是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
当前回答
Yes totally can, and pretty easily too. This is done by exposing your private variables and functions by returning the prototype object graph in the constructor. This is nothing new, but take a bit of js foo to understand the elegance of it. This way does not use global scoped, or weakmaps. It is a form of reflection built into the language. Depending on how you leverage this; one can either force an exception which interrupts the call stack, or bury the exception as an undefined. This is demonstarted below, and can read more about these features here
class Clazz { constructor() { var _level = 1 function _private(x) { return _level * x; } return { level: _level, public: this.private, public2: function(x) { return _private(x); }, public3: function(x) { return _private(x) * this.public(x); }, }; } private(x) { return x * x; } } var clazz = new Clazz(); console.log(clazz._level); //undefined console.log(clazz._private); // undefined console.log(clazz.level); // 1 console.log(clazz.public(1)); //1 console.log(clazz.public2(2)); //2 console.log(clazz.public3(3)); //27 console.log(clazz.private(0)); //error
其他回答
在寻找“类的私有数据”的最佳实践时,我偶然看到了这篇文章。上面提到了一些模式会有性能问题。
我根据在线书籍“探索ES6”中的4个主要模式整理了一些jsperf测试:
http://exploringjs.com/es6/ch_classes.html#sec_private-data-for-classes
测试可以在这里找到:
https://jsperf.com/private-data-for-classes
在Chrome 63.0.3239 / Mac OS X 10.11.6中,表现最好的模式是“通过构造函数环境的私有数据”和“通过命名约定的私有数据”。对我来说,Safari在WeakMap上表现得很好,而Chrome则不太好。
我不知道对内存的影响,但“构造函数环境”的模式(有些人曾警告过这将是一个性能问题)非常具有性能。
这4种基本模式是:
通过构造函数环境的私有数据
class Countdown {
constructor(counter, action) {
Object.assign(this, {
dec() {
if (counter < 1) return;
counter--;
if (counter === 0) {
action();
}
}
});
}
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();
通过构造函数环境的私有数据2
class Countdown {
constructor(counter, action) {
this.dec = function dec() {
if (counter < 1) return;
counter--;
if (counter === 0) {
action();
}
}
}
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();
通过命名约定的私有数据
class Countdown {
constructor(counter, action) {
this._counter = counter;
this._action = action;
}
dec() {
if (this._counter < 1) return;
this._counter--;
if (this._counter === 0) {
this._action();
}
}
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();
通过WeakMaps的私有数据
const _counter = new WeakMap();
const _action = new WeakMap();
class Countdown {
constructor(counter, action) {
_counter.set(this, counter);
_action.set(this, action);
}
dec() {
let counter = _counter.get(this);
if (counter < 1) return;
counter--;
_counter.set(this, counter);
if (counter === 0) {
_action.get(this)();
}
}
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();
通过符号的私有数据
const _counter = Symbol('counter');
const _action = Symbol('action');
class Countdown {
constructor(counter, action) {
this[_counter] = counter;
this[_action] = action;
}
dec() {
if (this[_counter] < 1) return;
this[_counter]--;
if (this[_counter] === 0) {
this[_action]();
}
}
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();
我相信在构造函数中使用闭包是可能获得“两全其美”的。有两种变化:
所有数据成员都是私有的
函数myFunc() { console.log(' x的值:' + this.x); this.myPrivateFunc (); } 函数myPrivateFunc() { console.log(' x的增强值:' +(此。X + 1)); } 类测试{ 构造函数(){ Let internal = { X: 2, }; 内部的。myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(内部); 这一点。myFunc = myFunc.bind(内部); } };
有些成员是私有的
注意:这确实很难看。如果您知道更好的解决方案,请编辑此回复。
function myFunc(priv, pub) { pub.y = 3; // The Test object now gets a member 'y' with value 3. console.log('Value of x: ' + priv.x); this.myPrivateFunc(); } function myPrivateFunc() { pub.z = 5; // The Test object now gets a member 'z' with value 3. console.log('Enhanced value of x: ' + (priv.x + 1)); } class Test { constructor() { let self = this; let internal = { x : 2, }; internal.myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(null, internal, self); this.myFunc = myFunc.bind(null, internal, self); } };
我认为Benjamin的答案在大多数情况下可能是最好的,直到语言本身支持显式私有变量。
但是,如果出于某种原因需要阻止使用object . getownpropertysymbols()进行访问,我考虑使用的一种方法是附加一个惟一的、不可配置的、不可枚举的、不可写的属性,可以将其用作构造中的每个对象的属性标识符(例如惟一的Symbol,如果您还没有其他一些惟一的属性,如id)。然后使用该标识符保存每个对象的“私有”变量的映射。
const privateVars = {};
class Something {
constructor(){
Object.defineProperty(this, '_sym', {
configurable: false,
enumerable: false,
writable: false,
value: Symbol()
});
var myPrivateVars = {
privateProperty: "I'm hidden"
};
privateVars[this._sym] = myPrivateVars;
this.property = "I'm public";
}
getPrivateProperty() {
return privateVars[this._sym].privateProperty;
}
// A clean up method of some kind is necessary since the
// variables won't be cleaned up from memory automatically
// when the object is garbage collected
destroy() {
delete privateVars[this._sym];
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "I'm public"
console.log(instance.privateProperty); //=> undefined
console.log(instance.getPrivateProperty()); //=> "I'm hidden"
与使用WeakMap相比,这种方法的潜在优势是,如果需要考虑性能,则访问时间更快。
不同的“私人”方式
Instead of fighting against the fact that private visibility is currently unavailable in ES6, I decided to take a more practical approach that does just fine if your IDE supports JSDoc (e.g., Webstorm). The idea is to use the @private tag. As far as development goes, the IDE will prevent you from accessing any private member from outside its class. Works pretty well for me and it's been really useful for hiding internal methods so the auto-complete feature shows me just what the class really meant to expose. Here's an example:
实际上这是可能的。 1. 首先,创建类,并在构造函数中返回被调用的_public函数。 2. 在被调用的_public函数中传递this引用(以获得对所有私有方法和道具的访问),以及构造函数的所有参数(将在new Names()中传递) 3.在_public函数作用域中,还有一个Names类,它可以访问私有Names类的this (_this)引用
class Names {
constructor() {
this.privateProperty = 'John';
return _public(this, arguments);
}
privateMethod() { }
}
const names = new Names(1,2,3);
console.log(names.somePublicMethod); //[Function]
console.log(names.publicProperty); //'Jasmine'
console.log(names.privateMethod); //undefined
console.log(names.privateProperty); //undefind
function _public(_this, _arguments) {
class Names {
constructor() {
this.publicProperty = 'Jasmine';
_this.privateProperty; //"John";
_this.privateMethod; //[Function]
}
somePublicMethod() {
_this.privateProperty; //"John";
_this.privateMethod; //[Function]
}
}
return new Names(..._arguments);
}