与@Kametrixom的答案在这里，我相信返回一个数组将比返回AnySequence更好，因为你可以访问所有数组的好东西，如计数等。

以下是改写后的内容:

public protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
    public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
        typealias S = Self
        let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
            var raw = 0
            return AnyGenerator {
                let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
                guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
                raw += 1
                return current
            }
        }

        return [S](retVal)
    }
}

在Swift中，枚举类型可以像EnumType一样访问。案例:

let tableView = UITableView(frame: self.view. view)UITableViewStyle.Plain)

大多数情况下，只有当您有几个选项可以使用，并且确切地知道在每个选项上要做什么时，才会使用枚举类型。

在处理枚举类型时，使用for-in结构没有太大意义。

你可以这样做，例如:

func sumNumbers(numbers : Int...) -> Int {
    var sum = 0

    for number in numbers{
        sum += number
    }

    return sum
}

以下是我的建议。这不是完全令人满意的(我对Swift和OOP很陌生!)，但也许有人可以改进它。这个想法是让每个枚举提供自己的范围信息作为.first和.last属性。它只向每个枚举添加了两行代码:仍然有点硬编码，但至少它没有复制整个集合。它确实需要将Suit enum修改为Int类型，就像Rank enum一样，而不是无类型的。

而不是重复整个解决方案，下面是我添加到。在case语句之后的某个地方(Suit enum类似):

var first: Int { return Ace.toRaw() }
var last: Int { return King.toRaw() }

以及我用来将deck构建为String数组的循环。(问题定义没有说明牌组是如何构造的。)

func createDeck() -> [String] {
    var deck: [String] = []
    var card: String
    for r in Rank.Ace.first...Rank.Ace.last {
        for s in Suit.Hearts.first...Suit.Hearts.last {
            card = Rank.simpleDescription( Rank.fromRaw(r)!)() + " of " + Suit.simpleDescription( Suit.fromRaw(s)!)()
           deck.append( card)
       }
    }
    return deck
}

这并不令人满意，因为属性与元素而不是enum相关联。但它确实为“for”循环增加了清晰度。我希望它是Rank。而不是Rank.Ace.first。它适用于任何元素，但很难看。有人能演示一下如何将其提升到enum级别吗?

为了使它工作，我从Card结构中提取了createDeck方法。我不知道如何从该结构返回一个[String]数组，这似乎是一个糟糕的地方，把这样的方法无论如何。

enum Rank: Int {
    case Ace = 1
    case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
    case Jack, Queen, King

    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        switch self {
        case .Ace: return "ace"
        case .Jack: return "jack"
        case .Queen: return "queen"
        case .King: return "king"
        default: return String(self.toRaw())
        }
    }
}

enum Suit: Int {
    case Spades = 1
    case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs

    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        switch self {
        case .Spades: return "spades"
        case .Hearts: return "hearts"
        case .Diamonds: return "diamonds"
        case .Clubs: return "clubs"
        }
    }

    func color() -> String {
        switch self {
        case .Spades, .Clubs: return "black"
        case .Hearts, .Diamonds: return "red"
        }
    }
}

struct Card {
    var rank: Rank
    var suit: Suit
    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
    }

    static func createPokers() -> Card[] {
        let ranks = Array(Rank.Ace.toRaw()...Rank.King.toRaw())
        let suits = Array(Suit.Spades.toRaw()...Suit.Clubs.toRaw())
        let cards = suits.reduce(Card[]()) { (tempCards, suit) in
            tempCards + ranks.map { rank in
                Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(rank)!, suit: Suit.fromRaw(suit)!)
            }
        }
        return cards
    }
}

我的解决方案是声明一个包含所有枚举可能性的数组。所以for循环可以遍历所有这些。

//Function inside struct Card
static func generateFullDeck() -> [Card] {
    let allRanks = [Rank.Ace, Rank.Two, Rank.Three, Rank.Four, Rank.Five, Rank.Six, Rank.Seven, Rank.Eight, Rank.Nine, Rank.Ten, Rank.Jack, Rank.Queen, Rank.King]
    let allSuits = [Suit.Hearts, Suit.Diamonds, Suit.Clubs, Suit.Spades]
    var myFullDeck: [Card] = []

    for myRank in allRanks {
        for mySuit in allSuits {
            myFullDeck.append(Card(rank: myRank, suit: mySuit))
        }
    }
    return myFullDeck
}

//actual use:
let aFullDeck = Card.generateFullDeck()    //Generate the desired full deck

var allDesc: [String] = []
for aCard in aFullDeck {
    println(aCard.simpleDescription())    //You'll see all the results in playground
}

我发现了一种有点俗气但更安全的方法，它不需要键入两次值或引用枚举值的内存，因此不太可能损坏。

基本上，与其使用枚举，不如创建一个具有单个实例的结构体，并将所有enum-values设置为常量。然后可以使用Mirror查询变量

public struct Suit{

    // the values
    let spades = "♠"
    let hearts = "♥"
    let diamonds = "♦"
    let clubs = "♣"

    // make a single instance of the Suit struct, Suit.instance
    struct SStruct{static var instance: Suit = Suit()}
    static var instance : Suit{
        get{return SStruct.instance}
        set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
    }

    // an array with all of the raw values
    static var allValues: [String]{
        var values = [String]()

        let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: Suit.instance)
        for (_, v) in mirror.children{
            guard let suit = v as? String else{continue}
            values.append(suit)
        }

        return values
    }
}

如果使用此方法，则需要使用Suit.instance.clubs或Suit.instance.spades来获取单个值

但所有这些都太无聊了……让我们做一些事情，使它更像一个真正的enum!

public struct SuitType{

    // store multiple things for each suit
    let spades = Suit("♠", order: 4)
    let hearts = Suit("♥", order: 3)
    let diamonds = Suit("♦", order: 2)
    let clubs = Suit("♣", order: 1)

    struct SStruct{static var instance: SuitType = SuitType()}
    static var instance : SuitType{
        get{return SStruct.instance}
        set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
    }

    // a dictionary mapping the raw values to the values
    static var allValuesDictionary: [String : Suit]{
        var values = [String : Suit]()

        let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
        for (_, v) in mirror.children{
            guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
            values[suit.rawValue] = suit
        }

        return values
    }
}

public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
    public var rawValue: String
    public typealias RawValue = String

    public var hashValue: Int{
        // find some integer that can be used to uniquely identify
        // each value. In this case, we could have used the order
        // variable because it is a unique value, yet to make this
        // apply to more cases, the hash table address of rawValue
        // will be returned, which should work in almost all cases
        // 
        // you could also add a hashValue parameter to init() and
        // give each suit a different hash value
        return rawValue.hash
    }

    public var order: Int
    public init(_ value: String, order: Int){
        self.rawValue = value
        self.order = order
    }

    // an array of all of the Suit values
    static var allValues: [Suit]{
        var values = [Suit]()

        let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
        for (_, v) in mirror.children{
            guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
            values.append(suit)
        }

        return values
    }

    // allows for using Suit(rawValue: "♦"), like a normal enum
    public init?(rawValue: String){
        // get the Suit from allValuesDictionary in SuitType, or return nil if that raw value doesn't exist
        guard let suit = SuitType.allValuesDictionary[rawValue] else{return nil}
        // initialize a new Suit with the same properties as that with the same raw value
        self.init(suit.rawValue, order: suit.order)
    }
}

你现在可以做

let allSuits: [Suit] = Suit.allValues

or

for suit in Suit.allValues{
   print("The suit \(suit.rawValue) has the order \(suit.order)")
}

然而，要获得一个单一，你仍然需要使用SuitType.instance.spades或SuitType.instance.hearts。为了更加直观，您可以向Suit添加一些允许您使用Suit.type的代码。*而不是SuitType.instance.*

public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
   // ...your code...

   static var type = SuitType.instance

   // ...more of your code...
}

您现在可以使用Suit.type.diamonds而不是SuitType.instance。diamonds，或者Suit.type.clubs而不是SuitType.instance.clubs