更新:
再次感谢你的例子,它们对我很有帮助,我并不是说
夺走他们的一切。
Aren't the currently given examples, as far as I understand them & state-machines, only half of what we usually understand by a state-machine?
In the sense that the examples do change state but that's only represented by changing the value of a variable (and allowing different value- changes in different states), while usually, a state machine should also change its behavior, and behavior not (only) in the sense of allowing different value changes for a variable depending on the state, but in the sense of allowing different methods to be executed for different states.
还是我对状态机及其常用用法有误解?
最初的问题:
我发现了关于c#中的状态机和迭代器块的讨论,以及用于创建状态机和c#的工具,所以我发现了很多抽象的东西,但作为一个新手,所有这些都有点令人困惑。
因此,如果有人能提供一个c#源代码-示例,实现一个简单的状态机,可能只有3,4个状态,那就太好了,只是为了了解它的要点。
我还没有尝试过在c#中实现FSM,但这些听起来(或看起来)与我过去在C或ASM等低级语言中处理FSM的方式非常复杂。
我相信我所知道的方法被称为“迭代循环”。在其中,你实际上有一个“while”循环,它周期性地根据事件(中断)退出,然后再次返回到主循环。
在中断处理程序中,您将传递一个CurrentState并返回一个NextState,然后在主循环中覆盖CurrentState变量。你可以无限地这样做,直到程序关闭(或微控制器复位)。
在我看来,与FSM的实现方式相比,我看到的其他答案都显得非常复杂;它的美丽在于它的简单性,FSM可以非常复杂,有很多很多的状态和过渡,但它们允许复杂的过程很容易被分解和消化。
我知道我的回答不应该包含另一个问题,但我不得不问:为什么这些其他提出的解决方案看起来如此复杂?
它们似乎类似于用一个巨大的大锤敲一个小钉子。
让我们从这个简单的状态图开始:
我们有:
4种状态(非活动、活动、暂停和退出)
5种状态转换(开始命令,结束命令,暂停命令,恢复命令,退出命令)。
您可以通过几种方式将其转换为c#,例如在当前状态和命令上执行switch语句,或者在转换表中查找转换。对于这个简单的状态机,我更喜欢一个转换表,它很容易使用Dictionary表示:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace Juliet
{
public enum ProcessState
{
Inactive,
Active,
Paused,
Terminated
}
public enum Command
{
Begin,
End,
Pause,
Resume,
Exit
}
public class Process
{
class StateTransition
{
readonly ProcessState CurrentState;
readonly Command Command;
public StateTransition(ProcessState currentState, Command command)
{
CurrentState = currentState;
Command = command;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return 17 + 31 * CurrentState.GetHashCode() + 31 * Command.GetHashCode();
}
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
StateTransition other = obj as StateTransition;
return other != null && this.CurrentState == other.CurrentState && this.Command == other.Command;
}
}
Dictionary<StateTransition, ProcessState> transitions;
public ProcessState CurrentState { get; private set; }
public Process()
{
CurrentState = ProcessState.Inactive;
transitions = new Dictionary<StateTransition, ProcessState>
{
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Inactive, Command.Exit), ProcessState.Terminated },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Inactive, Command.Begin), ProcessState.Active },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Active, Command.End), ProcessState.Inactive },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Active, Command.Pause), ProcessState.Paused },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Paused, Command.End), ProcessState.Inactive },
{ new StateTransition(ProcessState.Paused, Command.Resume), ProcessState.Active }
};
}
public ProcessState GetNext(Command command)
{
StateTransition transition = new StateTransition(CurrentState, command);
ProcessState nextState;
if (!transitions.TryGetValue(transition, out nextState))
throw new Exception("Invalid transition: " + CurrentState + " -> " + command);
return nextState;
}
public ProcessState MoveNext(Command command)
{
CurrentState = GetNext(command);
return CurrentState;
}
}
public class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Process p = new Process();
Console.WriteLine("Current State = " + p.CurrentState);
Console.WriteLine("Command.Begin: Current State = " + p.MoveNext(Command.Begin));
Console.WriteLine("Command.Pause: Current State = " + p.MoveNext(Command.Pause));
Console.WriteLine("Command.End: Current State = " + p.MoveNext(Command.End));
Console.WriteLine("Command.Exit: Current State = " + p.MoveNext(Command.Exit));
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
根据个人喜好,我喜欢用GetNext函数来确定地返回下一个状态,用MoveNext函数来改变状态机。