这个问题已经有很多答案了，但似乎都不如我最喜欢的解决这个问题的方法，这种方法只遍历和测试每个项目一次，并使用列表理解的速度来构建两个输出列表之一，因此它只需要使用相对较慢的附加来构建一个输出列表:

bad = []
good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals or bad.append(x)]

In my answer to a similar question, I explain how this approach works (a combination of Python's greedy evaluation of or refraining from executing the append for "good" items, and append returning a false-like value which leaves the if condition false for "bad" items), and I show timeit results indicating that this approach outcompetes alternatives like those suggested here, especially in cases where the majority of items will go into the list built by list-comprehension (in this case, the good list).

如果列表由组和间歇分隔符组成，您可以使用:

def split(items, p):
    groups = [[]]
    for i in items:
        if p(i):
            groups.append([])
        groups[-1].append(i)
    return groups

用法:

split(range(1,11), lambda x: x % 3 == 0)
# gives [[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [6, 7, 8], [9, 10]]

所有提出的解决方案的问题是，它将扫描和应用过滤功能两次。我会做一个简单的小函数，像这样:

def split_into_two_lists(lst, f):
    a = []
    b = []
    for elem in lst:
        if f(elem):
            a.append(elem)
        else:
            b.append(elem)
    return a, b

这样你就不会重复处理任何东西，也不会重复代码。

如果你不介意使用一个外部库，有两个我知道本机实现这个操作:

>>> files = [ ('file1.jpg', 33, '.jpg'), ('file2.avi', 999, '.avi')]
>>> IMAGE_TYPES = ('.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png')

iteration_utilities.partition: >>> from iteration_utilities import partition >>> notimages, images = partition(files, lambda x: x[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES) >>> notimages [('file2.avi', 999, '.avi')] >>> images [('file1.jpg', 33, '.jpg')] more_itertools.partition >>> from more_itertools import partition >>> notimages, images = partition(lambda x: x[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES, files) >>> list(notimages) # returns a generator so you need to explicitly convert to list. [('file2.avi', 999, '.avi')] >>> list(images) [('file1.jpg', 33, '.jpg')]

这个问题已经有很多答案了，但似乎都不如我最喜欢的解决这个问题的方法，这种方法只遍历和测试每个项目一次，并使用列表理解的速度来构建两个输出列表之一，因此它只需要使用相对较慢的附加来构建一个输出列表:

bad = []
good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals or bad.append(x)]

In my answer to a similar question, I explain how this approach works (a combination of Python's greedy evaluation of or refraining from executing the append for "good" items, and append returning a false-like value which leaves the if condition false for "bad" items), and I show timeit results indicating that this approach outcompetes alternatives like those suggested here, especially in cases where the majority of items will go into the list built by list-comprehension (in this case, the good list).

bad = []
good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals or bad.append(x)]

append返回None，所以它可以工作。