我想测量执行一个函数所花费的时间。我没时间工作:
import timeit
start = timeit.timeit()
print("hello")
end = timeit.timeit()
print(end - start)
我想测量执行一个函数所花费的时间。我没时间工作:
import timeit
start = timeit.timeit()
print("hello")
end = timeit.timeit()
print(end - start)
当前回答
我参加聚会已经很晚了,但这种方法以前没有涉及过。当我们想要手动对某段代码进行基准测试时,我们可能需要首先找出哪些类方法占用了执行时间,这有时并不明显。我构建了以下元类来解决这个问题:
from __future__ import annotations
from functools import wraps
from time import time
from typing import Any, Callable, TypeVar, cast
F = TypeVar('F', bound=Callable[..., Any])
def timed_method(func: F, prefix: str | None = None) -> F:
prefix = (prefix + ' ') if prefix else ''
@wraps(func)
def inner(*args, **kwargs): # type: ignore
start = time()
try:
ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
except BaseException:
print(f'[ERROR] {prefix}{func.__qualname__}: {time() - start}')
raise
print(f'{prefix}{func.__qualname__}: {time() - start}')
return ret
return cast(F, inner)
class TimedClass(type):
def __new__(
cls: type[TimedClass],
name: str,
bases: tuple[type[type], ...],
attrs: dict[str, Any],
**kwargs: Any,
) -> TimedClass:
for name, attr in attrs.items():
if isinstance(attr, (classmethod, staticmethod)):
attrs[name] = type(attr)(timed_method(attr.__func__))
elif isinstance(attr, property):
attrs[name] = property(
timed_method(attr.fget, 'get') if attr.fget is not None else None,
timed_method(attr.fset, 'set') if attr.fset is not None else None,
timed_method(attr.fdel, 'del') if attr.fdel is not None else None,
)
elif callable(attr):
attrs[name] = timed_method(attr)
return super().__new__(cls, name, bases, attrs)
它允许如下使用:
class MyClass(metaclass=TimedClass):
def foo(self):
print('foo')
@classmethod
def bar(cls):
print('bar')
@staticmethod
def baz():
print('baz')
@property
def prop(self):
print('prop')
@prop.setter
def prop(self, v):
print('fset')
@prop.deleter
def prop(self):
print('fdel')
c = MyClass()
c.foo()
c.bar()
c.baz()
c.prop
c.prop = 2
del c.prop
MyClass.bar()
MyClass.baz()
它打印:
foo
MyClass.foo: 1.621246337890625e-05
bar
MyClass.bar: 4.5299530029296875e-06
baz
MyClass.baz: 4.291534423828125e-06
prop
get MyClass.prop: 3.814697265625e-06
fset
set MyClass.prop: 3.5762786865234375e-06
fdel
del MyClass.prop: 3.5762786865234375e-06
bar
MyClass.bar: 3.814697265625e-06
baz
MyClass.baz: 4.0531158447265625e-06
它可以与其他答案相结合,以更精确的方式代替time.time。
其他回答
我们还可以将时间转换为人类可读的时间。
import time, datetime
start = time.clock()
def num_multi1(max):
result = 0
for num in range(0, 1000):
if (num % 3 == 0 or num % 5 == 0):
result += num
print "Sum is %d " % result
num_multi1(1000)
end = time.clock()
value = end - start
timestamp = datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(value)
print timestamp.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')
使用timeit.default_timer而不是timeit.timeit。前者自动提供您的平台和Python版本上可用的最佳时钟:
from timeit import default_timer as timer
start = timer()
# ...
end = timer()
print(end - start) # Time in seconds, e.g. 5.38091952400282
timeit.default_timer被分配给time.time()或time.clock(),具体取决于操作系统。在Python 3.3+default_timer上,所有平台上都有time.perf_counter()。请参见Python-time.cclock()与time.time()-精度?
另请参见:
正在优化代码如何优化速度
我参加聚会已经很晚了,但这种方法以前没有涉及过。当我们想要手动对某段代码进行基准测试时,我们可能需要首先找出哪些类方法占用了执行时间,这有时并不明显。我构建了以下元类来解决这个问题:
from __future__ import annotations
from functools import wraps
from time import time
from typing import Any, Callable, TypeVar, cast
F = TypeVar('F', bound=Callable[..., Any])
def timed_method(func: F, prefix: str | None = None) -> F:
prefix = (prefix + ' ') if prefix else ''
@wraps(func)
def inner(*args, **kwargs): # type: ignore
start = time()
try:
ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
except BaseException:
print(f'[ERROR] {prefix}{func.__qualname__}: {time() - start}')
raise
print(f'{prefix}{func.__qualname__}: {time() - start}')
return ret
return cast(F, inner)
class TimedClass(type):
def __new__(
cls: type[TimedClass],
name: str,
bases: tuple[type[type], ...],
attrs: dict[str, Any],
**kwargs: Any,
) -> TimedClass:
for name, attr in attrs.items():
if isinstance(attr, (classmethod, staticmethod)):
attrs[name] = type(attr)(timed_method(attr.__func__))
elif isinstance(attr, property):
attrs[name] = property(
timed_method(attr.fget, 'get') if attr.fget is not None else None,
timed_method(attr.fset, 'set') if attr.fset is not None else None,
timed_method(attr.fdel, 'del') if attr.fdel is not None else None,
)
elif callable(attr):
attrs[name] = timed_method(attr)
return super().__new__(cls, name, bases, attrs)
它允许如下使用:
class MyClass(metaclass=TimedClass):
def foo(self):
print('foo')
@classmethod
def bar(cls):
print('bar')
@staticmethod
def baz():
print('baz')
@property
def prop(self):
print('prop')
@prop.setter
def prop(self, v):
print('fset')
@prop.deleter
def prop(self):
print('fdel')
c = MyClass()
c.foo()
c.bar()
c.baz()
c.prop
c.prop = 2
del c.prop
MyClass.bar()
MyClass.baz()
它打印:
foo
MyClass.foo: 1.621246337890625e-05
bar
MyClass.bar: 4.5299530029296875e-06
baz
MyClass.baz: 4.291534423828125e-06
prop
get MyClass.prop: 3.814697265625e-06
fset
set MyClass.prop: 3.5762786865234375e-06
fdel
del MyClass.prop: 3.5762786865234375e-06
bar
MyClass.bar: 3.814697265625e-06
baz
MyClass.baz: 4.0531158447265625e-06
它可以与其他答案相结合,以更精确的方式代替time.time。
要深入了解递归调用的每个函数,请执行以下操作:
%load_ext snakeviz
%%snakeviz
它只需要在Jupyter笔记本中使用这两行代码,就可以生成一个很好的交互图。例如:
这是代码。同样,以%开头的2行是使用snakeviz所需的唯一额外代码行:
# !pip install snakeviz
%load_ext snakeviz
import glob
import hashlib
%%snakeviz
files = glob.glob('*.txt')
def print_files_hashed(files):
for file in files:
with open(file) as f:
print(hashlib.md5(f.read().encode('utf-8')).hexdigest())
print_files_hashed(files)
在笔记本外运行snakeviz似乎也是可能的。更多信息请访问snakeviz网站。
print_elapsed_time函数如下
def print_elapsed_time(prefix=''):
e_time = time.time()
if not hasattr(print_elapsed_time, 's_time'):
print_elapsed_time.s_time = e_time
else:
print(f'{prefix} elapsed time: {e_time - print_elapsed_time.s_time:.2f} sec')
print_elapsed_time.s_time = e_time
用这种方式
print_elapsed_time()
.... heavy jobs ...
print_elapsed_time('after heavy jobs')
.... tons of jobs ...
print_elapsed_time('after tons of jobs')
结果是
after heavy jobs elapsed time: 0.39 sec
after tons of jobs elapsed time: 0.60 sec
这个函数的优点和缺点是你不需要经过开始时间