这是一个Javascript解决方案:

const transpose = m => m[0].map((x,i) => m.map(x => x[i]));

a: // original matrix
123
456
789

transpose(a).reverse(); // rotate 90 degrees counter clockwise 
369
258
147

transpose(a.slice().reverse()); // rotate 90 degrees clockwise 
741
852
963

transpose(transpose(a.slice().reverse()).slice().reverse())
// rotate 180 degrees 
987
654
321

试试我图书馆的算盘——常见的:

@Test
public void test_42519() throws Exception {
    final IntMatrix matrix = IntMatrix.range(0, 16).reshape(4);

    N.println("======= original =======================");
    matrix.println();
    // print out:
    //    [0, 1, 2, 3]
    //    [4, 5, 6, 7]
    //    [8, 9, 10, 11]
    //    [12, 13, 14, 15]

    N.println("======= rotate 90 ======================");
    matrix.rotate90().println();
    // print out:
    //    [12, 8, 4, 0]
    //    [13, 9, 5, 1]
    //    [14, 10, 6, 2]
    //    [15, 11, 7, 3]

    N.println("======= rotate 180 =====================");
    matrix.rotate180().println();
    // print out:
    //    [15, 14, 13, 12]
    //    [11, 10, 9, 8]
    //    [7, 6, 5, 4]
    //    [3, 2, 1, 0]

    N.println("======= rotate 270 ======================");
    matrix.rotate270().println();
    // print out:
    //    [3, 7, 11, 15]
    //    [2, 6, 10, 14]
    //    [1, 5, 9, 13]
    //    [0, 4, 8, 12]

    N.println("======= transpose =======================");
    matrix.transpose().println();
    // print out:
    //    [0, 4, 8, 12]
    //    [1, 5, 9, 13]
    //    [2, 6, 10, 14]
    //    [3, 7, 11, 15]

    final IntMatrix bigMatrix = IntMatrix.range(0, 10000_0000).reshape(10000);

    // It take about 2 seconds to rotate 10000 X 10000 matrix.
    Profiler.run(1, 2, 3, "sequential", () -> bigMatrix.rotate90()).printResult();

    // Want faster? Go parallel. 1 second to rotate 10000 X 10000 matrix.
    final int[][] a = bigMatrix.array();
    final int[][] c = new int[a[0].length][a.length];
    final int n = a.length;
    final int threadNum = 4;

    Profiler.run(1, 2, 3, "parallel", () -> {
        IntStream.range(0, n).parallel(threadNum).forEach(i -> {
            for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
                c[i][j] = a[n - j - 1][i];
            }
        });
    }).printResult();
}

#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>

using namespace std;
const int SIZE=3;
void print(int a[][SIZE],int);
void rotate(int a[][SIZE],int);

void main()
{
    int a[SIZE][SIZE]={{11,22,33},{44,55,66},{77,88,99}};
    cout<<"the array befor rotate\n";

    print(a,SIZE);
    rotate( a,SIZE);
    cout<<"the array after rotate\n";
    print(a,SIZE);
    cout<<endl;

}

void print(int a[][SIZE],int SIZE)
{
    int i,j;
    for(i=0;i<SIZE;i++)
       for(j=0;j<SIZE;j++)
          cout<<a[i][j]<<setw(4);
}

void rotate(int a[][SIZE],int SIZE)
{
    int temp[3][3],i,j;
    for(i=0;i<SIZE;i++)
       for(j=0;j<SIZE/2.5;j++)
       {
           temp[i][j]= a[i][j];
           a[i][j]= a[j][SIZE-i-1] ;
           a[j][SIZE-i-1] =temp[i][j];

       }
}

下面是Java版本:

public static void rightRotate(int[][] matrix, int n) {
    for (int layer = 0; layer < n / 2; layer++) {
        int first = layer;
        int last = n - 1 - first;
        for (int i = first; i < last; i++) {
           int offset = i - first;
           int temp = matrix[first][i];
           matrix[first][i] = matrix[last-offset][first];
           matrix[last-offset][first] = matrix[last][last-offset];
           matrix[last][last-offset] = matrix[i][last];
           matrix[i][last] = temp;
        }
    }
}

该方法首先旋转最外层，然后按顺序移动到内层。

虽然旋转数据可能是必要的(也许是为了更新物理存储的表示)，但在数组访问上添加一层间接层(也许是一个接口)会变得更简单，可能更性能:

interface IReadableMatrix
{
    int GetValue(int x, int y);
}

如果你的矩阵已经实现了这个接口，那么它可以通过这样一个装饰器类来旋转:

class RotatedMatrix : IReadableMatrix
{
    private readonly IReadableMatrix _baseMatrix;

    public RotatedMatrix(IReadableMatrix baseMatrix)
    {
        _baseMatrix = baseMatrix;
    }

    int GetValue(int x, int y)
    {
        // transpose x and y dimensions
        return _baseMatrix(y, x);
    }
}

旋转+90/-90/180度，水平/垂直翻转和缩放都可以以这种方式实现。

Performance would need to be measured in your specific scenario. However the O(n^2) operation has now been replaced with an O(1) call. It's a virtual method call which is slower than direct array access, so it depends upon how frequently the rotated array is used after rotation. If it's used once, then this approach would definitely win. If it's rotated then used in a long-running system for days, then in-place rotation might perform better. It also depends whether you can accept the up-front cost.

与所有性能问题一样，测量，测量，测量!

这是我对矩阵90度旋转的尝试，这是c中的2步解决方案，首先转置矩阵，然后交换cols。

#define ROWS        5
#define COLS        5

void print_matrix_b(int B[][COLS], int rows, int cols) 
{
    for (int i = 0; i <= rows; i++) {
        for (int j = 0; j <=cols; j++) {
            printf("%d ", B[i][j]);
        }
        printf("\n");
    }
}

void swap_columns(int B[][COLS], int l, int r, int rows)
{
    int tmp;
    for (int i = 0; i <= rows; i++) {
        tmp = B[i][l];
        B[i][l] = B[i][r];
        B[i][r] = tmp;
    }
}


void matrix_2d_rotation(int B[][COLS], int rows, int cols)
{
    int tmp;
    // Transpose the matrix first
    for (int i = 0; i <= rows; i++) {
        for (int j = i; j <=cols; j++) {
            tmp = B[i][j];
            B[i][j] = B[j][i];
            B[j][i] = tmp;
        }
    }
    // Swap the first and last col and continue until
    // the middle.
    for (int i = 0; i < (cols / 2); i++)
        swap_columns(B, i, cols - i, rows);
}



int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
    int B[ROWS][COLS] = { 
                  {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, 
                      {6, 7, 8, 9, 10},
                          {11, 12, 13, 14, 15},
                          {16, 17, 18, 19, 20},
                          {21, 22, 23, 24, 25}
                        };

    matrix_2d_rotation(B, ROWS - 1, COLS - 1);

    print_matrix_b(B, ROWS - 1, COLS -1);
    return 0;
}