#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string.h>
using namespace std;
main(){
    fstream file;
    //Open a file
    file.open("test.txt");
    string copy,temp;
    //While loop to store whole document in copy string
    //Temp reads a complete line
    //Loop stops until temp reads the last line of document
    while(getline(file,temp)){
        //add new line text in copy
        copy+=temp;
        //adds a new line
        copy+="\n";
    }
    //Display whole document
    cout<<copy;
    //close the document
    file.close();
}

请看类似问题的答案。

为了方便大家，我转发了CTT的解决方案:

string readFile2(const string &fileName)
{
    ifstream ifs(fileName.c_str(), ios::in | ios::binary | ios::ate);

    ifstream::pos_type fileSize = ifs.tellg();
    ifs.seekg(0, ios::beg);

    vector<char> bytes(fileSize);
    ifs.read(bytes.data(), fileSize);

    return string(bytes.data(), fileSize);
}

当对《白鲸记》(Moby Dick, 1.3M)的文本进行平均100次运行时，该解决方案比本文给出的其他答案的执行时间快了约20%。对于一个可移植的c++解决方案来说还不错，我想看看mmap'ing文件的结果;)

这是我使用的函数，当处理大文件(1GB+)时，由于某种原因std::ifstream::read()比std::ifstream::rdbuf()快得多，当你知道文件大小时，所以整个“先检查文件大小”的事情实际上是一个速度优化

#include <string>
#include <fstream>
#include <sstream>
std::string file_get_contents(const std::string &$filename)
{
    std::ifstream file($filename, std::ifstream::binary);
    file.exceptions(std::ifstream::failbit | std::ifstream::badbit);
    file.seekg(0, std::istream::end);
    const std::streampos ssize = file.tellg();
    if (ssize < 0)
    {
        // can't get size for some reason, fallback to slower "just read everything"
        // because i dont trust that we could seek back/fourth in the original stream,
        // im creating a new stream.
        std::ifstream file($filename, std::ifstream::binary);
        file.exceptions(std::ifstream::failbit | std::ifstream::badbit);
        std::ostringstream ss;
        ss << file.rdbuf();
        return ss.str();
    }
    file.seekg(0, std::istream::beg);
    std::string result(size_t(ssize), 0);
    file.read(&result[0], std::streamsize(ssize));
    return result;
}

就性能而言，我还没有找到比下面的代码更快的代码。

std::string readAllText(std::string const &path)
{
    assert(path.c_str() != NULL);
    FILE *stream = fopen(path.c_str(), "r");
    assert(stream != NULL);
    fseek(stream, 0, SEEK_END);
    long stream_size = ftell(stream);
    fseek(stream, 0, SEEK_SET);
    void *buffer = malloc(stream_size);
    fread(buffer, stream_size, 1, stream);
    assert(ferror(stream) == 0);
    fclose(stream);
    std::string text((const char *)buffer, stream_size);
    assert(buffer != NULL);
    free((void *)buffer);
    return text;
}

从几个地方提取信息…这应该是最快最好的方法:

#include <filesystem>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>

//Returns true if successful.
bool readInFile(std::string pathString)
{
  //Make sure the file exists and is an actual file.
  if (!std::filesystem::is_regular_file(pathString))
  {
    return false;
  }
  //Convert relative path to absolute path.
  pathString = std::filesystem::weakly_canonical(pathString);
  //Open the file for reading (binary is fastest).
  std::wifstream in(pathString, std::ios::binary);
  //Make sure the file opened.
  if (!in)
  {
    return false;
  }
  //Wide string to store the file's contents.
  std::wstring fileContents;
  //Jump to the end of the file to determine the file size.
  in.seekg(0, std::ios::end);
  //Resize the wide string to be able to fit the entire file (Note: Do not use reserve()!).
  fileContents.resize(in.tellg());
  //Go back to the beginning of the file to start reading.
  in.seekg(0, std::ios::beg);
  //Read the entire file's contents into the wide string.
  in.read(fileContents.data(), fileContents.size());
  //Close the file.
  in.close();
  //Do whatever you want with the file contents.
  std::wcout << fileContents << L" " << fileContents.size();
  return true;
}

这将宽字符读入std::wstring，但如果您只想要常规字符和std::string，则可以很容易地进行调整。

我知道这是一个非常古老的问题，有很多答案，但没有一个人提到我认为最明显的方法。是的，我知道这是c++，使用libc是邪恶和错误的，但这是疯狂的。使用libc很好，特别是对于这样简单的事情。

本质上:只需打开文件，获取它的大小(不一定是按这个顺序)，然后读取它。

#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstring>
#include <sys/stat.h>

static constexpr char const filename[] = "foo.bar";

int main(void)
{
    FILE *fp = ::fopen(filename, "rb");
    if (!fp) {
        ::perror("fopen");
        ::exit(1);
    }

    struct stat st;
    if (::fstat(fileno(fp), &st) == (-1)) {
        ::perror("fstat");
        ::exit(1);
    }

    // You could simply allocate a buffer here and use std::string_view, or
    // even allocate a buffer and copy it to a std::string. Creating a
    // std::string and setting its size is simplest, but will pointlessly
    // initialize the buffer to 0. You can't win sometimes.
    std::string str;
    str.reserve(st.st_size + 1U);
    str.resize(st.st_size);
    ::fread(str.data(), 1, st.st_size, fp);
    str[st.st_size] = '\0';
    ::fclose(fp);
}

除了(在实践中)完全可移植之外，这看起来并不比其他一些解决方案更糟糕。当然，也可以抛出异常，而不是立即退出。它严重激怒我，调整std::string总是0初始化它，但这是没有办法的。

请注意，这只适用于c++ 17及以后的版本。早期版本(应该)禁止编辑std::string::data()。如果使用较早的版本，可以考虑使用std::string_view或简单地复制一个原始缓冲区。