实际上这是可能的。 1. 首先，创建类，并在构造函数中返回被调用的_public函数。 2. 在被调用的_public函数中传递this引用(以获得对所有私有方法和道具的访问)，以及构造函数的所有参数(将在new Names()中传递) 3.在_public函数作用域中，还有一个Names类，它可以访问私有Names类的this (_this)引用

class Names {
  constructor() {
    this.privateProperty = 'John';
    return _public(this, arguments);
  }
  privateMethod() { }
}

const names = new Names(1,2,3);
console.log(names.somePublicMethod); //[Function]
console.log(names.publicProperty); //'Jasmine'
console.log(names.privateMethod); //undefined
console.log(names.privateProperty); //undefind

function _public(_this, _arguments) {
  class Names {
    constructor() {
      this.publicProperty = 'Jasmine';
      _this.privateProperty; //"John";
      _this.privateMethod; //[Function]
    }

    somePublicMethod() {
      _this.privateProperty; //"John";
      _this.privateMethod; //[Function]
    }

  }
  return new Names(..._arguments);
}

这段代码演示了私有和公共、静态和非静态、实例级和类级、变量、方法和属性。

https://codesandbox.io/s/class-demo-837bj

class Animal { static count = 0 // class static public static #ClassPriVar = 3 // class static private constructor(kind) { this.kind = kind // instance public property Animal.count++ let InstancePriVar = 'InstancePriVar: ' + kind // instance private constructor-var log(InstancePriVar) Animal.#ClassPriVar += 3 this.adhoc = 'adhoc' // instance public property w/out constructor- parameter } #PawCount = 4 // instance private var set Paws(newPawCount) { // instance public prop this.#PawCount = newPawCount } get Paws() { // instance public prop return this.#PawCount } get GetPriVar() { // instance public prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar } static get GetPriVarStat() { // class public prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar } PrintKind() { // instance public method log('kind: ' + this.kind) } ReturnKind() { // instance public function return this.kind } /* May be unsupported get #PrivMeth(){ // instance private prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar + ' Private Method' } static get #PrivMeth(){ // class private prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar + ' Private Method' } */ } function log(str) { console.log(str) } // TESTING log(Animal.count) // static, avail w/out instance log(Animal.GetPriVarStat) // static, avail w/out instance let A = new Animal('Cat') log(Animal.count + ': ' + A.kind) log(A.GetPriVar) A.PrintKind() A.Paws = 6 log('Paws: ' + A.Paws) log('ReturnKind: ' + A.ReturnKind()) log(A.adhoc) let B = new Animal('Dog') log(Animal.count + ': ' + B.kind) log(B.GetPriVar) log(A.GetPriVar) // returns same as B.GetPriVar. Acts like a class-level property, but called like an instance-level property. It's cuz non-stat fx requires instance. log('class: ' + Animal.GetPriVarStat) // undefined log('instance: ' + B.GetPriVarStat) // static class fx log(Animal.GetPriVar) // non-stat instance fx log(A.InstancePriVar) // private log(Animal.InstancePriVar) // private instance var log('PawCount: ' + A.PawCount) // private. Use getter /* log('PawCount: ' + A.#PawCount) // private. Use getter log('PawCount: ' + Animal.#PawCount) // Instance and private. Use getter */

我相信在构造函数中使用闭包是可能获得“两全其美”的。有两种变化:

所有数据成员都是私有的

函数myFunc() { console.log(' x的值:' + this.x); this.myPrivateFunc (); ｝ 函数myPrivateFunc() { console.log(' x的增强值:' +(此。X + 1)); ｝ 类测试{ 构造函数(){ Let internal = { X: 2， }; 内部的。myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(内部); 这一点。myFunc = myFunc.bind(内部); ｝ };

有些成员是私有的

注意:这确实很难看。如果您知道更好的解决方案，请编辑此回复。

function myFunc(priv, pub) { pub.y = 3; // The Test object now gets a member 'y' with value 3. console.log('Value of x: ' + priv.x); this.myPrivateFunc(); } function myPrivateFunc() { pub.z = 5; // The Test object now gets a member 'z' with value 3. console.log('Enhanced value of x: ' + (priv.x + 1)); } class Test { constructor() { let self = this; let internal = { x : 2, }; internal.myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(null, internal, self); this.myFunc = myFunc.bind(null, internal, self); } };

我们可以使用getter和setter来模拟类的私有属性。

eg 1

class FootballClub {
    constructor (cname, cstadium, ccurrentmanager) {
        this.name = cname;
        this._stadium  = cstadium;  //  we will treat this prop as private and give getter and setter for this.
        this.currmanager = ccurrentmanager;
    }

    get stadium( ) {
        return this._stadium.toUpperCase();
    }

}

let club = new FootballClub("Arsenal", "Emirates" , "Arteta")
console.log(club);
//FootballClub {
//    name: 'Arsenal',
//    _stadium: 'Emirates',
//    currmanager: 'Arteta'
//  }
console.log( club.stadium ); // EMIRATES
club.stadium = "Highbury"; // TypeError: Cannot set property stadium of #<FootballClub> which has only a getter

在上面的例子中，我们没有给出stadium的setter方法，因此我们不能为它设置一个新值。在接下来的例子中，为体育场添加了一个setter

eg 2

class FootballClub {
    constructor (cname, cstadium, ccurrentmanager) {
        this.name = cname;
        this._stadium  = cstadium;  //  we will treat this prop as private and give getter and setter for this.
        this.currmanager = ccurrentmanager;
    }

    get stadium( ) {
        return this._stadium.toUpperCase();
    }

    set stadium(val) {
       this._stadium = val;
    }
}

let club = new FootballClub("Arsenal", "Emirates" , "Arteta")
console.log(club.stadium); // EMIRATES
club.stadium = "Emirates Stadium";
console.log(club.stadium); // EMIRATES STADIUM

更新:看别人的回答，这个已经过时了。

简单的回答，不，ES6类不支持私有属性。

但是你可以模仿这种行为，不将新属性附加到对象，而是将它们保存在类构造函数中，并使用getter和setter来获取隐藏的属性。注意，在类的每个新实例上重新定义getter和setter。

ES6

class Person {
    constructor(name) {
        var _name = name
        this.setName = function(name) { _name = name; }
        this.getName = function() { return _name; }
    }
}

ES5

function Person(name) {
    var _name = name
    this.setName = function(name) { _name = name; }
    this.getName = function() { return _name; }
}

来这个派对很晚，但我在搜索中碰到了OP问题，所以… 是的，您可以通过将类声明包装在闭包中来拥有私有属性

这里有一个我如何在这个代码依赖中拥有私有方法的例子。在下面的代码片段中，Subscribable类有两个“私有”函数process和processCallbacks。任何属性都可以以这种方式添加，并且通过使用闭包将它们保持为私有。如果关注点被很好地分离，并且Javascript不需要通过添加更多的语法而变得臃肿，当闭包整齐地完成工作时，隐私是一个罕见的需求。

const Subscribable = (function(){

  const process = (self, eventName, args) => {
    self.processing.set(eventName, setTimeout(() => processCallbacks(self, eventName, args)))};

  const processCallbacks = (self, eventName, args) => {
    if (self.callingBack.get(eventName).length > 0){
      const [nextCallback, ...callingBack] = self.callingBack.get(eventName);
      self.callingBack.set(eventName, callingBack);
      process(self, eventName, args);
      nextCallback(...args)}
    else {
      delete self.processing.delete(eventName)}};

  return class {
    constructor(){
      this.callingBack = new Map();
      this.processing = new Map();
      this.toCallbacks = new Map()}

    subscribe(eventName, callback){
      const callbacks = this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback);
      this.toCallbacks.set(eventName,  [...callbacks, callback]);
      return () => this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback)}  // callable to unsubscribe for convenience

    unsubscribe(eventName, callback){
      let callbacks = this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || [];
      callbacks = callbacks.filter(subscribedCallback => subscribedCallback !== callback);
      if (callbacks.length > 0) {
        this.toCallbacks.set(eventName, callbacks)}
      else {
        this.toCallbacks.delete(eventName)}
      return callbacks}

    emit(eventName, ...args){
      this.callingBack.set(eventName, this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || []);
      if (!this.processing.has(eventName)){
        process(this, eventName, args)}}}})();

我喜欢这种方法，因为它很好地分离了关注点，并保持了真正的私密性。唯一的缺点是需要使用'self'(或类似的东西)在私有内容中引用'this'。