的一个更简洁的版本。

good_list_set = set(good_list)  # 40%+ faster than a tuple.

good, bad = [], []
for item in my_origin_list:
    out = good if item in good_list_set else bad
    out.append(item)

优雅可能有点主观，但一些鲁布·戈德堡风格的解决方案很可爱，很巧妙，不应该用于任何语言的产品代码中，更不用说本质上优雅的python了。

基准测试结果:

filter_BJHomer                  80/s       --   -3265%   -5312%   -5900%   -6262%   -7273%   -7363%   -8051%   -8162%   -8244%
zip_Funky                       118/s    4848%       --   -3040%   -3913%   -4450%   -5951%   -6085%   -7106%   -7271%   -7393%
two_lst_tuple_JohnLaRoy         170/s   11332%    4367%       --   -1254%   -2026%   -4182%   -4375%   -5842%   -6079%   -6254%
if_else_DBR                     195/s   14392%    6428%    1434%       --    -882%   -3348%   -3568%   -5246%   -5516%   -5717%
two_lst_compr_Parand            213/s   16750%    8016%    2540%     967%       --   -2705%   -2946%   -4786%   -5083%   -5303%
if_else_1_line_DanSalmo         292/s   26668%   14696%    7189%    5033%    3707%       --    -331%   -2853%   -3260%   -3562%
tuple_if_else                   302/s   27923%   15542%    7778%    5548%    4177%     343%       --   -2609%   -3029%   -3341%
set_1_line                      409/s   41308%   24556%   14053%   11035%    9181%    3993%    3529%       --    -569%    -991%
set_shorter                     434/s   44401%   26640%   15503%   12303%   10337%    4836%    4345%     603%       --    -448%
set_if_else                     454/s   46952%   28358%   16699%   13349%   11290%    5532%    5018%    1100%     469%       --

Python 3.7的完整基准代码(从FunkySayu修改而来):

good_list = ['.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png']

import random
import string
my_origin_list = []
for i in range(10000):
    fname = ''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_lowercase) for i in range(random.randrange(10)))
    if random.getrandbits(1):
        fext = random.choice(list(good_list))
    else:
        fext = "." + ''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_lowercase) for i in range(3))

    my_origin_list.append((fname + fext, random.randrange(1000), fext))

# Parand
def two_lst_compr_Parand(*_):
    return [e for e in my_origin_list if e[2] in good_list], [e for e in my_origin_list if not e[2] in good_list]

# dbr
def if_else_DBR(*_):
    a, b = list(), list()
    for e in my_origin_list:
        if e[2] in good_list:
            a.append(e)
        else:
            b.append(e)
    return a, b

# John La Rooy
def two_lst_tuple_JohnLaRoy(*_):
    a, b = list(), list()
    for e in my_origin_list:
        (b, a)[e[2] in good_list].append(e)
    return a, b

# # Ants Aasma
# def f4():
#     l1, l2 = tee((e[2] in good_list, e) for e in my_origin_list)
#     return [i for p, i in l1 if p], [i for p, i in l2 if not p]

# My personal way to do
def zip_Funky(*_):
    a, b = zip(*[(e, None) if e[2] in good_list else (None, e) for e in my_origin_list])
    return list(filter(None, a)), list(filter(None, b))

# BJ Homer
def filter_BJHomer(*_):
    return list(filter(lambda e: e[2] in good_list, my_origin_list)), list(filter(lambda e: not e[2] in good_list,                                                                             my_origin_list))

# ChaimG's answer; as a list.
def if_else_1_line_DanSalmo(*_):
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        _ = good.append(e) if e[2] in good_list else bad.append(e)
    return good, bad

# ChaimG's answer; as a set.
def set_1_line(*_):
    good_list_set = set(good_list)
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        _ = good.append(e) if e[2] in good_list_set else bad.append(e)
    return good, bad

# ChaimG set and if else list.
def set_shorter(*_):
    good_list_set = set(good_list)
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        out = good if e[2] in good_list_set else bad
        out.append(e)
    return good, bad

# ChaimG's best answer; if else as a set.
def set_if_else(*_):
    good_list_set = set(good_list)
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        if e[2] in good_list_set:
            good.append(e)
        else:
            bad.append(e)
    return good, bad

# ChaimG's best answer; if else as a set.
def tuple_if_else(*_):
    good_list_tuple = tuple(good_list)
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        if e[2] in good_list_tuple:
            good.append(e)
        else:
            bad.append(e)
    return good, bad

def cmpthese(n=0, functions=None):
    results = {}
    for func_name in functions:
        args = ['%s(range(256))' % func_name, 'from __main__ import %s' % func_name]
        t = Timer(*args)
        results[func_name] = 1 / (t.timeit(number=n) / n) # passes/sec

    functions_sorted = sorted(functions, key=results.__getitem__)
    for f in functions_sorted:
        diff = []
        for func in functions_sorted:
            if func == f:
                diff.append("--")
            else:
                diff.append(f"{results[f]/results[func]*100 - 100:5.0%}")
        diffs = " ".join(f'{x:>8s}' for x in diff)

        print(f"{f:27s} \t{results[f]:,.0f}/s {diffs}")


if __name__=='__main__':
    from timeit import Timer
cmpthese(1000, 'two_lst_compr_Parand if_else_DBR two_lst_tuple_JohnLaRoy zip_Funky filter_BJHomer if_else_1_line_DanSalmo set_1_line set_if_else tuple_if_else set_shorter'.split(" "))

images = [f for f in files if f[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES]
anims  = [f for f in files if f not in images]

当条件较长时很好，例如在您的示例中。读者不需要弄清楚否定条件以及它是否适用于所有其他情况。

还有另一个答案，简短但“邪恶”(用于理解列表的副作用)。

digits = list(range(10))
odd = [x.pop(i) for i, x in enumerate(digits) if x % 2]

>>> odd
[1, 3, 5, 7, 9]

>>> digits
[0, 2, 4, 6, 8]

bad = []
good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals or bad.append(x)]

append返回None，所以它可以工作。

good.append(x) if x in goodvals else bad.append(x)

来自@dansalmo的这个优雅简洁的回答被埋没在评论中，所以我只是把它作为一个答案转发到这里，这样它就能得到应有的重视，尤其是对新读者来说。

完整的例子:

good, bad = [], []
for x in my_list:
    good.append(x) if x in goodvals else bad.append(x)

你可以在Python中进行惰性函数编程，像这样:

partition = lambda l, c: map(
  lambda iii: (i for ii in iii for i in ii),
  zip(*(([], [e]) if c(e) else ([e], []) for e in l)))

函数式编程很优雅，但在Python中不是这样。如果你知道你的列表中没有None值，也可以参考这个例子:

partition = lambda l, c: map(
  filter(lambda x: x is not None, l),
  zip(*((None, e) if c(e) else (e, None) for e in l)))

使用布尔逻辑将数据分配给两个数组

>>> images, anims = [[i for i in files if t ^ (i[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES) ] for t in (0, 1)]
>>> images
[('file1.jpg', 33, '.jpg')]
>>> anims
[('file2.avi', 999, '.avi')]

之前的答案似乎并不能满足我所有的四种强迫症:

尽可能的懒惰， 只对原始Iterable求值一次 每个项只计算谓词一次 提供良好的类型注释(适用于python 3.7)

我的解决方案并不漂亮，我不认为我可以推荐使用它，但它是:

def iter_split_on_predicate(predicate: Callable[[T], bool], iterable: Iterable[T]) -> Tuple[Iterator[T], Iterator[T]]:
    deque_predicate_true = deque()
    deque_predicate_false = deque()
    
    # define a generator function to consume the input iterable
    # the Predicate is evaluated once per item, added to the appropriate deque, and the predicate result it yielded 
    def shared_generator(definitely_an_iterator):
        for item in definitely_an_iterator:
            print("Evaluate predicate.")
            if predicate(item):
                deque_predicate_true.appendleft(item)
                yield True
            else:
                deque_predicate_false.appendleft(item)
                yield False
    
    # consume input iterable only once,
    # converting to an iterator with the iter() function if necessary. Probably this conversion is unnecessary
    shared_gen = shared_generator(
        iterable if isinstance(iterable, collections.abc.Iterator) else iter(iterable)
    )
    
    # define a generator function for each predicate outcome and queue
    def iter_for(predicate_value, hold_queue):
        def consume_shared_generator_until_hold_queue_contains_something():
            if not hold_queue:
                try:
                    while next(shared_gen) != predicate_value:
                        pass
                except:
                    pass
        
        consume_shared_generator_until_hold_queue_contains_something()
        while hold_queue:
            print("Yield where predicate is "+str(predicate_value))
            yield hold_queue.pop()
            consume_shared_generator_until_hold_queue_contains_something()
    
    # return a tuple of two generators  
    return iter_for(predicate_value=True, hold_queue=deque_predicate_true), iter_for(predicate_value=False, hold_queue=deque_predicate_false)

用下面的测试，我们从print语句中得到如下输出:

t,f = iter_split_on_predicate(lambda item:item>=10,[1,2,3,10,11,12,4,5,6,13,14,15])
print(list(zip(t,f)))
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# [(10, 1), (11, 2), (12, 3), (13, 4), (14, 5), (15, 6)]

一个基于生成器的版本，如果你能忍受一个或两个原始列表的反转。

设置…

random.seed(1234)
a = list(range(10))
random.shuffle(a)
a
[2, 8, 3, 5, 6, 4, 9, 0, 1, 7]

至于分裂……

(list((a.pop(j) for j, y in [(len(a)-i-1, x) for i,x in enumerate(a[::-1])] if y%2 == 0))[::-1], a)
([2, 8, 6, 4, 0], [3, 5, 9, 1, 7])

Another list of tuples of locations and each element is built in reverse order. In a generator wrapped round that each element is tested against the predicate (here test for even) and if True then the element is poped using previously computed locations. We are working backwards along the list so poping elements out does not change positions closer to the beginning of the list. A wrapping list() evaluates the generator and a final revers [::-1] puts the elements back in the right order. The original list "a" now only contains elements that for which the predicate is False.

清晰快速

这个列表理解是简单的阅读和快速。这正是上级要求的。

set_good_vals = set(good_vals)    # Speed boost.
good = [x for x in my_list if x in set_good_vals]
bad = [x for x in my_list if x not in set_good_vals]

我更喜欢一个列表理解而不是两个，但不像张贴的许多答案(其中一些相当巧妙)，它是可读的和清晰的。这也是网页上最快的答案之一。

唯一(稍微)快一点的答案是:

set_good_vals = set(good_vals)
good, bad = [], []
for item in my_list:
    _ = good.append(item) if item in set_good_vals else bad.append(item)
    

.．.还有它的变体。(见我的另一个答案)。但我觉得第一种方法更优雅，而且几乎一样快。

我转向numpy来解决这个问题，以限制行数，并使其成为一个简单的函数。

我能够得到一个条件满足，将一个列表分为两个，使用np。在哪里分离出一个列表。这适用于数字，但这可以扩展使用字符串和列表，我相信。

在这儿……

from numpy import where as wh, array as arr

midz = lambda a, mid: (a[wh(a > mid)], a[wh((a =< mid))])
p_ = arr([i for i in [75, 50, 403, 453, 0, 25, 428] if i])
high,low = midz(p_, p_.mean())

这个问题已经有很多答案了，但似乎都不如我最喜欢的解决这个问题的方法，这种方法只遍历和测试每个项目一次，并使用列表理解的速度来构建两个输出列表之一，因此它只需要使用相对较慢的附加来构建一个输出列表:

bad = []
good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals or bad.append(x)]

In my answer to a similar question, I explain how this approach works (a combination of Python's greedy evaluation of or refraining from executing the append for "good" items, and append returning a false-like value which leaves the if condition false for "bad" items), and I show timeit results indicating that this approach outcompetes alternatives like those suggested here, especially in cases where the majority of items will go into the list built by list-comprehension (in this case, the good list).

简单的生成器版本，在内存中保存尽可能少的值，并且只调用pred一次:

from collections import deque
from typing import Callable, TypeVar, Iterable
_T = TypeVar('_T')

def iter_split(pred: Callable[[_T], bool],
               iterable: Iterable[_T]) -> tuple[Iterable[_T], Iterable[_T]]:
    """Split an iterable into two iterables based on a predicate.
    
    The predicate will only be called once per element.
    
    Returns:
        A tuple of two iterables, the first containing all elements for which
        the predicate returned True, the second containing all elements for
        which the predicate returned False.
    """
    iterator = iter(iterable)
    true_values: deque[_T] = deque()
    false_values: deque[_T] = deque()
    
    def true_generator():
        while True:
            while true_values:
                yield true_values.popleft()
            
            for item in iterator:
                if pred(item):
                    yield item
                    break
                false_values.append(item)
            else:
                break
            
    def false_generator():
        while True:
            while false_values:
                yield false_values.popleft()
            
            for item in iterator:
                if not pred(item):
                    yield item
                    break
                true_values.append(item)
            else:
                break

    return true_generator(), false_generator()