是否有办法在bash上比较这些字符串，例如:2.4.5和2.8和2.4.5.1?
可能没有普遍正确的方法来实现这一点。如果您正在尝试比较Debian包系统中的版本，请尝试dpkg——compare-versions <first> <relation> <second>。
你可以递归地拆分。和下面的算法进行比较，从这里开始。如果版本相同则返回10，如果版本1大于版本2则返回11，否则返回9。
#!/bin/bash
do_version_check() {
[ "$1" == "$2" ] && return 10
ver1front=`echo $1 | cut -d "." -f -1`
ver1back=`echo $1 | cut -d "." -f 2-`
ver2front=`echo $2 | cut -d "." -f -1`
ver2back=`echo $2 | cut -d "." -f 2-`
if [ "$ver1front" != "$1" ] || [ "$ver2front" != "$2" ]; then
[ "$ver1front" -gt "$ver2front" ] && return 11
[ "$ver1front" -lt "$ver2front" ] && return 9
[ "$ver1front" == "$1" ] || [ -z "$ver1back" ] && ver1back=0
[ "$ver2front" == "$2" ] || [ -z "$ver2back" ] && ver2back=0
do_version_check "$ver1back" "$ver2back"
return $?
else
[ "$1" -gt "$2" ] && return 11 || return 9
fi
}
do_version_check "$1" "$2"
源
如果你有coreutils-7 (Ubuntu Karmic，而不是Jaunty)，那么你的排序命令应该有一个-V选项(版本排序)，你可以使用它来进行比较:
verlte() {
[ "$1" = "`echo -e "$1\n$2" | sort -V | head -n1`" ]
}
verlt() {
[ "$1" = "$2" ] && return 1 || verlte $1 $2
}
verlte 2.5.7 2.5.6 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # no
verlt 2.4.10 2.4.9 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # no
verlt 2.4.8 2.4.10 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # yes
verlte 2.5.6 2.5.6 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # yes
verlt 2.5.6 2.5.6 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # no
下面是一个不需要任何外部工具的纯Bash版本:
#!/bin/bash
vercomp () {
if [[ $1 == $2 ]]
then
return 0
fi
local IFS=.
local i ver1=($1) ver2=($2)
# fill empty fields in ver1 with zeros
for ((i=${#ver1[@]}; i<${#ver2[@]}; i++))
do
ver1[i]=0
done
for ((i=0; i<${#ver1[@]}; i++))
do
if [[ -z ${ver2[i]} ]]
then
# fill empty fields in ver2 with zeros
ver2[i]=0
fi
if ((10#${ver1[i]} > 10#${ver2[i]}))
then
return 1
fi
if ((10#${ver1[i]} < 10#${ver2[i]}))
then
return 2
fi
done
return 0
}
testvercomp () {
vercomp $1 $2
case $? in
0) op='=';;
1) op='>';;
2) op='<';;
esac
if [[ $op != $3 ]]
then
echo "FAIL: Expected '$3', Actual '$op', Arg1 '$1', Arg2 '$2'"
else
echo "Pass: '$1 $op $2'"
fi
}
# Run tests
# argument table format:
# testarg1 testarg2 expected_relationship
echo "The following tests should pass"
while read -r test
do
testvercomp $test
done << EOF
1 1 =
2.1 2.2 <
3.0.4.10 3.0.4.2 >
4.08 4.08.01 <
3.2.1.9.8144 3.2 >
3.2 3.2.1.9.8144 <
1.2 2.1 <
2.1 1.2 >
5.6.7 5.6.7 =
1.01.1 1.1.1 =
1.1.1 1.01.1 =
1 1.0 =
1.0 1 =
1.0.2.0 1.0.2 =
1..0 1.0 =
1.0 1..0 =
EOF
echo "The following test should fail (test the tester)"
testvercomp 1 1 '>'
运行测试:
$ . ./vercomp
The following tests should pass
Pass: '1 = 1'
Pass: '2.1 < 2.2'
Pass: '3.0.4.10 > 3.0.4.2'
Pass: '4.08 < 4.08.01'
Pass: '3.2.1.9.8144 > 3.2'
Pass: '3.2 < 3.2.1.9.8144'
Pass: '1.2 < 2.1'
Pass: '2.1 > 1.2'
Pass: '5.6.7 = 5.6.7'
Pass: '1.01.1 = 1.1.1'
Pass: '1.1.1 = 1.01.1'
Pass: '1 = 1.0'
Pass: '1.0 = 1'
Pass: '1.0.2.0 = 1.0.2'
Pass: '1..0 = 1.0'
Pass: '1.0 = 1..0'
The following test should fail (test the tester)
FAIL: Expected '>', Actual '=', Arg1 '1', Arg2 '1'
对于旧版本/busybox排序。简单的形式提供了粗略的结果，往往奏效。
sort -n
这是特别有用的版本，其中包含alpha符号，如
10.c.3
10.a.4
2.b.5
我遇到并解决了这个问题，添加了一个额外的(更短更简单的)答案…
首先注意，扩展shell比较失败了，你可能已经知道了…
if [[ 1.2.0 < 1.12.12 ]]; then echo true; else echo false; fi
false
使用sort -t'。'-g(或者kanaka提到的sort -V)来排序版本和简单的bash字符串比较，我找到了一个解决方案。输入文件包含列3和列4中的版本，我想对它们进行比较。这将遍历列表，确定匹配项或其中一个大于另一个。希望这仍然可以帮助那些希望使用bash尽可能简单地做到这一点的人。
while read l
do
#Field 3 contains version on left to compare (change -f3 to required column).
kf=$(echo $l | cut -d ' ' -f3)
#Field 4 contains version on right to compare (change -f4 to required column).
mp=$(echo $l | cut -d ' ' -f4)
echo 'kf = '$kf
echo 'mp = '$mp
#To compare versions m.m.m the two can be listed and sorted with a . separator and the greater version found.
gv=$(echo -e $kf'\n'$mp | sort -t'.' -g | tail -n 1)
if [ $kf = $mp ]; then
echo 'Match Found: '$l
elif [ $kf = $gv ]; then
echo 'Karaf feature file version is greater '$l
elif [ $mp = $gv ]; then
echo 'Maven pom file version is greater '$l
else
echo 'Comparison error '$l
fi
done < features_and_pom_versions.tmp.txt
感谢Barry的博客给出了排序的想法…… 裁判:http://bkhome.org/blog/?viewDetailed=02199
### the answer is does we second argument is higher
function _ver_higher {
ver=`echo -ne "$1\n$2" |sort -Vr |head -n1`
if [ "$2" == "$1" ]; then
return 1
elif [ "$2" == "$ver" ]; then
return 0
else
return 1
fi
}
if _ver_higher $1 $2; then
echo higher
else
echo same or less
fi
它非常简单和小。
这个怎么样?似乎有用?
checkVersion() {
subVer1=$1
subVer2=$2
[ "$subVer1" == "$subVer2" ] && echo "Version is same"
echo "Version 1 is $subVer1"
testVer1=$subVer1
echo "Test version 1 is $testVer1"
x=0
while [[ $testVer1 != "" ]]
do
((x++))
testVer1=`echo $subVer1|cut -d "." -f $x`
echo "testVer1 now is $testVer1"
testVer2=`echo $subVer2|cut -d "." -f $x`
echo "testVer2 now is $testVer2"
if [[ $testVer1 -gt $testVer2 ]]
then
echo "$ver1 is greater than $ver2"
break
elif [[ "$testVer2" -gt "$testVer1" ]]
then
echo "$ver2 is greater than $ver1"
break
fi
echo "This is the sub verion for first value $testVer1"
echo "This is the sub verion for second value $testVer2"
done
}
ver1=$1
ver2=$2
checkVersion "$ver1" "$ver2"
如果你知道字段的数量，你可以用-k,n,n，得到一个超级简单的解
echo '2.4.5
2.8
2.4.5.1
2.10.2' | sort -t '.' -k 1,1 -k 2,2 -k 3,3 -k 4,4 -g
2.4.5
2.4.5.1
2.8
2.10.2
这里是另一个没有任何外部调用的纯bash解决方案:
#!/bin/bash
function version_compare {
IFS='.' read -ra ver1 <<< "$1"
IFS='.' read -ra ver2 <<< "$2"
[[ ${#ver1[@]} -gt ${#ver2[@]} ]] && till=${#ver1[@]} || till=${#ver2[@]}
for ((i=0; i<${till}; i++)); do
local num1; local num2;
[[ -z ${ver1[i]} ]] && num1=0 || num1=${ver1[i]}
[[ -z ${ver2[i]} ]] && num2=0 || num2=${ver2[i]}
if [[ $num1 -gt $num2 ]]; then
echo ">"; return 0
elif
[[ $num1 -lt $num2 ]]; then
echo "<"; return 0
fi
done
echo "="; return 0
}
echo "${1} $(version_compare "${1}" "${2}") ${2}"
还有更简单的解决方案，如果你确定所讨论的版本在第一个点后不包含前导零:
#!/bin/bash
function version_compare {
local ver1=${1//.}
local ver2=${2//.}
if [[ $ver1 -gt $ver2 ]]; then
echo ">"; return 0
elif
[[ $ver1 -lt $ver2 ]]; then
echo "<"; return 0
fi
echo "="; return 0
}
echo "${1} $(version_compare "${1}" "${2}") ${2}"
这适用于像1.2.3 vs 1.3.1 vs 0.9.7这样的版本，但不适用于其他版本 1.2.3 vs 1.2.3.0或1.01.1 vs 1.1.1
感谢Dennis的解决方案，我们可以扩展它以允许比较运算符'>'，'<'，'='，'=='，'<='和'>='。
# compver ver1 '=|==|>|<|>=|<=' ver2
compver() {
local op
vercomp $1 $3
case $? in
0) op='=';;
1) op='>';;
2) op='<';;
esac
[[ $2 == *$op* ]] && return 0 || return 1
}
然后我们可以在表达式中使用比较运算符，比如:
compver 1.7 '<=' 1.8
compver 1.7 '==' 1.7
compver 1.7 '=' 1.7
并且只测试结果的真/假，比如:
if compver $ver1 '>' $ver2; then
echo "Newer"
fi
这在版本中最多为4个字段。
$ function ver { printf "%03d%03d%03d%03d" $(echo "$1" | tr '.' ' '); }
$ [ $(ver 10.9) -lt $(ver 10.10) ] && echo hello
hello
我使用嵌入式Linux (Yocto)与BusyBox。BusyBox排序没有-V选项(但BusyBox expr匹配可以做正则表达式)。所以我需要一个Bash版本的比较，它适用于这个约束。
我做了以下(类似于Dennis Williamson的回答)来比较使用“自然排序”类型的算法。它将字符串分成数字部分和非数字部分;它以数字方式比较数字部分(因此10大于9)，并以纯ASCII方式比较非数字部分。
ascii_frag() {
expr match "$1" "\([^[:digit:]]*\)"
}
ascii_remainder() {
expr match "$1" "[^[:digit:]]*\(.*\)"
}
numeric_frag() {
expr match "$1" "\([[:digit:]]*\)"
}
numeric_remainder() {
expr match "$1" "[[:digit:]]*\(.*\)"
}
vercomp_debug() {
OUT="$1"
#echo "${OUT}"
}
# return 1 for $1 > $2
# return 2 for $1 < $2
# return 0 for equal
vercomp() {
local WORK1="$1"
local WORK2="$2"
local NUM1="", NUM2="", ASCII1="", ASCII2=""
while true; do
vercomp_debug "ASCII compare"
ASCII1=`ascii_frag "${WORK1}"`
ASCII2=`ascii_frag "${WORK2}"`
WORK1=`ascii_remainder "${WORK1}"`
WORK2=`ascii_remainder "${WORK2}"`
vercomp_debug "\"${ASCII1}\" remainder \"${WORK1}\""
vercomp_debug "\"${ASCII2}\" remainder \"${WORK2}\""
if [ "${ASCII1}" \> "${ASCII2}" ]; then
vercomp_debug "ascii ${ASCII1} > ${ASCII2}"
return 1
elif [ "${ASCII1}" \< "${ASCII2}" ]; then
vercomp_debug "ascii ${ASCII1} < ${ASCII2}"
return 2
fi
vercomp_debug "--------"
vercomp_debug "Numeric compare"
NUM1=`numeric_frag "${WORK1}"`
NUM2=`numeric_frag "${WORK2}"`
WORK1=`numeric_remainder "${WORK1}"`
WORK2=`numeric_remainder "${WORK2}"`
vercomp_debug "\"${NUM1}\" remainder \"${WORK1}\""
vercomp_debug "\"${NUM2}\" remainder \"${WORK2}\""
if [ -z "${NUM1}" -a -z "${NUM2}" ]; then
vercomp_debug "blank 1 and blank 2 equal"
return 0
elif [ -z "${NUM1}" -a -n "${NUM2}" ]; then
vercomp_debug "blank 1 less than non-blank 2"
return 2
elif [ -n "${NUM1}" -a -z "${NUM2}" ]; then
vercomp_debug "non-blank 1 greater than blank 2"
return 1
fi
if [ "${NUM1}" -gt "${NUM2}" ]; then
vercomp_debug "num ${NUM1} > ${NUM2}"
return 1
elif [ "${NUM1}" -lt "${NUM2}" ]; then
vercomp_debug "num ${NUM1} < ${NUM2}"
return 2
fi
vercomp_debug "--------"
done
}
它可以比较更复杂的版本号，例如
1.2-r3和1.2-r4 1.2 r3 vs 1.2r4
请注意，对于Dennis Williamson的回答中的一些极端情况，它不会返回相同的结果。特别是:
1 1.0 <
1.0 1 >
1.0.2.0 1.0.2 >
1..0 1.0 >
1.0 1..0 <
但这些都是极端情况，我认为结果仍然是合理的。
如果它只是想知道一个版本是否比另一个版本低，我会检查sort——version-sort是否会改变我的版本字符串的顺序:
string="$1
$2"
[ "$string" == "$(sort --version-sort <<< "$string")" ]
下面是另一个纯bash版本，比公认的答案要小得多。它只检查版本是否小于或等于“最小版本”，并且它将按字典顺序检查字母数字序列，这通常会给出错误的结果(举个常见的例子，“snapshot”不晚于“release”)。它将工作的主要/次要。
is_number() {
case "$BASH_VERSION" in
3.1.*)
PATTERN='\^\[0-9\]+\$'
;;
*)
PATTERN='^[0-9]+$'
;;
esac
[[ "$1" =~ $PATTERN ]]
}
min_version() {
if [[ $# != 2 ]]
then
echo "Usage: min_version current minimum"
return
fi
A="${1%%.*}"
B="${2%%.*}"
if [[ "$A" != "$1" && "$B" != "$2" && "$A" == "$B" ]]
then
min_version "${1#*.}" "${2#*.}"
else
if is_number "$A" && is_number "$B"
then
[[ "$A" -ge "$B" ]]
else
[[ ! "$A" < "$B" ]]
fi
fi
}
function version { echo "$@" | awk -F. '{ printf("%d%03d%03d%03d\n", $1,$2,$3,$4); }'; }
这样用:
if [ $(version $VAR) -ge $(version "6.2.0") ]; then
echo "Version is up to date"
fi
(来自https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/123408/11374)
我实现了一个函数，返回与Dennis Williamson相同的结果，但使用更少的行数。它最初执行一个健全性检查，导致1..0从他的测试中失败(我认为应该是这样)，但他所有的其他测试都通过了这段代码:
#!/bin/bash
version_compare() {
if [[ $1 =~ ^([0-9]+\.?)+$ && $2 =~ ^([0-9]+\.?)+$ ]]; then
local l=(${1//./ }) r=(${2//./ }) s=${#l[@]}; [[ ${#r[@]} -gt ${#l[@]} ]] && s=${#r[@]}
for i in $(seq 0 $((s - 1))); do
[[ ${l[$i]} -gt ${r[$i]} ]] && return 1
[[ ${l[$i]} -lt ${r[$i]} ]] && return 2
done
return 0
else
echo "Invalid version number given"
exit 1
fi
}
下面是对顶部答案(Dennis的)的改进，它更简洁，并使用了不同的返回值方案，以便通过单个比较轻松实现<=和>=。它还比较不是[0-9]的第一个字符之后的所有内容。]因此1.0rc1 < 1.0rc2。
# Compares two tuple-based, dot-delimited version numbers a and b (possibly
# with arbitrary string suffixes). Returns:
# 1 if a<b
# 2 if equal
# 3 if a>b
# Everything after the first character not in [0-9.] is compared
# lexicographically using ASCII ordering if the tuple-based versions are equal.
compare_versions() {
if [[ $1 == "$2" ]]; then
return 2
fi
local IFS=.
local i a=(${1%%[^0-9.]*}) b=(${2%%[^0-9.]*})
local arem=${1#${1%%[^0-9.]*}} brem=${2#${2%%[^0-9.]*}}
for ((i=0; i<${#a[@]} || i<${#b[@]}; i++)); do
if ((10#${a[i]:-0} < 10#${b[i]:-0})); then
return 1
elif ((10#${a[i]:-0} > 10#${b[i]:-0})); then
return 3
fi
done
if [ "$arem" '<' "$brem" ]; then
return 1
elif [ "$arem" '>' "$brem" ]; then
return 3
fi
return 2
}
为了解决@gammazero的评论，一个(我认为)与语义版本兼容的更长的版本是:
# Compares two dot-delimited decimal-element version numbers a and b that may
# also have arbitrary string suffixes. Compatible with semantic versioning, but
# not as strict: comparisons of non-semver strings may have unexpected
# behavior.
#
# Returns:
# 1 if a<b
# 2 if equal
# 3 if a>b
compare_versions() {
local LC_ALL=C
# Optimization
if [[ $1 == "$2" ]]; then
return 2
fi
# Compare numeric release versions. Supports an arbitrary number of numeric
# elements (i.e., not just X.Y.Z) in which unspecified indices are regarded
# as 0.
local aver=${1%%[^0-9.]*} bver=${2%%[^0-9.]*}
local arem=${1#$aver} brem=${2#$bver}
local IFS=.
local i a=($aver) b=($bver)
for ((i=0; i<${#a[@]} || i<${#b[@]}; i++)); do
if ((10#${a[i]:-0} < 10#${b[i]:-0})); then
return 1
elif ((10#${a[i]:-0} > 10#${b[i]:-0})); then
return 3
fi
done
# Remove build metadata before remaining comparison
arem=${arem%%+*}
brem=${brem%%+*}
# Prelease (w/remainder) always older than release (no remainder)
if [ -n "$arem" -a -z "$brem" ]; then
return 1
elif [ -z "$arem" -a -n "$brem" ]; then
return 3
fi
# Otherwise, split by periods and compare individual elements either
# numerically or lexicographically
local a=(${arem#-}) b=(${brem#-})
for ((i=0; i<${#a[@]} && i<${#b[@]}; i++)); do
local anns=${a[i]#${a[i]%%[^0-9]*}} bnns=${b[i]#${b[i]%%[^0-9]*}}
if [ -z "$anns$bnns" ]; then
# Both numeric
if ((10#${a[i]:-0} < 10#${b[i]:-0})); then
return 1
elif ((10#${a[i]:-0} > 10#${b[i]:-0})); then
return 3
fi
elif [ -z "$anns" ]; then
# Numeric comes before non-numeric
return 1
elif [ -z "$bnns" ]; then
# Numeric comes before non-numeric
return 3
else
# Compare lexicographically
if [[ ${a[i]} < ${b[i]} ]]; then
return 1
elif [[ ${a[i]} > ${b[i]} ]]; then
return 3
fi
fi
done
# Fewer elements is earlier
if (( ${#a[@]} < ${#b[@]} )); then
return 1
elif (( ${#a[@]} > ${#b[@]} )); then
return 3
fi
# Must be equal!
return 2
}
我实现了另一个比较器函数。这一个有两个特定的要求:(i)我不希望函数失败使用返回1，但echo代替;(ii)当我们从git存储库中检索版本时，版本“1.0”应该大于“1.0.2”，这意味着“1.0”来自trunk。
function version_compare {
IFS="." read -a v_a <<< "$1"
IFS="." read -a v_b <<< "$2"
while [[ -n "$v_a" || -n "$v_b" ]]; do
[[ -z "$v_a" || "$v_a" -gt "$v_b" ]] && echo 1 && return
[[ -z "$v_b" || "$v_b" -gt "$v_a" ]] && echo -1 && return
v_a=("${v_a[@]:1}")
v_b=("${v_b[@]:1}")
done
echo 0
}
请随意评论并提出改进建议。
另一种方法(@joynes的修改版本)比较问题中问到的虚线版本 (即“1.2”、“2.3.4”、“1.0”、“1.10.1”等)。 最大数量的位置必须事先知道。该方法期望最多3个版本位置。
expr $(printf "$1\n$2" | sort -t '.' -k 1,1 -k 2,2 -k 3,3 -g | sed -n 2p) != $2
使用示例:
expr $(printf "1.10.1\n1.7" | sort -t '.' -k 1,1 -k 2,2 -k 3,3 -g | sed -n 2p) != "1.7"
返回:1，因为1.10.1大于1.7
expr $(printf "1.10.1\n1.11" | sort -t '.' -k 1,1 -k 2,2 -k 3,3 -g | sed -n 2p) != "1.11"
返回:0，因为1.10.1比1.11低
下面是一个不使用外部命令的简单Bash函数。它适用于包含最多三个数字部分的版本字符串-小于3也是可以的。它可以很容易地扩展为更多。它实现了=、<、<=、>、>=和!=条件。
#!/bin/bash
vercmp() {
version1=$1 version2=$2 condition=$3
IFS=. v1_array=($version1) v2_array=($version2)
v1=$((v1_array[0] * 100 + v1_array[1] * 10 + v1_array[2]))
v2=$((v2_array[0] * 100 + v2_array[1] * 10 + v2_array[2]))
diff=$((v2 - v1))
[[ $condition = '=' ]] && ((diff == 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '!=' ]] && ((diff != 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '<' ]] && ((diff > 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '<=' ]] && ((diff >= 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '>' ]] && ((diff < 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '>=' ]] && ((diff <= 0)) && return 0
return 1
}
下面是测试:
for tv1 in '*' 1.1.1 2.5.3 7.3.0 0.5.7 10.3.9 8.55.32 0.0.1; do
for tv2 in 3.1.1 1.5.3 4.3.0 0.0.7 0.3.9 11.55.32 10.0.0 '*'; do
for c in '=' '>' '<' '>=' '<=' '!='; do
vercmp "$tv1" "$tv2" "$c" && printf '%s\n' "$tv1 $c $tv2 is true" || printf '%s\n' "$tv1 $c $tv2 is false"
done
done
done
测试输出的子集:
<snip>
* >= * is true
* <= * is true
* != * is true
1.1.1 = 3.1.1 is false
1.1.1 > 3.1.1 is false
1.1.1 < 3.1.1 is true
1.1.1 >= 3.1.1 is false
1.1.1 <= 3.1.1 is true
1.1.1 != 3.1.1 is true
1.1.1 = 1.5.3 is false
1.1.1 > 1.5.3 is false
1.1.1 < 1.5.3 is true
1.1.1 >= 1.5.3 is false
1.1.1 <= 1.5.3 is true
1.1.1 != 1.5.3 is true
1.1.1 = 4.3.0 is false
1.1.1 > 4.3.0 is false
<snip>
$ for OVFTOOL_VERSION in "4.2.0" "4.2.1" "5.2.0" "3.2.0" "4.1.9" "4.0.1" "4.3.0" "4.5.0" "4.2.1" "30.1.0" "4" "5" "4.1" "4.3"
> do
> if [ $(echo "$OVFTOOL_VERSION 4.2.0" | tr " " "\n" | sort --version-sort | head -n 1) = 4.2.0 ]; then
> echo "$OVFTOOL_VERSION is >= 4.2.0";
> else
> echo "$OVFTOOL_VERSION is < 4.2.0";
> fi
> done
4.2.0 is >= 4.2.0
4.2.1 is >= 4.2.0
5.2.0 is >= 4.2.0
3.2.0 is < 4.2.0
4.1.9 is < 4.2.0
4.0.1 is < 4.2.0
4.3.0 is >= 4.2.0
4.5.0 is >= 4.2.0
4.2.1 is >= 4.2.0
30.1.0 is >= 4.2.0
4 is < 4.2.0
5 is >= 4.2.0
4.1 is < 4.2.0
4.3 is >= 4.2.0
函数V -纯bash解决方案，不需要外部实用程序。 支持== = != < <= >和>=(字典)。 可选尾字母比较:1.5a < 1.5b 长度不等比较:1.6 > 1.5b 从左到右读取:如果V 1.5 '<' 1.6;然后……
<>
# Sample output
# Note: ++ (true) and __ (false) mean that V works correctly.
++ 3.6 '>' 3.5b
__ 2.5.7 '<=' 2.5.6
++ 2.4.10 '<' 2.5.9
__ 3.0002 '>' 3.0003.3
++ 4.0-RC2 '>' 4.0-RC1
<>
function V() # $1-a $2-op $3-$b
# Compare a and b as version strings. Rules:
# R1: a and b : dot-separated sequence of items. Items are numeric. The last item can optionally end with letters, i.e., 2.5 or 2.5a.
# R2: Zeros are automatically inserted to compare the same number of items, i.e., 1.0 < 1.0.1 means 1.0.0 < 1.0.1 => yes.
# R3: op can be '=' '==' '!=' '<' '<=' '>' '>=' (lexicographic).
# R4: Unrestricted number of digits of any item, i.e., 3.0003 > 3.0000004.
# R5: Unrestricted number of items.
{
local a=$1 op=$2 b=$3 al=${1##*.} bl=${3##*.}
while [[ $al =~ ^[[:digit:]] ]]; do al=${al:1}; done
while [[ $bl =~ ^[[:digit:]] ]]; do bl=${bl:1}; done
local ai=${a%$al} bi=${b%$bl}
local ap=${ai//[[:digit:]]} bp=${bi//[[:digit:]]}
ap=${ap//./.0} bp=${bp//./.0}
local w=1 fmt=$a.$b x IFS=.
for x in $fmt; do [ ${#x} -gt $w ] && w=${#x}; done
fmt=${*//[^.]}; fmt=${fmt//./%${w}s}
printf -v a $fmt $ai$bp; printf -v a "%s-%${w}s" $a $al
printf -v b $fmt $bi$ap; printf -v b "%s-%${w}s" $b $bl
case $op in
'<='|'>=' ) [ "$a" ${op:0:1} "$b" ] || [ "$a" = "$b" ] ;;
* ) [ "$a" $op "$b" ] ;;
esac
}
代码解释
第1行:定义局部变量:
A, op, b -比较操作数和操作符，即"3.6" > "3.5a"。 Al, a和b的bl尾字母，初始化为尾项，即“6”和“5a”。
第2行和第3行:从尾部项目中向左修剪数字，因此如果有字母，则只剩下“”和“a”。
第4行:右修剪a和b中的字母，只保留数字项的序列作为局部变量ai和bi，即“3.6”和“3.5”。 值得注意的例子:"4.01-RC2" > "4.01-RC1"得到ai="4.01" al="-RC2"和bi="4.01" bl="-RC1"。
第6行:定义局部变量:
Ap, bp - 0 ai和bi的右填充。首先只保留项间点，其中点的数量分别等于a和b的元素的数量。
第7行:然后在每个点后面添加“0”来制作填充蒙版。
第9行:局部变量:
W -项目宽度 FMT - printf格式字符串，待计算 X -暂时 IFS =。Bash以“。”分隔变量值。
第10行:计算w，最大条目宽度，它将用于对齐条目进行字典比较。在我们的例子中w=2。
第11行:通过替换$a中的每个字符创建printf对齐格式。w b美元% ${},即,“3.6”>“3.5”收益率“% 2 s % 2 s % 2 s % 2 s”。
第12行:"printf -v a"设置变量a的值。这相当于许多编程语言中的a=sprintf(…)。注意这里，通过IFS=的影响。printf的参数拆分为单独的项。
在第一个printf中，a中的项用空格左填充，同时从bp中追加足够多的“0”项，以确保结果字符串a可以与类似格式的b进行有意义的比较。
请注意，我们将bp -而不是ap附加到ai，因为ap和bp可能有不同的长度，所以这导致a和b具有相同的长度。
对于第二个printf，我们将字母部分al附加到a，并使用足够的填充来进行有意义的比较。现在a可以和b比较了。
第13行:与第12行相同，但b。
第15行:在非内置(<=和>=)操作符和内置操作符之间分割比较情况。
第16行:如果比较操作符<=，则分别测试a<b或a=b - >= a<b或a=b
第17行:测试内置比较操作符。
<>
# All tests
function P { printf "$@"; }
function EXPECT { printf "$@"; }
function CODE { awk $BASH_LINENO'==NR{print " "$2,$3,$4}' "$0"; }
P 'Note: ++ (true) and __ (false) mean that V works correctly.\n'
V 2.5 '!=' 2.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5 '=' 2.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5 '==' 2.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5a '==' 2.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5a '<' 2.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5a '>' 2.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5b '>' 2.5a && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5b '<' 2.5a && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.5 '<' 3.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.5 '>' 3.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.5b '>' 3.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.5b '<' 3.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.6 '<' 3.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.6 '>' 3.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.5b '<' 3.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.5b '>' 3.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5.7 '<=' 2.5.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.4.10 '<' 2.4.9 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.4.10 '<' 2.5.9 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.4.10 '<' 2.5.9 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.4.8 '>' 2.4.10 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5.6 '<=' 2.5.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5.6 '>=' 2.5.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.0 '<' 3.0.3 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.0002 '<' 3.0003.3 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.0002 '>' 3.0003.3 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.0003.3 '<' 3.0002 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.0003.3 '>' 3.0002 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 4.0-RC2 '>' 4.0-RC1 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 4.0-RC2 '<' 4.0-RC1 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
您可以通过版本命令行查看版本约束
$ version ">=1.0, <2.0" "1.7"
$ go version | version ">=1.9"
Bash脚本示例:
#!/bin/bash
if `version -b ">=9.0.0" "$(gcc --version)"`; then
echo "gcc version satisfies constraints >=9.0.0"
else
echo "gcc version doesn't satisfies constraints >=9.0.0"
fi
这里有一个支持修订的纯Bash解决方案(例如。“1.0-r1”)，答案是基于丹尼斯·威廉姆森(Dennis Williamson)发布的答案。可以很容易地修改它以支持'-RC1'之类的东西，或者通过更改正则表达式从更复杂的字符串中提取版本。
有关实现的详细信息，请参考代码内注释和/或启用包含的调试代码:
#!/bin/bash
# Compare two version strings [$1: version string 1 (v1), $2: version string 2 (v2)]
# Return values:
# 0: v1 == v2
# 1: v1 > v2
# 2: v1 < v2
# Based on: https://stackoverflow.com/a/4025065 by Dennis Williamson
function compare_versions() {
# Trivial v1 == v2 test based on string comparison
[[ "$1" == "$2" ]] && return 0
# Local variables
local regex="^(.*)-r([0-9]*)$" va1=() vr1=0 va2=() vr2=0 len i IFS="."
# Split version strings into arrays, extract trailing revisions
if [[ "$1" =~ ${regex} ]]; then
va1=(${BASH_REMATCH[1]})
[[ -n "${BASH_REMATCH[2]}" ]] && vr1=${BASH_REMATCH[2]}
else
va1=($1)
fi
if [[ "$2" =~ ${regex} ]]; then
va2=(${BASH_REMATCH[1]})
[[ -n "${BASH_REMATCH[2]}" ]] && vr2=${BASH_REMATCH[2]}
else
va2=($2)
fi
# Bring va1 and va2 to same length by filling empty fields with zeros
(( ${#va1[@]} > ${#va2[@]} )) && len=${#va1[@]} || len=${#va2[@]}
for ((i=0; i < len; ++i)); do
[[ -z "${va1[i]}" ]] && va1[i]="0"
[[ -z "${va2[i]}" ]] && va2[i]="0"
done
# Append revisions, increment length
va1+=($vr1)
va2+=($vr2)
len=$((len+1))
# *** DEBUG ***
#echo "TEST: '${va1[@]} (?) ${va2[@]}'"
# Compare version elements, check if v1 > v2 or v1 < v2
for ((i=0; i < len; ++i)); do
if (( 10#${va1[i]} > 10#${va2[i]} )); then
return 1
elif (( 10#${va1[i]} < 10#${va2[i]} )); then
return 2
fi
done
# All elements are equal, thus v1 == v2
return 0
}
# ---------- everything below this line is just for testing ----------
# Test compare_versions [$1: version string 1, $2: version string 2, $3: expected result]
function test_compare_versions() {
local op
compare_versions "$1" "$2"
case $? in
0) op="==" ;;
1) op=">" ;;
2) op="<" ;;
esac
if [[ "$op" == "$3" ]]; then
echo -e "\e[1;32mPASS: '$1 $op $2'\e[0m"
else
echo -e "\e[1;31mFAIL: '$1 $3 $2' (result: '$1 $op $2')\e[0m"
fi
}
echo -e "\nThe following tests should pass:"
while read -r test; do
test_compare_versions $test
done << EOF
1 1 ==
2.1 2.2 <
3.0.4.10 3.0.4.2 >
4.08 4.08.01 <
3.2.1.9.8144 3.2 >
3.2 3.2.1.9.8144 <
1.2 2.1 <
2.1 1.2 >
5.6.7 5.6.7 ==
1.01.1 1.1.1 ==
1.1.1 1.01.1 ==
1 1.0 ==
1.0 1 ==
1.0.2.0 1.0.2 ==
1..0 1.0 ==
1.0 1..0 ==
1.0-r1 1.0-r3 <
1.0-r9 2.0 <
3.0-r15 3.0-r9 >
...-r1 ...-r2 <
2.0-r1 1.9.8.21-r2 >
1.0 3.8.9.32-r <
-r -r3 <
-r3 -r >
-r3 -r3 ==
-r -r ==
0.0-r2 0.0.0.0-r2 ==
1.0.0.0-r2 1.0-r2 ==
0.0.0.1-r7 -r9 >
0.0-r0 0 ==
1.002.0-r6 1.2.0-r7 <
001.001-r2 1.1-r2 ==
5.6.1-r0 5.6.1 ==
EOF
echo -e "\nThe following tests should fail:"
while read -r test; do
test_compare_versions $test
done << EOF
1 1 >
3.0.5-r5 3..5-r5 >
4.9.21-r3 4.8.22-r9 <
1.0-r 1.0-r1 ==
-r 1.0-r >
-r1 0.0-r1 <
-r2 0-r2 <
EOF
这也是一个纯bash解决方案，因为printf是bash内置的。
function ver()
# Description: use for comparisons of version strings.
# $1 : a version string of form 1.2.3.4
# use: (( $(ver 1.2.3.4) >= $(ver 1.2.3.3) )) && echo "yes" || echo "no"
{
printf "%02d%02d%02d%02d" ${1//./ }
}
哇……这是一个老问题，但我认为这是一个相当优雅的答案。首先，使用shell参数展开(参见shell参数展开)将每个点分隔的版本转换为自己的数组。
v1="05.2.3" # some evil examples that work here
v2="7.001.0.0"
declare -a v1_array=(${v1//./ })
declare -a v2_array=(${v2//./ })
现在，这两个数组将版本号按优先级顺序作为数值字符串。上面的许多解决方案都是从这里开始的，但它们都源于这样的观察:版本字符串只是一个具有任意基数的整数。我们可以测试找到第一个不相等的数字(就像strcmp对字符串中的字符所做的那样)。
compare_version() {
declare -a v1_array=(${1//./ })
declare -a v2_array=(${2//./ })
while [[ -nz $v1_array ]] || [[ -nz $v2_array ]]; do
let v1_val=${v1_array:-0} # this will remove any leading zeros
let v2_val=${v2_array:-0}
let result=$((v1_val-v2_val))
if (( result != 0 )); then
echo $result
return
fi
v1_array=("${v1_array[@]:1}") # trim off the first "digit". it doesn't help
v2_array=("${v2_array[@]:1}")
done
# if we get here, both the arrays are empty and neither has been numerically
# different, which is equivalent to the two versions being equal
echo 0
return
}
如果第一个版本小于第二个版本，则返回负数，如果相等则返回零，如果第一个版本大于第二个版本则返回正数。一些输出:
$ compare_version 1 1.2
-2
$ compare_version "05.1.3" "5.001.03.0.0.0.1"
-1
$ compare_version "05.1.3" "5.001.03.0.0.0"
0
$ compare_version "05.1.3" "5.001.03.0"
0
$ compare_version "05.1.3" "5.001.30.0"
-27
$ compare_version "05.2.3" "7.001.0.0"
-2
$ compare_version "05.1.3" "5.001.30.0"
-27
$ compare_version "7.001.0.0" "05.1.3"
2
堕落的例子，”。2”或“3.0.”不起作用(未定义的结果)，并且如果'. 2 '旁边出现非数字字符。它可能会失败(还没有测试)，但肯定是没有定义的。因此，这应该与一个消毒函数或适当的检查有效的格式相匹配。此外，我相信通过一些调整，可以在没有太多额外负担的情况下使其更加健壮。
function version_compare () {
function sub_ver () {
local len=${#1}
temp=${1%%"."*} && indexOf=`echo ${1%%"."*} | echo ${#temp}`
echo -e "${1:0:indexOf}"
}
function cut_dot () {
local offset=${#1}
local length=${#2}
echo -e "${2:((++offset)):length}"
}
if [ -z "$1" ] || [ -z "$2" ]; then
echo "=" && exit 0
fi
local v1=`echo -e "${1}" | tr -d '[[:space:]]'`
local v2=`echo -e "${2}" | tr -d '[[:space:]]'`
local v1_sub=`sub_ver $v1`
local v2_sub=`sub_ver $v2`
if (( v1_sub > v2_sub )); then
echo ">"
elif (( v1_sub < v2_sub )); then
echo "<"
else
version_compare `cut_dot $v1_sub $v1` `cut_dot $v2_sub $v2`
fi
}
### Usage:
version_compare "1.2.3" "1.2.4"
# Output: <
功劳归于@Shellman
我不喜欢这些解决方案，因为它们漏洞百出、不可移植等等。
我(目前)努力提出一个更好的解决方案……src: version_compare(),测试
Sorta-copied /贴在这里……
来源:
##
# Compare two versions.
#
# **Usage:** version_compare version1 operator version2
#
# - operator:
#
# + ``lesser_than``, ``-lt``, ``<``
# + ``lesser_than_or_equal``, ``-le``, ``<=``
# + ``greater_than``, ``-gt``, ``>``
# + ``greater_than_or_equal``, ``-ge``, ``>=``
# + ``equal``, ``-eq``, ``==``
# + ``not_equal``, ``-ne``, ``!=``
#
# - version{1,2}: arbitrary version strings to compare
#
# **Version Format:** ``[0-9]+($VERSION_SEPARATOR[0-9]+)*`` (i.e. 1, 1.0, 90, 1.2.3.4)
#
# **Returns:** true if comparison statement is correct
##
version_compare() {
_largest_version "$1" "$3"; _cmp="$(printf '%s' "$?")"
# Check for valid responses or bail early
case "$_cmp" in
1|0|2) :;;
*) _die "$_cmp" 'version comparison failed';;
esac
# The easy part
case "$2" in
'lesser_than'|'-lt'|'<')
[ "$_cmp" = '2' ] && return 0
;;
'lesser_or_equal'|'-le'|'<=')
[ "$_cmp" = '0' ] && return 0
[ "$_cmp" = '2' ] && return 0
;;
'greater_than'|'-gt'|'>')
[ "$_cmp" = '1' ] && return 0
;;
'greater_or_equal'|'-ge'|'>=')
[ "$_cmp" = '1' ] && return 0
[ "$_cmp" = '0' ] && return 0
;;
'equal'|'-eq'|'==')
[ "$_cmp" = '0' ] && return 0
;;
'not_equal'|'-ne'|'!=')
[ "$_cmp" = '1' ] && return 0
[ "$_cmp" = '2' ] && return 0
;;
*) _die 7 'Unknown operatoration called for version_compare().';;
esac
return 1
}
##
# Print a formatted (critical) message and exit with status.
#
# **Usage:** _die [exit_status] message
#
# - exit_status: exit code to use with script termination (default: 1)
# - message: message to print before terminating script execution
##
_die() {
# If first argument was an integer, use as exit_status
if [ "$1" -eq "$1" ] 2>/dev/null; then
_exit_status="$1"; shift
else
_exit_status=1
fi
printf '*** CRITICAL: %s ***\n' "$1"
exit "$_exit_status"
}
##
# Compare two versions.
# Check if one version is larger/smaller/equal than/to another.
#
# **Usage:** _largest_version ver1 ver2
#
# Returns: ($1 > $2): 1 ; ($1 = $2): 0 ; ($1 < $2): 2
# [IOW- 1 = $1 is largest; 0 = neither ; 2 = $2 is largest]
##
_largest_version() (
# Value used to separate version components
VERSION_SEPARATOR="${VERSION_SEPARATOR:-.}"
for _p in "$1" "$2"; do
[ "$(printf %.1s "$_p")" = "$VERSION_SEPARATOR" ] &&
_die 7 'invalid version pattern provided'
done
# Split versions on VER_SEP into int/sub
_v="$1$2"
_v1="$1"
_s1="${1#*$VERSION_SEPARATOR}"
if [ "$_v1" = "$_s1" ]; then
_s1=''
_m1="$_v1"
else
_m1="${1%%$VERSION_SEPARATOR*}"
fi
_v2="$2"
_s2="${2#*$VERSION_SEPARATOR}"
if [ "$_v2" = "$_s2" ]; then
_s2=''
_m2="$_v2"
else
_m2="${2%%$VERSION_SEPARATOR*}"
fi
# Both are equal
[ "$_v1" = "$_v2" ] && return 0
# Something is larger than nothing (30 < 30.0)
if [ -n "$_v1" ] && [ ! -n "$_v2" ]; then
return 1
elif [ ! -n "$_v1" ] && [ -n "$_v2" ]; then
return 2
fi
# Check for invalid
case "$_m1$_m2" in
*[!0-9]*)
_die 7 'version_compare called with unsupported version type'
;;
esac
# If a ver_sep is present
if [ "${_v#*$VERSION_SEPARATOR}" != "$_v" ]; then
# Check for a larger "major" version number
[ "$_m1" -lt "$_m2" ] && return 2
[ "$_m1" -gt "$_m2" ] && return 1
# Compare substring components
_largest_version "$_s1" "$_s2"; return "$?"
else
# Only integers present; simple integer comparison
[ "$_v1" -lt "$_v2" ] && return 2
[ "$_v1" -gt "$_v2" ] && return 1
fi
)
测试:
# Simple test of all operators
( version_compare '1' 'lesser_than' '2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '2' 'equal' '2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '3' 'not_equal' '1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '2' 'greater_than' '1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '1' '-lt' '2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '2' '-eq' '2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '3' '-ne' '1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '2' '-gt' '1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
# Semver test of primary operators (expect true)
( version_compare '7.0.1' '-lt' '7.0.2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '7.0.2' '-eq' '7.0.2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '3.0.2' '-ne' '2.0.7' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '7.0.2' '-gt' '7.0.1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
# Semver test of primary operators (expect false)
( version_compare '7.0.2' '-lt' '7.0.1' ); [ "$?" = '1' ] || return 1
( version_compare '3.0.2' '-eq' '2.0.7' ); [ "$?" = '1' ] || return 1
( version_compare '7.0.2' '-ne' '7.0.2' ); [ "$?" = '1' ] || return 1
( version_compare '7.0.1' '-gt' '7.0.2' ); [ "$?" = '1' ] || return 1
# Mismatched version strings (expect true)
( version_compare '7' '-lt' '7.1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '3' '-ne' '7.0.0' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '7.0.1' '-gt' '7' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
# Mismatched version strings (expect false)
( version_compare '7.0.0' '-eq' '7.0' ); [ "$?" = '1' ] || return 1
# Invalid operation supplied
( version_compare '2' '-inv' '1' >/dev/null ); [ "$?" = '7' ] || return 1
# Invalid version formats
( version_compare '1..0' '==' '1.0' >/dev/null ); [ "$?" = '7' ] || return 1
( version_compare '1.0' '==' '1..0' >/dev/null ); [ "$?" = '7' ] || return 1
( version_compare '1.0' '==' '1.0b7' >/dev/null ); [ "$?" = '7' ] || return 1
( version_compare '1.0a' '==' '1.0' >/dev/null ); [ "$?" = '7' ] || return 1
# "how does that handle comparing 10.0.0 (not a number) to 2.0 (a number)?"
( version_compare '10.0.0' '-lt' '2.0' ); [ "$?" = '1' ] || return 1
( version_compare '10.0' '-gt' '2.0.0' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
# not less/greater-than... but equal
( version_compare '7' '-lt' '7' ); [ "$?" = '1' ] || return 1
( version_compare '7' '-gt' '7' ); [ "$?" = '1' ] || return 1
# String vs. numerical comparison
( version_compare '1.18.1' '-gt' '1.8.1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
# Random tests found on the internet
( version_compare '1' '==' '1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '2.1' '<' '2.2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '3.0.4.10' '>' '3.0.4.2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '4.08' '<' '4.08.01' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '3.2.1.9.8144' '>' '3.2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '3.2' '<' '3.2.1.9.8144' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '1.2' '<' '2.1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '2.1' '>' '1.2' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '5.6.7' '==' '5.6.7' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '1.01.1' '==' '1.1.1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '1.1.1' '==' '1.01.1' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '1' '!=' '1.0' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
( version_compare '1.0.0' '!=' '1.0' ); [ "$?" = '0' ] || return 1
这里一个有用的技巧是字符串索引。
$ echo "${BASH_VERSION}"
4.4.23(1)-release
$ echo "${BASH_VERSION:0:1}"
4
ver_cmp()
{
local IFS=.
local V1=($1) V2=($2) I
for ((I=0 ; I<${#V1[*]} || I<${#V2[*]} ; I++)) ; do
[[ ${V1[$I]:-0} -lt ${V2[$I]:-0} ]] && echo -1 && return
[[ ${V1[$I]:-0} -gt ${V2[$I]:-0} ]] && echo 1 && return
done
echo 0
}
ver_eq()
{
[[ $(ver_cmp "$1" "$2") -eq 0 ]]
}
ver_lt()
{
[[ $(ver_cmp "$1" "$2") -eq -1 ]]
}
ver_gt()
{
[[ $(ver_cmp "$1" "$2") -eq 1 ]]
}
ver_le()
{
[[ ! $(ver_cmp "$1" "$2") -eq 1 ]]
}
ver_ge()
{
[[ ! $(ver_cmp "$1" "$2") -eq -1 ]]
}
测试:
( ( while read V1 V2 ; do echo $V1 $(ver_cmp $V1 $V2) $V2 ; done ) <<EOF
1.2.3 2.2.3
2.2.3 2.2.2
3.10 3.2
2.2 2.2.1
3.1 3.1.0
EOF
) | sed 's/ -1 / < / ; s/ 0 / = / ; s/ 1 / > /' | column -t
1.2.3 < 2.2.3
2.2.3 > 2.2.2
3.10 > 3.2
2.2 < 2.2.1
3.1 = 3.1.0
ver_lt 10.1.2 10.1.20 && echo 'Your version is too old'
Your version is too old
我使用一个函数来规范化这些数字，然后比较它们。
for循环用于将版本字符串中的八进制数转换为十进制数，例如:1.08→1 8,1.0030→1 30,2021-02-03→2021 2 3…
(用bash 5.0.17测试
#!/usr/bin/env bash
v() {
printf "%04d%04d%04d%04d%04d" $(for i in ${1//[^0-9]/ }; do printf "%d " $((10#$i)); done)
}
while read -r test; do
set -- $test
printf "$test "
eval "if [[ $(v $1) $3 $(v $2) ]] ; then echo true; else echo false; fi"
done << EOF
1 1 ==
2.1 2.2 <
3.0.4.10 3.0.4.2 >
4.08 4.08.01 <
3.2.1.9.8144 3.2 >
3.2 3.2.1.9.8144 <
1.2 2.1 <
2.1 1.2 >
5.6.7 5.6.7 ==
1.01.1 1.1.1 ==
1.1.1 1.01.1 ==
1 1.0 ==
1.0 1 ==
1.0.2.0 1.0.2 ==
1..0 1.0 ==
1.0 1..0 ==
1 1 >
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3~rc4 >
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3~rc4 ==
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3~rc4 <
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3~rc4 !=
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3+rc4 <
2021-11-23-rc1 2021-11-23-rc1.1 <
2021-11-23-rc1 2021-11-23-rc1-rf1 <
2021-01-03-rc1 2021-01-04 <
5.0.17(1)-release 5.0.17(2)-release <
EOF
结果:
1 1 == true
2.1 2.2 < true
3.0.4.10 3.0.4.2 > true
4.08 4.08.01 < true
3.2.1.9.8144 3.2 > true
3.2 3.2.1.9.8144 < true
1.2 2.1 < true
2.1 1.2 > true
5.6.7 5.6.7 == true
1.01.1 1.1.1 == true
1.1.1 1.01.1 == true
1 1.0 == true
1.0 1 == true
1.0.2.0 1.0.2 == true
1..0 1.0 == true
1.0 1..0 == true
1 1 > false
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3~rc4 > false
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3~rc4 == false
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3~rc4 < true
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3~rc4 != true
1.2.3~rc2 1.2.3+rc4 < true
2021-11-23-rc1 2021-11-23-rc1.1 < true
2021-11-23-rc1 2021-11-23-rc1-rf1 < true
2021-01-03-rc1 2021-01-04 < true
5.0.17(1)-release 5.0.17(2)-release < true
你们都给出了复杂的解决方案。这里有一个更简单的例子。
function compare_versions {
local a=${1%%.*} b=${2%%.*}
[[ "10#${a:-0}" -gt "10#${b:-0}" ]] && return 1
[[ "10#${a:-0}" -lt "10#${b:-0}" ]] && return 2
a=${1:${#a} + 1} b=${2:${#b} + 1}
[[ -z $a && -z $b ]] || compare_versions "$a" "$b"
}
用法:compare_versions <ver_a> <ver_b>
返回代码1表示第一个版本大于第二个版本，2表示小于第二个版本，0表示两者相等。
也是一个非递归的版本:
function compare_versions {
local a=$1 b=$2 x y
while [[ $a || $b ]]; do
x=${a%%.*} y=${b%%.*}
[[ "10#${x:-0}" -gt "10#${y:-0}" ]] && return 1
[[ "10#${x:-0}" -lt "10#${y:-0}" ]] && return 2
a=${a:${#x} + 1} b=${b:${#y} + 1}
done
return 0
}
当Bash变得太复杂时，就把它输送到python中!
vercomp(){ echo "$1" "$2" | python3 -c "import re, sys; arr = lambda x: list(map(int, re.split('[^0-9]+', x))); x, y = map(arr, sys.stdin.read().split()); exit(not x >= y)"; }
比较两个版本号的例子:
vercomp 2.8 2.4.5 && echo ">=" || echo "<"
这个python一行代码比较左边版本号和右边版本号，如果左边版本号等于或更高，则退出0。它还处理2.4.5rc3这样的版本
分解后，这是可读的代码:
import re, sys
# Convert a version string into a list "2.4.5" -> [2, 4, 5]
arr = lambda x: list(map(int, re.split('[^0-9]+', x)))
# Read the version numbers from stdin and apply the above function to them
x, y = map(arr, sys.stdin.read().split())
# Exit 0 if the left number is greater than the right
exit(not x >= y)
我的观点是:
vercomp () {
if [[ "${1}" == "${2}" ]]; then
echo '0'
return
fi
echo "${1}" | sed 's/\([0-9]\+\)\./\1\n/g' | {
_RES_=-1
for _VB_ in $(echo "${2}" | sed 's/\([0-9]\+\)\./\1\n/g'); do
if ! read -r _VA_ || [[ "${_VB_}" -gt "${_VA_}" ]]; then
_RES_=1
break
fi
done
read -r _VA_ && echo '-1' || echo "${_RES_}"
}
}
语法:
vercomp VERSION_A VERSION_B
打印:
-1如果VERSION_A是最近的版本 如果两个版本相等，则为0 如果VERSION_B是最近的版本，则为1
与其编写冗长的代码使您的生活过于复杂，不如使用一些已经存在的东西。很多时候，当bash不够用时，python可以提供帮助。你仍然可以很容易地从bash脚本调用它(额外的好处:从bash到python的变量替换):
VERSION1=1.2.3
VERSION2=1.2.4
cat <<EOF | python3 | grep -q True
from packaging import version
print(version.parse("$VERSION1") > version.parse("$VERSION2"))
EOF
if [ "$?" == 0 ]; then
echo "$VERSION1 is greater than $VERSION2"
else
echo "$VERSION2 is greater or equal than $VERSION1"
fi
这里有更多信息:如何比较Python中的版本号?
我希望这对某些人有用(使用awk)
#!/bin/bash
available_version=1.2.3 # or online version
this_version=1.2.1
if [[ "ok" == "$(echo | awk "(${available_version} > ${this_version}) { print \"ok\"; }")" ]]; then
echo "Notice, new version is available"
elif [[ "ok" == "$(echo | awk "(${available_version} == ${this_version}) { print \"ok\"; }")" ]]; then
echo "OK, version is up to date"
else
echo "Warning, the current version is ahead of the online version!"
fi
推荐文章
- 检查bash变量是否等于0
- 只使用md5sum获取哈希值(没有文件名)
- 如何生成一个核心转储在Linux上的分段错误?
- 在Bash中测试非零长度字符串:[-n "$var"]或["$var"]
- 如何删除超过X小时的文件
- 如何创建Bash别名?
- 将所有变量从一个shell脚本传递到另一个?
- 如何删除shell脚本中文件名的扩展名?
- 使用xargs调用shell函数
- 如何限制从grep返回的结果的数量?
- 'find -exec'是Linux中的shell函数
- 将值从管道读入shell变量
- 在Bash中重用上一个命令的输出
- RE错误:在Mac OS X上的非法字节序列
- 对bash脚本函数中定义的变量使用curl POST
