虽然旋转数据可能是必要的(也许是为了更新物理存储的表示)，但在数组访问上添加一层间接层(也许是一个接口)会变得更简单，可能更性能:

interface IReadableMatrix
{
    int GetValue(int x, int y);
}

如果你的矩阵已经实现了这个接口，那么它可以通过这样一个装饰器类来旋转:

class RotatedMatrix : IReadableMatrix
{
    private readonly IReadableMatrix _baseMatrix;

    public RotatedMatrix(IReadableMatrix baseMatrix)
    {
        _baseMatrix = baseMatrix;
    }

    int GetValue(int x, int y)
    {
        // transpose x and y dimensions
        return _baseMatrix(y, x);
    }
}

旋转+90/-90/180度，水平/垂直翻转和缩放都可以以这种方式实现。

Performance would need to be measured in your specific scenario. However the O(n^2) operation has now been replaced with an O(1) call. It's a virtual method call which is slower than direct array access, so it depends upon how frequently the rotated array is used after rotation. If it's used once, then this approach would definitely win. If it's rotated then used in a long-running system for days, then in-place rotation might perform better. It also depends whether you can accept the up-front cost.

与所有性能问题一样，测量，测量，测量!

下面是Java语言:

public static void rotateInPlace(int[][] m) {
    for(int layer = 0; layer < m.length/2; layer++){
        int first = layer;
        int last = m.length - 1 - first;
        for(int i = first; i < last; i ++){
            int offset = i - first;
            int top = m[first][i];
            m[first][i] = m[last - offset][first];
            m[last - offset][first] = m[last][last - offset];
            m[last][last - offset] = m[i][last];
            m[i][last] = top;
        }
    }
}

下面是PHP的递归方法:

$m = array();
            $m[0] = array('a', 'b', 'c');
            $m[1] = array('d', 'e', 'f');
            $m[2] = array('g', 'h', 'i');
            $newMatrix = array();

            function rotateMatrix($m, $i = 0, &$newMatrix)
            {
                foreach ($m as $chunk) {
                    $newChunk[] = $chunk[$i];
                }
                $newMatrix[] = array_reverse($newChunk);
                $i++;

                if ($i < count($m)) {
                    rotateMatrix($m, $i, $newMatrix);
                }
            }

            rotateMatrix($m, 0, $newMatrix);
            echo '<pre>';
            var_dump($newMatrix);
            echo '<pre>';

虽然旋转数据可能是必要的(也许是为了更新物理存储的表示)，但在数组访问上添加一层间接层(也许是一个接口)会变得更简单，可能更性能:

interface IReadableMatrix
{
    int GetValue(int x, int y);
}

如果你的矩阵已经实现了这个接口，那么它可以通过这样一个装饰器类来旋转:

class RotatedMatrix : IReadableMatrix
{
    private readonly IReadableMatrix _baseMatrix;

    public RotatedMatrix(IReadableMatrix baseMatrix)
    {
        _baseMatrix = baseMatrix;
    }

    int GetValue(int x, int y)
    {
        // transpose x and y dimensions
        return _baseMatrix(y, x);
    }
}

旋转+90/-90/180度，水平/垂直翻转和缩放都可以以这种方式实现。

Performance would need to be measured in your specific scenario. However the O(n^2) operation has now been replaced with an O(1) call. It's a virtual method call which is slower than direct array access, so it depends upon how frequently the rotated array is used after rotation. If it's used once, then this approach would definitely win. If it's rotated then used in a long-running system for days, then in-place rotation might perform better. It also depends whether you can accept the up-front cost.

与所有性能问题一样，测量，测量，测量!

很好的答案，但对于那些正在寻找DRY JavaScript代码的人- +90度和-90度:

// Input: 1 2 3 // 4 5 6 // 7 8 9 // Transpose: // 1 4 7 // 2 5 8 // 3 6 9 // Output: // +90 Degree: // 7 4 1 // 8 5 2 // 9 6 3 // -90 Degree: // 3 6 9 // 2 5 8 // 1 4 7 // Rotate +90 function rotate90(matrix) { matrix = transpose(matrix); matrix.map(function(array) { array.reverse(); }); return matrix; } // Rotate -90 function counterRotate90(matrix) { var result = createEmptyMatrix(matrix.length); matrix = transpose(matrix); var counter = 0; for (var i = matrix.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { result[counter] = matrix[i]; counter++; } return result; } // Create empty matrix function createEmptyMatrix(len) { var result = new Array(); for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) { result.push([]); } return result; } // Transpose the matrix function transpose(matrix) { // make empty array var len = matrix.length; var result = createEmptyMatrix(len); for (var i = 0; i < matrix.length; i++) { for (var j = 0; j < matrix[i].length; j++) { var temp = matrix[i][j]; result[j][i] = temp; } } return result; } // Test Cases var array1 = [ [1, 2], [3, 4] ]; var array2 = [ [1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9] ]; var array3 = [ [1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 6, 7, 8], [9, 10, 11, 12], [13, 14, 15, 16] ]; // +90 degress Rotation Tests var test1 = rotate90(array1); var test2 = rotate90(array2); var test3 = rotate90(array3); console.log(test1); console.log(test2); console.log(test3); // -90 degress Rotation Tests var test1 = counterRotate90(array1); var test2 = counterRotate90(array2); var test3 = counterRotate90(array3); console.log(test1); console.log(test2); console.log(test3);

这是c#的

int[,] array = new int[4,4] {
    { 1,2,3,4 },
    { 5,6,7,8 },
    { 9,0,1,2 },
    { 3,4,5,6 }
};

int[,] rotated = RotateMatrix(array, 4);

static int[,] RotateMatrix(int[,] matrix, int n) {
    int[,] ret = new int[n, n];

    for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
        for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
            ret[i, j] = matrix[n - j - 1, i];
        }
    }

    return ret;
}