你可以使用一个堆栈来保存尚未访问的节点:

stack.push(root)
while !stack.isEmpty() do
    node = stack.pop()
    for each node.childNodes do
        stack.push(stack)
    endfor
    // …
endwhile

基于biziclops的ES6实现很棒的答案:

root = { text: "root", children: [{ text: "c1", children: [{ text: "c11" }, { text: "c12" }] }, { text: "c2", children: [{ text: "c21" }, { text: "c22" }] }, ] } console.log("DFS:") DFS(root, node => node.children, node => console.log(node.text)); console.log("BFS:") BFS(root, node => node.children, node => console.log(node.text)); function BFS(root, getChildren, visit) { let nodesToVisit = [root]; while (nodesToVisit.length > 0) { const currentNode = nodesToVisit.shift(); nodesToVisit = [ ...nodesToVisit, ...(getChildren(currentNode) || []), ]; visit(currentNode); } } function DFS(root, getChildren, visit) { let nodesToVisit = [root]; while (nodesToVisit.length > 0) { const currentNode = nodesToVisit.shift(); nodesToVisit = [ ...(getChildren(currentNode) || []), ...nodesToVisit, ]; visit(currentNode); } }

Stack<Node> stack = new Stack<>();
stack.add(root);
while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
    Node node = stack.pop();
    System.out.print(node.getData() + " ");

    Node right = node.getRight();
    if (right != null) {
        stack.push(right);
    }

    Node left = node.getLeft();
    if (left != null) {
        stack.push(left);
    }
}

只是想把我的python实现添加到长长的解决方案列表中。这种非递归算法具有发现和完成事件。

worklist = [root_node]
visited = set()
while worklist:
    node = worklist[-1]
    if node in visited:
        # Node is finished
        worklist.pop()
    else:
        # Node is discovered
        visited.add(node)
        for child in node.children:
            worklist.append(child)

Java中的DFS迭代:

//DFS: Iterative
private Boolean DFSIterative(Node root, int target) {
    if (root == null)
        return false;
    Stack<Node> _stack = new Stack<Node>();
    _stack.push(root);
    while (_stack.size() > 0) {
        Node temp = _stack.peek();
        if (temp.data == target)
            return true;
        if (temp.left != null)
            _stack.push(temp.left);
        else if (temp.right != null)
            _stack.push(temp.right);
        else
            _stack.pop();
    }
    return false;
}

假设您希望在访问图中的每个节点时执行通知。简单的递归实现是:

void DFSRecursive(Node n, Set<Node> visited) {
  visited.add(n);
  for (Node x : neighbors_of(n)) {  // iterate over all neighbors
    if (!visited.contains(x)) {
      DFSRecursive(x, visited);
    }
  }
  OnVisit(n);  // callback to say node is finally visited, after all its non-visited neighbors
}

好的，现在你需要一个基于堆栈的实现，因为你的例子不起作用。例如，复杂的图形可能会导致程序的堆栈崩溃，您需要实现一个非递归版本。最大的问题是知道何时发出通知。

下面的伪代码可以工作(为了可读性，Java和c++混合使用):

void DFS(Node root) {
  Set<Node> visited;
  Set<Node> toNotify;  // nodes we want to notify

  Stack<Node> stack;
  stack.add(root);
  toNotify.add(root);  // we won't pop nodes from this until DFS is done
  while (!stack.empty()) {
    Node current = stack.pop();
    visited.add(current);
    for (Node x : neighbors_of(current)) {
      if (!visited.contains(x)) {
        stack.add(x);
        toNotify.add(x);
      }
    }
  }
  // Now issue notifications. toNotifyStack might contain duplicates (will never
  // happen in a tree but easily happens in a graph)
  Set<Node> notified;
  while (!toNotify.empty()) {
  Node n = toNotify.pop();
  if (!toNotify.contains(n)) {
    OnVisit(n);  // issue callback
    toNotify.add(n);
  }
}

它看起来很复杂，但发出通知所需的额外逻辑存在，因为您需要以相反的访问顺序通知- DFS从根开始，但在最后通知它，不像BFS实现非常简单。

看看下面的图表: 节点是s t v w。 有向边为: S ->t, S ->v, t->w, v->w, v->t。 运行你自己的DFS实现，访问节点的顺序必须是: W t v s 一个笨拙的DFS实现可能会首先通知t，这表明存在错误。DFS的递归实现总是最后到达w。