enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
与@Kametrixom的答案在这里,我相信返回一个数组将比返回AnySequence更好,因为你可以访问所有数组的好东西,如计数等。
以下是改写后的内容:
public protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
typealias S = Self
let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyGenerator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
return [S](retVal)
}
}
其他回答
有时,您可能会处理具有底层原始整数类型的枚举类型,这种类型在整个软件开发生命周期中都会发生变化。下面是一个很适合这种情况的例子:
public class MyClassThatLoadsTexturesEtc
{
//...
// Colors used for gems and sectors.
public enum Color: Int
{
// Colors arranged in order of the spectrum.
case First = 0
case Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Purple, Pink
// --> Add more colors here, between the first and last markers.
case Last
}
//...
public func preloadGems()
{
// Preload all gems.
for i in (Color.First.toRaw() + 1) ..< (Color.Last.toRaw())
{
let color = Color.fromRaw(i)!
loadColoredTextures(forKey: color)
}
}
//...
}
其他的解决方法都是可行的,但它们都假设了可能的等级和花色的数量,或者第一和最后的等级是什么。的确,在可预见的未来,一副纸牌的布局可能不会有太大变化。然而,一般来说,编写尽可能少假设的代码会更简洁。我的解决方案:
我已经在Suit枚举中添加了一个原始类型,所以我可以使用Suit(rawValue:)来访问Suit案例:
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 1
case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades:
return "spades"
case .Hearts:
return "hearts"
case .Diamonds:
return "diamonds"
case .Clubs:
return "clubs"
}
}
func color() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades:
return "black"
case .Clubs:
return "black"
case .Diamonds:
return "red"
case .Hearts:
return "red"
}
}
}
enum Rank: Int {
case Ace = 1
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Ace:
return "ace"
case .Jack:
return "jack"
case .Queen:
return "queen"
case .King:
return "king"
default:
return String(self.rawValue)
}
}
}
在Card的createDeck()方法实现的下面。init(rawValue:)是一个可失败的初始化式,返回一个可选值。通过在两个while语句中展开并检查它的值,不需要假设Rank或Suit情况的数量:
struct Card {
var rank: Rank
var suit: Suit
func simpleDescription() -> String {
return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
}
func createDeck() -> [Card] {
var n = 1
var deck = [Card]()
while let rank = Rank(rawValue: n) {
var m = 1
while let suit = Suit(rawValue: m) {
deck.append(Card(rank: rank, suit: suit))
m += 1
}
n += 1
}
return deck
}
}
下面是如何调用createDeck方法:
let card = Card(rank: Rank.Ace, suit: Suit.Clubs)
let deck = card.createDeck()
Swift 5解决方案:
enum Suit: String, CaseIterable {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
// access cases like this:
for suitKey in Suit.allCases {
print(suitKey)
}
这看起来像一个黑客,但如果你使用原始值,你可以这样做
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 0, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
...
}
var suitIndex = 0
while var suit = Suit.fromRaw(suitIndex++) {
...
}
原则上,如果你不为enum的大小写使用原始值赋值,这样做是可能的:
enum RankEnum: Int {
case Ace
case One
case Two
}
class RankEnumGenerator: Generator {
var i = 0
typealias Element = RankEnum
func next() -> Element? {
let r = RankEnum.fromRaw(i)
i += 1
return r
}
}
extension RankEnum {
static func enumerate() -> SequenceOf<RankEnum> {
return SequenceOf<RankEnum>({ RankEnumGenerator() })
}
}
for r in RankEnum.enumerate() {
println("\(r.toRaw())")
}