我使用以下扩展方法(使用c# 6.0)使INPC实现尽可能简单:

public static bool ChangeProperty<T>(this PropertyChangedEventHandler propertyChanged, ref T field, T value, object sender,
    IEqualityComparer<T> comparer = null, [CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
    if (comparer == null)
        comparer = EqualityComparer<T>.Default;

    if (comparer.Equals(field, value))
    {
        return false;
    }
    else
    {
        field = value;
        propertyChanged?.Invoke(sender, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
        return true;
    }
}

INPC实现可以归结为(你可以每次都实现它，也可以创建一个基类):

public class INPCBaseClass: INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;

    protected bool changeProperty<T>(ref T field, T value,
        IEqualityComparer<T> comparer = null, [CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
    {
        return PropertyChanged.ChangeProperty(ref field, value, this, comparer, propertyName);
    }
}

然后像这样写属性:

private string testProperty;
public string TestProperty
{
    get { return testProperty; }
    set { changeProperty(ref testProperty, value); }
}

注意:如果您愿意，可以在扩展方法中省略[CallerMemberName]声明，但我想保持它的灵活性。

如果你有一个没有支持字段的属性，你可以重载changeProperty:

protected bool changeProperty<T>(T property, Action<T> set, T value,
    IEqualityComparer<T> comparer = null, [CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
    bool ret = changeProperty(ref property, value, comparer, propertyName);
    if (ret)
        set(property);
    return ret;
}

一个例子是:

public string MyTestProperty
{
    get { return base.TestProperty; }
    set { changeProperty(base.TestProperty, (x) => { base.TestProperty = x; }, value); }
}

=>这里我的解决方案具有以下特征

 public ResourceStatus Status
 {
     get { return _status; }
     set
     {
         _status = value;
         Notify(Npcea.Status,Npcea.Comments);
     }
 }

没有refelction 短的符号 业务代码中没有神奇的字符串 PropertyChangedEventArgs在应用程序中的可重用性 在一条语句中通知多个属性的可能性

从。net 4.5开始，终于有了一个简单的方法。

. net 4.5引入了一个新的调用者信息属性。

private void OnPropertyChanged<T>([CallerMemberName]string caller = null) {
     // make sure only to call this if the value actually changes

     var handler = PropertyChanged;
     if (handler != null) {
        handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(caller));
     }
}

在函数中添加比较器可能也是一个好主意。

EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals

更多的例子在这里和这里

参见调用者信息(c#和Visual Basic)

我意识到这个问题已经有无数个答案了，但没有一个适合我。我的问题是我不想有任何性能上的影响，并愿意忍受一点冗长的原因。我也不太关心自动属性，这让我想到了以下解决方案:

public abstract class AbstractObject : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;

    public void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
    {
        PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
    }

    protected virtual bool SetValue<TKind>(ref TKind Source, TKind NewValue, params string[] Notify)
    {
        //Set value if the new value is different from the old
        if (!Source.Equals(NewValue))
        {
            Source = NewValue;

            //Notify all applicable properties
            foreach (var i in Notify)
                OnPropertyChanged(i);

            return true;
        }

        return false;
    }

    public AbstractObject()
    {
    }
}

换句话说，如果你不介意这样做，上面的解决方案是很方便的:

public class SomeObject : AbstractObject
{
    public string AnotherProperty
    {
        get
        {
            return someProperty ? "Car" : "Plane";
        }
    }

    bool someProperty = false;
    public bool SomeProperty
    {
        get
        {
            return someProperty;
        }
        set
        {
            SetValue(ref someProperty, value, "SomeProperty", "AnotherProperty");
        }
    }

    public SomeObject() : base()
    {
    }
}

Pros

没有反映 只通知旧值!=新值 同时通知多个属性

Cons

没有自动属性(不过，您可以同时添加对两者的支持!) 一些冗长 拳击(小性能命中?)

唉，还是比这样做要好，

set
{
    if (!someProperty.Equals(value))
    {
        someProperty = value;
        OnPropertyChanged("SomeProperty");
        OnPropertyChanged("AnotherProperty");
    }
}

对于每一个单独的属性，这将成为一个额外的冗长的噩梦;-(

注意，我并不是说这个解决方案在性能上比其他解决方案更好，只是说对于那些不喜欢其他解决方案的人来说，它是一个可行的解决方案。

我提出了这个基类来实现可观察模式，几乎做了你所需要的(“自动”实现set和get)。我花了一个小时在这个原型上，所以它没有很多单元测试，但证明了这个概念。注意，它使用Dictionary<string, ObservablePropertyContext>来消除私有字段的需要。

  public class ObservableByTracking<T> : IObservable<T>
  {
    private readonly Dictionary<string, ObservablePropertyContext> _expando;
    private bool _isDirty;

    public ObservableByTracking()
    {
      _expando = new Dictionary<string, ObservablePropertyContext>();

      var properties = this.GetType().GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance).ToList();
      foreach (var property in properties)
      {
        var valueContext = new ObservablePropertyContext(property.Name, property.PropertyType)
        {
          Value = GetDefault(property.PropertyType)
        };

        _expando[BuildKey(valueContext)] = valueContext;
      }
    }

    protected void SetValue<T>(Expression<Func<T>> expression, T value)
    {
      var keyContext = GetKeyContext(expression);
      var key = BuildKey(keyContext.PropertyName, keyContext.PropertyType);

      if (!_expando.ContainsKey(key))
      {
        throw new Exception($"Object doesn't contain {keyContext.PropertyName} property.");
      }

      var originalValue = (T)_expando[key].Value;
      if (EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals(originalValue, value))
      {
        return;
      }

      _expando[key].Value = value;
      _isDirty = true;
    }

    protected T GetValue<T>(Expression<Func<T>> expression)
    {
      var keyContext = GetKeyContext(expression);
      var key = BuildKey(keyContext.PropertyName, keyContext.PropertyType);

      if (!_expando.ContainsKey(key))
      {
        throw new Exception($"Object doesn't contain {keyContext.PropertyName} property.");
      }

      var value = _expando[key].Value;
      return (T)value;
    }

    private KeyContext GetKeyContext<T>(Expression<Func<T>> expression)
    {
      var castedExpression = expression.Body as MemberExpression;
      if (castedExpression == null)
      {
        throw new Exception($"Invalid expression.");
      }

      var parameterName = castedExpression.Member.Name;

      var propertyInfo = castedExpression.Member as PropertyInfo;
      if (propertyInfo == null)
      {
        throw new Exception($"Invalid expression.");
      }

      return new KeyContext {PropertyType = propertyInfo.PropertyType, PropertyName = parameterName};
    }

    private static string BuildKey(ObservablePropertyContext observablePropertyContext)
    {
      return $"{observablePropertyContext.Type.Name}.{observablePropertyContext.Name}";
    }

    private static string BuildKey(string parameterName, Type type)
    {
      return $"{type.Name}.{parameterName}";
    }

    private static object GetDefault(Type type)
    {
      if (type.IsValueType)
      {
        return Activator.CreateInstance(type);
      }
      return null;
    }

    public bool IsDirty()
    {
      return _isDirty;
    }

    public void SetPristine()
    {
      _isDirty = false;
    }

    private class KeyContext
    {
      public string PropertyName { get; set; }
      public Type PropertyType { get; set; }
    }
  }

  public interface IObservable<T>
  {
    bool IsDirty();
    void SetPristine();
  }

这是用法

public class ObservableByTrackingTestClass : ObservableByTracking<ObservableByTrackingTestClass>
  {
    public ObservableByTrackingTestClass()
    {
      StringList = new List<string>();
      StringIList = new List<string>();
      NestedCollection = new List<ObservableByTrackingTestClass>();
    }

    public IEnumerable<string> StringList
    {
      get { return GetValue(() => StringList); }
      set { SetValue(() => StringIList, value); }
    }

    public IList<string> StringIList
    {
      get { return GetValue(() => StringIList); }
      set { SetValue(() => StringIList, value); }
    }

    public int IntProperty
    {
      get { return GetValue(() => IntProperty); }
      set { SetValue(() => IntProperty, value); }
    }

    public ObservableByTrackingTestClass NestedChild
    {
      get { return GetValue(() => NestedChild); }
      set { SetValue(() => NestedChild, value); }
    }

    public IList<ObservableByTrackingTestClass> NestedCollection
    {
      get { return GetValue(() => NestedCollection); }
      set { SetValue(() => NestedCollection, value); }
    }

    public string StringProperty
    {
      get { return GetValue(() => StringProperty); }
      set { SetValue(() => StringProperty, value); }
    }
  }

我真的很喜欢Marc的解决方案，但我认为可以稍微改进一下，以避免使用“魔法字符串”(不支持重构)。与其将属性名作为字符串使用，不如将其创建为lambda表达式:

private string name;
public string Name
{
    get { return name; }
    set { SetField(ref name, value, () => Name); }
}

只需要在Marc的代码中添加以下方法，就可以了:

protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged<T>(Expression<Func<T>> selectorExpression)
{
    if (selectorExpression == null)
        throw new ArgumentNullException("selectorExpression");
    MemberExpression body = selectorExpression.Body as MemberExpression;
    if (body == null)
        throw new ArgumentException("The body must be a member expression");
    OnPropertyChanged(body.Member.Name);
}

protected bool SetField<T>(ref T field, T value, Expression<Func<T>> selectorExpression)
{
    if (EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals(field, value)) return false;
    field = value;
    OnPropertyChanged(selectorExpression);
    return true;
}

顺便说一句，这是受到这篇博客文章的启发。