用所有24位的颜色测试怎么样?

请注意，YIQ方法将返回1.9:1的最小对比度，这不会通过AA和AAA WCAG2.0测试，假设阈值为128。

对于W3C方法，它将返回最小对比度4.58:1，通过AA和AAA测试的大文本，AA测试的小文本，它不会通过AAA测试的小文本的每一种颜色。

我从来没有做过这样的事情，但是写一个函数来检查每个颜色的值与十六进制7F (FF / 2)的中位数颜色。如果三种颜色中有两种大于7F，那么你正在使用较深的颜色。

以下是我用Java编写的Android解决方案:

// Put this method in whichever class you deem appropriate
// static or non-static, up to you.
public static int getContrastColor(int colorIntValue) {
    int red = Color.red(colorIntValue);
    int green = Color.green(colorIntValue);
    int blue = Color.blue(colorIntValue);
    double lum = (((0.299 * red) + ((0.587 * green) + (0.114 * blue))));
    return lum > 186 ? 0xFF000000 : 0xFFFFFFFF;
}

// Usage
// If Color is represented as HEX code:
String colorHex = "#484588";
int color = Color.parseColor(colorHex);

// Or if color is Integer:
int color = 0xFF484588;

// Get White (0xFFFFFFFF) or Black (0xFF000000)
int contrastColor = WhateverClass.getContrastColor(color);

从hex到black或white:

function hexToRgb(hex) {
  var result = /^#?([a-f\d]{2})([a-f\d]{2})([a-f\d]{2})$/i.exec(hex);
  return result
    ? [
        parseInt(result[1], 16),
        parseInt(result[2], 16),
        parseInt(result[3], 16)
      ]
    : [0, 0, 0];
}

function lum(hex) {
  var rgb = hexToRgb(hex)
  var lrgb = [];
  rgb.forEach(function(c) {
    c = c / 255.0;
    if (c <= 0.03928) {
      c = c / 12.92;
    } else {
      c = Math.pow((c + 0.055) / 1.055, 2.4);
    }
    lrgb.push(c);
  });
  var lum = 0.2126 * lrgb[0] + 0.7152 * lrgb[1] + 0.0722 * lrgb[2];
  return lum > 0.179 ? "#000000" : "#ffffff";
}

以我对类似问题的回答为基础。

您需要将十六进制代码分解为3个部分，以获得单独的红色、绿色和蓝色强度。代码的每两个数字代表一个十六进制(以16为基数)表示法的值。这里我就不详细讲了，它们很容易查到。

一旦有了各个颜色的强度，就可以确定颜色的整体强度并选择相应的文本。

if (red*0.299 + green*0.587 + blue*0.114) > 186 use #000000 else use #ffffff

186的阈值是基于理论的，但可以根据口味进行调整。根据评论，低于150的阈值可能更适合您。

Edit: The above is simple and works reasonably well, and seems to have good acceptance here at StackOverflow. However, one of the comments below shows it can lead to non-compliance with W3C guidelines in some circumstances. Herewith I derive a modified form that always chooses the highest contrast based on the guidelines. If you don't need to conform to W3C rules then I'd stick with the simpler formula above. For an interesting look into the problems with this see Contrast Ratio Math and Related Visual Issues.

The formula given for contrast in the W3C Recommendations (WCAG 2.0) is (L1 + 0.05) / (L2 + 0.05), where L1 is the luminance of the lightest color and L2 is the luminance of the darkest on a scale of 0.0-1.0. The luminance of black is 0.0 and white is 1.0, so substituting those values lets you determine the one with the highest contrast. If the contrast for black is greater than the contrast for white, use black, otherwise use white. Given the luminance of the color you're testing as L the test becomes:

if (L + 0.05) / (0.0 + 0.05) > (1.0 + 0.05) / (L + 0.05) use #000000 else use #ffffff

这在代数上简化为:

if L > sqrt(1.05 * 0.05) - 0.05

或约:

if L > 0.179 use #000000 else use #ffffff

唯一剩下的就是计算l。该公式也在指南中给出，它看起来像从sRGB到线性RGB的转换，然后是ITU-R建议BT.709的亮度。

for each c in r,g,b:
    c = c / 255.0
    if c <= 0.04045 then c = c/12.92 else c = ((c+0.055)/1.055) ^ 2.4
L = 0.2126 * r + 0.7152 * g + 0.0722 * b

阈值0.179不应该改变，因为它与W3C指南相关联。如果你发现结果不是你喜欢的，试试上面更简单的公式。

用所有24位的颜色测试怎么样?

请注意，YIQ方法将返回1.9:1的最小对比度，这不会通过AA和AAA WCAG2.0测试，假设阈值为128。

对于W3C方法，它将返回最小对比度4.58:1，通过AA和AAA测试的大文本，AA测试的小文本，它不会通过AAA测试的小文本的每一种颜色。