这是这个问题的另一个解决方案。我需要一个尽可能快的解决方案。这意味着只对列表进行一次迭代，并且最好是O(1)用于向结果列表之一添加数据。这与sastanin提供的解决方案非常相似，只是更短:

from collections import deque

def split(iterable, function):
    dq_true = deque()
    dq_false = deque()

    # deque - the fastest way to consume an iterator and append items
    deque((
      (dq_true if function(item) else dq_false).append(item) for item in iterable
    ), maxlen=0)

    return dq_true, dq_false

此时，可以按照如下方式使用该函数:

lower, higher = split([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], lambda x: x < 5)

selected, other = split([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], lambda x: x in {0,4,9})

如果你对结果的deque对象不满意，你可以很容易地将其转换为list、set或任何你喜欢的对象(例如list(lower))。转换要快得多，直接构建列表。

该方法保持项目的顺序，以及任何副本。

我将采用2步方法，将谓词的求值与列表的过滤分离:

def partition(pred, iterable):
    xs = list(zip(map(pred, iterable), iterable))
    return [x[1] for x in xs if x[0]], [x[1] for x in xs if not x[0]]

就性能而言(除了在iterable的每个成员上只对pred求值一次之外)，这样做的好处在于它将大量逻辑从解释器中移出，转移到高度优化的迭代和映射代码中。这可以加快长迭代对象的迭代速度，就像回答中描述的那样。

在表达性方面，它利用了像理解和映射这样的表达性习语。

Good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals] Bad = [x for x in mylist if x not in goodvals] 我怎样才能做得更优雅呢?

代码已经非常优雅了。

使用集合可能会有轻微的性能改进，但差异是微不足道的。基于集合的方法也会丢弃重复项，并且不会保留元素的顺序。我发现列表理解也更容易阅读。

事实上，我们甚至可以更简单地使用for循环:

good, bad = [], []

for x in mylist:
    if x in goodvals:
        good.append(f)
    else:
        bad.append(f)

这种方法可以更容易地添加额外的逻辑。例如，代码很容易被修改为丢弃None值:

good, bad = [], []

for x in mylist:
    if x is None:
        continue
    if x in goodvals:
        good.append(f)
    else:
        bad.append(f)

images = [f for f in files if f[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES]
anims  = [f for f in files if f not in images]

当条件较长时很好，例如在您的示例中。读者不需要弄清楚否定条件以及它是否适用于所有其他情况。

如果你坚持聪明，你可以采用温登的解决方案，再加上一点虚假的聪明:

def splay(l, f, d=None):
  d = d or {}
  for x in l: d.setdefault(f(x), []).append(x)
  return d

优雅快捷

受到DanSalmo评论的启发，这里有一个简洁、优雅的解决方案，同时也是最快的解决方案之一。

good_set = set(goodvals)
good, bad = [], []
for item in my_list:
    good.append(item) if item in good_set else bad.append(item)

提示:将goodvals转换为一组可以很容易地提高速度。

最快

为了获得最大速度，我们取最快的答案，并通过将good_list转换为一个集合来对其进行涡轮增压。仅这一项就为我们提供了40%以上的速度提升，我们最终得到了比最慢的解决方案快5.5倍以上的解决方案，即使它仍然可读。

good_list_set = set(good_list)  # 40%+ faster than a tuple.

good, bad = [], []
for item in my_origin_list:
    if item in good_list_set:
        good.append(item)
    else:
        bad.append(item)

稍微短一点

这是之前答案的一个更简洁的版本。

good_list_set = set(good_list)  # 40%+ faster than a tuple.

good, bad = [], []
for item in my_origin_list:
    out = good if item in good_list_set else bad
    out.append(item)

优雅可能有点主观，但一些鲁布·戈德堡风格的解决方案很可爱，很巧妙，不应该用于任何语言的产品代码中，更不用说本质上优雅的python了。

基准测试结果:

filter_BJHomer                  80/s       --   -3265%   -5312%   -5900%   -6262%   -7273%   -7363%   -8051%   -8162%   -8244%
zip_Funky                       118/s    4848%       --   -3040%   -3913%   -4450%   -5951%   -6085%   -7106%   -7271%   -7393%
two_lst_tuple_JohnLaRoy         170/s   11332%    4367%       --   -1254%   -2026%   -4182%   -4375%   -5842%   -6079%   -6254%
if_else_DBR                     195/s   14392%    6428%    1434%       --    -882%   -3348%   -3568%   -5246%   -5516%   -5717%
two_lst_compr_Parand            213/s   16750%    8016%    2540%     967%       --   -2705%   -2946%   -4786%   -5083%   -5303%
if_else_1_line_DanSalmo         292/s   26668%   14696%    7189%    5033%    3707%       --    -331%   -2853%   -3260%   -3562%
tuple_if_else                   302/s   27923%   15542%    7778%    5548%    4177%     343%       --   -2609%   -3029%   -3341%
set_1_line                      409/s   41308%   24556%   14053%   11035%    9181%    3993%    3529%       --    -569%    -991%
set_shorter                     434/s   44401%   26640%   15503%   12303%   10337%    4836%    4345%     603%       --    -448%
set_if_else                     454/s   46952%   28358%   16699%   13349%   11290%    5532%    5018%    1100%     469%       --

Python 3.7的完整基准代码(从FunkySayu修改而来):

good_list = ['.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png']

import random
import string
my_origin_list = []
for i in range(10000):
    fname = ''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_lowercase) for i in range(random.randrange(10)))
    if random.getrandbits(1):
        fext = random.choice(list(good_list))
    else:
        fext = "." + ''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_lowercase) for i in range(3))

    my_origin_list.append((fname + fext, random.randrange(1000), fext))

# Parand
def two_lst_compr_Parand(*_):
    return [e for e in my_origin_list if e[2] in good_list], [e for e in my_origin_list if not e[2] in good_list]

# dbr
def if_else_DBR(*_):
    a, b = list(), list()
    for e in my_origin_list:
        if e[2] in good_list:
            a.append(e)
        else:
            b.append(e)
    return a, b

# John La Rooy
def two_lst_tuple_JohnLaRoy(*_):
    a, b = list(), list()
    for e in my_origin_list:
        (b, a)[e[2] in good_list].append(e)
    return a, b

# # Ants Aasma
# def f4():
#     l1, l2 = tee((e[2] in good_list, e) for e in my_origin_list)
#     return [i for p, i in l1 if p], [i for p, i in l2 if not p]

# My personal way to do
def zip_Funky(*_):
    a, b = zip(*[(e, None) if e[2] in good_list else (None, e) for e in my_origin_list])
    return list(filter(None, a)), list(filter(None, b))

# BJ Homer
def filter_BJHomer(*_):
    return list(filter(lambda e: e[2] in good_list, my_origin_list)), list(filter(lambda e: not e[2] in good_list,                                                                             my_origin_list))

# ChaimG's answer; as a list.
def if_else_1_line_DanSalmo(*_):
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        _ = good.append(e) if e[2] in good_list else bad.append(e)
    return good, bad

# ChaimG's answer; as a set.
def set_1_line(*_):
    good_list_set = set(good_list)
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        _ = good.append(e) if e[2] in good_list_set else bad.append(e)
    return good, bad

# ChaimG set and if else list.
def set_shorter(*_):
    good_list_set = set(good_list)
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        out = good if e[2] in good_list_set else bad
        out.append(e)
    return good, bad

# ChaimG's best answer; if else as a set.
def set_if_else(*_):
    good_list_set = set(good_list)
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        if e[2] in good_list_set:
            good.append(e)
        else:
            bad.append(e)
    return good, bad

# ChaimG's best answer; if else as a set.
def tuple_if_else(*_):
    good_list_tuple = tuple(good_list)
    good, bad = [], []
    for e in my_origin_list:
        if e[2] in good_list_tuple:
            good.append(e)
        else:
            bad.append(e)
    return good, bad

def cmpthese(n=0, functions=None):
    results = {}
    for func_name in functions:
        args = ['%s(range(256))' % func_name, 'from __main__ import %s' % func_name]
        t = Timer(*args)
        results[func_name] = 1 / (t.timeit(number=n) / n) # passes/sec

    functions_sorted = sorted(functions, key=results.__getitem__)
    for f in functions_sorted:
        diff = []
        for func in functions_sorted:
            if func == f:
                diff.append("--")
            else:
                diff.append(f"{results[f]/results[func]*100 - 100:5.0%}")
        diffs = " ".join(f'{x:>8s}' for x in diff)

        print(f"{f:27s} \t{results[f]:,.0f}/s {diffs}")


if __name__=='__main__':
    from timeit import Timer
cmpthese(1000, 'two_lst_compr_Parand if_else_DBR two_lst_tuple_JohnLaRoy zip_Funky filter_BJHomer if_else_1_line_DanSalmo set_1_line set_if_else tuple_if_else set_shorter'.split(" "))