要创建一个带有公共方法的JavaScript类,我可以这样做:

function Restaurant() {}

Restaurant.prototype.buy_food = function(){
   // something here
}

Restaurant.prototype.use_restroom = function(){
   // something here
}

这样,我类的用户就可以:

var restaurant = new Restaurant();
restaurant.buy_food();
restaurant.use_restroom();

如何创建一个私有方法,可以由buy_food和use_restroom方法调用,但不能由类的用户外部调用?

换句话说,我希望我的方法实现能够做到:

Restaurant.prototype.use_restroom = function() {
   this.private_stuff();
}

但这是行不通的:

var r = new Restaurant();
r.private_stuff();

如何将private_stuff定义为私有方法,使两者都成立?

我读过Doug Crockford的文章几次,但它似乎不像“私有”方法可以被公共方法调用,而“特权”方法可以被外部调用。


当前回答

如果你想要所有的公共函数和私有函数,并让公共函数能够访问私有函数,可以这样布局一个对象的代码:

function MyObject(arg1, arg2, ...) {
  //constructor code using constructor arguments...
  //create/access public variables as 
  // this.var1 = foo;

  //private variables

  var v1;
  var v2;

  //private functions
  function privateOne() {
  }

  function privateTwon() {
  }

  //public functions

  MyObject.prototype.publicOne = function () {
  };

  MyObject.prototype.publicTwo = function () {
  };
}

其他回答

你可以这样做,但缺点是它不能成为原型的一部分:

function Restaurant() {
    var myPrivateVar;

    var private_stuff = function() {  // Only visible inside Restaurant()
        myPrivateVar = "I can set this here!";
    }

    this.use_restroom = function() {  // use_restroom is visible to all
        private_stuff();
    }

    this.buy_food = function() {   // buy_food is visible to all
        private_stuff();
    }
}

就我个人而言,我更喜欢用JavaScript创建类的以下模式:

var myClass = (function() {
    // Private class properties go here

    var blueprint = function() {
        // Private instance properties go here
        ...
    };

    blueprint.prototype = { 
        // Public class properties go here
        ...
    };

    return  {
         // Public class properties go here
        create : function() { return new blueprint(); }
        ...
    };
})();

如您所见,它允许您定义类属性和实例属性,每个属性都可以是公共的和私有的。


Demo

var Restaurant = function() { var totalfoodcount = 0; // Private class property var totalrestroomcount = 0; // Private class property var Restaurant = function(name){ var foodcount = 0; // Private instance property var restroomcount = 0; // Private instance property this.name = name this.incrementFoodCount = function() { foodcount++; totalfoodcount++; this.printStatus(); }; this.incrementRestroomCount = function() { restroomcount++; totalrestroomcount++; this.printStatus(); }; this.getRestroomCount = function() { return restroomcount; }, this.getFoodCount = function() { return foodcount; } }; Restaurant.prototype = { name : '', buy_food : function(){ this.incrementFoodCount(); }, use_restroom : function(){ this.incrementRestroomCount(); }, getTotalRestroomCount : function() { return totalrestroomcount; }, getTotalFoodCount : function() { return totalfoodcount; }, printStatus : function() { document.body.innerHTML += '<h3>Buying food at '+this.name+'</h3>' + '<ul>' + '<li>Restroom count at ' + this.name + ' : '+ this.getRestroomCount() + '</li>' + '<li>Food count at ' + this.name + ' : ' + this.getFoodCount() + '</li>' + '<li>Total restroom count : '+ this.getTotalRestroomCount() + '</li>' + '<li>Total food count : '+ this.getTotalFoodCount() + '</li>' + '</ul>'; } }; return { // Singleton public properties create : function(name) { return new Restaurant(name); }, printStatus : function() { document.body.innerHTML += '<hr />' + '<h3>Overview</h3>' + '<ul>' + '<li>Total restroom count : '+ Restaurant.prototype.getTotalRestroomCount() + '</li>' + '<li>Total food count : '+ Restaurant.prototype.getTotalFoodCount() + '</li>' + '</ul>' + '<hr />'; } }; }(); var Wendys = Restaurant.create("Wendy's"); var McDonalds = Restaurant.create("McDonald's"); var KFC = Restaurant.create("KFC"); var BurgerKing = Restaurant.create("Burger King"); Restaurant.printStatus(); Wendys.buy_food(); Wendys.use_restroom(); KFC.use_restroom(); KFC.use_restroom(); Wendys.use_restroom(); McDonalds.buy_food(); BurgerKing.buy_food(); Restaurant.printStatus(); BurgerKing.buy_food(); Wendys.use_restroom(); McDonalds.buy_food(); KFC.buy_food(); Wendys.buy_food(); BurgerKing.buy_food(); McDonalds.buy_food(); Restaurant.printStatus();

看看这小提琴。

以下是迄今为止我最喜欢的关于javascript中的私有/公共方法/成员和实例化:

这是文章:http://www.sefol.com/?p=1090

下面是一个例子:

var Person = (function () {

    //Immediately returns an anonymous function which builds our modules 
    return function (name, location) {

        alert("createPerson called with " + name);

        var localPrivateVar = name;

        var localPublicVar = "A public variable";

        var localPublicFunction = function () {
            alert("PUBLIC Func called, private var is :" + localPrivateVar)
        };

        var localPrivateFunction = function () {
            alert("PRIVATE Func called ")
        };

        var setName = function (name) {

            localPrivateVar = name;

        }

        return {

            publicVar: localPublicVar,

            location: location,

            publicFunction: localPublicFunction,

            setName: setName

        }

    }
})();


//Request a Person instance - should print "createPerson called with ben"
var x = Person("ben", "germany");

//Request a Person instance - should print "createPerson called with candide"
var y = Person("candide", "belgium");

//Prints "ben"
x.publicFunction();

//Prints "candide"
y.publicFunction();

//Now call a public function which sets the value of a private variable in the x instance
x.setName("Ben 2");

//Shouldn't have changed this : prints "candide"
y.publicFunction();

//Should have changed this : prints "Ben 2"
x.publicFunction();

JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/northkildonan/kopj3dt3/1/

既然每个人都在这里张贴自己的代码,我也要这样做…

我喜欢Crockford,因为他在Javascript中引入了真正的面向对象模式。但他也产生了一个新的误解,那个“那个”。

那么他为什么要用"that = this"呢?这和私人活动完全没有关系。它与内部函数有关!

因为根据Crockford的说法,这是有bug的代码:

Function Foo( ) {
    this.bar = 0; 
    var foobar=function( ) {
        alert(this.bar);
    }
} 

所以他建议这样做:

Function Foo( ) {
    this.bar = 0;
    that = this; 
    var foobar=function( ) {
        alert(that.bar);
    }
}

就像我说的,我很确定Crockford对这个和这个的解释是错误的(但他的代码肯定是正确的)。或者他只是在愚弄Javascript世界,知道谁在复制他的代码?我不知道……我不是浏览器极客

EDIT

啊,这就是问题所在:'var that = this;'在JavaScript中是什么意思?

所以Crockie的解释是错误的....但他的代码是正确的,所以他还是个好人。:))

模块模式的典范:揭示模块模式

一个非常健壮的模式的简洁的小扩展。