enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
与@Kametrixom的答案在这里,我相信返回一个数组将比返回AnySequence更好,因为你可以访问所有数组的好东西,如计数等。
以下是改写后的内容:
public protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
typealias S = Self
let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyGenerator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
return [S](retVal)
}
}
其他回答
我发现自己在代码中经常使用. allvalues。我终于找到了一种方法来简单地遵循Iteratable协议并拥有一个rawValues()方法。
protocol Iteratable {}
extension RawRepresentable where Self: RawRepresentable {
static func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyIterator<T> {
var i = 0
return AnyIterator {
let next = withUnsafePointer(to: &i) {
$0.withMemoryRebound(to: T.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee }
}
if next.hashValue != i { return nil }
i += 1
return next
}
}
}
extension Iteratable where Self: RawRepresentable, Self: Hashable {
static func hashValues() -> AnyIterator<Self> {
return iterateEnum(self)
}
static func rawValues() -> [Self.RawValue] {
return hashValues().map({$0.rawValue})
}
}
// Example
enum Grocery: String, Iteratable {
case Kroger = "kroger"
case HEB = "h.e.b."
case Randalls = "randalls"
}
let groceryHashes = Grocery.hashValues() // AnyIterator<Grocery>
let groceryRawValues = Grocery.rawValues() // ["kroger", "h.e.b.", "randalls"]
原则上,如果你不为enum的大小写使用原始值赋值,这样做是可能的:
enum RankEnum: Int {
case Ace
case One
case Two
}
class RankEnumGenerator: Generator {
var i = 0
typealias Element = RankEnum
func next() -> Element? {
let r = RankEnum.fromRaw(i)
i += 1
return r
}
}
extension RankEnum {
static func enumerate() -> SequenceOf<RankEnum> {
return SequenceOf<RankEnum>({ RankEnumGenerator() })
}
}
for r in RankEnum.enumerate() {
println("\(r.toRaw())")
}
这篇文章是相关的https://www.swift-studies.com/blog/2014/6/10/enumerating-enums-in-swift
基本上,提议的解决方案是
enum ProductCategory : String {
case Washers = "washers", Dryers = "dryers", Toasters = "toasters"
static let allValues = [Washers, Dryers, Toasters]
}
for category in ProductCategory.allValues{
//Do something
}
以下是我的建议。这不是完全令人满意的(我对Swift和OOP很陌生!),但也许有人可以改进它。这个想法是让每个枚举提供自己的范围信息作为.first和.last属性。它只向每个枚举添加了两行代码:仍然有点硬编码,但至少它没有复制整个集合。它确实需要将Suit enum修改为Int类型,就像Rank enum一样,而不是无类型的。
而不是重复整个解决方案,下面是我添加到。在case语句之后的某个地方(Suit enum类似):
var first: Int { return Ace.toRaw() }
var last: Int { return King.toRaw() }
以及我用来将deck构建为String数组的循环。(问题定义没有说明牌组是如何构造的。)
func createDeck() -> [String] {
var deck: [String] = []
var card: String
for r in Rank.Ace.first...Rank.Ace.last {
for s in Suit.Hearts.first...Suit.Hearts.last {
card = Rank.simpleDescription( Rank.fromRaw(r)!)() + " of " + Suit.simpleDescription( Suit.fromRaw(s)!)()
deck.append( card)
}
}
return deck
}
这并不令人满意,因为属性与元素而不是enum相关联。但它确实为“for”循环增加了清晰度。我希望它是Rank。而不是Rank.Ace.first。它适用于任何元素,但很难看。有人能演示一下如何将其提升到enum级别吗?
为了使它工作,我从Card结构中提取了createDeck方法。我不知道如何从该结构返回一个[String]数组,这似乎是一个糟糕的地方,把这样的方法无论如何。
我的解决方案是声明一个包含所有枚举可能性的数组。所以for循环可以遍历所有这些。
//Function inside struct Card
static func generateFullDeck() -> [Card] {
let allRanks = [Rank.Ace, Rank.Two, Rank.Three, Rank.Four, Rank.Five, Rank.Six, Rank.Seven, Rank.Eight, Rank.Nine, Rank.Ten, Rank.Jack, Rank.Queen, Rank.King]
let allSuits = [Suit.Hearts, Suit.Diamonds, Suit.Clubs, Suit.Spades]
var myFullDeck: [Card] = []
for myRank in allRanks {
for mySuit in allSuits {
myFullDeck.append(Card(rank: myRank, suit: mySuit))
}
}
return myFullDeck
}
//actual use:
let aFullDeck = Card.generateFullDeck() //Generate the desired full deck
var allDesc: [String] = []
for aCard in aFullDeck {
println(aCard.simpleDescription()) //You'll see all the results in playground
}