在Java中

public class Matrix {
/* Author Shrikant Dande */
private static void showMatrix(int[][] arr,int rows,int col){

    for(int i =0 ;i<rows;i++){
        for(int j =0 ;j<col;j++){
            System.out.print(arr[i][j]+" ");
        }
        System.out.println();
    }

}

private static void rotateMatrix(int[][] arr,int rows,int col){

    int[][] tempArr = new int[4][4];
    for(int i =0 ;i<rows;i++){
        for(int j =0 ;j<col;j++){
            tempArr[i][j] = arr[rows-1-j][i];
            System.out.print(tempArr[i][j]+" ");
        }
        System.out.println();
    }

}
public static void main(String[] args) {
    int[][] arr = { {1,  2,  3,  4},
             {5,  6,  7,  8},
             {9,  1, 2, 5},
             {7, 4, 8, 9}};
    int rows = 4,col = 4;

    showMatrix(arr, rows, col);
    System.out.println("------------------------------------------------");
    rotateMatrix(arr, rows, col);

}

}

short normal[4][4] = {{8,4,7,5},{3,4,5,7},{9,5,5,6},{3,3,3,3}};

short rotated[4][4];

for (int r = 0; r < 4; ++r)
{
  for (int c = 0; c < 4; ++c)
  {
    rotated[r][c] = normal[c][3-r];
  }
}

简单的c++方法，尽管在大数组中会有很大的内存开销。

虽然旋转数据可能是必要的(也许是为了更新物理存储的表示)，但在数组访问上添加一层间接层(也许是一个接口)会变得更简单，可能更性能:

interface IReadableMatrix
{
    int GetValue(int x, int y);
}

如果你的矩阵已经实现了这个接口，那么它可以通过这样一个装饰器类来旋转:

class RotatedMatrix : IReadableMatrix
{
    private readonly IReadableMatrix _baseMatrix;

    public RotatedMatrix(IReadableMatrix baseMatrix)
    {
        _baseMatrix = baseMatrix;
    }

    int GetValue(int x, int y)
    {
        // transpose x and y dimensions
        return _baseMatrix(y, x);
    }
}

旋转+90/-90/180度，水平/垂直翻转和缩放都可以以这种方式实现。

Performance would need to be measured in your specific scenario. However the O(n^2) operation has now been replaced with an O(1) call. It's a virtual method call which is slower than direct array access, so it depends upon how frequently the rotated array is used after rotation. If it's used once, then this approach would definitely win. If it's rotated then used in a long-running system for days, then in-place rotation might perform better. It also depends whether you can accept the up-front cost.

与所有性能问题一样，测量，测量，测量!

下面是Java版本:

public static void rightRotate(int[][] matrix, int n) {
    for (int layer = 0; layer < n / 2; layer++) {
        int first = layer;
        int last = n - 1 - first;
        for (int i = first; i < last; i++) {
           int offset = i - first;
           int temp = matrix[first][i];
           matrix[first][i] = matrix[last-offset][first];
           matrix[last-offset][first] = matrix[last][last-offset];
           matrix[last][last-offset] = matrix[i][last];
           matrix[i][last] = temp;
        }
    }
}

该方法首先旋转最外层，然后按顺序移动到内层。

我的旋转版本:

void rotate_matrix(int *matrix, int size)
{

int result[size*size];

    for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i)
        for (int j = 0; j < size; ++j)
            result[(size - 1 - i) + j*size] = matrix[i*size+j];

    for (int i = 0; i < size*size; ++i)
        matrix[i] = result[i];
}

在其中，我们将最后一列改为第一行，以此类推。这可能不是最理想的，但对于理解来说是清楚的。

这是c#的

int[,] array = new int[4,4] {
    { 1,2,3,4 },
    { 5,6,7,8 },
    { 9,0,1,2 },
    { 3,4,5,6 }
};

int[,] rotated = RotateMatrix(array, 4);

static int[,] RotateMatrix(int[,] matrix, int n) {
    int[,] ret = new int[n, n];

    for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
        for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
            ret[i, j] = matrix[n - j - 1, i];
        }
    }

    return ret;
}