我参加聚会已经很晚了，但这种方法以前没有涉及过。当我们想要手动对某段代码进行基准测试时，我们可能需要首先找出哪些类方法占用了执行时间，这有时并不明显。我构建了以下元类来解决这个问题：

from __future__ import annotations

from functools import wraps
from time import time
from typing import Any, Callable, TypeVar, cast

F = TypeVar('F', bound=Callable[..., Any])


def timed_method(func: F, prefix: str | None = None) -> F:
    prefix = (prefix + ' ') if prefix else ''

    @wraps(func)
    def inner(*args, **kwargs):  # type: ignore
        start = time()
        try:
            ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
        except BaseException:
            print(f'[ERROR] {prefix}{func.__qualname__}: {time() - start}')
            raise
        
        print(f'{prefix}{func.__qualname__}: {time() - start}')
        return ret

    return cast(F, inner)


class TimedClass(type):
    def __new__(
        cls: type[TimedClass],
        name: str,
        bases: tuple[type[type], ...],
        attrs: dict[str, Any],
        **kwargs: Any,
    ) -> TimedClass:
        for name, attr in attrs.items():
            if isinstance(attr, (classmethod, staticmethod)):
                attrs[name] = type(attr)(timed_method(attr.__func__))
            elif isinstance(attr, property):
                attrs[name] = property(
                    timed_method(attr.fget, 'get') if attr.fget is not None else None,
                    timed_method(attr.fset, 'set') if attr.fset is not None else None,
                    timed_method(attr.fdel, 'del') if attr.fdel is not None else None,
                )
            elif callable(attr):
                attrs[name] = timed_method(attr)

        return super().__new__(cls, name, bases, attrs)

它允许如下使用：

class MyClass(metaclass=TimedClass):
    def foo(self): 
        print('foo')
    
    @classmethod
    def bar(cls): 
        print('bar')
    
    @staticmethod
    def baz(): 
        print('baz')
    
    @property
    def prop(self): 
        print('prop')
    
    @prop.setter
    def prop(self, v): 
        print('fset')
    
    @prop.deleter
    def prop(self): 
        print('fdel')


c = MyClass()

c.foo()
c.bar()
c.baz()
c.prop
c.prop = 2
del c.prop

MyClass.bar()
MyClass.baz()

它打印：

foo
MyClass.foo: 1.621246337890625e-05
bar
MyClass.bar: 4.5299530029296875e-06
baz
MyClass.baz: 4.291534423828125e-06
prop
get MyClass.prop: 3.814697265625e-06
fset
set MyClass.prop: 3.5762786865234375e-06
fdel
del MyClass.prop: 3.5762786865234375e-06
bar
MyClass.bar: 3.814697265625e-06
baz
MyClass.baz: 4.0531158447265625e-06

它可以与其他答案相结合，以更精确的方式代替time.time。

计算操作持续时间的最简单方法：

import time

start_time = time.monotonic()

<operations, programs>

print('seconds: ', time.monotonic() - start_time)

这里有官方文件。

这里有一个很好的文档记录和完全类型提示的装饰器，我将其用作通用工具：

from functools import wraps
from time import perf_counter
from typing import Any, Callable, Optional, TypeVar, cast

F = TypeVar("F", bound=Callable[..., Any])


def timer(prefix: Optional[str] = None, precision: int = 6) -> Callable[[F], F]:
    """Use as a decorator to time the execution of any function.

    Args:
        prefix: String to print before the time taken.
            Default is the name of the function.
        precision: How many decimals to include in the seconds value.

    Examples:
        >>> @timer()
        ... def foo(x):
        ...     return x
        >>> foo(123)
        foo: 0.000...s
        123
        >>> @timer("Time taken: ", 2)
        ... def foo(x):
        ...     return x
        >>> foo(123)
        Time taken: 0.00s
        123

    """
    def decorator(func: F) -> F:
        @wraps(func)
        def wrapper(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any:
            nonlocal prefix
            prefix = prefix if prefix is not None else f"{func.__name__}: "
            start = perf_counter()
            result = func(*args, **kwargs)
            end = perf_counter()
            print(f"{prefix}{end - start:.{precision}f}s")
            return result
        return cast(F, wrapper)
    return decorator

示例用法：

from timer import timer


@timer(precision=9)
def takes_long(x: int) -> bool:
    return x in (i for i in range(x + 1))


result = takes_long(10**8)
print(result)

输出：耗时：4.942629056秒真的

可以通过以下方式检查doctest：

$ python3 -m doctest --verbose -o=ELLIPSIS timer.py

类型提示：

$ mypy timer.py

这种独特的基于类的方法提供了可打印的字符串表示、可自定义的舍入，以及以字符串或浮点形式方便地访问经过的时间。它是用Python 3.7开发的。

import datetime
import timeit


class Timer:
    """Measure time used."""
    # Ref: https://stackoverflow.com/a/57931660/

    def __init__(self, round_ndigits: int = 0):
        self._round_ndigits = round_ndigits
        self._start_time = timeit.default_timer()

    def __call__(self) -> float:
        return timeit.default_timer() - self._start_time

    def __str__(self) -> str:
        return str(datetime.timedelta(seconds=round(self(), self._round_ndigits)))

用法：

# Setup timer
>>> timer = Timer()

# Access as a string
>>> print(f'Time elapsed is {timer}.')
Time elapsed is 0:00:03.
>>> print(f'Time elapsed is {timer}.')
Time elapsed is 0:00:04.

# Access as a float
>>> timer()
6.841332235
>>> timer()
7.970274425

使用探查器模块。它提供了非常详细的概况。

import profile
profile.run('main()')

它输出类似于：

          5 function calls in 0.047 seconds

   Ordered by: standard name

   ncalls  tottime  percall  cumtime  percall filename:lineno(function)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 :0(exec)
        1    0.047    0.047    0.047    0.047 :0(setprofile)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 <string>:1(<module>)
        0    0.000             0.000          profile:0(profiler)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.047    0.047 profile:0(main())
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 two_sum.py:2(twoSum)

我发现它很有启发性。

这是另一种方法：

>> from pytictoc import TicToc
>> t = TicToc() # create TicToc instance
>> t.tic() # Start timer
>> # do something
>> t.toc() # Print elapsed time
Elapsed time is 2.612231 seconds.

与传统方式相比：

>> from time import time
>> t1 = time()
>> # do something
>> t2 = time()
>> elapsed = t2 - t1
>> print('Elapsed time is %f seconds.' % elapsed)
Elapsed time is 2.612231 seconds.

安装：

pip install pytictoc

有关详细信息，请参阅PyPi页面。