INTERCAL可能是最奇怪的语言特征的最佳汇编。我个人最喜欢的是COMEFROM语句，它(几乎)与GOTO相反。

COMEFROM is roughly the opposite of GOTO in that it can take the execution state from any arbitrary point in code to a COMEFROM statement. The point in code where the state transfer happens is usually given as a parameter to COMEFROM. Whether the transfer happens before or after the instruction at the specified transfer point depends on the language used. Depending on the language used, multiple COMEFROMs referencing the same departure point may be invalid, be non-deterministic, be executed in some sort of defined priority, or even induce parallel or otherwise concurrent execution as seen in Threaded Intercal. A simple example of a "COMEFROM x" statement is a label x (which does not need to be physically located anywhere near its corresponding COMEFROM) that acts as a "trap door". When code execution reaches the label, control gets passed to the statement following the COMEFROM. The effect of this is primarily to make debugging (and understanding the control flow of the program) extremely difficult, since there is no indication near the label that control will mysteriously jump to another point of the program.

ruby中的隐含变量\constants和可变常量

在Perl中，对象只是被祝福的引用，所以在运行时改变对象的类是小菜一碟:

package Foo;
sub new { bless {}, $_[0] }
package Bar;
package main;
my $foo = Foo->new;
ref($foo); # => "Foo"
bless $foo, 'Bar';
ref($foo); # => "Bar"

我很惊讶其他语言不能做到这一点。多么有用的功能啊!

Java有一整本关于它们的书。

书http://www.javapuzzlers.com/lg-puzzlers-cropped.jpg

爪哇益智游戏

JCL条件返回执行。

//STEP02 EXEC PGM=PROG02,COND=(4,GT,STEP01) .

该特性允许您根据前面步骤的返回代码运行或不运行某个步骤。真是个不错的功能。

除了一些小功能，把逻辑颠倒过来。

首先，如果条件为真，则不运行步骤。

其次，4 GT,STEP01实际上意味着“如果STEP01的返回码大于4”

因此，整个过程意味着“如果来自STEP01的返回代码大于4，则不要运行此步骤”。这与“如果4大于来自STEP01的返回代码，则运行步骤”的简单解释几乎相同，但并不完全相同。

考虑到你唯一认真看待这些事情的时间是凌晨2点30分左右，电话另一端是一个疯狂的夜班接线员，这种双重模糊会导致严重的头痛。

在c#中: A = cond ?B: c; 如果“b”和“c”是“赋值不兼容”，你永远不会得到结果，即使“a”是对象。 它是ms中最常用和最愚蠢的实现运算符。有关比较，请参阅D语言中的实现(关于类型推断的注意)。