更新:
再次感谢你的例子，它们对我很有帮助，我并不是说
夺走他们的一切。
Aren't the currently given examples, as far as I understand them & state-machines, only half of what we usually understand by a state-machine?
In the sense that the examples do change state but that's only represented by changing the value of a variable (and allowing different value- changes in different states), while usually, a state machine should also change its behavior, and behavior not (only) in the sense of allowing different value changes for a variable depending on the state, but in the sense of allowing different methods to be executed for different states.
还是我对状态机及其常用用法有误解?
最初的问题:
我发现了关于c#中的状态机和迭代器块的讨论，以及用于创建状态机和c#的工具，所以我发现了很多抽象的东西，但作为一个新手，所有这些都有点令人困惑。
因此，如果有人能提供一个c#源代码-示例，实现一个简单的状态机，可能只有3,4个状态，那就太好了，只是为了了解它的要点。
下面是一个非常经典的有限状态机的例子，它模拟了一个非常简化的电子设备(比如电视)
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
namespace fsm
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var fsm = new FiniteStateMachine();
Console.WriteLine(fsm.State);
fsm.ProcessEvent(FiniteStateMachine.Events.PlugIn);
Console.WriteLine(fsm.State);
fsm.ProcessEvent(FiniteStateMachine.Events.TurnOn);
Console.WriteLine(fsm.State);
fsm.ProcessEvent(FiniteStateMachine.Events.TurnOff);
Console.WriteLine(fsm.State);
fsm.ProcessEvent(FiniteStateMachine.Events.TurnOn);
Console.WriteLine(fsm.State);
fsm.ProcessEvent(FiniteStateMachine.Events.RemovePower);
Console.WriteLine(fsm.State);
Console.ReadKey();
}
class FiniteStateMachine
{
public enum States { Start, Standby, On };
public States State { get; set; }
public enum Events { PlugIn, TurnOn, TurnOff, RemovePower };
private Action[,] fsm;
public FiniteStateMachine()
{
this.fsm = new Action[3, 4] {
//PlugIn, TurnOn, TurnOff, RemovePower
{this.PowerOn, null, null, null}, //start
{null, this.StandbyWhenOff, null, this.PowerOff}, //standby
{null, null, this.StandbyWhenOn, this.PowerOff} }; //on
}
public void ProcessEvent(Events theEvent)
{
this.fsm[(int)this.State, (int)theEvent].Invoke();
}
private void PowerOn() { this.State = States.Standby; }
private void PowerOff() { this.State = States.Start; }
private void StandbyWhenOn() { this.State = States.Standby; }
private void StandbyWhenOff() { this.State = States.On; }
}
}
}
您可以编写一个迭代器块，使您能够以编排的方式执行代码块。代码块是如何分解的并不一定要对应于任何东西，这只是你想要如何编码它。例如:
IEnumerable<int> CountToTen()
{
System.Console.WriteLine("1");
yield return 0;
System.Console.WriteLine("2");
System.Console.WriteLine("3");
System.Console.WriteLine("4");
yield return 0;
System.Console.WriteLine("5");
System.Console.WriteLine("6");
System.Console.WriteLine("7");
yield return 0;
System.Console.WriteLine("8");
yield return 0;
System.Console.WriteLine("9");
System.Console.WriteLine("10");
}
在本例中，当调用CountToTen时，还没有实际执行任何东西。您得到的实际上是一个状态机生成器，您可以为它创建一个状态机的新实例。可以通过调用GetEnumerator()来实现。生成的IEnumerator实际上是一个状态机，您可以通过调用MoveNext(…)来驱动它。
因此，在本例中，第一次调用MoveNext(…)时，您将看到“1”写入控制台，下一次调用MoveNext(…)时，您将看到2、3、4，然后是5、6、7、8，然后是9、10。正如您所看到的，这是一种编排事情应该如何发生的有用机制。
让我们从这个简单的状态图开始:
我们有:
4种状态(非活动、活动、暂停和退出)
5种状态转换(开始命令，结束命令，暂停命令，恢复命令，退出命令)。
您可以通过几种方式将其转换为c#，例如在当前状态和命令上执行switch语句，或者在转换表中查找转换。对于这个简单的状态机，我更喜欢一个转换表，它很容易使用Dictionary表示:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace Juliet
{
public enum ProcessState
{
Inactive,
Active,
Paused,
Terminated
}
public enum Command
{
Begin,
End,
Pause,
Resume,
Exit
}
public class Process
{
class StateTransition
{
readonly ProcessState CurrentState;
readonly Command Command;
public StateTransition(ProcessState currentState, Command command)
{
CurrentState = currentState;
Command = command;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return 17 + 31 * CurrentState.GetHashCode() + 31 * Command.GetHashCode();
}
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
StateTransition other = obj as StateTransition;
return other != null && this.CurrentState == other.CurrentState && this.Command == other.Command;
}
}
Dictionary<StateTransition, ProcessState> transitions;
public ProcessState CurrentState { get; private set; }
public Process()
{
CurrentState = ProcessState.Inactive;
transitions = new Dictionary<StateTransition, ProcessState>
{
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Inactive, Command.Exit), ProcessState.Terminated },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Inactive, Command.Begin), ProcessState.Active },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Active, Command.End), ProcessState.Inactive },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Active, Command.Pause), ProcessState.Paused },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Paused, Command.End), ProcessState.Inactive },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Paused, Command.Resume), ProcessState.Active }
};
}
public ProcessState GetNext(Command command)
{
StateTransition transition = new StateTransition(CurrentState, command);
ProcessState nextState;
if (!transitions.TryGetValue(transition, out nextState))
throw new Exception("Invalid transition: " + CurrentState + " -> " + command);
return nextState;
}
public ProcessState MoveNext(Command command)
{
CurrentState = GetNext(command);
return CurrentState;
}
}
public class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Process p = new Process();
Console.WriteLine("Current State = " + p.CurrentState);
Console.WriteLine("Command.Begin: Current State = " + p.MoveNext(Command.Begin));
Console.WriteLine("Command.Pause: Current State = " + p.MoveNext(Command.Pause));
Console.WriteLine("Command.End: Current State = " + p.MoveNext(Command.End));
Console.WriteLine("Command.Exit: Current State = " + p.MoveNext(Command.Exit));
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
根据个人喜好，我喜欢用GetNext函数来确定地返回下一个状态，用MoveNext函数来改变状态机。
其他替代在此回购https://github.com/lingkodsoft/StateBliss
使用流畅的语法，支持触发器。
public class BasicTests
{
[Fact]
public void Tests()
{
// Arrange
StateMachineManager.Register(new [] { typeof(BasicTests).Assembly }); //Register at bootstrap of your application, i.e. Startup
var currentState = AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated;
var nextState = AuthenticationState.Authenticated;
var data = new Dictionary<string, object>();
// Act
var changeInfo = StateMachineManager.Trigger(currentState, nextState, data);
// Assert
Assert.True(changeInfo.StateChangedSucceeded);
Assert.Equal("ChangingHandler1", changeInfo.Data["key1"]);
Assert.Equal("ChangingHandler2", changeInfo.Data["key2"]);
}
//this class gets regitered automatically by calling StateMachineManager.Register
public class AuthenticationStateDefinition : StateDefinition<AuthenticationState>
{
public override void Define(IStateFromBuilder<AuthenticationState> builder)
{
builder.From(AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated).To(AuthenticationState.Authenticated)
.Changing(this, a => a.ChangingHandler1)
.Changed(this, a => a.ChangedHandler1);
builder.OnEntering(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEnteringHandler1);
builder.OnEntered(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEnteredHandler1);
builder.OnExiting(AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated, this, a => a.OnExitingHandler1);
builder.OnExited(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnExitedHandler1);
builder.OnEditing(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEditingHandler1);
builder.OnEdited(AuthenticationState.Authenticated, this, a => a.OnEditedHandler1);
builder.ThrowExceptionWhenDiscontinued = true;
}
private void ChangingHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
var data = changeinfo.DataAs<Dictionary<string, object>>();
data["key1"] = "ChangingHandler1";
}
private void OnEnteringHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
// changeinfo.Continue = false; //this will prevent changing the state
}
private void OnEditedHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnExitedHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnEnteredHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnEditingHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void OnExitingHandler1(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
private void ChangedHandler1(StateChangeInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
}
}
public class AnotherAuthenticationStateDefinition : StateDefinition<AuthenticationState>
{
public override void Define(IStateFromBuilder<AuthenticationState> builder)
{
builder.From(AuthenticationState.Unauthenticated).To(AuthenticationState.Authenticated)
.Changing(this, a => a.ChangingHandler2);
}
private void ChangingHandler2(StateChangeGuardInfo<AuthenticationState> changeinfo)
{
var data = changeinfo.DataAs<Dictionary<string, object>>();
data["key2"] = "ChangingHandler2";
}
}
}
public enum AuthenticationState
{
Unauthenticated,
Authenticated
}
}
我还没有尝试过在c#中实现FSM，但这些听起来(或看起来)与我过去在C或ASM等低级语言中处理FSM的方式非常复杂。
我相信我所知道的方法被称为“迭代循环”。在其中，你实际上有一个“while”循环，它周期性地根据事件(中断)退出，然后再次返回到主循环。
在中断处理程序中，您将传递一个CurrentState并返回一个NextState，然后在主循环中覆盖CurrentState变量。你可以无限地这样做，直到程序关闭(或微控制器复位)。
在我看来，与FSM的实现方式相比，我看到的其他答案都显得非常复杂;它的美丽在于它的简单性，FSM可以非常复杂，有很多很多的状态和过渡，但它们允许复杂的过程很容易被分解和消化。
我知道我的回答不应该包含另一个问题，但我不得不问:为什么这些其他提出的解决方案看起来如此复杂?
它们似乎类似于用一个巨大的大锤敲一个小钉子。
