如果你不想用两行代码来完成一个语义只需要一次的操作，你可以把上面的一些方法(甚至是你自己的方法)包装在一个函数中:

def part_with_predicate(l, pred):
    return [i for i in l if pred(i)], [i for i in l if not pred(i)]

这不是一种惰性计算方法，它确实对列表进行了两次迭代，但是它允许您在一行代码中对列表进行分区。

有时候你并不需要清单上的另一半。 例如:

import sys
from itertools import ifilter

trustedPeople = sys.argv[1].split(',')
newName = sys.argv[2]

myFriends = ifilter(lambda x: x.startswith('Shi'), trustedPeople)

print '%s is %smy friend.' % (newName, newName not in myFriends 'not ' or '')

之前的答案似乎并不能满足我所有的四种强迫症:

尽可能的懒惰， 只对原始Iterable求值一次 每个项只计算谓词一次 提供良好的类型注释(适用于python 3.7)

我的解决方案并不漂亮，我不认为我可以推荐使用它，但它是:

def iter_split_on_predicate(predicate: Callable[[T], bool], iterable: Iterable[T]) -> Tuple[Iterator[T], Iterator[T]]:
    deque_predicate_true = deque()
    deque_predicate_false = deque()
    
    # define a generator function to consume the input iterable
    # the Predicate is evaluated once per item, added to the appropriate deque, and the predicate result it yielded 
    def shared_generator(definitely_an_iterator):
        for item in definitely_an_iterator:
            print("Evaluate predicate.")
            if predicate(item):
                deque_predicate_true.appendleft(item)
                yield True
            else:
                deque_predicate_false.appendleft(item)
                yield False
    
    # consume input iterable only once,
    # converting to an iterator with the iter() function if necessary. Probably this conversion is unnecessary
    shared_gen = shared_generator(
        iterable if isinstance(iterable, collections.abc.Iterator) else iter(iterable)
    )
    
    # define a generator function for each predicate outcome and queue
    def iter_for(predicate_value, hold_queue):
        def consume_shared_generator_until_hold_queue_contains_something():
            if not hold_queue:
                try:
                    while next(shared_gen) != predicate_value:
                        pass
                except:
                    pass
        
        consume_shared_generator_until_hold_queue_contains_something()
        while hold_queue:
            print("Yield where predicate is "+str(predicate_value))
            yield hold_queue.pop()
            consume_shared_generator_until_hold_queue_contains_something()
    
    # return a tuple of two generators  
    return iter_for(predicate_value=True, hold_queue=deque_predicate_true), iter_for(predicate_value=False, hold_queue=deque_predicate_false)

用下面的测试，我们从print语句中得到如下输出:

t,f = iter_split_on_predicate(lambda item:item>=10,[1,2,3,10,11,12,4,5,6,13,14,15])
print(list(zip(t,f)))
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# Evaluate predicate.
# Yield where predicate is True
# Yield where predicate is False
# [(10, 1), (11, 2), (12, 3), (13, 4), (14, 5), (15, 6)]

Good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals] Bad = [x for x in mylist if x not in goodvals] 我怎样才能做得更优雅呢?

代码已经非常优雅了。

使用集合可能会有轻微的性能改进，但差异是微不足道的。基于集合的方法也会丢弃重复项，并且不会保留元素的顺序。我发现列表理解也更容易阅读。

事实上，我们甚至可以更简单地使用for循环:

good, bad = [], []

for x in mylist:
    if x in goodvals:
        good.append(f)
    else:
        bad.append(f)

这种方法可以更容易地添加额外的逻辑。例如，代码很容易被修改为丢弃None值:

good, bad = [], []

for x in mylist:
    if x is None:
        continue
    if x in goodvals:
        good.append(f)
    else:
        bad.append(f)

def partition(pred, seq):
  return reduce( lambda (yes, no), x: (yes+[x], no) if pred(x) else (yes, no+[x]), seq, ([], []) )

我转向numpy来解决这个问题，以限制行数，并使其成为一个简单的函数。

我能够得到一个条件满足，将一个列表分为两个，使用np。在哪里分离出一个列表。这适用于数字，但这可以扩展使用字符串和列表，我相信。

在这儿……

from numpy import where as wh, array as arr

midz = lambda a, mid: (a[wh(a > mid)], a[wh((a =< mid))])
p_ = arr([i for i in [75, 50, 403, 453, 0, 25, 428] if i])
high,low = midz(p_, p_.mean())