受Raymond Chen帖子的启发,假设你有一个4x4二维数组,写一个函数使它旋转90度。Raymond链接到伪代码中的解决方案,但我想看到一些真实的东西。

[1][2][3][4]
[5][6][7][8]
[9][0][1][2]
[3][4][5][6]

就变成:

[3][9][5][1]
[4][0][6][2]
[5][1][7][3]
[6][2][8][4]

更新:Nick的答案是最直接的,但是有没有比n²更好的方法呢?如果矩阵是10000x10000呢?


当前回答

O(1)内存算法:

旋转最外层的数据,然后你可以得到以下结果: [3] [9] [5] [1] [4] [6] [7] [2] [5] [0] [1] [3] [6] [2] [8] [4]

做这个旋转,我们知道

    dest[j][n-1-i] = src[i][j]

观察下图: A (0,0) -> A (0,3) A (0,3) -> A (3,3) A (3,3) -> A (3,0) A (3,0) -> A (0,0)

因此它是一个圆,你可以在一个循环中旋转N个元素。做这个N-1循环,然后你可以旋转最外层的元素。

对于2X2,内部也是一样的问题。

因此,我们可以得出如下结论:

function rotate(array, N)
{
    Rotate outer-most data
    rotate a new array with N-2 or you can do the similar action following step1
}

其他回答

正如我在上一篇文章中所说的,这里有一些c#代码,可以为任何大小的矩阵实现O(1)矩阵旋转。为了简洁性和可读性,没有错误检查或范围检查。代码:

static void Main (string [] args)
{
  int [,]
    //  create an arbitrary matrix
    m = {{0, 1}, {2, 3}, {4, 5}};

  Matrix
    //  create wrappers for the data
    m1 = new Matrix (m),
    m2 = new Matrix (m),
    m3 = new Matrix (m);

  //  rotate the matricies in various ways - all are O(1)
  m1.RotateClockwise90 ();
  m2.Rotate180 ();
  m3.RotateAnitclockwise90 ();

  //  output the result of transforms
  System.Diagnostics.Trace.WriteLine (m1.ToString ());
  System.Diagnostics.Trace.WriteLine (m2.ToString ());
  System.Diagnostics.Trace.WriteLine (m3.ToString ());
}

class Matrix
{
  enum Rotation
  {
    None,
    Clockwise90,
    Clockwise180,
    Clockwise270
  }

  public Matrix (int [,] matrix)
  {
    m_matrix = matrix;
    m_rotation = Rotation.None;
  }

  //  the transformation routines
  public void RotateClockwise90 ()
  {
    m_rotation = (Rotation) (((int) m_rotation + 1) & 3);
  }

  public void Rotate180 ()
  {
    m_rotation = (Rotation) (((int) m_rotation + 2) & 3);
  }

  public void RotateAnitclockwise90 ()
  {
    m_rotation = (Rotation) (((int) m_rotation + 3) & 3);
  }

  //  accessor property to make class look like a two dimensional array
  public int this [int row, int column]
  {
    get
    {
      int
        value = 0;

      switch (m_rotation)
      {
      case Rotation.None:
        value = m_matrix [row, column];
        break;

      case Rotation.Clockwise90:
        value = m_matrix [m_matrix.GetUpperBound (0) - column, row];
        break;

      case Rotation.Clockwise180:
        value = m_matrix [m_matrix.GetUpperBound (0) - row, m_matrix.GetUpperBound (1) - column];
        break;

      case Rotation.Clockwise270:
        value = m_matrix [column, m_matrix.GetUpperBound (1) - row];
        break;
      }

      return value;
    }

    set
    {
      switch (m_rotation)
      {
      case Rotation.None:
        m_matrix [row, column] = value;
        break;

      case Rotation.Clockwise90:
        m_matrix [m_matrix.GetUpperBound (0) - column, row] = value;
        break;

      case Rotation.Clockwise180:
        m_matrix [m_matrix.GetUpperBound (0) - row, m_matrix.GetUpperBound (1) - column] = value;
        break;

      case Rotation.Clockwise270:
        m_matrix [column, m_matrix.GetUpperBound (1) - row] = value;
        break;
      }
    }
  }

  //  creates a string with the matrix values
  public override string ToString ()
  {
    int
      num_rows = 0,
      num_columns = 0;

    switch (m_rotation)
    {
    case Rotation.None:
    case Rotation.Clockwise180:
      num_rows = m_matrix.GetUpperBound (0);
      num_columns = m_matrix.GetUpperBound (1);
      break;

    case Rotation.Clockwise90:
    case Rotation.Clockwise270:
      num_rows = m_matrix.GetUpperBound (1);
      num_columns = m_matrix.GetUpperBound (0);
      break;
    }

    StringBuilder
      output = new StringBuilder ();

    output.Append ("{");

    for (int row = 0 ; row <= num_rows ; ++row)
    {
      if (row != 0)
      {
        output.Append (", ");
      }

      output.Append ("{");

      for (int column = 0 ; column <= num_columns ; ++column)
      {
        if (column != 0)
        {
          output.Append (", ");
        }

        output.Append (this [row, column].ToString ());
      }

      output.Append ("}");
    }

    output.Append ("}");

    return output.ToString ();
  }

  int [,]
    //  the original matrix
    m_matrix;

  Rotation
    //  the current view of the matrix
    m_rotation;
}

好的,我把手举起来,当旋转时,它实际上不会对原始数组做任何修改。但是,在面向对象系统中,只要对象看起来像是被旋转到类的客户端,这就无关紧要了。目前,Matrix类使用对原始数组数据的引用,因此改变m1的任何值也将改变m2和m3。对构造函数稍加更改,创建一个新数组并将值复制到该数组中,就可以将其整理出来。

当前所有的解决方案都有O(n^2)开销作为临时空间(这不包括那些肮脏的OOP骗子!)这里有一个内存占用为O(1)的解决方案,将矩阵原地右转90度。该死的延展性,这玩意儿跑得很快!

#include <algorithm>
#include <cstddef>

// Rotates an NxN matrix of type T 90 degrees to the right.
template <typename T, size_t N>
void rotate_matrix(T (&matrix)[N][N])
{
    for(size_t i = 0; i < N; ++i)
        for(size_t j = 0; j <= (N-i); ++j)
            std::swap(matrix[i][j], matrix[j][i]);
}

免责声明:我实际上并没有测试这个。让我们玩打虫游戏吧!

这是一个Javascript解决方案:

const transpose = m => m[0].map((x,i) => m.map(x => x[i]));

a: // original matrix
123
456
789

transpose(a).reverse(); // rotate 90 degrees counter clockwise 
369
258
147

transpose(a.slice().reverse()); // rotate 90 degrees clockwise 
741
852
963

transpose(transpose(a.slice().reverse()).slice().reverse())
// rotate 180 degrees 
987
654
321

下面是我的Ruby版本(注意,值显示的不一样,但它仍然按照描述旋转)。

def rotate(matrix)
  result = []
  4.times { |x|
    result[x] = []
    4.times { |y|
      result[x][y] = matrix[y][3 - x]
    }
  }

  result
end

matrix = []
matrix[0] = [1,2,3,4]
matrix[1] = [5,6,7,8]
matrix[2] = [9,0,1,2]
matrix[3] = [3,4,5,6]

def print_matrix(matrix)
  4.times { |y|
    4.times { |x|
      print "#{matrix[x][y]} "
    }
    puts ""
  }
end

print_matrix(matrix)
puts ""
print_matrix(rotate(matrix))

输出:

1 5 9 3 
2 6 0 4 
3 7 1 5 
4 8 2 6 

4 3 2 1 
8 7 6 5 
2 1 0 9 
6 5 4 3

JavaScript解决方案旋转矩阵90度的地方:

function rotateBy90(m) {
  var length = m.length;
  //for each layer of the matrix
  for (var first = 0; first < length >> 1; first++) {
    var last = length - 1 - first;
    for (var i = first; i < last; i++) {
      var top = m[first][i]; //store top
      m[first][i] = m[last - i][first]; //top = left
      m[last - i][first] = m[last][last - i]; //left = bottom
      m[last][last - i] = m[i][last]; //bottom = right
      m[i][last] = top; //right = top
    }
  }
  return m;
}