(注意:虽然克隆版本可能很有用，但对于简单的浅复制，我在另一篇文章中提到的构造函数是更好的选择。)

你希望拷贝的深度是多少，你使用的是什么版本的。net ?如果你使用的是。net 3.5，我认为对ToDictionary的LINQ调用，同时指定键和元素选择器将是最简单的方法。

例如，如果你不介意这个值是一个浅克隆:

var newDictionary = oldDictionary.ToDictionary(entry => entry.Key,
                                               entry => entry.Value);

如果你已经限制了T来实现ICloneable:

var newDictionary = oldDictionary.ToDictionary(entry => entry.Key, 
                                               entry => (T) entry.Value.Clone());

(这些方法未经测试，但应该有效。)

好的，.NET 2.0的答案是:

如果不需要克隆值，可以使用构造函数重载to Dictionary，该构造函数接受一个现有的Dictionary。(也可以将比较器指定为现有字典的比较器。)

如果你确实需要克隆值，你可以使用这样的方法:

public static Dictionary<TKey, TValue> CloneDictionaryCloningValues<TKey, TValue>
   (Dictionary<TKey, TValue> original) where TValue : ICloneable
{
    Dictionary<TKey, TValue> ret = new Dictionary<TKey, TValue>(original.Count,
                                                            original.Comparer);
    foreach (KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> entry in original)
    {
        ret.Add(entry.Key, (TValue) entry.Value.Clone());
    }
    return ret;
}

当然，这也依赖于TValue.Clone()是一个适当的深度克隆。

对于。net 2.0，你可以实现一个继承自Dictionary并实现ICloneable的类。

public class CloneableDictionary<TKey, TValue> : Dictionary<TKey, TValue> where TValue : ICloneable
{
    public IDictionary<TKey, TValue> Clone()
    {
        CloneableDictionary<TKey, TValue> clone = new CloneableDictionary<TKey, TValue>();

        foreach (KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> pair in this)
        {
            clone.Add(pair.Key, (TValue)pair.Value.Clone());
        }

        return clone;
    }
}

然后，只需调用clone方法就可以克隆字典。当然，这个实现要求字典的值类型实现ICloneable，但除此之外，泛型实现根本不实用。

你总是可以使用序列化。你可以序列化对象，然后反序列化它。这将为您提供Dictionary及其所有条目的深层副本。现在您可以创建任何标记为[Serializable]的对象的深度副本，而无需编写任何特殊代码。

这里有两种将使用二进制序列化的方法。如果使用这些方法，只需调用

object deepcopy = FromBinary(ToBinary(yourDictionary));

public Byte[] ToBinary()
{
  MemoryStream ms = null;
  Byte[] byteArray = null;
  try
  {
    BinaryFormatter serializer = new BinaryFormatter();
    ms = new MemoryStream();
    serializer.Serialize(ms, this);
    byteArray = ms.ToArray();
  }
  catch (Exception unexpected)
  {
    Trace.Fail(unexpected.Message);
    throw;
  }
  finally
  {
    if (ms != null)
      ms.Close();
  }
  return byteArray;
}

public object FromBinary(Byte[] buffer)
{
  MemoryStream ms = null;
  object deserializedObject = null;

  try
  {
    BinaryFormatter serializer = new BinaryFormatter();
    ms = new MemoryStream();
    ms.Write(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
    ms.Position = 0;
    deserializedObject = serializer.Deserialize(ms);
  }
  finally
  {
    if (ms != null)
      ms.Close();
  }
  return deserializedObject;
}

二进制序列化方法工作得很好，但在我的测试中，它比克隆的非序列化实现慢了10倍。在Dictionary<string, List<double>>上测试

Dictionary<string, int> dictionary = new Dictionary<string, int>();

Dictionary<string, int> copy = new Dictionary<string, int>(dictionary);

对我来说最好的方法是:

Dictionary<int, int> copy= new Dictionary<int, int>(yourListOrDictionary);

如果键/值是ICloneable，试试这个:

    public static Dictionary<K,V> CloneDictionary<K,V>(Dictionary<K,V> dict) where K : ICloneable where V : ICloneable
    {
        Dictionary<K, V> newDict = null;

        if (dict != null)
        {
            // If the key and value are value types, just use copy constructor.
            if (((typeof(K).IsValueType || typeof(K) == typeof(string)) &&
                 (typeof(V).IsValueType) || typeof(V) == typeof(string)))
            {
                newDict = new Dictionary<K, V>(dict);
            }
            else // prepare to clone key or value or both
            {
                newDict = new Dictionary<K, V>();

                foreach (KeyValuePair<K, V> kvp in dict)
                {
                    K key;
                    if (typeof(K).IsValueType || typeof(K) == typeof(string))
                    {
                        key = kvp.Key;
                    }
                    else
                    {
                        key = (K)kvp.Key.Clone();
                    }
                    V value;
                    if (typeof(V).IsValueType || typeof(V) == typeof(string))
                    {
                        value = kvp.Value;
                    }
                    else
                    {
                        value = (V)kvp.Value.Clone();
                    }

                    newDict[key] = value;
                }
            }
        }

        return newDict;
    }

这对我来说很好

 // assuming this fills the List
 List<Dictionary<string, string>> obj = this.getData(); 

 List<Dictionary<string, string>> objCopy = new List<Dictionary<string, string>>(obj);

正如Tomer Wolberg在评论中所描述的，如果值类型是可变类，这是行不通的。

这帮助了我，当我试图深度复制Dictionary < string, string >

Dictionary<string, string> dict2 = new Dictionary<string, string>(dict);

祝你好运

在这种情况下，你有一个"object"的字典，object可以是(double, int，…或ComplexClass):

Dictionary<string, object> dictSrc { get; set; }

public class ComplexClass : ICloneable
{
    
    private Point3D ...;
    private Vector3D ....;
    [...]

    public object Clone()
    {
        ComplexClass clone = new ComplexClass();
        clone = (ComplexClass)this.MemberwiseClone();
        return clone;
    }

}


dictSrc["toto"] = new ComplexClass()
dictSrc["tata"] = 12.3
...

dictDest = dictSrc.ToDictionary(entry => entry.Key,
                                entry => ((entry.Value is ICloneable) ? (entry.Value as ICloneable).Clone() : entry.Value) );

这里是一些真正的“真正的深度复制”，不知道类型用一些递归行走，很适合初学者。我认为它适用于嵌套类型和几乎所有棘手的类型。我还没有添加嵌套数组处理，但是您可以根据自己的选择进行修改。

Dictionary<string, Dictionary<string, dynamic>> buildInfoDict =
    new Dictionary<string, Dictionary<string, dynamic>>()
    {
        {"tag",new Dictionary<string,dynamic>(){
                 { "attrName", "tag"  },
                 { "isCss", "False"  },
               { "turnedOn","True" },
                 { "tag",null }
            } },
        {"id",new Dictionary<string,dynamic>(){
                 { "attrName", "id"  },
                 { "isCss", "False"  },
               { "turnedOn","True" },
                 { "id",null }
            } },
                {"width",new Dictionary<string,dynamic>(){
                 { "attrName", "width"  },
                 { "isCss", "True"  },
               { "turnedOn","True" },
                 { "width","20%" }
            } },
                {"height",new Dictionary<string,dynamic>(){
                 { "attrName", "height"  },
                 { "isCss", "True"  },
               { "turnedOn","True" },
                 { "height","20%" }
            } },
                {"text",new Dictionary<string,dynamic>(){
                 { "attrName", null  },
                 { "isCss", "False"  },
               { "turnedOn","True" },
                 { "text","" }
            } },
                {"href",new Dictionary<string,dynamic>(){
                 { "attrName", null  },
                 { "isCss", "False"  },
                 { "flags", "removeAttrIfTurnedOff"  },
               { "turnedOn","True" },
                 { "href","about:blank" }
            } }
    };

var cln=clone(buildInfoDict);

public static dynamic clone(dynamic obj)
{
    dynamic cloneObj = null;
    if (IsAssignableFrom(obj, typeof(IDictionary)))
    {
        cloneObj = Activator.CreateInstance(obj.GetType());
        foreach (var key in obj.Keys)
        {
            cloneObj[key] = clone(obj[key]);
        }

    }
    else if (IsNumber(obj) || obj.GetType() == typeof(string))
    {
        cloneObj = obj;
    }
    else
    {
        Debugger.Break();
    }
    return cloneObj;
}


public static bool IsAssignableFrom(this object obj, Type ObjType = null, Type ListType = null, bool HandleBaseTypes = false)
{
    if (ObjType == null)
    {
        ObjType = obj.GetType();
    }

    bool Res;

    do
    {
        Res = (ObjType.IsGenericType && ObjType.GetGenericTypeDefinition().IsAssignableFrom(ListType)) ||
            (ListType == null && ObjType.IsAssignableFrom(obj.GetType()));
        ObjType = ObjType.BaseType;
    } while ((!Res && ObjType != null) && HandleBaseTypes && ObjType != typeof(object));

    return Res;
}

public static bool IsNumber(this object value)
{
    return value is sbyte
            || value is byte
            || value is short
            || value is ushort
            || value is int
            || value is uint
            || value is long
            || value is ulong
            || value is float
            || value is double
            || value is decimal;
}

这里是克隆字典的另一种方法，假设你知道做“正确”的事情，只要处理任何隐藏在“T”(a.k.a)后面的东西。“对象”)。

internal static Dictionary<string, object> Clone(Dictionary<string, object> dictIn) 
    {
        Dictionary<string, object> dictOut = new Dictionary<string, object>();
    
        IDictionaryEnumerator enumMyDictionary = dictIn.GetEnumerator();
        while (enumMyDictionary.MoveNext())
        {
            string strKey = (string)enumMyDictionary.Key;
            object oValue = enumMyDictionary.Value;
            dictOut.Add(strKey, oValue);
        }
    
        return dictOut; 
    }

我将计算T是否为值或引用类型。如果T是值类型，我将使用Dictionary的构造函数，如果T是引用类型，我将确保T继承自ICloneable。

它会给

    private static IDictionary<string, T> Copy<T>(this IDictionary<string, T> dict)
         where T : ICloneable
    {
        if (typeof(T).IsValueType)
        {
            return new Dictionary<string, T>(dict);
        }
        else
        {
            var copy = new Dictionary<string, T>();
            foreach (var pair in dict)
            {
                copy[pair.Key] = pair.Value;
            }
            return copy;
        }
    }