更新:
再次感谢你的例子，它们对我很有帮助，我并不是说
夺走他们的一切。
Aren't the currently given examples, as far as I understand them & state-machines, only half of what we usually understand by a state-machine?
In the sense that the examples do change state but that's only represented by changing the value of a variable (and allowing different value- changes in different states), while usually, a state machine should also change its behavior, and behavior not (only) in the sense of allowing different value changes for a variable depending on the state, but in the sense of allowing different methods to be executed for different states.
还是我对状态机及其常用用法有误解?
最初的问题:
我发现了关于c#中的状态机和迭代器块的讨论，以及用于创建状态机和c#的工具，所以我发现了很多抽象的东西，但作为一个新手，所有这些都有点令人困惑。
因此，如果有人能提供一个c#源代码-示例，实现一个简单的状态机，可能只有3,4个状态，那就太好了，只是为了了解它的要点。
其他替代在此回购https://github.com/lingkodsoft/StateBliss
使用流畅的语法，支持触发器。
public class BasicTests
{
[Fact]
public void Tests()
{
// Arrange
StateMachineManager.Register(new [] { typeof(BasicTests).Assembly }); //Register at bootstrap of your application, i.e. Startup
var currentState = AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated;
var nextState = AuthenticationState.Authenticated;
var data = new Dictionary<string, object>();
// Act
var changeInfo = StateMachineManager.Trigger(currentState, nextState, data);
// Assert
Assert.True(changeInfo.StateChangedSucceeded);
Assert.Equal("ChangingHandler1", changeInfo.Data["key1"]);
Assert.Equal("ChangingHandler2", changeInfo.Data["key2"]);
}
//this class gets regitered automatically by calling StateMachineManager.Register
public class AuthenticationStateDefinition : StateDefinition<AuthenticationState>
{
public override void Define(IStateFromBuilder<AuthenticationState> builder)
{
builder.From(AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated).To(AuthenticationState.Authenticated)
.Changing(this, a => a.ChangingHandler1)
.Changed(this, a => a.ChangedHandler1);
builder.OnEntering(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEnteringHandler1);
builder.OnEntered(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEnteredHandler1);
builder.OnExiting(AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated, this, a => a.OnExitingHandler1);
builder.OnExited(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnExitedHandler1);
builder.OnEditing(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEditingHandler1);
builder.OnEdited(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEditedHandler1);
builder.ThrowExceptionWhenDiscontinued = true;
}
private void ChangingHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
var data = changeinfo.DataAs<Dictionary<string, object>>();
data["key1"] = "ChangingHandler1";
}
private void OnEnteringHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
// changeinfo.Continue = false; //this will prevent changing the state
}
private void OnEditedHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnExitedHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnEnteredHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnEditingHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnExitingHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void ChangedHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
}
public class AnotherAuthenticationStateDefinition : StateDefinition<AuthenticationState>
{
public override void Define(IStateFromBuilder<AuthenticationState> builder)
{
builder.From(AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated).To(AuthenticationState.Authenticated)
.Changing(this, a => a.ChangingHandler2);
}
private void ChangingHandler2(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
var data = changeinfo.DataAs<Dictionary<string, object>>();
data["key2"] = "ChangingHandler2";
}
}
}
public enum AuthenticationState
{
Unauthenticated,
Authenticated
}
}
这里有些无耻的自我宣传，但在不久前，我创建了一个名为YieldMachine的库，它允许以非常干净和简单的方式描述一个有限复杂性的状态机。例如，考虑一盏灯:
注意，这个状态机有2个触发器和3个状态。在YieldMachine代码中，我们为所有与状态相关的行为编写了一个方法，在这个方法中，我们对每个状态都使用goto，这是一种可怕的暴行。触发器变成Action类型的属性或字段，用一个称为trigger的属性进行修饰。我在下面注释了第一个状态及其转换的代码;接下来的状态遵循相同的模式。
public class Lamp : StateMachine
{
// Triggers (or events, or actions, whatever) that our
// state machine understands.
[Trigger]
public readonly Action PressSwitch;
[Trigger]
public readonly Action GotError;
// Actual state machine logic
protected override IEnumerable WalkStates()
{
off:
Console.WriteLine("off.");
yield return null;
if (Trigger == PressSwitch) goto on;
InvalidTrigger();
on:
Console.WriteLine("*shiiine!*");
yield return null;
if (Trigger == GotError) goto error;
if (Trigger == PressSwitch) goto off;
InvalidTrigger();
error:
Console.WriteLine("-err-");
yield return null;
if (Trigger == PressSwitch) goto off;
InvalidTrigger();
}
}
又短又好，嗯!
这个状态机通过发送触发器来控制:
var sm = new Lamp();
sm.PressSwitch(); //go on
sm.PressSwitch(); //go off
sm.PressSwitch(); //go on
sm.GotError(); //get error
sm.PressSwitch(); //go off
为了澄清，我在第一个状态中添加了一些注释，以帮助您理解如何使用它。
protected override IEnumerable WalkStates()
{
off: // Each goto label is a state
Console.WriteLine("off."); // State entry actions
yield return null; // This means "Wait until a
// trigger is called"
// Ah, we got triggered!
// perform state exit actions
// (none, in this case)
if (Trigger == PressSwitch) goto on; // Transitions go here:
// depending on the trigger
// that was called, go to
// the right state
InvalidTrigger(); // Throw exception on
// invalid trigger
...
这是因为c#编译器实际上在内部为每个使用yield return的方法创建了一个状态机。这个构造通常用于惰性地创建数据序列，但在这种情况下，我们实际上对返回的序列并不感兴趣(反正都是null)，而是对在底层创建的状态行为感兴趣。
StateMachine基类对构造进行一些反射，将代码分配给每个[Trigger]操作，该操作设置Trigger成员并向前移动状态机。
但是你不需要真正理解它的内部原理就能使用它。
其他替代在此回购https://github.com/lingkodsoft/StateBliss
使用流畅的语法，支持触发器。
public class BasicTests
{
[Fact]
public void Tests()
{
// Arrange
StateMachineManager.Register(new [] { typeof(BasicTests).Assembly }); //Register at bootstrap of your application, i.e. Startup
var currentState = AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated;
var nextState = AuthenticationState.Authenticated;
var data = new Dictionary<string, object>();
// Act
var changeInfo = StateMachineManager.Trigger(currentState, nextState, data);
// Assert
Assert.True(changeInfo.StateChangedSucceeded);
Assert.Equal("ChangingHandler1", changeInfo.Data["key1"]);
Assert.Equal("ChangingHandler2", changeInfo.Data["key2"]);
}
//this class gets regitered automatically by calling StateMachineManager.Register
public class AuthenticationStateDefinition : StateDefinition<AuthenticationState>
{
public override void Define(IStateFromBuilder<AuthenticationState> builder)
{
builder.From(AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated).To(AuthenticationState.Authenticated)
.Changing(this, a => a.ChangingHandler1)
.Changed(this, a => a.ChangedHandler1);
builder.OnEntering(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEnteringHandler1);
builder.OnEntered(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEnteredHandler1);
builder.OnExiting(AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated, this, a => a.OnExitingHandler1);
builder.OnExited(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnExitedHandler1);
builder.OnEditing(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEditingHandler1);
builder.OnEdited(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEditedHandler1);
builder.ThrowExceptionWhenDiscontinued = true;
}
private void ChangingHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
var data = changeinfo.DataAs<Dictionary<string, object>>();
data["key1"] = "ChangingHandler1";
}
private void OnEnteringHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
// changeinfo.Continue = false; //this will prevent changing the state
}
private void OnEditedHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnExitedHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnEnteredHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnEditingHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnExitingHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void ChangedHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
}
public class AnotherAuthenticationStateDefinition : StateDefinition<AuthenticationState>
{
public override void Define(IStateFromBuilder<AuthenticationState> builder)
{
builder.From(AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated).To(AuthenticationState.Authenticated)
.Changing(this, a => a.ChangingHandler2);
}
private void ChangingHandler2(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
var data = changeinfo.DataAs<Dictionary<string, object>>();
data["key2"] = "ChangingHandler2";
}
}
}
public enum AuthenticationState
{
Unauthenticated,
Authenticated
}
}
记住状态机是一种抽象是很有用的，创建状态机不需要特定的工具，但是工具是有用的。
例如，你可以用函数实现一个状态机:
void Hunt(IList<Gull> gulls)
{
if (gulls.Empty())
return;
var target = gulls.First();
TargetAcquired(target, gulls);
}
void TargetAcquired(Gull target, IList<Gull> gulls)
{
var balloon = new WaterBalloon(weightKg: 20);
this.Cannon.Fire(balloon);
if (balloon.Hit)
{
TargetHit(target, gulls);
}
else
TargetMissed(target, gulls);
}
void TargetHit(Gull target, IList<Gull> gulls)
{
Console.WriteLine("Suck on it {0}!", target.Name);
Hunt(gulls);
}
void TargetMissed(Gull target, IList<Gull> gulls)
{
Console.WriteLine("I'll get ya!");
TargetAcquired(target, gulls);
}
这台机器会捕捉海鸥，并试图用水球击中它们。如果它没有命中，它将尝试发射一个直到命中为止(可以有一些现实的期望;))，否则它将在控制台幸灾乐祸。它继续捕猎，直到没有海鸥可以骚扰为止。
每个函数对应于每个状态;没有显示开始和结束(或接受)状态。其中的状态可能比函数所模拟的要多。例如，在发射气球后，机器实际上处于与之前不同的状态，但我认为这种区分是不切实际的。
常用的方法是使用类来表示状态，然后以不同的方式将它们连接起来。
我在这里发布了另一个答案，因为这是从不同的角度来看状态机;非常视觉。
我最初的答案是经典的命令式代码。我认为它在代码运行时非常直观，因为数组使得状态机的可视化变得简单。缺点是你必须把这些都写下来。Remos的回答减轻了编写样板代码的工作量，但远没有那么直观。还有第三种选择;画状态机。
如果您正在使用。net，并且可以将运行时版本4作为目标，那么您可以选择使用工作流的状态机活动。从本质上讲，它们允许您绘制状态机(就像Juliet的图一样)，并让WF运行时为您执行它。
有关更多细节，请参阅MSDN文章使用Windows Workflow Foundation构建状态机，以及最新版本的CodePlex站点。
这是我在瞄准。net时更喜欢的选项，因为它很容易看到、更改和向非程序员解释;俗话说，图片胜过千言万语!
