这是一个简单的O(1/n)算法。它甚至做了一些有趣的事情!

function foo(list input) {
  int m;
  double output;

  m = (1/ input.size) * max_value;  
  output = 0;
  for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
    output+= random(0,1);

  return output;
}

O(1/n) is possible as it describes how the output of a function changes given increasing size of input. If we are using the function 1/n to describe the number of instructions a function executes then there is no requirement that the function take zero instructions for any input size. Rather, it is that for every input size, n above some threshold, the number of instructions required is bounded above by a positive constant multiplied by 1/n. As there is no actual number for which 1/n is 0, and the constant is positive, then there is no reason why the function would constrained to take 0 or fewer instructions.

我不懂数学，但这个概念似乎是寻找一个函数，需要更少的时间，你添加更多的输入?在这种情况下，怎么样:

def f( *args ): 
  if len(args)<1:
    args[1] = 10

当添加可选的第二个参数时，此函数会更快，因为否则必须赋值它。我意识到这不是一个方程，但维基百科页面说大o通常也应用于计算系统。

如果不管输入数据如何，答案都是一样的，那么你就有一个O(0)算法。

或者换句话说——在提交输入数据之前，答案就已经知道了 -这个功能可以优化-所以O(0)

inline void O0Algorithm() {}

不，这不可能:

随着n在1/n范围内趋于无穷，我们最终得到1/(无穷)，这实际上是0。

因此，问题的大-oh类将是O(0)和一个巨大的n，但更接近常数时间和一个低n。这是不明智的，因为唯一可以在比常数时间更快的时间内完成的事情是:

Void nothing() {};

甚至这也是有争议的!

只要你执行了一个命令，你至少在O(1)，所以不，我们不能有一个O(1/n)的大哦类!

It may be possible to construct an algorithm that is O(1/n). One example would be a loop that iterates some multiple of f(n)-n times where f(n) is some function whose value is guaranteed to be greater than n and the limit of f(n)-n as n approaches infinity is zero. The calculation of f(n) would also need to be constant for all n. I do not know off hand what f(n) would look like or what application such an algorithm would have, in my opinion however such a function could exist but the resulting algorithm would have no purpose other than to prove the possibility of an algorithm with O(1/n).