我找到了一个解决这类问题的下流方法。如果您出于某种原因(我有时间限制的原因)仍然希望保留ActivityGroups，您只需实现即可

public void onBackPressed() {}

在Activity中做一些回显代码。即使旧设备上没有这样的方法，这个方法也会被新设备调用。

请在这里检查我的答案。基本上我只需要:

@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    //No call for super(). Bug on API Level > 11.
}

不要在saveInstanceState方法上调用super()。这把事情搞砸了……

这是支持包中的一个已知错误。

如果你需要保存实例并添加一些东西到outState Bundle中，你可以使用以下方法:

@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    outState.putString("WORKAROUND_FOR_BUG_19917_KEY", "WORKAROUND_FOR_BUG_19917_VALUE");
    super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
}

最后，正确的解决方案是(如评论所示)使用:

transaction.commitAllowingStateLoss();

当添加或执行导致异常的FragmentTransaction时。

这里有一个不同的解决方法。

使用私有成员变量，你可以将返回的数据设置为一个意图，然后在super.onResume();

像这样:

private Intent mOnActivityResultIntent = null; 

@Override
protected void onResume() {
    super.onResume();
    if(mOnActivityResultIntent != null){
        ... do things ...
        mOnActivityResultIntent = null;
    }
 }

@Override
public void onActivityResult(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent data){
    if(data != null){
        mOnActivityResultIntent = data;
    }
}

简单有效的解决方案:

遵循简单的步骤

步骤

步骤1:在各自的片段中覆盖onSaveInstanceState状态。并从中移除super method。

 @Override
public void onSaveInstanceState( Bundle outState ) {

}  

2 .使用 fragmentTransaction.commitAllowingStateLoss ();

而不是fragmentTransaction.commit();而片段操作。

我得到这个异常时，我按下后退按钮取消意图选择器在我的地图片段活动。 我通过替换onResume(在那里我初始化片段)的代码来解决这个问题，onstart()和应用程序工作正常。希望能有所帮助。

有许多与类似错误消息相关的问题。检查这个特定堆栈跟踪的第二行。这个异常与FragmentManagerImpl.popBackStackImmediate调用相关。

这个方法调用，就像popBackStack一样，如果会话状态已经被保存，它总是会以IllegalStateException失败。检查来源。您无法阻止抛出此异常。

删除对super的调用。onSaveInstanceState没有帮助。 使用commitAllowingStateLoss创建Fragment是没有帮助的。

以下是我对这个问题的观察:

有一个带有提交按钮的表单。 当单击按钮时，将创建一个对话框并启动异步进程。 用户在过程结束之前单击home键—调用onSaveInstanceState。 进程完成后，将执行回调并尝试popBackStackImmediate。 抛出IllegalStateException。

下面是我解决问题的方法:

因为在回调中不可能避免IllegalStateException，所以捕获并忽略它。

try {
    activity.getSupportFragmentManager().popBackStackImmediate(name);
} catch (IllegalStateException ignored) {
    // There's no way to avoid getting this if saveInstanceState has already been called.
}

这足以阻止应用程序崩溃。但现在用户将恢复应用程序，并看到他们认为他们按下的按钮根本没有按下(他们认为)。表单片段仍然显示!

要修复此问题，在创建对话框时，使某些状态表示进程已启动。

progressDialog.show(fragmentManager, TAG);
submitPressed = true;

并将这个状态保存在bundle中。

@Override
public void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    ...
    outState.putBoolean(SUBMIT_PRESSED, submitPressed);
}

不要忘记在onViewCreated中再次加载它

然后，在恢复时，如果之前尝试提交，则回滚这些片段。这可以防止用户返回到一个似乎未提交的表单。

@Override
public void onResume() {
    super.onResume();
    if (submitPressed) {
        // no need to try-catch this, because we are not in a callback
        activity.getSupportFragmentManager().popBackStackImmediate(name);
        submitPressed = false;
    }
}

在显示片段之前检查活动是否是finished()，并注意commitAllowingStateLoss()。

例子:

if(!isFinishing()) {
FragmentManager fm = getSupportFragmentManager();
            FragmentTransaction ft = fm.beginTransaction();
            DummyFragment dummyFragment = DummyFragment.newInstance();
            ft.add(R.id.dummy_fragment_layout, dummyFragment);
            ft.commitAllowingStateLoss();
}

我也遇到过类似的问题，场景是这样的:

我的活动正在添加/替换列表片段。 每个列表片段都有一个对活动的引用，以便在单击列表项时通知活动(观察者模式)。 每个列表片段调用setRetainInstance(true);在其onCreate方法中。

活动的onCreate方法是这样的:

mMainFragment = (SelectionFragment) getSupportFragmentManager()
                .findFragmentByTag(MAIN_FRAGMENT_TAG);
        if (mMainFragment == null) {
            mMainFragment = new SelectionFragment();

            mMainFragment.setListAdapter(new ArrayAdapter<String>(this,
                    R.layout.item_main_menu, getResources().getStringArray(
                            R.array.main_menu)));
mMainFragment.setOnSelectionChangedListener(this);
            FragmentTransaction transaction = getSupportFragmentManager()
                    .beginTransaction();
            transaction.add(R.id.content, mMainFragment, MAIN_FRAGMENT_TAG);
            transaction.commit();
        }

异常被抛出是因为当配置改变时(设备旋转)，活动被创建，主片段从片段管理器的历史中检索，同时片段已经有一个OLD引用到被销毁的活动

将实现改为这样就解决了问题:

mMainFragment = (SelectionFragment) getSupportFragmentManager()
                .findFragmentByTag(MAIN_FRAGMENT_TAG);
        if (mMainFragment == null) {
            mMainFragment = new SelectionFragment();

            mMainFragment.setListAdapter(new ArrayAdapter<String>(this,
                    R.layout.item_main_menu, getResources().getStringArray(
                            R.array.main_menu)));
            FragmentTransaction transaction = getSupportFragmentManager()
                    .beginTransaction();
            transaction.add(R.id.content, mMainFragment, MAIN_FRAGMENT_TAG);
            transaction.commit();
        }
        mMainFragment.setOnSelectionChangedListener(this);

您需要在每次创建活动时设置侦听器，以避免片段引用已销毁的活动的旧实例。

我认为使用transaction.commitAllowingStateLoss();不是最好的解决方案。 当活动的配置改变，并且片段onSavedInstanceState()被调用，然后您的异步回调方法尝试提交片段时，将抛出此异常。

简单的解决方案是检查活动是否正在改变配置

例如:检查isChangingConfigurations()

i.e.

如果(! isChangingConfigurations ()) { / /提交事务。 ｝

签出这个链接

注意，使用transaction.commitAllowingStateLoss()可能会给用户带来糟糕的体验。有关为什么会抛出这个异常的更多信息，请参阅这篇文章。

把这个添加到你的活动中

@Override
public void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
    if (outState.isEmpty()) {
        // Work-around for a pre-Android 4.2 bug
        outState.putBoolean("bug:fix", true);
    }
}

我也经历过这个问题，每当FragmentActivity的上下文发生变化时(例如屏幕方向被改变等)，问题就会发生。所以最好的修复方法就是从FragmentActivity中更新context。

从支持库版本24.0.0开始，您可以调用FragmentTransaction.commitNow()方法，该方法同步提交事务，而不是调用commit()，然后调用executePendingTransactions()。正如文档所述，这种方法甚至更好:

调用commitNow比调用commit()之后再调用executePendingTransactions()更可取，因为后者会产生试图提交所有当前挂起的事务的副作用，无论这是否是所需的行为。

不要使用commitAllowingStateLoss()，它只应该用于用户的UI状态可以意外改变的情况。

https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/FragmentTransaction.html commitAllowingStateLoss ()

如果事务发生在parentFragment的ChildFragmentManager中，则使用 在外面检查parentFragment.isResume()。

if (parentFragment.isResume()) {
    DummyFragment dummyFragment = DummyFragment.newInstance();
    transaction = childFragmentManager.BeginTransaction();
    trans.Replace(Resource.Id.fragmentContainer, startFragment);
}

在我的案例中，我发现的最流畅和最简单的解决方案可能是避免在响应活动结果时从堆栈中弹出有问题的片段。所以在onActivityResult()中改变这个调用:

popMyFragmentAndMoveOn();

:

new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).post(new Runnable() {
    public void run() {
        popMyFragmentAndMoveOn();
    }
}

对我有帮助。

异常在这里抛出(在FragmentActivity中):

@Override
public void onBackPressed() {
    if (!mFragments.getSupportFragmentManager().popBackStackImmediate()) {
        super.onBackPressed();
    }
}

在FragmentManager.popBackStatckImmediate()中，FragmentManager.checkStateLoss()首先被调用。这就是IllegalStateException的原因。参见下面的实现:

private void checkStateLoss() {
    if (mStateSaved) { // Boom!
        throw new IllegalStateException(
                "Can not perform this action after onSaveInstanceState");
    }
    if (mNoTransactionsBecause != null) {
        throw new IllegalStateException(
                "Can not perform this action inside of " + mNoTransactionsBecause);
    }
}

我通过使用一个标志来标记Activity的当前状态来解决这个问题。以下是我的解决方案:

public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
    /**
     * A flag that marks whether current Activity has saved its instance state
     */
    private boolean mHasSaveInstanceState;

    @Override
    protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
        super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
        setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
    }

    @Override
    protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
        mHasSaveInstanceState = true;
        super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
    }

    @Override
    protected void onResume() {
        super.onResume();
        mHasSaveInstanceState = false;
    }

    @Override
    public void onBackPressed() {
        if (!mHasSaveInstanceState) {
            // avoid FragmentManager.checkStateLoss()'s throwing IllegalStateException
            super.onBackPressed();
        }
    }
}

每当你试图在你的活动中加载一个片段时，请确保活动处于恢复状态，而不是进入暂停状态。在暂停状态下，您可能会丢失已完成的提交操作。

你可以使用transaction.commitAllowingStateLoss()而不是transaction.commit()来加载片段

or

创建一个布尔值并检查activity是否不进入onpause状态

@Override
public void onResume() {
    super.onResume();
    mIsResumed = true;
}

@Override
public void onPause() {
    mIsResumed = false;
    super.onPause();
}

然后在加载片段时检查

if(mIsResumed){
//load the your fragment
}

这是2017年10月，谷歌制作了Android支持库与新事物称为生命周期组件。它为“onSaveInstanceState后不能执行此操作”的问题提供了一些新的思路。

简而言之:

使用生命周期组件来确定弹出片段的时间是否正确。

带解释的较长版本:

why this problem come out? It's because you are trying to use FragmentManager from your activity(which is going to hold your fragment I suppose?) to commit a transaction for you fragment. Usually this would look like you are trying to do some transaction for an up coming fragment, meanwhile the host activity already call savedInstanceState method(user may happen to touch the home button so the activity calls onStop(), in my case it's the reason) Usually this problem shouldn't happen -- we always try to load fragment into activity at the very beginning, like the onCreate() method is a perfect place for this. But sometimes this do happen, especially when you can't decide what fragment you will load to that activity, or you are trying to load fragment from an AsyncTask block(or anything will take a little time). The time, before the fragment transaction really happens, but after the activity's onCreate() method, user can do anything. If user press the home button, which triggers the activity's onSavedInstanceState() method, there would be a can not perform this action crash. If anyone want to see deeper in this issue, I suggest them to take a look at this blog post. It looks deep inside the source code layer and explain a lot about it. Also, it gives the reason that you shouldn't use the commitAllowingStateLoss() method to workaround this crash(trust me it offers nothing good for your code) How to fix this? Should I use commitAllowingStateLoss() method to load fragment? Nope you shouldn't; Should I override onSaveInstanceState method, ignore super method inside it? Nope you shouldn't; Should I use the magical isFinishing inside activity, to check if the host activity is at the right moment for fragment transaction? Yeah this looks like the right way to do. Take a look at what Lifecycle component can do. Basically, Google makes some implementation inside the AppCompatActivity class(and several other base class you should use in your project), which makes it a easier to determine current lifecycle state. Take a look back to our problem: why would this problem happen? It's because we do something at the wrong timing. So we try not to do it, and this problem will be gone. I code a little for my own project, here is what I do using LifeCycle. I code in Kotlin.

val hostActivity: AppCompatActivity? = null // the activity to host fragments. It's value should be properly initialized.

fun dispatchFragment(frag: Fragment) {
    hostActivity?.let {
       if(it.lifecyclecurrentState.isAtLeast(Lifecycle.State.RESUMED)){
           showFragment(frag)
       }
    }
}

private fun showFragment(frag: Fragment) {
    hostActivity?.let {
        Transaction.begin(it, R.id.frag_container)
                .show(frag)
                .commit()
    }

如上所示。我将检查主机活动的生命周期状态。对于支持库中的生命周期组件，这可能更具体。代码lifecyclecurrentState.isAtLeast(lifeccycle . state . resumed)的意思是，如果当前状态至少是onResume，不晚于它?这确保我的方法不会在其他生命状态(如onStop)期间执行。

Is it all done? Of course not. The code I have shown tells some new way to prevent application from crashing. But if it do go to the state of onStop, that line of code wont do things and thus show nothing on your screen. When users come back to the application, they will see an empty screen, that's the empty host activity showing no fragments at all. It's bad experience(yeah a little bit better than a crash). So here I wish there could be something nicer: app won't crash if it comes to life state later than onResume, the transaction method is life state aware; besides, the activity will try continue to finished that fragment transaction action, after the user come back to our app. I add something more to this method:

class FragmentDispatcher(_host: FragmentActivity) : LifecycleObserver {
    private val hostActivity: FragmentActivity? = _host
    private val lifeCycle: Lifecycle? = _host.lifecycle
    private val profilePendingList = mutableListOf<BaseFragment>()

    @OnLifecycleEvent(Lifecycle.Event.ON_RESUME)
    fun resume() {
        if (profilePendingList.isNotEmpty()) {
            showFragment(profilePendingList.last())
        }
    }

    fun dispatcherFragment(frag: BaseFragment) {
        if (lifeCycle?.currentState?.isAtLeast(Lifecycle.State.RESUMED) == true) {
            showFragment(frag)
        } else {
            profilePendingList.clear()
            profilePendingList.add(frag)
        }
    }

    private fun showFragment(frag: BaseFragment) {
        hostActivity?.let {
            Transaction.begin(it, R.id.frag_container)
                    .show(frag)
                    .commit()
        }
    }
}

我在这个dispatcher类中维护了一个列表，来存储那些没有机会完成事务操作的片段。当用户从主屏幕返回并发现仍然有片段等待启动时，它将转到@OnLifecycleEvent(lifeccycle . event . on_resume)注释下的resume()方法。现在我认为它应该像我预期的那样工作。

我最终创建了一个基本片段，并使我的应用程序中的所有片段扩展它

public class BaseFragment extends Fragment {

    private boolean mStateSaved;

    @CallSuper
    @Override
    public void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
        mStateSaved = true;
        super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
    }

    /**
     * Version of {@link #show(FragmentManager, String)} that no-ops when an IllegalStateException
     * would otherwise occur.
     */
    public void showAllowingStateLoss(FragmentManager manager, String tag) {
        // API 26 added this convenient method
        if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O) {
            if (manager.isStateSaved()) {
                return;
            }
        }

        if (mStateSaved) {
            return;
        }

        show(manager, tag);
    }
}

然后，当我试图显示一个片段时，我使用showAllowingStateLoss而不是show

是这样的:

MyFragment.newInstance()
.showAllowingStateLoss(getFragmentManager(), MY_FRAGMENT.TAG);

我从这个PR上找到了这个解决方案:https://github.com/googlesamples/easypermissions/pull/170/files

另一个可能的解决方法，我不确定是否在所有情况下都有帮助(来源在这里):

@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
    if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.KITKAT) {
        final View rootView = findViewById(android.R.id.content);
        if (rootView != null) {
            rootView.cancelPendingInputEvents();
        }
    }
}

如果你在onActivityResult中做一些FragmentTransaction，你可以做什么，你可以在onActivityResult中设置一些布尔值，然后在onResume中，你可以根据布尔值做你的FragmentTransaction。请参考下面的代码。

@Override
protected void onResume() {
    super.onResume;
    if(isSwitchFragment){
        isSwitchFragment=false;
        bottomNavigationView.getTabAt(POS_FEED).select();
    }
}

@Override
protected void onActivityResult(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent data) {
    if (requestCode == FilterActivity.FILTER_REQUEST_EVENT && data != null) {
        isSwitchFragment=true;
    }
}

我知道@Ovidiu Latcu有一个公认的答案，但过了一段时间，错误仍然存在。

@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
     //No call for super(). Bug on API Level > 11.
}

Crashlytics仍然给我发送这个奇怪的错误信息。

但是错误现在只发生在版本7+(牛轧糖) 我的修复方法是在fragmentTransaction中使用commitAllowingStateLoss()而不是commit()。

这篇文章对commitAllowingStateLoss()有帮助，并且再也没有片段问题了。

总而言之，这里公认的答案可能适用于牛轧糖之前的安卓版本。

这可能会节省一些人几个小时的搜索时间。 幸福的准则。< 3干杯

我也有同样的问题。 这是因为之前的活动被破坏了。 当你支持之前的活动时，它被摧毁了。 我写的是base activity(错误)

@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
    SpinnerCustom2.setFragmentManager(getSupportFragmentManager());
    onCreateDrawerActivity(savedInstanceState);
}

我把它放入onStart，它是正确的

@Override
protected void onStart() {
    super.onStart();
    SpinnerCustom2.setFragmentManager(getSupportFragmentManager());

}

为了绕过这个问题，我们可以使用谷歌I/O 2018中引入的导航体系结构组件。 导航架构组件简化了Android应用程序中导航的实现。

提供:IllegalStateException的解决方案

这个问题困扰了我很久，但幸运的是，我想出了一个具体的解决方案。这里有详细的解释。

使用commitAllowStateloss()可能会防止这种异常，但会导致UI不规范。到目前为止，我们已经了解到，当我们在Activity状态丢失后试图提交一个片段时，会遇到IllegalStateException—所以我们应该延迟事务，直到状态恢复。可以像这样简单地做

声明两个私有布尔变量

 public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {

    //Boolean variable to mark if the transaction is safe
    private boolean isTransactionSafe;

    //Boolean variable to mark if there is any transaction pending
    private boolean isTransactionPending;

现在在onPostResume()和onPause中，我们设置和取消设置布尔变量isTransactionSafe。想法是只有当活动在前台时才标记事务安全，这样就不会有无状态的机会。

/*
onPostResume is called only when the activity's state is completely restored. In this we will
set our boolean variable to true. Indicating that transaction is safe now
 */
public void onPostResume(){
    super.onPostResume();
    isTransactionSafe=true;
}
/*
onPause is called just before the activity moves to background and also before onSaveInstanceState. In this
we will mark the transaction as unsafe
 */

public void onPause(){
    super.onPause();
    isTransactionSafe=false;

}

private void commitFragment(){
    if(isTransactionSafe) {
        MyFragment myFragment = new MyFragment();
        FragmentManager fragmentManager = getFragmentManager();
        FragmentTransaction fragmentTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction();
        fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.frame, myFragment);
        fragmentTransaction.commit();
    }
}

-我们到目前为止所做的将从IllegalStateException保存，但我们的事务将丢失，如果它们在活动移动到后台后完成，有点像commitAllowStateloss()。为了解决这个问题，我们有一个isTransactionPending布尔变量

public void onPostResume(){
   super.onPostResume();
   isTransactionSafe=true;
/* Here after the activity is restored we check if there is any transaction pending from
the last restoration
*/
   if (isTransactionPending) {
      commitFragment();
   }
}


private void commitFragment(){

 if(isTransactionSafe) {
     MyFragment myFragment = new MyFragment();
     FragmentManager fragmentManager = getFragmentManager();
     FragmentTransaction fragmentTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction();
     fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.frame, myFragment);
     fragmentTransaction.commit();
     isTransactionPending=false;
 }else {
     /*
     If any transaction is not done because the activity is in background. We set the
     isTransactionPending variable to true so that we can pick this up when we come back to
foreground
     */
     isTransactionPending=true;
 }
}

关于@Anthonyeef的回答，这里有一个Java的示例代码:

private boolean shouldShowFragmentInOnResume;

private void someMethodThatShowsTheFragment() {

    if (this.getLifecycle().getCurrentState().isAtLeast(Lifecycle.State.RESUMED)) {
        showFragment();
    } else {
        shouldShowFragmentInOnResume = true;
    }
}

private void showFragment() {
    //Your code here
}

@Override
protected void onResume() {
    super.onResume();

    if (shouldShowFragmentInOnResume) {
        shouldShowFragmentInOnResume = false;
        showFragment();
    }
}

如果你继承FragmentActivity，你必须调用onActivityResult()中的超类:

@Override
protected void onActivityResult(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent intent) {
    super.onActivityResult(requestCode, resultCode, intent);
    ...
}

如果你不这样做，并试图在该方法中显示一个片段对话框，你可能会得到OP的IllegalStateException。(说实话，我不太明白为什么超级调用可以解决这个问题。onActivityResult()在onResume()之前被调用，所以它仍然不允许显示片段对话框。

如果你有崩溃与popBackStack()或popBackStackImmediate()方法，请尝试修复:

        if (!fragmentManager.isStateSaved()) {
            fragmentManager.popBackStackImmediate();
        }

这对我来说也很管用。

在我的情况下，我在一个叫做onActivityResult的覆盖方法中得到了这个错误。在挖掘之后，我才发现也许我之前需要打电话给“超级”。 我加进去了，效果很好

override fun onActivityResult(requestCode: Int, resultCode: Int, data: Intent?) {
    super.onActivityResult(requestCode, resultCode, data); //<--- THIS IS THE SUPPER CALL
    if (resultCode == Activity.RESULT_OK && requestCode == 0) {
        mostrarFragment(FiltroFragment.newInstance())
    }

}

也许你只需要在代码之前的任何重写上添加一个“super”。

@Gian Gomen在我的案例中，SUPER解决了问题。这似乎是比commitAllowingStateLoss()更正确的解决方案，因为它解决了问题，而不是隐藏它。

@Override
public void onRequestPermissionsResult(
     final int requestCode,
     @NonNull final String[] permissions, 
     @NonNull final int[] grantResults
) {
        super.onRequestPermissionsResult(requestCode,permissions, grantResults); //<--- Without this line crash 
        switch (requestCode) {
            case Constants.REQUEST_CODE_PERMISSION_STORAGE:
                if (grantResults[0] == PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) {
                    onPermissionGranted(Constants.REQUEST_CODE_PERMISSION_STORAGE);
                }
                break;
        }

如果状态保存，请使用remove()而不是popup()。

   private void removeFragment() {
    FragmentManager fragmentManager = getSupportFragmentManager();
    if (fragmentManager.isStateSaved()) {
        List<Fragment> fragments = fragmentManager.getFragments();
        if (fragments != null && !fragments.isEmpty()) {
            fragmentManager.beginTransaction().remove(fragments.get(fragments.size() - 1)).commitAllowingStateLoss();
        }
    }
}

Fragment事务不应该在Activity.onStop()之后执行! 检查你没有任何回调可以在onStop()之后执行事务。最好是修复原因，而不是尝试使用.commitAllowingStateLoss()等方法来绕过问题。

芬兰湾的科特林扩展

fun FragmentManager?.replaceAndAddToBackStack(
    @IdRes containerViewId: Int,
    fragment: () -> Fragment,
    tag: String
) {
    // Find and synchronously remove a fragment with the same tag.
    // The second transaction must start after the first has finished.
    this?.findFragmentByTag(tag)?.let {
        beginTransaction().remove(it).commitNow()
    }
    // Add a fragment.
    this?.beginTransaction()?.run {
        replace(containerViewId, fragment, tag)
        // The next line will add the fragment to a back stack.
        // Remove if not needed.
        // You can use null instead of tag, but tag is needed for popBackStack(), 
        // see https://stackoverflow.com/a/59158254/2914140
        addToBackStack(tag)
    }?.commitAllowingStateLoss()
}

用法:

val fragment = { SomeFragment.newInstance(data) }
fragmentManager?.replaceAndAddToBackStack(R.id.container, fragment, SomeFragment.TAG)

将getFragmentManager()更改为getChildFragmentManager()。不要使用父FragmentManager，尽量使用self。

正如您在崩溃报告中看到的，引发异常的最后一行是

checkStateLoss(FragmentManager.java:1109)

如果你看checkStateLoss的实现

private void checkStateLoss() {
    if (isStateSaved()) {
        throw new IllegalStateException(
                "Can not perform this action after onSaveInstanceState");
    }
}

所以对我来说一个简单的解决方案是找到你在应用程序中调用的片段管理器的任何方法，最终导致这个方法被调用，并简单地检查是否isStateSaved()在调用该方法之前是假的。对我来说是show()方法。我是这样做的

if (!isStateSaved()) {
  myDialog.show(fragmentManager, Tag)
}