受Raymond Chen帖子的启发，假设你有一个4x4二维数组，写一个函数使它旋转90度。Raymond链接到伪代码中的解决方案，但我想看到一些真实的东西。
[1][2][3][4]
[5][6][7][8]
[9][0][1][2]
[3][4][5][6]
就变成:
[3][9][5][1]
[4][0][6][2]
[5][1][7][3]
[6][2][8][4]
更新:Nick的答案是最直接的，但是有没有比n²更好的方法呢?如果矩阵是10000x10000呢?
当前回答
在JavaScript中实现dimple的+90伪代码(例如转置然后反转每一行):
function rotate90(a){
// transpose from http://www.codesuck.com/2012/02/transpose-javascript-array-in-one-line.html
a = Object.keys(a[0]).map(function (c) { return a.map(function (r) { return r[c]; }); });
// row reverse
for (i in a){
a[i] = a[i].reverse();
}
return a;
}
其他回答
private static int[][] rotate(int[][] matrix, int n) {
int[][] rotated = new int[n][n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
rotated[i][j] = matrix[n-j-1][i];
}
}
return rotated;
}
顺时针或逆时针旋转2D数组的常用方法。
顺时针旋转 首先颠倒上下，然后交换对称 1 2 3 7 8 9 7 4 4 5 6 => 4 5 6 => 8 5 7 8 9 1 2 3 9 6 3
void rotate(vector<vector<int> > &matrix) {
reverse(matrix.begin(), matrix.end());
for (int i = 0; i < matrix.size(); ++i) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < matrix[i].size(); ++j)
swap(matrix[i][j], matrix[j][i]);
}
}
逆时针方向旋转 首先从左到右反向，然后交换对称 1 2 3 3 2 1 3 6 9 4 5 6 => 6 5 4 => 2 5 7 8 9 9 8 7 1 4 7
void anti_rotate(vector<vector<int> > &matrix) {
for (auto vi : matrix) reverse(vi.begin(), vi.end());
for (int i = 0; i < matrix.size(); ++i) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < matrix[i].size(); ++j)
swap(matrix[i][j], matrix[j][i]);
}
}
对于i:= 0到X 对于j:= 0到X做 [j][i]:= graphic2[X-i][j]
X是图形所在数组的大小。
虽然旋转数据可能是必要的(也许是为了更新物理存储的表示)，但在数组访问上添加一层间接层(也许是一个接口)会变得更简单，可能更性能:
interface IReadableMatrix
{
int GetValue(int x, int y);
}
如果你的矩阵已经实现了这个接口，那么它可以通过这样一个装饰器类来旋转:
class RotatedMatrix : IReadableMatrix
{
private readonly IReadableMatrix _baseMatrix;
public RotatedMatrix(IReadableMatrix baseMatrix)
{
_baseMatrix = baseMatrix;
}
int GetValue(int x, int y)
{
// transpose x and y dimensions
return _baseMatrix(y, x);
}
}
旋转+90/-90/180度，水平/垂直翻转和缩放都可以以这种方式实现。
Performance would need to be measured in your specific scenario. However the O(n^2) operation has now been replaced with an O(1) call. It's a virtual method call which is slower than direct array access, so it depends upon how frequently the rotated array is used after rotation. If it's used once, then this approach would definitely win. If it's rotated then used in a long-running system for days, then in-place rotation might perform better. It also depends whether you can accept the up-front cost.
与所有性能问题一样，测量，测量，测量!
在原地顺时针90度旋转使用矢量矢量..
#include<iostream>
#include<vector>
#include<algorithm>
using namespace std;
//Rotate a Matrix by 90 degrees
void rotateMatrix(vector<vector<int> > &matrix){
int n=matrix.size();
for(int i=0;i<n;i++){
for(int j=i+1;j<n;j++){
swap(matrix[i][j],matrix[j][i]);
}
}
for(int i=0;i<n;i++){
reverse(matrix[i].begin(),matrix[i].end());
}
}
int main(){
int n;
cout<<"enter the size of the matrix:"<<endl;
while (cin >> n) {
vector< vector<int> > m;
cout<<"enter the elements"<<endl;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
m.push_back(vector<int>(n));
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
scanf("%d", &m[i][j]);
}
cout<<"the rotated matrix is:"<<endl;
rotateMatrix(m);
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
cout << m[i][j] << ' ';
cout << endl;
}
}
return 0;
}
