从另一个线程更新标签的最简单方法是什么?

我在thread1上运行了一个Form,然后我开始另一个线程(thread2)。当thread2处理一些文件时,我想用thread2工作的当前状态更新表单上的标签。

我怎么能这样做?


当前回答

在我的案例(WPF)中,解决方案简单如下:

private void updateUI()
{
    if (!Dispatcher.CheckAccess())
    {
        Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(updateUI);
        return;
    }

    // Update any number of controls here
}

其他回答

为了在WPF中实现这一点,我采用以下方式。

 new Thread(() => 
 {
     while (...)
     {
         SomeLabel.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke((Action)(() => SomeLabel.Text = ...));
     }
 }).Start();

我刚读了答案,这似乎是一个非常热门的话题。我目前正在使用.NET 3.5 SP1和Windows窗体。

前面的答案中大量描述的使用InvokeRequired属性的著名公式涵盖了大多数情况,但不包括整个池。

如果尚未创建句柄怎么办?

InvokeRequired属性,如这里所述(Control.InvokeRequired属性对MSDN的引用),如果调用是从非GUI线程的线程进行的,则返回true;如果调用是由GUI线程进行的或尚未创建Handle,则返回false。

如果希望由另一个线程显示和更新模态表单,则可能会遇到异常。因为您希望以模态方式显示该表单,所以可以执行以下操作:

private MyForm _gui;

public void StartToDoThings()
{
    _gui = new MyForm();
    Thread thread = new Thread(SomeDelegate);
    thread.Start();
    _gui.ShowDialog();
}

代理可以更新GUI上的标签:

private void SomeDelegate()
{
    // Operations that can take a variable amount of time, even no time
    //... then you update the GUI
    if(_gui.InvokeRequired)
        _gui.Invoke((Action)delegate { _gui.Label1.Text = "Done!"; });
    else
        _gui.Label1.Text = "Done!";
}

如果标签更新之前的操作“花费的时间”(阅读并将其解释为简化)少于GUI线程创建表单句柄所花费的时间,则这可能会导致InvalidOperationException。这发生在ShowDialog()方法中。

您还应检查手柄,如下所示:

private void SomeDelegate()
{
    // Operations that can take a variable amount of time, even no time
    //... then you update the GUI
    if(_gui.IsHandleCreated)  //  <---- ADDED
        if(_gui.InvokeRequired)
            _gui.Invoke((Action)delegate { _gui.Label1.Text = "Done!"; });
        else
            _gui.Label1.Text = "Done!";
}

如果尚未创建handle,您可以处理要执行的操作:您可以忽略GUI更新(如上面的代码所示),也可以等待(风险更大)。这应该能回答这个问题。

可选材料:就我个人而言,我编写了以下代码:

public class ThreadSafeGuiCommand
{
  private const int SLEEPING_STEP = 100;
  private readonly int _totalTimeout;
  private int _timeout;

  public ThreadSafeGuiCommand(int totalTimeout)
  {
    _totalTimeout = totalTimeout;
  }

  public void Execute(Form form, Action guiCommand)
  {
    _timeout = _totalTimeout;
    while (!form.IsHandleCreated)
    {
      if (_timeout <= 0) return;

      Thread.Sleep(SLEEPING_STEP);
      _timeout -= SLEEPING_STEP;
    }

    if (form.InvokeRequired)
      form.Invoke(guiCommand);
    else
      guiCommand();
  }
}

我用这个ThreadSafeGuidCommand的一个实例为另一个线程更新的表单提供数据,并定义如下更新GUI(在我的表单中)的方法:

public void SetLabeTextTo(string value)
{
  _threadSafeGuiCommand.Execute(this, delegate { Label1.Text = value; });
}

通过这种方式,我很确定无论什么线程进行调用,我都会更新GUI,可以选择等待一段明确定义的时间(超时)。

在这个问题上,大多数其他答案对我来说都有点复杂(我是C#新手),所以我写了我的答案:

我有一个WPF应用程序,并定义了如下工作人员:

问题:

BackgroundWorker workerAllocator;
workerAllocator.DoWork += delegate (object sender1, DoWorkEventArgs e1) {
    // This is my DoWork function.
    // It is given as an anonymous function, instead of a separate DoWork function

    // I need to update a message to textbox (txtLog) from this thread function

    // Want to write below line, to update UI
    txt.Text = "my message"

    // But it fails with:
    //  'System.InvalidOperationException':
    //  "The calling thread cannot access this object because a different thread owns it"
}

解决方案:

workerAllocator.DoWork += delegate (object sender1, DoWorkEventArgs e1)
{
    // The below single line works
    txtLog.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke((Action)(() => txtLog.Text = "my message"));
}

我还没有弄清楚上面这句话的意思,但它奏效了。

对于WinForms:

解决方案:

txtLog.Invoke((MethodInvoker)delegate
{
    txtLog.Text = "my message";
});

只使用ui的同步上下文

using System.Threading;

// ...

public partial class MyForm : Form
{
    private readonly SynchronizationContext uiContext;

    public MyForm()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
        uiContext = SynchronizationContext.Current; // get ui thread context
    }

    private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        Thread t = new Thread(() =>
            {// set ui thread context to new thread context                            
             // for operations with ui elements to be performed in proper thread
             SynchronizationContext
                 .SetSynchronizationContext(uiContext);
             label1.Text = "some text";
            });
        t.Start();
    }
}

也许有点过量,但这是我通常解决问题的方式:

由于同步,此处不需要调用。BasicClassThreadExample对我来说只是一种布局,因此请根据您的实际需要进行更改。

这很简单,因为您不需要处理UI线程中的内容!

public partial class Form1 : Form
{
    BasicClassThreadExample _example;

    public Form1()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
        _example = new BasicClassThreadExample();
        _example.MessageReceivedEvent += _example_MessageReceivedEvent;
    }

    void _example_MessageReceivedEvent(string command)
    {
        listBox1.Items.Add(command);
    }

    private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        listBox1.Items.Clear();
        _example.Start();
    }
}

public class BasicClassThreadExample : IDisposable
{
    public delegate void MessageReceivedHandler(string msg);

    public event MessageReceivedHandler MessageReceivedEvent;

    protected virtual void OnMessageReceivedEvent(string msg)
    {
        MessageReceivedHandler handler = MessageReceivedEvent;
        if (handler != null)
        {
            handler(msg);
        }
    }

    private System.Threading.SynchronizationContext _SynchronizationContext;
    private System.Threading.Thread _doWorkThread;
    private bool disposed = false;

    public BasicClassThreadExample()
    {
        _SynchronizationContext = System.ComponentModel.AsyncOperationManager.SynchronizationContext;
    }

    public void Start()
    {
        _doWorkThread = _doWorkThread ?? new System.Threading.Thread(dowork);

        if (!(_doWorkThread.IsAlive))
        {
            _doWorkThread = new System.Threading.Thread(dowork);
            _doWorkThread.IsBackground = true;
            _doWorkThread.Start();
        }
    }

    public void dowork()
    {
        string[] retval = System.IO.Directory.GetFiles(@"C:\Windows\System32", "*.*", System.IO.SearchOption.TopDirectoryOnly);
        foreach (var item in retval)
        {
            System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(25);
            _SynchronizationContext.Post(new System.Threading.SendOrPostCallback(delegate(object obj)
            {
                OnMessageReceivedEvent(item);
            }), null);
        }
    }

    protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if (!disposed)
        {
            if (disposing)
            {
                _doWorkThread.Abort();
            }
            disposed = true;
        }
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        Dispose(true);
        GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
    }

    ~BasicClassThreadExample() { Dispose(false); }

}