enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如，我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
这个问题现在简单多了。以下是我的Swift 4.2解决方案:
enum Suit: Int, CaseIterable {
case None
case Spade, Heart, Diamond, Club
static let allNonNullCases = Suit.allCases[Spade.rawValue...]
}
enum Rank: Int, CaseIterable {
case Joker
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight
case Nine, Ten, Jack, Queen, King, Ace
static let allNonNullCases = Rank.allCases[Two.rawValue...]
}
func makeDeck(withJoker: Bool = false) -> [Card] {
var deck = [Card]()
for suit in Suit.allNonNullCases {
for rank in Rank.allNonNullCases {
deck.append(Card(suit: suit, rank: rank))
}
}
if withJoker {
deck.append(Card(suit: .None, rank: .Joker))
}
return deck
}
4。2:
我喜欢这个解决方案，我把找到“列表理解在Swift”。
它使用Int rawws而不是string，但它避免了键入两次，它允许自定义范围，并且不硬编码原始值。
这是我最初解决方案的Swift 4版本，但请参阅上面的4.2改进:
enum Suit: Int {
case None
case Spade, Heart, Diamond, Club
static let allRawValues = Suit.Spade.rawValue...Suit.Club.rawValue
static let allCases = Array(allRawValues.map{ Suit(rawValue: $0)! })
}
enum Rank: Int {
case Joker
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six
case Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King, Ace
static let allRawValues = Rank.Two.rawValue...Rank.Ace.rawValue
static let allCases = Array(allRawValues.map{ Rank(rawValue: $0)! })
}
func makeDeck(withJoker: Bool = false) -> [Card] {
var deck = [Card]()
for suit in Suit.allCases {
for rank in Rank.allCases {
deck.append(Card(suit: suit, rank: rank))
}
}
if withJoker {
deck.append(Card(suit: .None, rank: .Joker))
}
return deck
}
其他回答
enum Rank: Int
{
case Ace = 0
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seve, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
case Count
}
enum Suit : Int
{
case Spades = 0
case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
case Count
}
struct Card
{
var rank:Rank
var suit:Suit
}
class Test
{
func makeDeck() -> Card[]
{
let suitsCount:Int = Suit.Count.toRaw()
let rankCount:Int = Rank.Count.toRaw()
let repeatedCard:Card = Card(rank:Rank.Ace, suit:Suit.Spades)
let deck:Card[] = Card[](count:suitsCount*rankCount, repeatedValue:repeatedCard)
for i:Int in 0..rankCount
{
for j:Int in 0..suitsCount
{
deck[i*suitsCount+j] = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(i)!, suit: Suit.fromRaw(j)!)
}
}
return deck
}
}
根据Rick的回答:这要快5倍
与@Kametrixom的答案在这里，我相信返回一个数组将比返回AnySequence更好，因为你可以访问所有数组的好东西，如计数等。
以下是改写后的内容:
public protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
typealias S = Self
let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyGenerator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
return [S](retVal)
}
}
如果你给枚举一个原始的Int值，它将使循环更容易。
例如，你可以使用anyGenerator来获得一个可以枚举你的值的生成器:
enum Suit: Int, CustomStringConvertible {
case Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
var description: String {
switch self {
case .Spades: return "Spades"
case .Hearts: return "Hearts"
case .Diamonds: return "Diamonds"
case .Clubs: return "Clubs"
}
}
static func enumerate() -> AnyGenerator<Suit> {
var nextIndex = Spades.rawValue
return anyGenerator { Suit(rawValue: nextIndex++) }
}
}
// You can now use it like this:
for suit in Suit.enumerate() {
suit.description
}
// or like this:
let allSuits: [Suit] = Array(Suit.enumerate())
然而，这看起来像一个相当常见的模式，如果我们可以通过简单地遵循协议使任何枚举类型可枚举，这不是很好吗?有了Swift 2.0和协议扩展，现在我们可以了!
简单地添加到你的项目:
protocol EnumerableEnum {
init?(rawValue: Int)
static func firstValue() -> Int
}
extension EnumerableEnum {
static func enumerate() -> AnyGenerator<Self> {
var nextIndex = firstRawValue()
return anyGenerator { Self(rawValue: nextIndex++) }
}
static func firstRawValue() -> Int { return 0 }
}
现在，任何时候你创建一个枚举(只要它有一个Int原始值)，你可以通过遵循协议使它可枚举:
enum Rank: Int, EnumerableEnum {
case Ace, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Jack, Queen, King
}
// ...
for rank in Rank.enumerate() { ... }
如果你的枚举值不以0开头(默认值)，重写firstRawValue方法:
enum DeckColor: Int, EnumerableEnum {
case Red = 10, Blue, Black
static func firstRawValue() -> Int { return Red.rawValue }
}
// ...
let colors = Array(DeckColor.enumerate())
最后一个Suit类，包括用更标准的CustomStringConvertible协议替换simpleDescription，看起来像这样:
enum Suit: Int, CustomStringConvertible, EnumerableEnum {
case Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
var description: String {
switch self {
case .Spades: return "Spades"
case .Hearts: return "Hearts"
case .Diamonds: return "Diamonds"
case .Clubs: return "Clubs"
}
}
}
// ...
for suit in Suit.enumerate() {
print(suit.description)
}
Swift 3语法:
protocol EnumerableEnum {
init?(rawValue: Int)
static func firstRawValue() -> Int
}
extension EnumerableEnum {
static func enumerate() -> AnyIterator<Self> {
var nextIndex = firstRawValue()
let iterator: AnyIterator<Self> = AnyIterator {
defer { nextIndex = nextIndex + 1 }
return Self(rawValue: nextIndex)
}
return iterator
}
static func firstRawValue() -> Int {
return 0
}
}
以下是我的建议。这不是完全令人满意的(我对Swift和OOP很陌生!)，但也许有人可以改进它。这个想法是让每个枚举提供自己的范围信息作为.first和.last属性。它只向每个枚举添加了两行代码:仍然有点硬编码，但至少它没有复制整个集合。它确实需要将Suit enum修改为Int类型，就像Rank enum一样，而不是无类型的。
而不是重复整个解决方案，下面是我添加到。在case语句之后的某个地方(Suit enum类似):
var first: Int { return Ace.toRaw() }
var last: Int { return King.toRaw() }
以及我用来将deck构建为String数组的循环。(问题定义没有说明牌组是如何构造的。)
func createDeck() -> [String] {
var deck: [String] = []
var card: String
for r in Rank.Ace.first...Rank.Ace.last {
for s in Suit.Hearts.first...Suit.Hearts.last {
card = Rank.simpleDescription( Rank.fromRaw(r)!)() + " of " + Suit.simpleDescription( Suit.fromRaw(s)!)()
deck.append( card)
}
}
return deck
}
这并不令人满意，因为属性与元素而不是enum相关联。但它确实为“for”循环增加了清晰度。我希望它是Rank。而不是Rank.Ace.first。它适用于任何元素，但很难看。有人能演示一下如何将其提升到enum级别吗?
为了使它工作，我从Card结构中提取了createDeck方法。我不知道如何从该结构返回一个[String]数组，这似乎是一个糟糕的地方，把这样的方法无论如何。
这看起来像一个黑客，但如果你使用原始值，你可以这样做
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 0, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
...
}
var suitIndex = 0
while var suit = Suit.fromRaw(suitIndex++) {
...
}
