#转置是Ruby的Array类的标准方法，因此:

% irb
irb(main):001:0> m = [[1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 6, 7, 8], [9, 0, 1, 2], [3, 4, 5, 6]]
=> [[1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 6, 7, 8], [9, 0, 1, 2], [3, 4, 5, 6]] 
irb(main):002:0> m.reverse.transpose
=> [[3, 9, 5, 1], [4, 0, 6, 2], [5, 1, 7, 3], [6, 2, 8, 4]]

实现是一个用c写的n^2转置函数，你可以在这里看到: http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/Array.html#method-i-transpose 通过选择“点击切换源”旁边的“转置”。

我记得比O(n^2)的解更好，但只适用于特殊构造的矩阵(如稀疏矩阵)

我的旋转版本:

void rotate_matrix(int *matrix, int size)
{

int result[size*size];

    for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i)
        for (int j = 0; j < size; ++j)
            result[(size - 1 - i) + j*size] = matrix[i*size+j];

    for (int i = 0; i < size*size; ++i)
        matrix[i] = result[i];
}

在其中，我们将最后一列改为第一行，以此类推。这可能不是最理想的，但对于理解来说是清楚的。

O(n²)时间和O(1)空间算法(没有任何变通方法和恶作剧的东西!)

旋转+90:

转置 反转每行

旋转-90:

方法一:

转置 反转每一列

方法二:

反转每行 转置

旋转180度:

方法一:旋转+90两次

方法2:反转每行，然后反转每列(转置)

旋转-180度:

方法一:旋转-90度2次

方法二:先反转每一列，再反转每一行

方法三:旋转+180，因为它们是相同的

哦，伙计。我一直认为这是一个“我很无聊，我能思考什么”的谜题。我想出了我的原地换位码，但到了这里发现你的和我的几乎一模一样……啊,好。这里是Ruby版本。

require 'pp'
n = 10
a = []
n.times { a << (1..n).to_a }

pp a

0.upto(n/2-1) do |i|
  i.upto(n-i-2) do |j|
    tmp             = a[i][j]
    a[i][j]         = a[n-j-1][i]
    a[n-j-1][i]     = a[n-i-1][n-j-1]
    a[n-i-1][n-j-1] = a[j][n-i-1]
    a[j][n-i-1]     = tmp
  end
end

pp a

private static int[][] rotate(int[][] matrix, int n) {
    int[][] rotated = new int[n][n];
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
            rotated[i][j] = matrix[n-j-1][i];
        }
    }
    return rotated;
}

基于大量的其他答案，我用c#想出了这个:

/// <param name="rotation">The number of rotations (if negative, the <see cref="Matrix{TValue}"/> is rotated counterclockwise; 
/// otherwise, it's rotated clockwise). A single (positive) rotation is equivalent to 90° or -270°; a single (negative) rotation is 
/// equivalent to -90° or 270°. Matrices may be rotated by 90°, 180°, or 270° only (or multiples thereof).</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public Matrix<TValue> Rotate(int rotation)
{
    var result = default(Matrix<TValue>);

    //This normalizes the requested rotation (for instance, if 10 is specified, the rotation is actually just +-2 or +-180°, but all 
    //correspond to the same rotation).
    var d = rotation.ToDouble() / 4d;
    d = d - (int)d;

    var degree = (d - 1d) * 4d;

    //This gets the type of rotation to make; there are a total of four unique rotations possible (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°).
    //Each correspond to 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively (or 0, -1, -2, and -3, if in the other direction). Since
    //1 is equivalent to -3 and so forth, we combine both cases into one. 
    switch (degree)
    {
        case -3:
        case +1:
            degree = 3;
            break;
        case -2:
        case +2:
            degree = 2;
            break;
        case -1:
        case +3:
            degree = 1;
            break;
        case -4:
        case  0:
        case +4:
            degree = 0;
            break;
    }
    switch (degree)
    {
        //The rotation is 0, +-180°
        case 0:
        case 2:
            result = new TValue[Rows, Columns];
            break;
        //The rotation is +-90°
        case 1:
        case 3:
            result = new TValue[Columns, Rows];
            break;
    }

    for (uint i = 0; i < Columns; ++i)
    {
        for (uint j = 0; j < Rows; ++j)
        {
            switch (degree)
            {
                //If rotation is 0°
                case 0:
                    result._values[j][i] = _values[j][i];
                    break;
                //If rotation is -90°
                case 1:
                    //Transpose, then reverse each column OR reverse each row, then transpose
                    result._values[i][j] = _values[j][Columns - i - 1];
                    break;
                //If rotation is +-180°
                case 2:
                    //Reverse each column, then reverse each row
                    result._values[(Rows - 1) - j][(Columns - 1) - i] = _values[j][i];
                    break;
                //If rotation is +90°
                case 3:
                    //Transpose, then reverse each row
                    result._values[i][j] = _values[Rows - j - 1][i];
                    break;
            }
        }
    }
    return result;
}

其中_values对应于由Matrix<TValue>定义的私有二维数组(形式为[][])。result = new TValue[Columns, Rows]可能通过隐式操作符重载并将二维数组转换为Matrix<TValue>。 Columns和Rows两个属性是公共属性，用于获取当前实例的列数和行数:

public uint Columns 
    => (uint)_values[0].Length;

public uint Rows 
    => (uint)_values.Length;

当然，假设您更喜欢使用无符号下标;-)

所有这些都允许您指定它应该旋转多少次，以及它应该向左旋转(如果小于零)还是向右旋转(如果大于零)。您可以改进此方法，以检查实际角度的旋转，但如果值不是90的倍数，则可能会抛出异常。有了这些输入，你可以相应地改变方法:

public Matrix<TValue> Rotate(int rotation)
{
    var _rotation = (double)rotation / 90d;

    if (_rotation - Math.Floor(_rotation) > 0)
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException("A matrix may only be rotated by multiples of 90.").
    }

    rotation = (int)_rotation;
    ...
}

Since a degree is more accurately expressed by double than int, but a matrix can only rotate in multiples of 90, it is far more intuitive to make the argument correspond to something else that can be accurately represented by the data structure used. int is perfect because it can tell you how many times to rotate it up to a certain unit (90) as well as the direction. double may very well be able to tell you that also, but it also includes values that aren't supported by this operation (which is inherently counter-intuitive).