不同的“私人”方式

Instead of fighting against the fact that private visibility is currently unavailable in ES6, I decided to take a more practical approach that does just fine if your IDE supports JSDoc (e.g., Webstorm). The idea is to use the @private tag. As far as development goes, the IDE will prevent you from accessing any private member from outside its class. Works pretty well for me and it's been really useful for hiding internal methods so the auto-complete feature shows me just what the class really meant to expose. Here's an example:

正如我们所知，ES6类不支持私有属性。

下面是我使用的方法(可能会有帮助)。基本上，我是在工厂内部包装一个类。

function Animal(name) {
    const privateData = 'NO experiments on animals have been done!';

    class Animal {
        constructor(_name) {
            this.name = _name;
        }
        getName() {
            return this.name
        }
        getDisclamer() {
            return `${privateData} Including ${this.name}`
        }
    }
    return new Animal(name)
}

我是一个初学者，所以很高兴听到这是一个坏的方法。

现在大多数浏览器都支持私有类特性。

class Something {
  #property;

  constructor(){
    this.#property = "test";
  }

  #privateMethod() {
    return 'hello world';
  }

  getPrivateMessage() {
      return this.#property;
  }
}

const instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> undefined
console.log(instance.privateMethod); //=> undefined
console.log(instance.getPrivateMessage()); //=> test
console.log(instance.#property); //=> Syntax error

完成@d13和@johnny-oshika和@DanyalAytekin的评论:

我想在@johnny-oshika提供的例子中，我们可以使用普通函数而不是箭头函数，然后用当前对象加上_privates对象作为curry形参。

something.js

function _greet(_privates) {
  return 'Hello ' + _privates.message;
}

function _updateMessage(_privates, newMessage) {
  _privates.message = newMessage;
}

export default class Something {
  constructor(message) {
    const _privates = {
      message
    };

    this.say = _greet.bind(this, _privates);
    this.updateMessage = _updateMessage.bind(this, _privates);
  }
}

main.js

import Something from './something.js';

const something = new Something('Sunny day!');

const message1 = something.say();
something.updateMessage('Cloudy day!');
const message2 = something.say();

console.log(message1 === 'Hello Sunny day!');  // true
console.log(message2 === 'Hello Cloudy day!');  // true

// the followings are not public
console.log(something._greet === undefined);  // true
console.log(something._privates === undefined);  // true
console.log(something._updateMessage === undefined);  // true

// another instance which doesn't share the _privates
const something2 = new Something('another Sunny day!');

const message3 = something2.say();

console.log(message3 === 'Hello another Sunny day!'); // true

我能想到的好处:

我们可以有私有方法(_greet和_updateMessage就像私有方法一样，只要我们不导出引用) 尽管它们不在原型上，但上面提到的方法将节省内存，因为实例只在类外部创建一次(而不是在构造函数中定义它们)。 我们不会泄露任何全局变量，因为我们是在一个模块内 我们还可以使用binding _privates对象拥有私有属性

我能想到的一些缺点:

更直观的 混合使用类语法和老式模式(对象绑定、模块/函数作用域变量) 硬绑定——我们不能重新绑定公共方法(尽管我们可以通过使用软绑定来改进这一点(https://github.com/getify/You-Dont-Know-JS/blob/master/this%20%26%20object%20prototypes/ch2.md#softening-binding))。

一个运行的片段可以在这里找到:http://www.webpackbin.com/NJgI5J8lZ

不同的“私人”方式

Instead of fighting against the fact that private visibility is currently unavailable in ES6, I decided to take a more practical approach that does just fine if your IDE supports JSDoc (e.g., Webstorm). The idea is to use the @private tag. As far as development goes, the IDE will prevent you from accessing any private member from outside its class. Works pretty well for me and it's been really useful for hiding internal methods so the auto-complete feature shows me just what the class really meant to expose. Here's an example:

我意识到这里有很多答案。我想分享我的解决方案，它确保了ES6类和旧JS中真正的私有变量。

var MyClass = (function() {
    var $ = new WeakMap();
    function priv(self) {
       var r = $.get(self);
       if (!r) $.set(self, r={});
       return r;
    }

    return class { /* use priv(this).prop inside your class */ } 
}();

外部世界无法访问$，这一事实确保了隐私。

当实例消失时，WeakMap将释放数据。

这肯定在纯Javascript中工作，我相信他们在ES6类中工作，但我还没有测试$将在成员方法的范围内可用。