在SQL Server 2000、2005、2008、2012中分页结果的最佳方法(性能方面)是什么?如果你还想获得结果的总数(在分页之前)?


当前回答

   CREATE view vw_sppb_part_listsource as 
    select row_number() over (partition by sppb_part.init_id order by sppb_part.sppb_part_id asc ) as idx, * from (
      select 
          part.SPPB_PART_ID
          , 0 as is_rev
          , part.part_number 
          , part.init_id 
      from t_sppb_init_part part 
      left join t_sppb_init_partrev prev on ( part.SPPB_PART_ID = prev.SPPB_PART_ID )
      where prev.SPPB_PART_ID is null 
      union 
      select 
          part.SPPB_PART_ID
          , 1 as is_rev
          , prev.part_number 
          , part.init_id 
      from t_sppb_init_part part 
      inner join t_sppb_init_partrev prev on ( part.SPPB_PART_ID = prev.SPPB_PART_ID )
    ) sppb_part

当涉及到不同的init_id时会重新启动idx吗

其他回答

对于ROW_NUMBER技术,如果你没有一个排序列,你可以使用CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,如下所示:

SELECT TOP 20 
    col1,
    col2,
    col3,
    col4
FROM (
    SELECT 
         tbl.col1 AS col1
        ,tbl.col2 AS col2
        ,tbl.col3 AS col3
        ,tbl.col4 AS col4
        ,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
            ORDER BY CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
            ) AS sort_row
    FROM dbo.MyTable tbl
    ) AS query
WHERE query.sort_row > 10
ORDER BY query.sort_row

对于我来说,这种方法在搜索表大小甚至高达700,000的情况下效果很好。

这将获取记录11到30。

http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/PagingLarge.aspx上有关于不同分页技术的很好的概述

我经常在SQL Server 2000中使用ROWCOUNT方法(也可以在2005和2008中使用,只测量与ROW_NUMBER相比的性能),它的速度非常快,但你需要确保排序的列(大多数)具有唯一的值。

在sql server 2012中分页的最佳方法是在存储过程中使用offset和fetch next。 OFFSET关键字-如果对order by子句使用OFFSET,则查询将跳过OFFSET n Rows中指定的记录数。

FETCH NEXT关键字-当我们使用FETCH NEXT与一个order by子句,它将返回你想要显示在分页的行数,没有Offset,那么SQL将生成一个错误。 下面是一个例子。

create procedure sp_paging
(
 @pageno as int,
 @records as int
)
as
begin
declare @offsetcount as int
set @offsetcount=(@pageno-1)*@records
select id,bs,variable from salary order by id offset @offsetcount rows fetch Next @records rows only
end

您可以像下面这样执行它。

exec sp_paging 2,3
   CREATE view vw_sppb_part_listsource as 
    select row_number() over (partition by sppb_part.init_id order by sppb_part.sppb_part_id asc ) as idx, * from (
      select 
          part.SPPB_PART_ID
          , 0 as is_rev
          , part.part_number 
          , part.init_id 
      from t_sppb_init_part part 
      left join t_sppb_init_partrev prev on ( part.SPPB_PART_ID = prev.SPPB_PART_ID )
      where prev.SPPB_PART_ID is null 
      union 
      select 
          part.SPPB_PART_ID
          , 1 as is_rev
          , prev.part_number 
          , part.init_id 
      from t_sppb_init_part part 
      inner join t_sppb_init_partrev prev on ( part.SPPB_PART_ID = prev.SPPB_PART_ID )
    ) sppb_part

当涉及到不同的init_id时会重新启动idx吗

好吧,我已经在我的SQL 2000数据库中使用了以下示例查询,它也适用于SQL 2005。它通过使用多个列来动态排序。 我告诉你……这是强大的:)

    ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[RE_ListingReports_SelectSummary] 

@CompanyID  int,
@pageNumber     int,
@pageSize   int, 
@sort       varchar(200)
AS

DECLARE @sql nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @strPageSize nvarchar(20)
DECLARE @strSkippedRows nvarchar(20)
DECLARE @strFields nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @strFilter nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @sortBy nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @strFrom nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @strID nvarchar(100)

If(@pageNumber < 0)
  SET @pageNumber = 1
SET @strPageSize = CAST(@pageSize AS varchar(20)) 
SET @strSkippedRows = CAST(((@pageNumber - 1) * @pageSize) AS varchar(20))-- For    example if pageNumber is 5  pageSize is 10, then SkippedRows = 40.
SET @strID = 'ListingDbID'
SET @strFields = 'ListingDbID,
ListingID,  
[ExtraRoom]
'
SET @strFrom = ' vwListingSummary '

SET @strFilter = ' WHERE
        CompanyID = ' + CAST(@CompanyID As varchar(20)) 
End
SET @sortBy = ''
if(len(ltrim(rtrim(@sort))) > 0)
SET @sortBy = ' Order By ' + @sort

-- Total Rows Count

SET @sql =  'SELECT Count(' + @strID + ')  FROM ' + @strFROM + @strFilter
EXEC sp_executesql @sql

--// This technique is used in a Single Table pagination
SET @sql = 'SELECT ' + @strFields + ' FROM ' + @strFROM +
    ' WHERE ' + @strID +  ' IN ' + 
   '  (SELECT TOP ' + @strPageSize + ' ' + @strID + ' FROM ' + @strFROM + @strFilter + 
             ' AND  ' + @strID + ' NOT IN ' + '
          (SELECT TOP ' + @strSkippedRows + ' ' + @strID + ' FROM ' + @strFROM + @strFilter + @SortBy + ') ' 
   + @SortBy + ') ' + @SortBy
Print @sql 
EXEC sp_executesql @sql

最好的部分是sp_executesql缓存以后的调用,只要您传递相同的参数,即生成相同的sql文本。