我如何确定两条直线是否相交，如果相交，在x,y点处?
当前回答
以下是对加文回答的改进。马普的解决方案也类似，但都没有推迟分割。
这实际上也是Gareth Rees的答案的一个实际应用，因为向量积在2D中的等价是补点积，这段代码用了其中的三个。切换到3D并使用叉积，在最后插入s和t，结果是3D中直线之间的两个最近点。 不管怎样，2D解:
int get_line_intersection(float p0_x, float p0_y, float p1_x, float p1_y,
float p2_x, float p2_y, float p3_x, float p3_y, float *i_x, float *i_y)
{
float s02_x, s02_y, s10_x, s10_y, s32_x, s32_y, s_numer, t_numer, denom, t;
s10_x = p1_x - p0_x;
s10_y = p1_y - p0_y;
s32_x = p3_x - p2_x;
s32_y = p3_y - p2_y;
denom = s10_x * s32_y - s32_x * s10_y;
if (denom == 0)
return 0; // Collinear
bool denomPositive = denom > 0;
s02_x = p0_x - p2_x;
s02_y = p0_y - p2_y;
s_numer = s10_x * s02_y - s10_y * s02_x;
if ((s_numer < 0) == denomPositive)
return 0; // No collision
t_numer = s32_x * s02_y - s32_y * s02_x;
if ((t_numer < 0) == denomPositive)
return 0; // No collision
if (((s_numer > denom) == denomPositive) || ((t_numer > denom) == denomPositive))
return 0; // No collision
// Collision detected
t = t_numer / denom;
if (i_x != NULL)
*i_x = p0_x + (t * s10_x);
if (i_y != NULL)
*i_y = p0_y + (t * s10_y);
return 1;
}
基本上，它将除法延迟到最后一刻，并将大多数测试移动到某些计算完成之前，从而增加了早期退出。最后，它还避免了直线平行时的除零情况。
您可能还想考虑使用ε检验，而不是与零比较。非常接近平行的线会产生稍微偏离的结果。这不是一个bug，这是浮点数学的一个限制。
其他回答
我已经尝试实现上述Jason所描述的算法;不幸的是，虽然在调试数学工作，我发现许多情况下，它不起作用。
例如，考虑点A(10,10) B(20,20) C(10,1) D(1,10) h=。5然而，通过检查可以清楚地看到，这些部分彼此一点也不接近。
将其绘制成图可以清楚地看出，0 < h < 1条件仅表明如果存在截距点，则截距点将位于CD上，而不告诉我们该点是否位于AB上。 为了确保有一个交叉点，你必须对变量g进行对称计算，拦截的要求是: 0 < g < 1 AND 0 < h < 1
许多答案把所有的计算都打包成一个函数。如果您需要计算直线斜率、y轴截距或x轴截距，以便在代码的其他地方使用，那么这些计算将是冗余的。我分离出了各自的函数，使用了明显的变量名，并注释了我的代码以使其更易于理解。我需要知道直线是否无限超出它们的端点，所以在JavaScript中:
http://jsfiddle.net/skibulk/evmqq00u/
var point_a = {x:0, y:10},
point_b = {x:12, y:12},
point_c = {x:10, y:0},
point_d = {x:0, y:0},
slope_ab = slope(point_a, point_b),
slope_bc = slope(point_b, point_c),
slope_cd = slope(point_c, point_d),
slope_da = slope(point_d, point_a),
yint_ab = y_intercept(point_a, slope_ab),
yint_bc = y_intercept(point_b, slope_bc),
yint_cd = y_intercept(point_c, slope_cd),
yint_da = y_intercept(point_d, slope_da),
xint_ab = x_intercept(point_a, slope_ab, yint_ab),
xint_bc = x_intercept(point_b, slope_bc, yint_bc),
xint_cd = x_intercept(point_c, slope_cd, yint_cd),
xint_da = x_intercept(point_d, slope_da, yint_da),
point_aa = intersect(slope_da, yint_da, xint_da, slope_ab, yint_ab, xint_ab),
point_bb = intersect(slope_ab, yint_ab, xint_ab, slope_bc, yint_bc, xint_bc),
point_cc = intersect(slope_bc, yint_bc, xint_bc, slope_cd, yint_cd, xint_cd),
point_dd = intersect(slope_cd, yint_cd, xint_cd, slope_da, yint_da, xint_da);
console.log(point_a, point_b, point_c, point_d);
console.log(slope_ab, slope_bc, slope_cd, slope_da);
console.log(yint_ab, yint_bc, yint_cd, yint_da);
console.log(xint_ab, xint_bc, xint_cd, xint_da);
console.log(point_aa, point_bb, point_cc, point_dd);
function slope(point_a, point_b) {
var i = (point_b.y - point_a.y) / (point_b.x - point_a.x);
if (i === -Infinity) return Infinity;
if (i === -0) return 0;
return i;
}
function y_intercept(point, slope) {
// Horizontal Line
if (slope == 0) return point.y;
// Vertical Line
if (slope == Infinity)
{
// THE Y-Axis
if (point.x == 0) return Infinity;
// No Intercept
return null;
}
// Angled Line
return point.y - (slope * point.x);
}
function x_intercept(point, slope, yint) {
// Vertical Line
if (slope == Infinity) return point.x;
// Horizontal Line
if (slope == 0)
{
// THE X-Axis
if (point.y == 0) return Infinity;
// No Intercept
return null;
}
// Angled Line
return -yint / slope;
}
// Intersection of two infinite lines
function intersect(slope_a, yint_a, xint_a, slope_b, yint_b, xint_b) {
if (slope_a == slope_b)
{
// Equal Lines
if (yint_a == yint_b && xint_a == xint_b) return Infinity;
// Parallel Lines
return null;
}
// First Line Vertical
if (slope_a == Infinity)
{
return {
x: xint_a,
y: (slope_b * xint_a) + yint_b
};
}
// Second Line Vertical
if (slope_b == Infinity)
{
return {
x: xint_b,
y: (slope_a * xint_b) + yint_a
};
}
// Not Equal, Not Parallel, Not Vertical
var i = (yint_b - yint_a) / (slope_a - slope_b);
return {
x: i,
y: (slope_a * i) + yint_a
};
}
上面有很多解决方案，但我认为下面的解决方案很简单，很容易理解。
矢量AB和矢量CD相交当且仅当
端点a和b在线段CD的两边。 端点c和d在线段AB的对边。
更具体地说，a和b在线段CD的对面当且仅当两个三元组中有一个是逆时针顺序的。
Intersect(a, b, c, d)
if CCW(a, c, d) == CCW(b, c, d)
return false;
else if CCW(a, b, c) == CCW(a, b, d)
return false;
else
return true;
这里的CCW代表逆时针，根据点的方向返回真/假。
来源:http://compgeom.cs.uiuc.edu/~jeffe/teaching/373/notes/x06-sweepline.pdf 第二页
一个c++程序，用于检查两条给定线段是否相交
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
struct Point
{
int x;
int y;
};
// Given three colinear points p, q, r, the function checks if
// point q lies on line segment 'pr'
bool onSegment(Point p, Point q, Point r)
{
if (q.x <= max(p.x, r.x) && q.x >= min(p.x, r.x) &&
q.y <= max(p.y, r.y) && q.y >= min(p.y, r.y))
return true;
return false;
}
// To find orientation of ordered triplet (p, q, r).
// The function returns following values
// 0 --> p, q and r are colinear
// 1 --> Clockwise
// 2 --> Counterclockwise
int orientation(Point p, Point q, Point r)
{
// See 10th slides from following link for derivation of the formula
// http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~pat/52233/slides/Geometry1x1.pdf
int val = (q.y - p.y) * (r.x - q.x) -
(q.x - p.x) * (r.y - q.y);
if (val == 0) return 0; // colinear
return (val > 0)? 1: 2; // clock or counterclock wise
}
// The main function that returns true if line segment 'p1q1'
// and 'p2q2' intersect.
bool doIntersect(Point p1, Point q1, Point p2, Point q2)
{
// Find the four orientations needed for general and
// special cases
int o1 = orientation(p1, q1, p2);
int o2 = orientation(p1, q1, q2);
int o3 = orientation(p2, q2, p1);
int o4 = orientation(p2, q2, q1);
// General case
if (o1 != o2 && o3 != o4)
return true;
// Special Cases
// p1, q1 and p2 are colinear and p2 lies on segment p1q1
if (o1 == 0 && onSegment(p1, p2, q1)) return true;
// p1, q1 and p2 are colinear and q2 lies on segment p1q1
if (o2 == 0 && onSegment(p1, q2, q1)) return true;
// p2, q2 and p1 are colinear and p1 lies on segment p2q2
if (o3 == 0 && onSegment(p2, p1, q2)) return true;
// p2, q2 and q1 are colinear and q1 lies on segment p2q2
if (o4 == 0 && onSegment(p2, q1, q2)) return true;
return false; // Doesn't fall in any of the above cases
}
// Driver program to test above functions
int main()
{
struct Point p1 = {1, 1}, q1 = {10, 1};
struct Point p2 = {1, 2}, q2 = {10, 2};
doIntersect(p1, q1, p2, q2)? cout << "Yes\n": cout << "No\n";
p1 = {10, 0}, q1 = {0, 10};
p2 = {0, 0}, q2 = {10, 10};
doIntersect(p1, q1, p2, q2)? cout << "Yes\n": cout << "No\n";
p1 = {-5, -5}, q1 = {0, 0};
p2 = {1, 1}, q2 = {10, 10};
doIntersect(p1, q1, p2, q2)? cout << "Yes\n": cout << "No\n";
return 0;
}
以下是对加文回答的改进。马普的解决方案也类似，但都没有推迟分割。
这实际上也是Gareth Rees的答案的一个实际应用，因为向量积在2D中的等价是补点积，这段代码用了其中的三个。切换到3D并使用叉积，在最后插入s和t，结果是3D中直线之间的两个最近点。 不管怎样，2D解:
int get_line_intersection(float p0_x, float p0_y, float p1_x, float p1_y,
float p2_x, float p2_y, float p3_x, float p3_y, float *i_x, float *i_y)
{
float s02_x, s02_y, s10_x, s10_y, s32_x, s32_y, s_numer, t_numer, denom, t;
s10_x = p1_x - p0_x;
s10_y = p1_y - p0_y;
s32_x = p3_x - p2_x;
s32_y = p3_y - p2_y;
denom = s10_x * s32_y - s32_x * s10_y;
if (denom == 0)
return 0; // Collinear
bool denomPositive = denom > 0;
s02_x = p0_x - p2_x;
s02_y = p0_y - p2_y;
s_numer = s10_x * s02_y - s10_y * s02_x;
if ((s_numer < 0) == denomPositive)
return 0; // No collision
t_numer = s32_x * s02_y - s32_y * s02_x;
if ((t_numer < 0) == denomPositive)
return 0; // No collision
if (((s_numer > denom) == denomPositive) || ((t_numer > denom) == denomPositive))
return 0; // No collision
// Collision detected
t = t_numer / denom;
if (i_x != NULL)
*i_x = p0_x + (t * s10_x);
if (i_y != NULL)
*i_y = p0_y + (t * s10_y);
return 1;
}
基本上，它将除法延迟到最后一刻，并将大多数测试移动到某些计算完成之前，从而增加了早期退出。最后，它还避免了直线平行时的除零情况。
您可能还想考虑使用ε检验，而不是与零比较。非常接近平行的线会产生稍微偏离的结果。这不是一个bug，这是浮点数学的一个限制。
