我很喜欢代码，在我的生活中从来没有上过任何与信息学相关的课程，我一开始很糟糕，开始从例子中学习，但自从我读了“四人帮”这本书以来，我一直记得并一直在我的脑海中:

“每个人都能写出机器能理解的代码，但不是所有人都能写出人类能理解的代码。”

考虑到这一点，在代码中有很多事情要做;)

使用一些wiki软件在你的网络上创建一个wiki。

在你的网站上开始一个叫做“最佳实践”或“编码标准”的类别。

把每个人都指向它。允许反馈。

当您发布软件时，让负责将代码放入构建中的人员向开发人员推送，让他们指向上面的Wiki页面。

我曾在我的组织中这样做过，人们花了几个月的时间才真正熟悉使用Wiki，但现在它是一个不可或缺的资源。

在Gerry Weinberg的书《计算机编程心理学》中有一些非常好的建议——他的“无我编程”的整个概念都是关于如何帮助人们接受对他们代码的批评，而不是对他们自己的批评。

我很喜欢代码，在我的生活中从来没有上过任何与信息学相关的课程，我一开始很糟糕，开始从例子中学习，但自从我读了“四人帮”这本书以来，我一直记得并一直在我的脑海中:

“每个人都能写出机器能理解的代码，但不是所有人都能写出人类能理解的代码。”

考虑到这一点，在代码中有很多事情要做;)

糟糕的命名习惯:总是不可原谅的。

是的，不要总是认为你的方式更好……这可能很困难，但必须保持客观性。

I've had an experience with a coder that had such horrible naming of functions, the code was worse than unreadable. The functions lied about what they did, the code was nonsensical. And they were protective/resistant to having someone else change their code. when confronted very politely, they admitted it was poorly named, but wanted to retain their ownership of the code and would go back and fix it up "at a later date." This is in the past now, but how do you deal with a situation where they error is ACKNOWLEDGED, but then protected? This went on for a long time and I had no idea how to break through that barrier.

Global variables: I myself am not THAT fond of global variables, but I know a few otherwise excellent programmers that like them A LOT. So much so that I've come to believe they are not actually all that bad in many situations, as they allow for clarity, ease of debugging. (please don't flame/downvote me :) ) It comes down to, I've seen a lot of very good, effective, bug free code that used global variables (not put in by me!) and great deal of buggy, impossible to read/maintain/fix code that meticulously used proper patterns. Maybe there IS a place (though shrinking perhaps) for global variables? I'm considering rethinking my position based on evidence.

您可能想要关注坏代码的影响，而不是您对它的风格是好是坏的主观看法。