enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
我发现了一种有点俗气但更安全的方法,它不需要键入两次值或引用枚举值的内存,因此不太可能损坏。
基本上,与其使用枚举,不如创建一个具有单个实例的结构体,并将所有enum-values设置为常量。然后可以使用Mirror查询变量
public struct Suit{
// the values
let spades = "♠"
let hearts = "♥"
let diamonds = "♦"
let clubs = "♣"
// make a single instance of the Suit struct, Suit.instance
struct SStruct{static var instance: Suit = Suit()}
static var instance : Suit{
get{return SStruct.instance}
set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
}
// an array with all of the raw values
static var allValues: [String]{
var values = [String]()
let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: Suit.instance)
for (_, v) in mirror.children{
guard let suit = v as? String else{continue}
values.append(suit)
}
return values
}
}
如果使用此方法,则需要使用Suit.instance.clubs或Suit.instance.spades来获取单个值
但所有这些都太无聊了……让我们做一些事情,使它更像一个真正的enum!
public struct SuitType{
// store multiple things for each suit
let spades = Suit("♠", order: 4)
let hearts = Suit("♥", order: 3)
let diamonds = Suit("♦", order: 2)
let clubs = Suit("♣", order: 1)
struct SStruct{static var instance: SuitType = SuitType()}
static var instance : SuitType{
get{return SStruct.instance}
set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
}
// a dictionary mapping the raw values to the values
static var allValuesDictionary: [String : Suit]{
var values = [String : Suit]()
let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
for (_, v) in mirror.children{
guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
values[suit.rawValue] = suit
}
return values
}
}
public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
public var rawValue: String
public typealias RawValue = String
public var hashValue: Int{
// find some integer that can be used to uniquely identify
// each value. In this case, we could have used the order
// variable because it is a unique value, yet to make this
// apply to more cases, the hash table address of rawValue
// will be returned, which should work in almost all cases
//
// you could also add a hashValue parameter to init() and
// give each suit a different hash value
return rawValue.hash
}
public var order: Int
public init(_ value: String, order: Int){
self.rawValue = value
self.order = order
}
// an array of all of the Suit values
static var allValues: [Suit]{
var values = [Suit]()
let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
for (_, v) in mirror.children{
guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
values.append(suit)
}
return values
}
// allows for using Suit(rawValue: "♦"), like a normal enum
public init?(rawValue: String){
// get the Suit from allValuesDictionary in SuitType, or return nil if that raw value doesn't exist
guard let suit = SuitType.allValuesDictionary[rawValue] else{return nil}
// initialize a new Suit with the same properties as that with the same raw value
self.init(suit.rawValue, order: suit.order)
}
}
你现在可以做
let allSuits: [Suit] = Suit.allValues
or
for suit in Suit.allValues{
print("The suit \(suit.rawValue) has the order \(suit.order)")
}
然而,要获得一个单一,你仍然需要使用SuitType.instance.spades或SuitType.instance.hearts。为了更加直观,您可以向Suit添加一些允许您使用Suit.type的代码。*而不是SuitType.instance.*
public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
// ...your code...
static var type = SuitType.instance
// ...more of your code...
}
您现在可以使用Suit.type.diamonds而不是SuitType.instance。diamonds,或者Suit.type.clubs而不是SuitType.instance.clubs
其他回答
enum Rank: Int {
...
static let ranks = (Rank.Ace.rawValue ... Rank.King.rawValue).map{Rank(rawValue: $0)! }
}
enum Suit {
...
static let suits = [Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs]
}
struct Card {
...
static func fullDesk() -> [Card] {
var desk: [Card] = []
for suit in Suit.suits {
for rank in Rank.ranks {
desk.append(Card(rank: rank,suit: suit))
}
}
return desk
}
}
这个怎么样?
有一种聪明的方法,尽管令人沮丧,但它说明了两种不同类型的枚举之间的区别。
试试这个:
func makeDeck() -> Card[] {
var deck: Card[] = []
var suits: Suit[] = [.Hearts, .Diamonds, .Clubs, .Spades]
for i in 1...13 {
for suit in suits {
deck += Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(i)!, suit: suit)
}
}
return deck
}
交易是,一个由数字(原始值)支持的枚举是隐式显式有序的,而一个没有数字支持的枚举是显式隐式无序的。
例如,当我们给枚举值数字时,语言足够狡猾,可以找出数字的顺序。 另一方面,如果我们不给它任何顺序,当我们尝试迭代这些值时,语言就会举起双手说:“是的,但你想先执行哪个??”
其他可以做到这一点(迭代无序枚举)的语言可能是相同的语言,其中所有内容实际上都是一个地图或字典,你可以迭代地图的键,无论是否有任何逻辑顺序。
诀窍是给它提供一些显式排序的东西,在这个例子中,suit的实例在数组中按照我们想要的顺序。一旦你这么说,霉霉就会说“你为什么不一开始就这么说呢?”
另一个简写技巧是在fromRaw函数上使用强制操作符。这说明了关于枚举的另一个“陷阱”,即可能传入的值的范围通常大于枚举的范围。例如,如果我们说Rank.fromRaw(60),就不会返回值,所以我们使用了语言的可选特性,在我们开始使用可选特性的地方,很快就会出现强制。(或者交替if let结构,这对我来说仍然有点奇怪)
枚举有toRaw()和fromRaw()方法。所以如果你的原始值是Int,你可以从第一个枚举迭代到最后一个枚举:
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 1
case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades:
return "spades"
case .Hearts:
return "hearts"
case .Diamonds:
return "diamonds"
case .Clubs:
return "clubs"
}
}
}
for i in Suit.Spades.toRaw()...Suit.Clubs.toRaw() {
if let covertedSuit = Suit.fromRaw(i) {
let description = covertedSuit.simpleDescription()
}
}
一个问题是在运行simpleDescription方法之前需要测试可选值,因此我们首先将convertedSuit设置为我们的值,然后将常量设置为convertedSuit.simpleDescription()
这看起来像一个黑客,但如果你使用原始值,你可以这样做
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 0, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
...
}
var suitIndex = 0
while var suit = Suit.fromRaw(suitIndex++) {
...
}
这篇文章是相关的https://www.swift-studies.com/blog/2014/6/10/enumerating-enums-in-swift
基本上,提议的解决方案是
enum ProductCategory : String {
case Washers = "washers", Dryers = "dryers", Toasters = "toasters"
static let allValues = [Washers, Dryers, Toasters]
}
for category in ProductCategory.allValues{
//Do something
}