让我们把你的优秀和最喜欢的扩展方法列一个列表。
要求是必须发布完整的代码，以及如何使用它的示例和解释。
基于对这个主题的高度兴趣，我在Codeplex上建立了一个名为extensionoverflow的开源项目。
请将您的回答标记为接受，以便将代码放入Codeplex项目。
请张贴完整的源代码，而不是一个链接。
Codeplex上新闻:
24.08.2010 Codeplex页面现在在这里:http://extensionoverflow.codeplex.com/
11.11.2008 XmlSerialize / XmlDeserialize现在是实现和单元测试。
11.11.2008仍有发展空间。;-)现在就加入!
11.11.2008第三位贡献者加入了ExtensionOverflow，欢迎加入BKristensen
11.11.2008 FormatWith现在是实现和单元测试。
09.11.2008第二个贡献者加入ExtensionOverflow。欢迎来到chakrit。
我们需要更多的开发人员。: -)
09.11.2008 ThrowIfArgumentIsNull现已在Codeplex上实现和单元测试。
我最喜欢的是字符串上的IsLike()扩展。IsLike()匹配VB的Like操作符，当你不想写一个完整的正则表达式来解决你的问题时，它很方便。用法是这样的:
"abc".IsLike("a*"); // true
"Abc".IsLike("[A-Z][a-z][a-z]"); // true
"abc123".IsLike("*###"); // true
"hat".IsLike("?at"); // true
"joe".IsLike("[!aeiou]*"); // true
"joe".IsLike("?at"); // false
"joe".IsLike("[A-Z][a-z][a-z]"); // false
下面是代码
public static class StringEntentions {
/// <summary>
/// Indicates whether the current string matches the supplied wildcard pattern. Behaves the same
/// as VB's "Like" Operator.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="s">The string instance where the extension method is called</param>
/// <param name="wildcardPattern">The wildcard pattern to match. Syntax matches VB's Like operator.</param>
/// <returns>true if the string matches the supplied pattern, false otherwise.</returns>
/// <remarks>See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/swf8kaxw(v=VS.100).aspx</remarks>
public static bool IsLike(this string s, string wildcardPattern) {
if (s == null || String.IsNullOrEmpty(wildcardPattern)) return false;
// turn into regex pattern, and match the whole string with ^$
var regexPattern = "^" + Regex.Escape(wildcardPattern) + "$";
// add support for ?, #, *, [], and [!]
regexPattern = regexPattern.Replace(@"\[!", "[^")
.Replace(@"\[", "[")
.Replace(@"\]", "]")
.Replace(@"\?", ".")
.Replace(@"\*", ".*")
.Replace(@"\#", @"\d");
var result = false;
try {
result = Regex.IsMatch(s, regexPattern);
}
catch (ArgumentException ex) {
throw new ArgumentException(String.Format("Invalid pattern: {0}", wildcardPattern), ex);
}
return result;
}
}
c#中Smalltalk样式的if/else。
您可以自由地在codeplex上使用您使用的任何许可证
using System;
namespace SmalltalkBooleanExtensionMethods
{
public static class BooleanExtension
{
public static T ifTrue<T> (this bool aBoolean, Func<T> method)
{
if (aBoolean)
return (T)method();
else
return default(T);
}
public static void ifTrue (this bool aBoolean, Action method)
{
if (aBoolean)
method();
}
public static T ifFalse<T> (this bool aBoolean, Func<T> method)
{
if (!aBoolean)
return (T)method();
else
return default(T);
}
public static void ifFalse (this bool aBoolean, Action method)
{
if (!aBoolean)
method();
}
public static T ifTrueifFalse<T> (this Boolean aBoolean, Func<T> methodA, Func<T> methodB)
{
if (aBoolean)
return (T)methodA();
else
return (T)methodB();
}
public static void ifTrueifFalse (this Boolean aBoolean, Action methodA, Action methodB)
{
if (aBoolean)
methodA();
else
methodB();
}
}
}
你可能已经有了一个timesRepeat方法。
using System;
namespace SmalltalkBooleanExtensionMethods
{
public static class IntExtension
{
public static int timesRepeat<T>(this int x, Func<T> method)
{
for (int i = x; i > 0; i--)
{
method();
}
return x;
}
public static int timesRepeat(this int x, Action method)
{
for (int i = x; i > 0; i--)
{
method();
}
return x;
}
}
}
Nunit测试
using System;
using SmalltalkBooleanExtensionMethods;
using NUnit.Framework;
namespace SmalltalkBooleanExtensionMethodsTest
{
[TestFixture]
public class SBEMTest
{
int i;
bool itWorks;
[SetUp]
public void Init()
{
i = 0;
itWorks = false;
}
[Test()]
public void TestifTrue()
{
itWorks = (true.ifTrue(() => true));
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
[Test()]
public void TestifFalse()
{
itWorks = (false.ifFalse(() => true));
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
[Test()]
public void TestifTrueifFalse()
{
itWorks = false.ifTrueifFalse(() => false, () => true);
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
itWorks = false;
itWorks = true.ifTrueifFalse(() => true, () => false);
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
[Test()]
public void TestTimesRepeat()
{
(5).timesRepeat(() => i = i + 1);
Assert.AreEqual(i, 5);
}
[Test()]
public void TestVoidMethodIfTrue()
{
true.ifTrue(() => SetItWorksBooleanToTrue());
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
[Test()]
public void TestVoidMethodIfFalse()
{
false.ifFalse(() => SetItWorksBooleanToTrue());
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
public void TestVoidMethodIfTrueIfFalse()
{
true.ifTrueifFalse(() => SetItWorksBooleanToTrue(), () => SetItWorksBooleanToFalse());
false.ifTrueifFalse(() => SetItWorksBooleanToFalse(), () => SetItWorksBooleanToTrue());
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
public void TestVoidMethodTimesRepeat()
{
(5).timesRepeat(() => AddOneToi());
Assert.AreEqual(i, 5);
}
public void SetItWorksBooleanToTrue()
{
itWorks = true;
}
public void SetItWorksBooleanToFalse()
{
itWorks = false;
}
public void AddOneToi()
{
i = i + 1;
}
}
}
下面是我们工作代码库中的一个有趣的例子。在作业线程上遍历一个昂贵的lazy-eval枚举对象，并通过一个可观察对象推回结果。
public static IObservable<T> ToAsyncObservable<T>(this IEnumerable<T> @this)
{
return Observable.Create<T>(observer =>
{
var task = new Task(() =>
{
try
{
@this.Run(observer.OnNext);
observer.OnCompleted();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
observer.OnError(e);
}
});
task.Start();
return () => { };
});
}
愚蠢的示例:
new DirectoryInfo(@"c:\program files")
.EnumerateFiles("*", SearchOption.AllDirectories)
.ToAsyncObservable()
.BufferWithTime(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(0.5))
.ObserveOnDispatcher()
.Subscribe(
l => Console.WriteLine("{0} received", l.Count),
() => Console.WriteLine("Done!"));
for (;;)
{
Thread.Sleep(10);
Dispatcher.PushFrame(new DispatcherFrame());
}
显然，这个扩展将是无用的，如果你不使用辉煌的响应式扩展!
感谢评论中的Richard，这个扩展方法是不必要的。RX已经有一个扩展方法“tooobservable”，它接受IScheduler。那就用这个吧!
我创建了一个漂亮的Each扩展，具有与jQuery的Each函数相同的行为。
它允许如下所示，你可以获得当前值的索引，并通过返回false跳出循环:
new[] { "first", "second", "third" }.Each((value, index) =>
{
if (value.Contains("d"))
return false;
Console.Write(value);
return true;
});
下面是代码
/// <summary>
/// Generic iterator function that is useful to replace a foreach loop with at your discretion. A provided action is performed on each element.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="source"></param>
/// <param name="action">Function that takes in the current value in the sequence.
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> Each<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Action<T> action)
{
return source.Each((value, index) =>
{
action(value);
return true;
});
}
/// <summary>
/// Generic iterator function that is useful to replace a foreach loop with at your discretion. A provided action is performed on each element.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="source"></param>
/// <param name="action">Function that takes in the current value and its index in the sequence.
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> Each<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Action<T, int> action)
{
return source.Each((value, index) =>
{
action(value, index);
return true;
});
}
/// <summary>
/// Generic iterator function that is useful to replace a foreach loop with at your discretion. A provided action is performed on each element.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="source"></param>
/// <param name="action">Function that takes in the current value in the sequence. Returns a value indicating whether the iteration should continue. So return false if you don't want to iterate anymore.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> Each<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Func<T, bool> action)
{
return source.Each((value, index) =>
{
return action(value);
});
}
/// <summary>
/// Generic iterator function that is useful to replace a foreach loop with at your discretion. A provided action is performed on each element.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="source"></param>
/// <param name="action">Function that takes in the current value and its index in the sequence. Returns a value indicating whether the iteration should continue. So return false if you don't want to iterate anymore.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> Each<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Func<T, int, bool> action)
{
if (source == null)
return source;
int index = 0;
foreach (var sourceItem in source)
{
if (!action(sourceItem, index))
break;
index++;
}
return source;
}
Sql server有~2000个参数的限制，如果你有10k个id并想要与它们连接的记录，这是一个痛苦。我写了这些方法，接受批量id列表，并像这样调用:
List<Order> orders = dataContext.Orders.FetchByIds(
orderIdChunks,
list => row => list.Contains(row.OrderId)
);
List<Customer> customers = dataContext.Orders.FetchByIds(
orderIdChunks,
list => row => list.Contains(row.OrderId),
row => row.Customer
);
public static List<ResultType> FetchByIds<RecordType, ResultType>(
this IQueryable<RecordType> querySource,
List<List<int>> IdChunks,
Func<List<int>, Expression<Func<RecordType, bool>>> filterExpressionGenerator,
Expression<Func<RecordType, ResultType>> projectionExpression
) where RecordType : class
{
List<ResultType> result = new List<ResultType>();
foreach (List<int> chunk in IdChunks)
{
Expression<Func<RecordType, bool>> filterExpression =
filterExpressionGenerator(chunk);
IQueryable<ResultType> query = querySource
.Where(filterExpression)
.Select(projectionExpression);
List<ResultType> rows = query.ToList();
result.AddRange(rows);
}
return result;
}
public static List<RecordType> FetchByIds<RecordType>(
this IQueryable<RecordType> querySource,
List<List<int>> IdChunks,
Func<List<int>, Expression<Func<RecordType, bool>>> filterExpressionGenerator
) where RecordType : class
{
Expression<Func<RecordType, RecordType>> identity = r => r;
return FetchByIds(
querySource,
IdChunks,
filterExpressionGenerator,
identity
);
}
