short normal[4][4] = {{8,4,7,5},{3,4,5,7},{9,5,5,6},{3,3,3,3}};

short rotated[4][4];

for (int r = 0; r < 4; ++r)
{
  for (int c = 0; c < 4; ++c)
  {
    rotated[r][c] = normal[c][3-r];
  }
}

简单的c++方法，尽管在大数组中会有很大的内存开销。

#!/usr/bin/env python

original = [ [1,2,3],
             [4,5,6],
             [7,8,9] ]

# Rotate matrix 90 degrees...
for i in map(None,*original[::-1]):
    print str(i) + '\n'

这导致双方旋转90度(即。123(上面)现在是741(左边)。

这个Python解决方案是可行的，因为它使用了带负步的切片来反转行顺序(将7移到最上面)

original = [ [7,8,9],
             [4,5,6],
             [1,2,3] ]

然后，它使用map(以及隐含的标识函数，这是map以None作为第一个参数的结果)和*按顺序解包所有元素，重新组合列(即。第一个元素一起放在一个元组中，第二个元素一起放在一个元组中，以此类推)。你有效地得到得到返回如下重组:

original = [[7,8,9],
             [4,5,6],
             [1,2,3]]

这是c#的

int[,] array = new int[4,4] {
    { 1,2,3,4 },
    { 5,6,7,8 },
    { 9,0,1,2 },
    { 3,4,5,6 }
};

int[,] rotated = RotateMatrix(array, 4);

static int[,] RotateMatrix(int[,] matrix, int n) {
    int[,] ret = new int[n, n];

    for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
        for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
            ret[i, j] = matrix[n - j - 1, i];
        }
    }

    return ret;
}

基于社区wiki算法和这个转置数组的SO答案，这里是一个Swift 4版本，可以逆时针旋转一些2D数组90度。这里假设matrix是一个2D数组:

func rotate(matrix: [[Int]]) -> [[Int]] {
    let transposedPoints = transpose(input: matrix)
    let rotatedPoints = transposedPoints.map{ Array($0.reversed()) }
    return rotatedPoints
}


fileprivate func transpose<T>(input: [[T]]) -> [[T]] {
    if input.isEmpty { return [[T]]() }
    let count = input[0].count
    var out = [[T]](repeating: [T](), count: count)
    for outer in input {
        for (index, inner) in outer.enumerated() {
            out[index].append(inner)
        }
    }

    return out
}

下面是一个c#静态泛型方法，它可以为您完成这项工作。变量的名称很好，所以您可以很容易地理解算法的思想。

private static T[,] Rotate180 <T> (T[,] matrix)
{
    var height = matrix.GetLength (0);
    var width = matrix.GetLength (1);
    var answer = new T[height, width];

    for (int y = 0; y < height / 2; y++)
    {
        int topY = y;
        int bottomY = height - 1 - y;
        for (int topX = 0; topX < width; topX++)
        {
            var bottomX = width - topX - 1;
            answer[topY, topX] = matrix[bottomY, bottomX];
            answer[bottomY, bottomX] = matrix[topY, topX];
        }
    }

    if (height % 2 == 0)
        return answer;

    var centerY = height / 2;
    for (int leftX = 0; leftX < Mathf.CeilToInt(width / 2f); leftX++)
    {
        var rightX = width - 1 - leftX;
        answer[centerY, leftX] = matrix[centerY, rightX];
        answer[centerY, rightX] = matrix[centerY, leftX];
    }

    return answer;
}

虽然旋转数据可能是必要的(也许是为了更新物理存储的表示)，但在数组访问上添加一层间接层(也许是一个接口)会变得更简单，可能更性能:

interface IReadableMatrix
{
    int GetValue(int x, int y);
}

如果你的矩阵已经实现了这个接口，那么它可以通过这样一个装饰器类来旋转:

class RotatedMatrix : IReadableMatrix
{
    private readonly IReadableMatrix _baseMatrix;

    public RotatedMatrix(IReadableMatrix baseMatrix)
    {
        _baseMatrix = baseMatrix;
    }

    int GetValue(int x, int y)
    {
        // transpose x and y dimensions
        return _baseMatrix(y, x);
    }
}

旋转+90/-90/180度，水平/垂直翻转和缩放都可以以这种方式实现。

Performance would need to be measured in your specific scenario. However the O(n^2) operation has now been replaced with an O(1) call. It's a virtual method call which is slower than direct array access, so it depends upon how frequently the rotated array is used after rotation. If it's used once, then this approach would definitely win. If it's rotated then used in a long-running system for days, then in-place rotation might perform better. It also depends whether you can accept the up-front cost.

与所有性能问题一样，测量，测量，测量!