是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
当前回答
你可以试试这个https://www.npmjs.com/package/private-members
这个包将按实例保存成员。
const pvt = require('private-members');
const _ = pvt();
let Exemplo = (function () {
function Exemplo() {
_(this).msg = "Minha Mensagem";
}
_().mensagem = function() {
return _(this).msg;
}
Exemplo.prototype.showMsg = function () {
let msg = _(this).mensagem();
console.log(msg);
};
return Exemplo;
})();
module.exports = Exemplo;
其他回答
在JS中获得真正隐私的唯一方法是通过作用域,因此不可能有一个属性是this的成员,只能在组件内部访问。在ES6中存储真正私有数据的最佳方法是使用WeakMap。
const privateProp1 = new WeakMap();
const privateProp2 = new WeakMap();
class SomeClass {
constructor() {
privateProp1.set(this, "I am Private1");
privateProp2.set(this, "I am Private2");
this.publicVar = "I am public";
this.publicMethod = () => {
console.log(privateProp1.get(this), privateProp2.get(this))
};
}
printPrivate() {
console.log(privateProp1.get(this));
}
}
显然,这可能是一个缓慢的,肯定是丑陋的,但它确实提供了隐私。
请记住,即使这样也不是完美的,因为Javascript是动态的。有人仍然可以这样做
var oldSet = WeakMap.prototype.set;
WeakMap.prototype.set = function(key, value){
// Store 'this', 'key', and 'value'
return oldSet.call(this, key, value);
};
为了在值被存储时捕获它们,所以如果你想格外小心的话,你需要捕获一个对.set和.get的本地引用来显式使用,而不是依赖于可覆盖的原型。
const {set: WMSet, get: WMGet} = WeakMap.prototype;
const privateProp1 = new WeakMap();
const privateProp2 = new WeakMap();
class SomeClass {
constructor() {
WMSet.call(privateProp1, this, "I am Private1");
WMSet.call(privateProp2, this, "I am Private2");
this.publicVar = "I am public";
this.publicMethod = () => {
console.log(WMGet.call(privateProp1, this), WMGet.call(privateProp2, this))
};
}
printPrivate() {
console.log(WMGet.call(privateProp1, this));
}
}
我相信在构造函数中使用闭包是可能获得“两全其美”的。有两种变化:
所有数据成员都是私有的
函数myFunc() { console.log(' x的值:' + this.x); this.myPrivateFunc (); } 函数myPrivateFunc() { console.log(' x的增强值:' +(此。X + 1)); } 类测试{ 构造函数(){ Let internal = { X: 2, }; 内部的。myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(内部); 这一点。myFunc = myFunc.bind(内部); } };
有些成员是私有的
注意:这确实很难看。如果您知道更好的解决方案,请编辑此回复。
function myFunc(priv, pub) { pub.y = 3; // The Test object now gets a member 'y' with value 3. console.log('Value of x: ' + priv.x); this.myPrivateFunc(); } function myPrivateFunc() { pub.z = 5; // The Test object now gets a member 'z' with value 3. console.log('Enhanced value of x: ' + (priv.x + 1)); } class Test { constructor() { let self = this; let internal = { x : 2, }; internal.myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(null, internal, self); this.myFunc = myFunc.bind(null, internal, self); } };
这取决于你问谁:-)
最大最小类提案中没有包含私有属性修饰符,这似乎已经进入了当前的草案。
但是,可能会支持私有名称,它允许私有属性—而且它们可能也可以用于类定义中。
这是一个干净简单的“类”解决方案,具有私有和公共接口,并支持组合
这段代码演示了私有和公共、静态和非静态、实例级和类级、变量、方法和属性。
https://codesandbox.io/s/class-demo-837bj
class Animal { static count = 0 // class static public static #ClassPriVar = 3 // class static private constructor(kind) { this.kind = kind // instance public property Animal.count++ let InstancePriVar = 'InstancePriVar: ' + kind // instance private constructor-var log(InstancePriVar) Animal.#ClassPriVar += 3 this.adhoc = 'adhoc' // instance public property w/out constructor- parameter } #PawCount = 4 // instance private var set Paws(newPawCount) { // instance public prop this.#PawCount = newPawCount } get Paws() { // instance public prop return this.#PawCount } get GetPriVar() { // instance public prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar } static get GetPriVarStat() { // class public prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar } PrintKind() { // instance public method log('kind: ' + this.kind) } ReturnKind() { // instance public function return this.kind } /* May be unsupported get #PrivMeth(){ // instance private prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar + ' Private Method' } static get #PrivMeth(){ // class private prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar + ' Private Method' } */ } function log(str) { console.log(str) } // TESTING log(Animal.count) // static, avail w/out instance log(Animal.GetPriVarStat) // static, avail w/out instance let A = new Animal('Cat') log(Animal.count + ': ' + A.kind) log(A.GetPriVar) A.PrintKind() A.Paws = 6 log('Paws: ' + A.Paws) log('ReturnKind: ' + A.ReturnKind()) log(A.adhoc) let B = new Animal('Dog') log(Animal.count + ': ' + B.kind) log(B.GetPriVar) log(A.GetPriVar) // returns same as B.GetPriVar. Acts like a class-level property, but called like an instance-level property. It's cuz non-stat fx requires instance. log('class: ' + Animal.GetPriVarStat) // undefined log('instance: ' + B.GetPriVarStat) // static class fx log(Animal.GetPriVar) // non-stat instance fx log(A.InstancePriVar) // private log(Animal.InstancePriVar) // private instance var log('PawCount: ' + A.PawCount) // private. Use getter /* log('PawCount: ' + A.#PawCount) // private. Use getter log('PawCount: ' + Animal.#PawCount) // Instance and private. Use getter */