如何使用map_函数和一个for循环?以下是我的解决方案:

list_to_df <- function(list_to_convert) {
  tmp_data_frame <- data.frame()
  for (i in 1:length(list_to_convert)) {
    tmp <- map_dfr(list_to_convert[[i]], data.frame)
    tmp_data_frame <- rbind(tmp_data_frame, tmp)
  }
  return(tmp_data_frame)
}

其中map_dfr将每个列表元素转换为data.frame，然后rbind将它们合并。

在你的情况下，我猜应该是:

converted_list <- list_to_df(l)

tibble包有一个函数enframe()，它通过将嵌套的列表对象强制转换为嵌套的tibble(“整齐的”数据帧)对象来解决这个问题。下面是R for Data Science的一个简单例子:

x <- list(
    a = 1:5,
    b = 3:4, 
    c = 5:6
) 

df <- enframe(x)
df
#> # A tibble: 3 × 2
#>    name     value
#>   <chr>    <list>
#>    1     a <int [5]>
#>    2     b <int [2]>
#>    3     c <int [2]>

Since you have several nests in your list, l, you can use the unlist(recursive = FALSE) to remove unnecessary nesting to get just a single hierarchical list and then pass to enframe(). I use tidyr::unnest() to unnest the output into a single level "tidy" data frame, which has your two columns (one for the group name and one for the observations with the groups value). If you want columns that make wide, you can add a column using add_column() that just repeats the order of the values 132 times. Then just spread() the values.

library(tidyverse)

l <- replicate(
    132,
    list(sample(letters, 20)),
    simplify = FALSE
)

l_tib <- l %>% 
    unlist(recursive = FALSE) %>% 
    enframe() %>% 
    unnest()
l_tib
#> # A tibble: 2,640 x 2
#>     name value
#>    <int> <chr>
#> 1      1     d
#> 2      1     z
#> 3      1     l
#> 4      1     b
#> 5      1     i
#> 6      1     j
#> 7      1     g
#> 8      1     w
#> 9      1     r
#> 10     1     p
#> # ... with 2,630 more rows

l_tib_spread <- l_tib %>%
    add_column(index = rep(1:20, 132)) %>%
    spread(key = index, value = value)
l_tib_spread
#> # A tibble: 132 x 21
#>     name   `1`   `2`   `3`   `4`   `5`   `6`   `7`   `8`   `9`  `10`  `11`
#> *  <int> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1      1     d     z     l     b     i     j     g     w     r     p     y
#> 2      2     w     s     h     r     i     k     d     u     a     f     j
#> 3      3     r     v     q     s     m     u     j     p     f     a     i
#> 4      4     o     y     x     n     p     i     f     m     h     l     t
#> 5      5     p     w     v     d     k     a     l     r     j     q     n
#> 6      6     i     k     w     o     c     n     m     b     v     e     q
#> 7      7     c     d     m     i     u     o     e     z     v     g     p
#> 8      8     f     s     e     o     p     n     k     x     c     z     h
#> 9      9     d     g     o     h     x     i     c     y     t     f     j
#> 10    10     y     r     f     k     d     o     b     u     i     x     s
#> # ... with 122 more rows, and 9 more variables: `12` <chr>, `13` <chr>,
#> #   `14` <chr>, `15` <chr>, `16` <chr>, `17` <chr>, `18` <chr>,
#> #   `19` <chr>, `20` <chr>

Reshape2产生与上面的plyr示例相同的输出:

library(reshape2)
l <- list(a = list(var.1 = 1, var.2 = 2, var.3 = 3)
          , b = list(var.1 = 4, var.2 = 5, var.3 = 6)
          , c = list(var.1 = 7, var.2 = 8, var.3 = 9)
          , d = list(var.1 = 10, var.2 = 11, var.3 = 12)
)
l <- melt(l)
dcast(l, L1 ~ L2)

收益率:

  L1 var.1 var.2 var.3
1  a     1     2     3
2  b     4     5     6
3  c     7     8     9
4  d    10    11    12

如果你几乎没有像素，你可以在一行w/ recast()中完成这一切。

对于使用purrr系列解决方案的并行(多核，多会话等)解决方案，使用:

library (furrr)
plan(multisession) # see below to see which other plan() is the more efficient
myTibble <- future_map_dfc(l, ~.x)

其中l是列表。

要对最有效的计划()进行基准测试，您可以使用:

library(tictoc)
plan(sequential) # reference time
# plan(multisession) # benchamark plan() goes here. See ?plan().
tic()
myTibble <- future_map_dfc(l, ~.x)
toc()

修正样本数据，使其符合原始描述“每个项目是一个长度为20的列表”

mylistlist <- replicate(
  132,
  as.list(sample(letters, 20)),
  simplify = FALSE
)

我们可以像这样把它转换成一个数据帧:

data.frame(t(sapply(mylistlist,c)))

Sapply将其转换为矩阵。 data.frame将矩阵转换为数据帧。

导致:

l <- replicate(10,list(sample(letters, 20)))
a <-lapply(l[1:10],data.frame)
do.call("cbind", a)