在SQL Server 2000、2005、2008、2012中分页结果的最佳方法(性能方面)是什么?如果你还想获得结果的总数(在分页之前)?
您没有指定使用的语言或驱动程序。因此我只是抽象地描述它。
创建可滚动的结果集/数据集。这要求在表上有一个(多个)主表 跳到最后 请求行数 跳转到页面的开头 滚动行直到页面的末尾
获取结果总数和分页是两个不同的操作。对于这个示例，让我们假设您正在处理的查询是
SELECT * FROM Orders WHERE OrderDate >= '1980-01-01' ORDER BY OrderDate
在这种情况下，您将使用以下命令确定结果的总数:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Orders WHERE OrderDate >= '1980-01-01'
.．.这可能看起来效率很低，但实际上性能很好，假设所有索引等都正确设置。
接下来，要以分页方式返回实际结果，下面的查询将是最有效的:
SELECT *
FROM ( SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( ORDER BY OrderDate ) AS RowNum, *
FROM Orders
WHERE OrderDate >= '1980-01-01'
) AS RowConstrainedResult
WHERE RowNum >= 1
AND RowNum < 20
ORDER BY RowNum
这将返回原始查询的第1-19行。这里很酷的事情是，尤其是对于web应用程序，你不需要保留任何状态，除了要返回的行号。
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/PagingLarge.aspx上有关于不同分页技术的很好的概述
我经常在SQL Server 2000中使用ROWCOUNT方法(也可以在2005和2008中使用，只测量与ROW_NUMBER相比的性能)，它的速度非常快，但你需要确保排序的列(大多数)具有唯一的值。
好吧，我已经在我的SQL 2000数据库中使用了以下示例查询，它也适用于SQL 2005。它通过使用多个列来动态排序。 我告诉你……这是强大的:)
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[RE_ListingReports_SelectSummary]
@CompanyID int,
@pageNumber int,
@pageSize int,
@sort varchar(200)
AS
DECLARE @sql nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @strPageSize nvarchar(20)
DECLARE @strSkippedRows nvarchar(20)
DECLARE @strFields nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @strFilter nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @sortBy nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @strFrom nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @strID nvarchar(100)
If(@pageNumber < 0)
SET @pageNumber = 1
SET @strPageSize = CAST(@pageSize AS varchar(20))
SET @strSkippedRows = CAST(((@pageNumber - 1) * @pageSize) AS varchar(20))-- For example if pageNumber is 5 pageSize is 10, then SkippedRows = 40.
SET @strID = 'ListingDbID'
SET @strFields = 'ListingDbID,
ListingID,
[ExtraRoom]
'
SET @strFrom = ' vwListingSummary '
SET @strFilter = ' WHERE
CompanyID = ' + CAST(@CompanyID As varchar(20))
End
SET @sortBy = ''
if(len(ltrim(rtrim(@sort))) > 0)
SET @sortBy = ' Order By ' + @sort
-- Total Rows Count
SET @sql = 'SELECT Count(' + @strID + ') FROM ' + @strFROM + @strFilter
EXEC sp_executesql @sql
--// This technique is used in a Single Table pagination
SET @sql = 'SELECT ' + @strFields + ' FROM ' + @strFROM +
' WHERE ' + @strID + ' IN ' +
' (SELECT TOP ' + @strPageSize + ' ' + @strID + ' FROM ' + @strFROM + @strFilter +
' AND ' + @strID + ' NOT IN ' + '
(SELECT TOP ' + @strSkippedRows + ' ' + @strID + ' FROM ' + @strFROM + @strFilter + @SortBy + ') '
+ @SortBy + ') ' + @SortBy
Print @sql
EXEC sp_executesql @sql
最好的部分是sp_executesql缓存以后的调用，只要您传递相同的参数，即生成相同的sql文本。
对于SQL Server 2000，您可以使用一个带有IDENTITY列的表变量来模拟ROW_NUMBER():
DECLARE @pageNo int -- 1 based
DECLARE @pageSize int
SET @pageNo = 51
SET @pageSize = 20
DECLARE @firstRecord int
DECLARE @lastRecord int
SET @firstRecord = (@pageNo - 1) * @pageSize + 1 -- 1001
SET @lastRecord = @firstRecord + @pageSize - 1 -- 1020
DECLARE @orderedKeys TABLE (
rownum int IDENTITY NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED,
TableKey int NOT NULL
)
SET ROWCOUNT @lastRecord
INSERT INTO @orderedKeys (TableKey) SELECT ID FROM Orders WHERE OrderDate >= '1980-01-01' ORDER BY OrderDate
SET ROWCOUNT 0
SELECT t.*
FROM Orders t
INNER JOIN @orderedKeys o ON o.TableKey = t.ID
WHERE o.rownum >= @firstRecord
ORDER BY o.rownum
这种方法可以扩展到具有多列键的表，并且不会引起使用OR(跳过索引使用)的性能开销。缺点是，如果数据集非常大，并且其中一个接近最后一页，则会占用大量临时空间。在这种情况下，我没有测试游标的性能，但它可能会更好。
注意，这种方法可以针对数据的第一页进行优化。另外，使用ROWCOUNT是因为TOP在SQL Server 2000中不接受变量。
最后，微软SQL Server 2012发布了，我真的很喜欢它的简单的分页，你不需要使用复杂的查询，就像这里回答的。
要获得接下来的10行，只需运行这个查询:
SELECT * FROM TableName ORDER BY id OFFSET 10 ROWS FETCH NEXT 10 ROWS ONLY;
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/select-order-by-clause-transact-sql#using-offset-and-fetch-to-limit-the-rows-returned
使用时需要考虑的要点:
ORDER BY是强制使用OFFSET…获取子句。 OFFSET子句在FETCH中是强制的。你不能使用ORDER BY… 取回。 在同一个查询中，TOP不能与OFFSET和FETCH组合使用 表达式。
MSDN: ROW_NUMBER (Transact-SQL)
返回结果集中分区内某一行的顺序编号，每个分区中的第一行从1开始。 下面的示例按照OrderDate的顺序返回数字为50到60的行。
WITH OrderedOrders AS
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY FirstName DESC) AS RowNumber,
FirstName, LastName, ROUND(SalesYTD,2,1) AS "Sales YTD"
FROM [dbo].[vSalesPerson]
)
SELECT RowNumber,
FirstName, LastName, Sales YTD
FROM OrderedOrders
WHERE RowNumber > 50 AND RowNumber < 60;
RowNumber FirstName LastName SalesYTD
--- ----------- ---------------------- -----------------
1 Linda Mitchell 4251368.54
2 Jae Pak 4116871.22
3 Michael Blythe 3763178.17
4 Jillian Carson 3189418.36
5 Ranjit Varkey Chudukatil 3121616.32
6 José Saraiva 2604540.71
7 Shu Ito 2458535.61
8 Tsvi Reiter 2315185.61
9 Rachel Valdez 1827066.71
10 Tete Mensa-Annan 1576562.19
11 David Campbell 1573012.93
12 Garrett Vargas 1453719.46
13 Lynn Tsoflias 1421810.92
14 Pamela Ansman-Wolfe 1352577.13
令人难以置信的是，没有其他答案提到在所有SQL Server版本中进行分页的最快方法。对于大页码，偏移量可能非常慢。在SQL中有一种完全不同的更快的分页方法。这通常被称为“查找方法”或“键集分页”，如本文所述。
SELECT TOP 10 first_name, last_name, score, COUNT(*) OVER()
FROM players
WHERE (score < @previousScore)
OR (score = @previousScore AND player_id < @previousPlayerId)
ORDER BY score DESC, player_id DESC
"seek谓词"
@previousScore和@previousPlayerId值分别是前一页中最后一条记录的值。这允许你获取“下一页”。如果ORDER BY方向为ASC，只需使用>即可。
使用上述方法，如果不先获取之前的40条记录，就不能立即跳转到第4页。但通常情况下，你并不想跳得那么远。相反，您将获得一个更快的查询，可能能够在常数时间内获取数据，这取决于您的索引。另外，你的页面保持“稳定”，无论底层数据是否发生变化(例如，在第1页，而你在第4页)。
例如，当在web应用程序中延迟加载更多数据时，这是实现分页的最佳方法。
注意，“seek方法”也称为键集分页。
分页前的记录总数
COUNT(*) OVER()窗口函数将帮助您计算“分页前”的总记录数量。如果您使用的是SQL Server 2000，则必须对COUNT(*)进行两次查询。
CREATE view vw_sppb_part_listsource as
select row_number() over (partition by sppb_part.init_id order by sppb_part.sppb_part_id asc ) as idx, * from (
select
part.SPPB_PART_ID
, 0 as is_rev
, part.part_number
, part.init_id
from t_sppb_init_part part
left join t_sppb_init_partrev prev on ( part.SPPB_PART_ID = prev.SPPB_PART_ID )
where prev.SPPB_PART_ID is null
union
select
part.SPPB_PART_ID
, 1 as is_rev
, prev.part_number
, part.init_id
from t_sppb_init_part part
inner join t_sppb_init_partrev prev on ( part.SPPB_PART_ID = prev.SPPB_PART_ID )
) sppb_part
当涉及到不同的init_id时会重新启动idx吗
试试这个方法:
SELECT TOP @offset a.*
FROM (select top @limit b.*, COUNT(*) OVER() totalrows
from TABLENAME b order by id asc) a
ORDER BY id desc;
用例方面，以下内容似乎易于使用和快速。只需设置页码。
use AdventureWorks
DECLARE @RowsPerPage INT = 10, @PageNumber INT = 6;
with result as(
SELECT SalesOrderDetailID, SalesOrderID, ProductID,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY SalesOrderDetailID) AS RowNum
FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail
where 1=1
)
select SalesOrderDetailID, SalesOrderID, ProductID from result
WHERE result.RowNum BETWEEN ((@PageNumber-1)*@RowsPerPage)+1
AND @RowsPerPage*(@PageNumber)
同样没有CTE
use AdventureWorks
DECLARE @RowsPerPage INT = 10, @PageNumber INT = 6
SELECT SalesOrderDetailID, SalesOrderID, ProductID
FROM (
SELECT SalesOrderDetailID, SalesOrderID, ProductID,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY SalesOrderDetailID) AS RowNum
FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail
where 1=1
) AS SOD
WHERE SOD.RowNum BETWEEN ((@PageNumber-1)*@RowsPerPage)+1
AND @RowsPerPage*(@PageNumber)
在SQL Server 2012中，我们可以使用OFFSET和FETCH NEXT子句来实现分页。
试试这个，SQL Server:
In the SQL Server 2012 a new feature was added in the ORDER BY clause, to query optimization of a set data, making work easier with data paging for anyone who writes in T-SQL as well for the entire Execution Plan in SQL Server. Below the T-SQL script with the same logic used in the previous example. --CREATING A PAGING WITH OFFSET and FETCH clauses IN "SQL SERVER 2012" DECLARE @PageNumber AS INT, @RowspPage AS INT SET @PageNumber = 2 SET @RowspPage = 10 SELECT ID_EXAMPLE, NM_EXAMPLE, DT_CREATE FROM TB_EXAMPLE ORDER BY ID_EXAMPLE OFFSET ((@PageNumber - 1) * @RowspPage) ROWS FETCH NEXT @RowspPage ROWS ONLY;
使用SQL Server对查询进行分页
对于ROW_NUMBER技术，如果你没有一个排序列，你可以使用CURRENT_TIMESTAMP，如下所示:
SELECT TOP 20
col1,
col2,
col3,
col4
FROM (
SELECT
tbl.col1 AS col1
,tbl.col2 AS col2
,tbl.col3 AS col3
,tbl.col4 AS col4
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
ORDER BY CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
) AS sort_row
FROM dbo.MyTable tbl
) AS query
WHERE query.sort_row > 10
ORDER BY query.sort_row
对于我来说，这种方法在搜索表大小甚至高达700,000的情况下效果很好。
这将获取记录11到30。
这些是我在SQL server端对查询结果进行分页的解决方案。 这些方法在SQL Server 2008和2012之间是不同的。 此外，我还添加了过滤和排序的概念。当你在Gridview中分页、过滤和排序时，它是非常高效的。
在测试之前，你必须创建一个示例表，并在这个表中插入一些行:(在现实世界中，你必须改变Where子句，考虑到你的表字段，也许你有一些连接和子查询在select的主要部分)
Create Table VLT
(
ID int IDentity(1,1),
Name nvarchar(50),
Tel Varchar(20)
)
GO
Insert INTO VLT
VALUES
('NAME' + Convert(varchar(10),@@identity),'FAMIL' + Convert(varchar(10),@@identity))
GO 500000
在所有这些示例中，我想查询每页200行，我正在获取页码为1200的行。
在SQL server 2008中，您可以使用CTE概念。因此，我为SQL server 2008+编写了两种类型的查询
SQL Server 2008+
DECLARE @PageNumber Int = 1200
DECLARE @PageSize INT = 200
DECLARE @SortByField int = 1 --The field used for sort by
DECLARE @SortOrder nvarchar(255) = 'ASC' --ASC or DESC
DECLARE @FilterType nvarchar(255) = 'None' --The filter type, as defined on the client side (None/Contain/NotContain/Match/NotMatch/True/False/)
DECLARE @FilterValue nvarchar(255) = '' --The value the user gave for the filter
DECLARE @FilterColumn int = 1 --The column to wich the filter is applied, represents the column number like when we send the information.
SELECT
Data.ID,
Data.Name,
Data.Tel
FROM
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER()
OVER( ORDER BY
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 1 AND @SortOrder = 'ASC'
THEN VLT.ID END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 1 AND @SortOrder = 'DESC'
THEN VLT.ID END DESC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 2 AND @SortOrder = 'ASC'
THEN VLT.Name END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 2 AND @SortOrder = 'DESC'
THEN VLT.Name END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 3 AND @SortOrder = 'ASC'
THEN VLT.Tel END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 3 AND @SortOrder = 'DESC'
THEN VLT.Tel END ASC
) AS RowNum
,*
FROM VLT
WHERE
( -- We apply the filter logic here
CASE
WHEN @FilterType = 'None' THEN 1
-- Name column filter
WHEN @FilterType = 'Contain' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.ID LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotContain' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.ID NOT LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'Match' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND VLT.ID = @FilterValue THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotMatch' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND VLT.ID <> @FilterValue THEN 1
-- Name column filter
WHEN @FilterType = 'Contain' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Name LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotContain' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Name NOT LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'Match' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND VLT.Name = @FilterValue THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotMatch' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND VLT.Name <> @FilterValue THEN 1
-- Tel column filter
WHEN @FilterType = 'Contain' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Tel LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotContain' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Tel NOT LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'Match' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND VLT.Tel = @FilterValue THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotMatch' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND VLT.Tel <> @FilterValue THEN 1
END
) = 1
) AS Data
WHERE Data.RowNum > @PageSize * (@PageNumber - 1)
AND Data.RowNum <= @PageSize * @PageNumber
ORDER BY Data.RowNum
GO
在SQL server 2008+中使用CTE的第二个解决方案
DECLARE @PageNumber Int = 1200
DECLARE @PageSize INT = 200
DECLARE @SortByField int = 1 --The field used for sort by
DECLARE @SortOrder nvarchar(255) = 'ASC' --ASC or DESC
DECLARE @FilterType nvarchar(255) = 'None' --The filter type, as defined on the client side (None/Contain/NotContain/Match/NotMatch/True/False/)
DECLARE @FilterValue nvarchar(255) = '' --The value the user gave for the filter
DECLARE @FilterColumn int = 1 --The column to wich the filter is applied, represents the column number like when we send the information.
;WITH
Data_CTE
AS
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER()
OVER( ORDER BY
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 1 AND @SortOrder = 'ASC'
THEN VLT.ID END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 1 AND @SortOrder = 'DESC'
THEN VLT.ID END DESC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 2 AND @SortOrder = 'ASC'
THEN VLT.Name END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 2 AND @SortOrder = 'DESC'
THEN VLT.Name END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 3 AND @SortOrder = 'ASC'
THEN VLT.Tel END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 3 AND @SortOrder = 'DESC'
THEN VLT.Tel END ASC
) AS RowNum
,*
FROM VLT
WHERE
( -- We apply the filter logic here
CASE
WHEN @FilterType = 'None' THEN 1
-- Name column filter
WHEN @FilterType = 'Contain' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.ID LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotContain' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.ID NOT LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'Match' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND VLT.ID = @FilterValue THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotMatch' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND VLT.ID <> @FilterValue THEN 1
-- Name column filter
WHEN @FilterType = 'Contain' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Name LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotContain' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Name NOT LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'Match' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND VLT.Name = @FilterValue THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotMatch' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND VLT.Name <> @FilterValue THEN 1
-- Tel column filter
WHEN @FilterType = 'Contain' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Tel LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotContain' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Tel NOT LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'Match' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND VLT.Tel = @FilterValue THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotMatch' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND VLT.Tel <> @FilterValue THEN 1
END
) = 1
)
SELECT
Data.ID,
Data.Name,
Data.Tel
FROM Data_CTE AS Data
WHERE Data.RowNum > @PageSize * (@PageNumber - 1)
AND Data.RowNum <= @PageSize * @PageNumber
ORDER BY Data.RowNum
SQL Server 2012+
DECLARE @PageNumber Int = 1200
DECLARE @PageSize INT = 200
DECLARE @SortByField int = 1 --The field used for sort by
DECLARE @SortOrder nvarchar(255) = 'ASC' --ASC or DESC
DECLARE @FilterType nvarchar(255) = 'None' --The filter type, as defined on the client side (None/Contain/NotContain/Match/NotMatch/True/False/)
DECLARE @FilterValue nvarchar(255) = '' --The value the user gave for the filter
DECLARE @FilterColumn int = 1 --The column to wich the filter is applied, represents the column number like when we send the information.
;WITH
Data_CTE
AS
(
SELECT
*
FROM VLT
WHERE
( -- We apply the filter logic here
CASE
WHEN @FilterType = 'None' THEN 1
-- Name column filter
WHEN @FilterType = 'Contain' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.ID LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotContain' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.ID NOT LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'Match' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND VLT.ID = @FilterValue THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotMatch' AND @FilterColumn = 1
AND VLT.ID <> @FilterValue THEN 1
-- Name column filter
WHEN @FilterType = 'Contain' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Name LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotContain' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Name NOT LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'Match' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND VLT.Name = @FilterValue THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotMatch' AND @FilterColumn = 2
AND VLT.Name <> @FilterValue THEN 1
-- Tel column filter
WHEN @FilterType = 'Contain' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Tel LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotContain' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND ( -- In this case, when the filter value is empty, we want to show everything.
VLT.Tel NOT LIKE '%' + @FilterValue + '%'
OR
@FilterValue = ''
) THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'Match' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND VLT.Tel = @FilterValue THEN 1
WHEN @FilterType = 'NotMatch' AND @FilterColumn = 3
AND VLT.Tel <> @FilterValue THEN 1
END
) = 1
)
SELECT
Data.ID,
Data.Name,
Data.Tel
FROM Data_CTE AS Data
ORDER BY
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 1 AND @SortOrder = 'ASC'
THEN Data.ID END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 1 AND @SortOrder = 'DESC'
THEN Data.ID END DESC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 2 AND @SortOrder = 'ASC'
THEN Data.Name END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 2 AND @SortOrder = 'DESC'
THEN Data.Name END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 3 AND @SortOrder = 'ASC'
THEN Data.Tel END ASC,
CASE WHEN @SortByField = 3 AND @SortOrder = 'DESC'
THEN Data.Tel END ASC
OFFSET @PageSize * (@PageNumber - 1) ROWS FETCH NEXT @PageSize ROWS ONLY;
在sql server 2012中分页的最佳方法是在存储过程中使用offset和fetch next。 OFFSET关键字-如果对order by子句使用OFFSET，则查询将跳过OFFSET n Rows中指定的记录数。
FETCH NEXT关键字-当我们使用FETCH NEXT与一个order by子句，它将返回你想要显示在分页的行数，没有Offset，那么SQL将生成一个错误。 下面是一个例子。
create procedure sp_paging
(
@pageno as int,
@records as int
)
as
begin
declare @offsetcount as int
set @offsetcount=(@pageno-1)*@records
select id,bs,variable from salary order by id offset @offsetcount rows fetch Next @records rows only
end
您可以像下面这样执行它。
exec sp_paging 2,3
create PROCEDURE SP_Company_List (@pagesize int= -1，@pageindex int= 0) 选择Id, NameEn从公司订单的Id ASC OFFSET (@pageindex-1)* @pagesize ROWS FETCH NEXt @pagesize ROWS ONLY END GO 声明@return_value int EXEC @return_value = [dbo]。[SP_Company_List] @pagesize = 1， > @pageindex = 2 SELECT 'Return Value' = @return_value 去
这个位使您能够使用SQL Server和新版本的MySQL进行分页，并携带每行中的总行数。 使用您的类推键来计数唯一行数。
WITH T AS
(
SELECT TABLE_ID, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY TABLE_ID) AS RN
, (SELECT COUNT(TABLE_ID) FROM TABLE) AS TOTAL
FROM TABLE (NOLOCK)
)
SELECT T2.FIELD1, T2.FIELD2, T2.FIELD3, T.TOTAL
FROM TABLE T2 (NOLOCK)
INNER JOIN T ON T2.TABLE_ID=T.TABLE_ID
WHERE T.RN >= 100
AND T.RN < 200
这是2012年老SO问题的重复: 实现分页的有效方法
从[TableX] ORDER BY [FieldX] 偏移量500行 只获取下100行
这里将更详细地讨论这个主题，并使用替代方法。
推荐文章
- 我如何在T-SQL用逗号格式化一个数字?
- LEFT OUTER JOIN如何返回比左表中存在的记录更多的记录?
- 如何用SQL语句计算百分比
- 数组与列表的性能
- 使用私有静态方法的优点
- Postgres唯一约束与索引
- SQL Server动态PIVOT查询?
- 如何等待2秒?
- SQL Server: CROSS JOIN和FULL OUTER JOIN的区别是什么?
- MySQL对重复键更新在一个查询中插入多行
- 如何在内存中获取对象大小?
- varchar和nvarchar SQL Server数据类型之间的主要性能差异是什么?
- 向现有表添加主键
- 为什么512x512矩阵的转置比513x513矩阵的转置慢得多?
- 使用电子邮件地址为主键?
