2021年这里!

这个polyfill有效地隐藏了你的私有属性和方法，当你试图读取你的私有属性时返回undefined，当你试图执行你的私有方法时返回TypeError，从而有效地使它们对外部都是private，但让你通过使用你的公共方法访问它们。

如果你检查它，你会发现它很容易实现。在大多数情况下，你不需要做任何奇怪的事情，如使用代理对象，下划线函数(_myprivate)， getter或setter。都不是。唯一需要做的事情是在构造函数中放置一段类似的代码片段，目的是让您向外界公开您的公共接口。

((self) => ({
      pubProp: self.pubProp,
      // More public properties to export HERE
      // ...
      pubMethod: self.pubMethod.bind(self)
      // More public mehods to export HERE
      // Be sure bind each of them to self!!!
      // ... 
 }))(self);

上面的代码就是魔术发生的地方。它是一个IIFE，返回一个对象，其中只包含您想要公开并绑定到第一次实例化的对象的上下文的属性和方法。

你仍然可以访问你的隐藏属性和方法，但只能通过你的公共方法，就像OOP应该做的那样。 将这部分代码视为module.exports

顺便说一句，这是没有使用最新的ECMAScript 2022 #添加到语言中。

'use strict'; class MyClass { constructor(pubProp) { let self = this; self.pubProp = pubProp; self.privProp = "I'm a private property!"; return ((self) => ({ pubProp: self.pubProp, // More public properties to export HERE // ... pubMethod: self.pubMethod.bind(self) // More public mehods to export HERE // Be sure to bind each of them to self!!! // ... }))(self); } pubMethod() { console.log("I'm a public method!"); console.log(this.pubProp); return this.privMethod(); } privMethod() { console.log("I'm a private method!"); return this.privProp } } const myObj = new MyClass("I'm a public property!"); console.log("***DUMPING MY NEW INSTANCE***"); console.dir(myObj); console.log(""); console.log("***TESTING ACCESS TO PUBLIC PROPERTIES***"); console.log(myObj.pubProp); console.log(""); console.log("***TESTING ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES***"); console.log(myObj.privProp); console.log(""); console.log("***TESTING ACCESS TO PUBLIC METHODS***"); console.log("1. pubMethod access pubProp "); console.log("2. pubMethod calls privMethod"); console.log("3. privMethod access privProp"); console.log("") console.log(myObj.pubMethod()); console.log(""); console.log("***TESTING ACCESS TO PRIVATE METHODS***"); console.log(myObj.privMethod());

看看我的主旨

既然每个人都在这里张贴自己的代码，我也要这样做…

我喜欢Crockford，因为他在Javascript中引入了真正的面向对象模式。但他也产生了一个新的误解，那个“那个”。

那么他为什么要用"that = this"呢?这和私人活动完全没有关系。它与内部函数有关!

因为根据Crockford的说法，这是有bug的代码:

Function Foo( ) {
    this.bar = 0; 
    var foobar=function( ) {
        alert(this.bar);
    }
} 

所以他建议这样做:

Function Foo( ) {
    this.bar = 0;
    that = this; 
    var foobar=function( ) {
        alert(that.bar);
    }
}

就像我说的，我很确定Crockford对这个和这个的解释是错误的(但他的代码肯定是正确的)。或者他只是在愚弄Javascript世界，知道谁在复制他的代码?我不知道……我不是浏览器极客

EDIT

啊，这就是问题所在:'var that = this;'在JavaScript中是什么意思?

所以Crockie的解释是错误的....但他的代码是正确的，所以他还是个好人。:))

var TestClass = function( ) {

    var privateProperty = 42;

    function privateMethod( ) {
        alert( "privateMethod, " + privateProperty );
    }

    this.public = {
        constructor: TestClass,

        publicProperty: 88,
        publicMethod: function( ) {
            alert( "publicMethod" );
            privateMethod( );
        }
    };
};
TestClass.prototype = new TestClass( ).public;


var myTestClass = new TestClass( );

alert( myTestClass.publicProperty );
myTestClass.publicMethod( );

alert( myTestClass.privateMethod || "no privateMethod" );

类似于georgebrock，但不太啰嗦(恕我直言) 这样做有什么问题吗?(我哪儿都没见过)

编辑:我意识到这有点没用，因为每个独立的实例化都有自己的公共方法副本，从而破坏了原型的使用。

以下是迄今为止我最喜欢的关于javascript中的私有/公共方法/成员和实例化:

这是文章:http://www.sefol.com/?p=1090

下面是一个例子:

var Person = (function () {

    //Immediately returns an anonymous function which builds our modules 
    return function (name, location) {

        alert("createPerson called with " + name);

        var localPrivateVar = name;

        var localPublicVar = "A public variable";

        var localPublicFunction = function () {
            alert("PUBLIC Func called, private var is :" + localPrivateVar)
        };

        var localPrivateFunction = function () {
            alert("PRIVATE Func called ")
        };

        var setName = function (name) {

            localPrivateVar = name;

        }

        return {

            publicVar: localPublicVar,

            location: location,

            publicFunction: localPublicFunction,

            setName: setName

        }

    }
})();


//Request a Person instance - should print "createPerson called with ben"
var x = Person("ben", "germany");

//Request a Person instance - should print "createPerson called with candide"
var y = Person("candide", "belgium");

//Prints "ben"
x.publicFunction();

//Prints "candide"
y.publicFunction();

//Now call a public function which sets the value of a private variable in the x instance
x.setName("Ben 2");

//Shouldn't have changed this : prints "candide"
y.publicFunction();

//Should have changed this : prints "Ben 2"
x.publicFunction();

JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/northkildonan/kopj3dt3/1/

如果你想要所有的公共函数和私有函数，并让公共函数能够访问私有函数，可以这样布局一个对象的代码:

function MyObject(arg1, arg2, ...) {
  //constructor code using constructor arguments...
  //create/access public variables as 
  // this.var1 = foo;

  //private variables

  var v1;
  var v2;

  //private functions
  function privateOne() {
  }

  function privateTwon() {
  }

  //public functions

  MyObject.prototype.publicOne = function () {
  };

  MyObject.prototype.publicTwo = function () {
  };
}

别啰嗦了。这是Javascript。使用命名约定。

在es6类工作了多年之后，我最近开始了一个es5项目(使用requireJS，它看起来已经非常冗长了)。我已经反复研究了这里提到的所有策略，基本上都可以归结为使用命名约定:

Javascript doesn't have scope keywords like private. Other developers entering Javascript will know this upfront. Therefore, a simple naming convention is more than sufficient. A simple naming convention of prefixing with an underscore solves the problem of both private properties and private methods. Let's take advantage of the Prototype for speed reasons, but lets not get anymore verbose than that. Let's try to keep the es5 "class" looking as closely to what we might expect in other backend languages (and treat every file as a class, even if we don't need to return an instance). Let's demonstrate with a more realistic module situation (we'll use old es5 and old requireJs).

my-tooltip.js

    define([
        'tooltip'
    ],
    function(
        tooltip
    ){

        function MyTooltip() {
            // Later, if needed, we can remove the underscore on some
            // of these (make public) and allow clients of our class
            // to set them.
            this._selector = "#my-tooltip"
            this._template = 'Hello from inside my tooltip!';
            this._initTooltip();
        }

        MyTooltip.prototype = {
            constructor: MyTooltip,

            _initTooltip: function () {
                new tooltip.tooltip(this._selector, {
                    content: this._template,
                    closeOnClick: true,
                    closeButton: true
                });
            }
        }

        return {
            init: function init() {
               new MyTooltip();  // <-- Our constructor adds our tooltip to the DOM so not much we need to do after instantiation.
            }

            // You could instead return a new instantiation, 
            // if later you do more with this class.
            /* 
            create: function create() {
               return new MyTooltip();
            }
            */
        }
    });