**更新**最近没有被验证工作。

我把一个小板条箱一起做这个基于vbo的答案。它提供了一个宏来返回或打印类型。

把这个放在你的货物里。toml文件:

[dependencies]
t_bang = "0.1.2"

然后你可以这样使用它:

#[macro_use] extern crate t_bang;
use t_bang::*;

fn main() {
  let x = 5;
  let x_type = t!(x);
  println!("{:?}", x_type);  // prints out: "i32"
  pt!(x);                    // prints out: "i32"
  pt!(5);                    // prints out: "i32"
}

您还可以使用println中的变量!("{:?}”,var)。如果没有为该类型实现Debug，则可以在编译器的错误消息中看到该类型:

mod some {
    pub struct SomeType;
}

fn main() {
    let unknown_var = some::SomeType;
    println!("{:?}", unknown_var);
}

(游戏围栏)

虽然很脏，但很管用。

更新，原始答案如下

trait函数type_name如何，它对于快速获取类型名称非常有用。

pub trait AnyExt {
    fn type_name(&self) -> &'static str;
}

impl<T> AnyExt for T {
    fn type_name(&self) -> &'static str {
        std::any::type_name::<T>()
    }
}

fn main(){
    let my_number = 32.90;
    println!("{}",my_number.type_name());
}

输出:

f64

原来的答案

我写了一个宏type_of!()来调试，它来自std dbg!()。

pub fn type_of2<T>(v: T) -> (&'static str, T) {
    (std::any::type_name::<T>(), v)
}

#[macro_export]
macro_rules! type_of {
    // NOTE: We cannot use `concat!` to make a static string as a format argument
    // of `eprintln!` because `file!` could contain a `{` or
    // `$val` expression could be a block (`{ .. }`), in which case the `eprintln!`
    // will be malformed.
    () => {
        eprintln!("[{}:{}]", file!(), line!());
    };
    ($val:expr $(,)?) => {
        // Use of `match` here is intentional because it affects the lifetimes
        // of temporaries - https://stackoverflow.com/a/48732525/1063961
        match $val {
            tmp => {
                let (type_,tmp) = $crate::type_of2(tmp);
                eprintln!("[{}:{}] {}: {}",
                    file!(), line!(), stringify!($val), type_);
                tmp
            }
        }
    };
    ($($val:expr),+ $(,)?) => {
        ($($crate::type_of!($val)),+,)
    };
}

fn main(){
    let my_number = type_of!(32.90);
    type_of!(my_number);
}

输出:

[src/main.rs:32] 32.90: f64
[src/main.rs:33] my_number: f64

如果你只是想找出一个变量的类型，并愿意在编译时执行，你可能会导致一个错误，并让编译器拾取它。

例如，将变量设置为一个无效的类型:

let mut my_number: () = 32.90;
// let () = x; would work too

error[E0308]: mismatched types
 --> src/main.rs:2:29
  |
2 |     let mut my_number: () = 32.90;
  |                             ^^^^^ expected (), found floating-point number
  |
  = note: expected type `()`
             found type `{float}`

或者调用无效的方法:

let mut my_number = 32.90;
my_number.what_is_this();

error[E0599]: no method named `what_is_this` found for type `{float}` in the current scope
 --> src/main.rs:3:15
  |
3 |     my_number.what_is_this();
  |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^

或访问无效字段:

let mut my_number = 32.90;
my_number.what_is_this

error[E0610]: `{float}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
 --> src/main.rs:3:15
  |
3 |     my_number.what_is_this
  |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^

These reveal the type, which in this case is actually not fully resolved. It’s called “floating-point variable” in the first example, and “{float}” in all three examples; this is a partially resolved type which could end up f32 or f64, depending on how you use it. “{float}” is not a legal type name, it’s a placeholder meaning “I’m not completely sure what this is”, but it is a floating-point number. In the case of floating-point variables, if you don't constrain it, it will default to f64¹. (An unqualified integer literal will default to i32.)

参见:

编译器错误消息中的{integer}或{float}是什么?

¹可能仍然有一些让编译器困惑的方法，使它无法在f32和f64之间做出决定;我不确定。它曾经像32.90.eq(&32.90)一样简单，但现在两者都被视为f64，并且可以愉快地进行，所以我不知道。

如果你事先知道所有的类型，你可以使用trait来添加type_of方法:

trait TypeInfo {
    fn type_of(&self) -> &'static str;
}

impl TypeInfo for i32 {
    fn type_of(&self) -> &'static str {
        "i32"
    }
}

impl TypeInfo for i64 {
    fn type_of(&self) -> &'static str {
        "i64"
    }
}

//...

没有复杂或什么都没有，所以尽管有更多的限制，这是唯一的解决方案，让你得到一个字符串，是稳定的。(参见Boiethios的回答)然而，这是非常费力的，并且没有考虑类型参数，所以我们可以……

trait TypeInfo {
    fn type_name() -> String;
    fn type_of(&self) -> String;
}

macro_rules! impl_type_info {
    ($($name:ident$(<$($T:ident),+>)*),*) => {
        $(impl_type_info_single!($name$(<$($T),*>)*);)*
    };
}

macro_rules! mut_if {
    ($name:ident = $value:expr, $($any:expr)+) => (let mut $name = $value;);
    ($name:ident = $value:expr,) => (let $name = $value;);
}

macro_rules! impl_type_info_single {
    ($name:ident$(<$($T:ident),+>)*) => {
        impl$(<$($T: TypeInfo),*>)* TypeInfo for $name$(<$($T),*>)* {
            fn type_name() -> String {
                mut_if!(res = String::from(stringify!($name)), $($($T)*)*);
                $(
                    res.push('<');
                    $(
                        res.push_str(&$T::type_name());
                        res.push(',');
                    )*
                    res.pop();
                    res.push('>');
                )*
                res
            }
            fn type_of(&self) -> String {
                $name$(::<$($T),*>)*::type_name()
            }
        }
    }
}

impl<'a, T: TypeInfo + ?Sized> TypeInfo for &'a T {
    fn type_name() -> String {
        let mut res = String::from("&");
        res.push_str(&T::type_name());
        res
    }
    fn type_of(&self) -> String {
        <&T>::type_name()
    }
}

impl<'a, T: TypeInfo + ?Sized> TypeInfo for &'a mut T {
    fn type_name() -> String {
        let mut res = String::from("&mut ");
        res.push_str(&T::type_name());
        res
    }
    fn type_of(&self) -> String {
        <&mut T>::type_name()
    }
}

macro_rules! type_of {
    ($x:expr) => { (&$x).type_of() };
}

让我们使用它:

impl_type_info!(i32, i64, f32, f64, str, String, Vec<T>, Result<T,S>)

fn main() {
    println!("{}", type_of!(1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&&1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&mut 1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&&mut 1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&mut &1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(1.0));
    println!("{}", type_of!("abc"));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&"abc"));
    println!("{}", type_of!(String::from("abc")));
    println!("{}", type_of!(vec![1,2,3]));

    println!("{}", <Result<String,i64>>::type_name());
    println!("{}", <&i32>::type_name());
    println!("{}", <&str>::type_name());
}

输出:

i32
&i32
&&i32
&mut i32
&&mut i32
&mut &i32
f64
&str
&&str
String
Vec<i32>
Result<String,i64>
&i32
&str

生锈的操场

UPD以下不再工作。检查Shubham的答案以作更正。

检查std::intrinsic::get_tydesc<T>()。它现在处于“实验”状态，但如果您只是对类型系统进行了修改，那么它是OK的。

请看下面的例子:

fn print_type_of<T>(_: &T) -> () {
    let type_name =
        unsafe {
            (*std::intrinsics::get_tydesc::<T>()).name
        };
    println!("{}", type_name);
}

fn main() -> () {
    let mut my_number = 32.90;
    print_type_of(&my_number);       // prints "f64"
    print_type_of(&(vec!(1, 2, 4))); // prints "collections::vec::Vec<int>"
}

这是在内部用来实现著名的{:?}格式化程序。